Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the powerpc-objtool tree

[Sathvika Vasireddy <sv@linux.ibm.com>]

On 29/11/22 20:58, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> Le 29/11/2022 à 16:13, Sathvika Vasireddy a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On 25/11/22 09:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the powerpc-objtool tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> pseries_le_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>>>
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_first_256B():
>>> can't find starting instruction
>>> arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.o: warning: objtool:
>>> optprobe_template_end(): can't find starting instruction
>>>
>>> I have no idea what started this (they may have been there yesterday).
>> I was able to recreate the above mentioned warnings with
>> pseries_le_defconfig and powernv_defconfig. The regression report also
>> mentions a warning
>> (https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202211282102.QUr7HHrW-lkp@intel.com/) seen with arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S assembly file.
>>
>>    [1] arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.o: warning: objtool:
>> optprobe_template_end(): can't find starting instruction
>>    [2] arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.o: warning: objtool:
>> kvm_template_end(): can't find starting instruction
>>    [3] arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_first_256B():
>> can't find starting instruction
>>
>> The warnings [1] and [2] go away after adding 'nop' instruction. Below
>> diff fixes it for me:
> You have to add NOPs just because those labels are at the end of the
> files. That's a bit odd.
> I think either we are missing some kind of flagging for the symbols, or
> objtool has a bug. In both cases, I'm not sure adding an artificial
> 'nop' is the solution. At least there should be a big hammer warning
> explaining why.

I don't see these warnings with powerpc/topic/objtool branch. However, 
they are seen with linux-next master branch.
Commit dbcdbdfdf137b49144204571f1a5e5dc01b8aaad objtool: Rework 
instruction -> symbol mapping in linux-next is resulting in objtool 
can't find starting instruction warnings on powerpc.

Reverting this particular hunk (pasted below), resolves it and we don't 
see the problem anymore.

@@ -427,7 +427,10 @@ static int decode_instructions(struct objtool_file 
*file)
                 }

                 list_for_each_entry(func, &sec->symbol_list, list) {
-                       if (func->type != STT_FUNC || func->alias != func)
+                       if (func->type != STT_NOTYPE && func->type != 
STT_FUNC)
+                               continue;
+
+                       if (func->return_thunk || func->alias != func)
                                 continue;

                         if (!find_insn(file, sec, func->offset)) {

Peterz, can we ignore STT_NOTYPE symbols?

>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
>> index cd4e7bc32609..ea4e3bd82f4f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S
>> @@ -134,3 +134,4 @@ optprobe_template_ret:
>>
>>           .global optprobe_template_end
>>    optprobe_template_end:
>> +       nop
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
>> index 7af6f8b50c5d..41fd664e3ba0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kvm_emul.S
>> @@ -352,3 +352,4 @@ kvm_tmp_end:
>>
>>    .global kvm_template_end
>>    kvm_template_end:
>> +       nop
>>
>> For warning [3], objtool is throwing can't find starting instruction
>> warning because it finds that the symbol (end_first_256B) is zero sized,
>> and such symbols are not added to the rbtree. I tried to fix it by
>> adding a 'nop' instruction (pasted diff below), but that resulted in a
>> kernel build failure.
> What's the failure ?
>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
>> index 874efd25cc45..d48850fe159f 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S
>> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@ __secondary_hold:
>>           EMIT_BUG_ENTRY 0b, __FILE__, __LINE__, 0
>>    #endif
>>    CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(first_256B)
>> +nop
>>
>>    /*
>>     * On server, we include the exception vectors code here as it
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>> index 26f8fef53c72..f7517d443e9b 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>> @@ -3104,9 +3104,13 @@ __end_interrupts:
>>    DEFINE_FIXED_SYMBOL(__end_interrupts, virt_trampolines)
>>
>>    CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(real_vectors);
>> +nop
>>    CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(real_trampolines);
>> +nop
>>    CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(virt_vectors);
>> +nop
>>    CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION(virt_trampolines);
>> +nop
> What are the NOPs after the CLOSE_FIXED_SECTION() ? You don't explain
> them, and I can't see any related warning in the warnings you show.
>
>
After fixing arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: 
end_first_256B(): can't find starting instruction warning, objtool 
started showing more warnings in the same file.
Below is the list of warnings:
  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_real_vectors(): 
can't find starting instruction
  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: 
end_real_trampolines(): can't find starting instruction
  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: end_virt_vectors(): 
can't find starting instruction
  arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.o: warning: objtool: 
end_virt_trampolines(): can't find starting instruction


Thanks,
Sathvika