* [PATCH v2 0/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs @ 2021-07-14 8:35 Rao Shoaib 2021-07-14 8:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Rao Shoaib 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Rao Shoaib @ 2021-07-14 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-rdma, jgg; +Cc: rao.shoaib Resubmitting my previous patch after kernel robot found that RXE_MAX_PKEYS is a u16 value and the value assigned would over flow and result in a zero value. I have reversed RXE_MAX_PKEYS to it original value. Rao Shoaib (1): RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) -- 2.27.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-14 8:35 [PATCH v2 0/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs Rao Shoaib @ 2021-07-14 8:35 ` Rao Shoaib 2021-07-15 5:02 ` Zhu Yanjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Rao Shoaib @ 2021-07-14 8:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-rdma, jgg; +Cc: rao.shoaib From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> In our internal testing we have found that the current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should be no limits but currently maximum values are reported via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values but they have been made suffiently large. Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> --- drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) + static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) { if (mtu < 256) @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) enum rxe_device_param { RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - sizeof(struct rxe_send_wqe), RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, -- 2.27.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-14 8:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Rao Shoaib @ 2021-07-15 5:02 ` Zhu Yanjun 2021-07-15 16:43 ` Shoaib Rao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-15 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rao Shoaib; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > > In our internal testing we have found that the > current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should > be no limits but currently maximum values are reported > via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values > but they have been made suffiently large. > > Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > > #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> > > +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? Thanks, Zhu Yanjun > + > static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > { > if (mtu < 256) > @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > enum rxe_device_param { > RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, > RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, > - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, > + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR > | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR > | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG > @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { > RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - > sizeof(struct rxe_send_wqe), > RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, > + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, > - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, > + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, > RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, > RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, > RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, > RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, > - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, > - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, > + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, > RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, > RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, > - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, > + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, > > - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, > + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > > RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > > - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, > + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, > - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, > + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, > > - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, > + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, > RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, > > - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, > + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, > RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, > - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, > + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, > RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, > RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, > > -- > 2.27.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-15 5:02 ` Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-15 16:43 ` Shoaib Rao 2021-07-16 4:07 ` Zhu Yanjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-15 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu Yanjun; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe Following is a link https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2 Or just search for my name in the archive. Do you see any issues with this value? Shoaib On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: >> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >> >> In our internal testing we have found that the >> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should >> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported >> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values >> but they have been made suffiently large. >> >> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. >> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >> --- >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ >> >> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> >> >> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) > Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? > > Thanks, > Zhu Yanjun > >> + >> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) >> { >> if (mtu < 256) >> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) >> enum rxe_device_param { >> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, >> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, >> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, >> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR >> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR >> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG >> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { >> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - >> sizeof(struct rxe_send_wqe), >> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, >> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, >> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, >> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, >> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, >> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, >> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, >> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, >> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, >> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, >> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, >> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, >> >> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, >> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> >> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >> >> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, >> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, >> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, >> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, >> >> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, >> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, >> >> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, >> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, >> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, >> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, >> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, >> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, >> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, >> >> -- >> 2.27.0 >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-15 16:43 ` Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-16 4:07 ` Zhu Yanjun [not found] ` <8eba2b02-36c5-e14c-3503-0e1cfeea4dd9@oracle.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-16 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shoaib Rao; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > Following is a link > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2 > > Or just search for my name in the archive. > > Do you see any issues with this value? After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem " [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem " Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to check this problem. Thanks a lot. Zhu Yanjun > > Shoaib > > On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > >> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > >> > >> In our internal testing we have found that the > >> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should > >> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported > >> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values > >> but they have been made suffiently large. > >> > >> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. > >> > >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ > >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > >> > >> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> > >> > >> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) > > Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? > > > > Thanks, > > Zhu Yanjun > > > >> + > >> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > >> { > >> if (mtu < 256) > >> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > >> enum rxe_device_param { > >> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, > >> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, > >> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, > >> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR > >> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR > >> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG > >> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { > >> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - > >> sizeof(struct rxe_send_wqe), > >> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > >> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, > >> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, > >> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, > >> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, > >> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, > >> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, > >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, > >> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, > >> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, > >> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, > >> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, > >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, > >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > >> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, > >> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, > >> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > >> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, > >> > >> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, > >> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> > >> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > >> > >> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, > >> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, > >> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, > >> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >> > >> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, > >> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, > >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >> > >> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, > >> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, > >> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, > >> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, > >> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, > >> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, > >> > >> -- > >> 2.27.0 > >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <8eba2b02-36c5-e14c-3503-0e1cfeea4dd9@oracle.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs [not found] ` <8eba2b02-36c5-e14c-3503-0e1cfeea4dd9@oracle.com> @ 2021-07-18 7:59 ` Zhu Yanjun 2021-07-18 19:46 ` Shoaib Rao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-18 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shoaib Rao; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > Following is a link > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$ > > Or just search for my name in the archive. > > Do you see any issues with this value? > > After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem > " > [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded > [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded > [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem > " > Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to > check this problem. > Thanks a lot. > > Zhu Yanjun > > I do not see the issue. > > [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe > rdma_rxe 126976 0 > ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 rdma_rxe > udp_tunnel 20480 1 rdma_rxe > ib_uverbs 147456 3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib > ib_core 364544 10 rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm > > I am using gdb to dump the values > > (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA > type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1, > RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576, > RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32, > RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512, RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576, > RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048, > RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 458752, > RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, > RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576, RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 262144, > RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073, > RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW = 4096, > RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537, > RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64, > RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64, > RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200, > RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215} > > It is possible that you are changing some values. I git clone the source code from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git again. And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit. " 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware stats to device and port stats 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE " And when I tried to add a new rxe0, " error: Invalid argument " And the dmesg logs are as below: # dmesg " [ 70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX [ 70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready [ 79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded [ 79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem [ 79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8 " Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again. Zhu Yanjun > > Shoaib > > Shoaib > > On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > > In our internal testing we have found that the > current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should > be no limits but currently maximum values are reported > via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values > but they have been made suffiently large. > > Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > --- > drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > > #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> > > +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) > > Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? > > Thanks, > Zhu Yanjun > > + > static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > { > if (mtu < 256) > @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > enum rxe_device_param { > RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, > RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, > - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, > + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR > | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR > | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG > @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { > RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - > sizeof(struct rxe_send_wqe), > RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, > + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, > - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, > + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, > RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, > RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, > RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, > RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, > - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, > - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, > + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, > RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, > RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, > - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, > + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, > > - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, > + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > > RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > > - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, > + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, > - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, > + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, > > - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, > + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, > RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, > > - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, > + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, > RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, > - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, > + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, > RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, > RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, > > -- > 2.27.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-18 7:59 ` Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-18 19:46 ` Shoaib Rao 2021-07-18 23:00 ` Shoaib Rao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-18 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu Yanjun; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe Your urls are garbled, so I can not make any sense out of them. [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git remote --v origin https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (fetch) origin https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (push) [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git show 8c1b4316c3fa fatal: ambiguous argument '8c1b4316c3fa': unknown revision or path not in the working tree. [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git log --grep='RDMA/efa: Split hardware' [root@ca-dev141 linux]# [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git describe v5.14-rc1-17-gc06676b5953b You need to do a little bit more work on your end and tell me which value rxe is complaining about. Also provide a kernel version that you are using as I have provided above. Shoaib On 7/18/21 12:59 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> Following is a link >> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$ >> >> Or just search for my name in the archive. >> >> Do you see any issues with this value? >> >> After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem >> " >> [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded >> [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded >> [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem >> " >> Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to >> check this problem. >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Zhu Yanjun >> >> I do not see the issue. >> >> [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe >> rdma_rxe 126976 0 >> ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 rdma_rxe >> udp_tunnel 20480 1 rdma_rxe >> ib_uverbs 147456 3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib >> ib_core 364544 10 rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm >> >> I am using gdb to dump the values >> >> (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA >> type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1, >> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576, >> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32, >> RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512, RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >> RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576, >> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048, >> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 458752, >> RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576, RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >> RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 262144, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW = 4096, >> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537, >> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64, >> RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64, >> RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200, >> RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215} >> >> It is possible that you are changing some values. > > I git clone the source code from > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!efPsL9fikzm6Ob1-zsmbsAzPkfqRpxYkp9oJXF9csPOJgoei9njj8RmA5IyuH447$ again. > And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit. > " > 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum > values used via uverbs > 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware > stats to device and port stats > 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE > " > > And when I tried to add a new rxe0, > " > error: Invalid argument > " > And the dmesg logs are as below: > > # dmesg > " > [ 70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, > Flow Control: RX > [ 70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready > [ 79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded > [ 79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem > [ 79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8 > " > > Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again. > > Zhu Yanjun > >> Shoaib >> >> Shoaib >> >> On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >> >> In our internal testing we have found that the >> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should >> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported >> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values >> but they have been made suffiently large. >> >> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. >> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >> --- >> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 ++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ >> >> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> >> >> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) >> >> Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? >> >> Thanks, >> Zhu Yanjun >> >> + >> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) >> { >> if (mtu < 256) >> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) >> enum rxe_device_param { >> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, >> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, >> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, >> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR >> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR >> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG >> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { >> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - >> sizeof(struct rxe_send_wqe), >> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, >> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, >> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, >> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, >> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, >> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, >> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, >> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, >> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, >> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, >> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, >> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, >> >> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, >> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> >> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >> >> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, >> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, >> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, >> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, >> >> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, >> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, >> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, >> >> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, >> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, >> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, >> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, >> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, >> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, >> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, >> >> -- >> 2.27.0 >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-18 19:46 ` Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-18 23:00 ` Shoaib Rao 2021-07-19 2:25 ` Zhu Yanjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-18 23:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu Yanjun; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe Thanks for reporting the issue. I was able to reproduce the issue and have fixed it. Kindly try gain. Regards, Shoaib On 7/18/21 12:46 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote: > Your urls are garbled, so I can not make any sense out of them. > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git remote --v > origin > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > (fetch) > origin > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (push) > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git show 8c1b4316c3fa > fatal: ambiguous argument '8c1b4316c3fa': unknown revision or path not > in the working tree. > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git log --grep='RDMA/efa: Split hardware' > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git describe > v5.14-rc1-17-gc06676b5953b > > You need to do a little bit more work on your end and tell me which > value rxe is complaining about. Also provide a kernel version that you > are using as I have provided above. > > Shoaib > > On 7/18/21 12:59 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Following is a link >>> >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$ >>> >>> >>> Or just search for my name in the archive. >>> >>> Do you see any issues with this value? >>> >>> After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem >>> " >>> [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded >>> [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded >>> [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem >>> " >>> Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to >>> check this problem. >>> Thanks a lot. >>> >>> Zhu Yanjun >>> >>> I do not see the issue. >>> >>> [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe >>> rdma_rxe 126976 0 >>> ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 rdma_rxe >>> udp_tunnel 20480 1 rdma_rxe >>> ib_uverbs 147456 3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib >>> ib_core 364544 10 >>> rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm >>> >>> I am using gdb to dump the values >>> >>> (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA >>> type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1, >>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576, >>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32, >>> RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512, >>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >>> RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576, >>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048, >>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = >>> 458752, >>> RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR >>> = 1, >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576, >>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >>> RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = >>> 262144, >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073, >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW = >>> 4096, >>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144, >>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537, >>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64, >>> RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64, >>> RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200, >>> RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215} >>> >>> It is possible that you are changing some values. >> >> I git clone the source code from >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!efPsL9fikzm6Ob1-zsmbsAzPkfqRpxYkp9oJXF9csPOJgoei9njj8RmA5IyuH447$ >> again. >> And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit. >> " >> 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum >> values used via uverbs >> 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware >> stats to device and port stats >> 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE >> " >> >> And when I tried to add a new rxe0, >> " >> error: Invalid argument >> " >> And the dmesg logs are as below: >> >> # dmesg >> " >> [ 70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, >> Flow Control: RX >> [ 70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready >> [ 79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded >> [ 79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem >> [ 79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8 >> " >> >> Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again. >> >> Zhu Yanjun >> >>> Shoaib >>> >>> Shoaib >>> >>> On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >>> >>> In our internal testing we have found that the >>> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should >>> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported >>> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values >>> but they have been made suffiently large. >>> >>> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. >>> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 >>> ++++++++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ >>> >>> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> >>> >>> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) >>> >>> Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Zhu Yanjun >>> >>> + >>> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) >>> { >>> if (mtu < 256) >>> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int >>> mtu) >>> enum rxe_device_param { >>> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, >>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, >>> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, >>> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR >>> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR >>> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG >>> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { >>> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - >>> sizeof(struct >>> rxe_send_wqe), >>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >>> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, >>> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, >>> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, >>> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, >>> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, >>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, >>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, >>> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, >>> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, >>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, >>> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, >>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, >>> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, >>> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, >>> >>> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, >>> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> >>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >>> >>> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, >>> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, >>> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, >>> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, >>> >>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, >>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, >>> >>> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, >>> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, >>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, >>> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, >>> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, >>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, >>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, >>> >>> -- >>> 2.27.0 >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-18 23:00 ` Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-19 2:25 ` Zhu Yanjun 2021-07-19 4:20 ` Shoaib Rao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-19 2:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shoaib Rao; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:00 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > Thanks for reporting the issue. I was able to reproduce the issue and > have fixed it. Kindly try gain. Do you make tests with rdma-core? IMHO, it is important to make tests with rdma-core before the commit is sent to the community. Zhu Yanjun > > Regards, > > Shoaib > > > On 7/18/21 12:46 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote: > > Your urls are garbled, so I can not make any sense out of them. > > > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git remote --v > > origin > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git > > (fetch) > > origin > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git (push) > > > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git show 8c1b4316c3fa > > fatal: ambiguous argument '8c1b4316c3fa': unknown revision or path not > > in the working tree. > > > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git log --grep='RDMA/efa: Split hardware' > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# > > > > [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git describe > > v5.14-rc1-17-gc06676b5953b > > > > You need to do a little bit more work on your end and tell me which > > value rxe is complaining about. Also provide a kernel version that you > > are using as I have provided above. > > > > Shoaib > > > > On 7/18/21 12:59 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Following is a link > >>> > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$ > >>> > >>> > >>> Or just search for my name in the archive. > >>> > >>> Do you see any issues with this value? > >>> > >>> After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem > >>> " > >>> [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded > >>> [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded > >>> [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem > >>> " > >>> Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to > >>> check this problem. > >>> Thanks a lot. > >>> > >>> Zhu Yanjun > >>> > >>> I do not see the issue. > >>> > >>> [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe > >>> rdma_rxe 126976 0 > >>> ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 rdma_rxe > >>> udp_tunnel 20480 1 rdma_rxe > >>> ib_uverbs 147456 3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib > >>> ib_core 364544 10 > >>> rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm > >>> > >>> I am using gdb to dump the values > >>> > >>> (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA > >>> type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1, > >>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576, > >>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32, > >>> RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512, > >>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > >>> RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576, > >>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048, > >>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > >>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = > >>> 458752, > >>> RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR > >>> = 1, > >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > >>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > >>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576, > >>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > >>> RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = > >>> 262144, > >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073, > >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW = > >>> 4096, > >>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144, > >>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537, > >>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64, > >>> RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64, > >>> RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200, > >>> RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215} > >>> > >>> It is possible that you are changing some values. > >> > >> I git clone the source code from > >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!efPsL9fikzm6Ob1-zsmbsAzPkfqRpxYkp9oJXF9csPOJgoei9njj8RmA5IyuH447$ > >> again. > >> And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit. > >> " > >> 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum > >> values used via uverbs > >> 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware > >> stats to device and port stats > >> 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE > >> " > >> > >> And when I tried to add a new rxe0, > >> " > >> error: Invalid argument > >> " > >> And the dmesg logs are as below: > >> > >> # dmesg > >> " > >> [ 70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, > >> Flow Control: RX > >> [ 70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready > >> [ 79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded > >> [ 79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem > >> [ 79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8 > >> " > >> > >> Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again. > >> > >> Zhu Yanjun > >> > >>> Shoaib > >>> > >>> Shoaib > >>> > >>> On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > >>> > >>> In our internal testing we have found that the > >>> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should > >>> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported > >>> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values > >>> but they have been made suffiently large. > >>> > >>> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. > >>> > >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 > >>> ++++++++++++++------------ > >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > >>> > >>> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> > >>> > >>> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) > >>> > >>> Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Zhu Yanjun > >>> > >>> + > >>> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > >>> { > >>> if (mtu < 256) > >>> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int > >>> mtu) > >>> enum rxe_device_param { > >>> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, > >>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, > >>> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR > >>> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR > >>> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG > >>> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { > >>> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - > >>> sizeof(struct > >>> rxe_send_wqe), > >>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > >>> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, > >>> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, > >>> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, > >>> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, > >>> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, > >>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, > >>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > >>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, > >>> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, > >>> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, > >>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, > >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, > >>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > >>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, > >>> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, > >>> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > >>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, > >>> > >>> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, > >>> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> > >>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > >>> > >>> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, > >>> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >>> > >>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, > >>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >>> > >>> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, > >>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, > >>> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, > >>> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, > >>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, > >>> > >>> -- > >>> 2.27.0 > >>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-19 2:25 ` Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-19 4:20 ` Shoaib Rao 2021-07-19 8:12 ` Zhu Yanjun 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-19 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu Yanjun; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe On 7/18/21 7:25 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:00 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: >> Thanks for reporting the issue. I was able to reproduce the issue and >> have fixed it. Kindly try gain. > Do you make tests with rdma-core? > > IMHO, it is important to make tests with rdma-core before the commit > is sent to the community. Yes I did. However the issue shows up only when I configure an interface not just when module is loading. Anyways, my apologies. Shoaib > > Zhu Yanjun > >> Regards, >> >> Shoaib >> >> >> On 7/18/21 12:46 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote: >>> Your urls are garbled, so I can not make any sense out of them. >>> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git remote --v >>> origin >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!dGmB_LFQF6at31F0sVXbfyjtAlgNTWzBEaIER13mVG0ZAWBomLdmWXUe6DxoVFcz$ >>> (fetch) >>> origin >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!dGmB_LFQF6at31F0sVXbfyjtAlgNTWzBEaIER13mVG0ZAWBomLdmWXUe6DxoVFcz$ (push) >>> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git show 8c1b4316c3fa >>> fatal: ambiguous argument '8c1b4316c3fa': unknown revision or path not >>> in the working tree. >>> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git log --grep='RDMA/efa: Split hardware' >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# >>> >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git describe >>> v5.14-rc1-17-gc06676b5953b >>> >>> You need to do a little bit more work on your end and tell me which >>> value rxe is complaining about. Also provide a kernel version that you >>> are using as I have provided above. >>> >>> Shoaib >>> >>> On 7/18/21 12:59 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Following is a link >>>>> >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Or just search for my name in the archive. >>>>> >>>>> Do you see any issues with this value? >>>>> >>>>> After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem >>>>> " >>>>> [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded >>>>> [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded >>>>> [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem >>>>> " >>>>> Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to >>>>> check this problem. >>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>> >>>>> Zhu Yanjun >>>>> >>>>> I do not see the issue. >>>>> >>>>> [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe >>>>> rdma_rxe 126976 0 >>>>> ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 rdma_rxe >>>>> udp_tunnel 20480 1 rdma_rxe >>>>> ib_uverbs 147456 3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib >>>>> ib_core 364544 10 >>>>> rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm >>>>> >>>>> I am using gdb to dump the values >>>>> >>>>> (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA >>>>> type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1, >>>>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576, >>>>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32, >>>>> RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512, >>>>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >>>>> RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576, >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048, >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >>>>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = >>>>> 458752, >>>>> RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR >>>>> = 1, >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >>>>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >>>>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576, >>>>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = >>>>> 262144, >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073, >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW = >>>>> 4096, >>>>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144, >>>>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537, >>>>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64, >>>>> RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64, >>>>> RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200, >>>>> RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215} >>>>> >>>>> It is possible that you are changing some values. >>>> I git clone the source code from >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!efPsL9fikzm6Ob1-zsmbsAzPkfqRpxYkp9oJXF9csPOJgoei9njj8RmA5IyuH447$ >>>> again. >>>> And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit. >>>> " >>>> 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum >>>> values used via uverbs >>>> 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware >>>> stats to device and port stats >>>> 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE >>>> " >>>> >>>> And when I tried to add a new rxe0, >>>> " >>>> error: Invalid argument >>>> " >>>> And the dmesg logs are as below: >>>> >>>> # dmesg >>>> " >>>> [ 70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, >>>> Flow Control: RX >>>> [ 70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready >>>> [ 79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded >>>> [ 79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem >>>> [ 79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8 >>>> " >>>> >>>> Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again. >>>> >>>> Zhu Yanjun >>>> >>>>> Shoaib >>>>> >>>>> Shoaib >>>>> >>>>> On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >>>>> >>>>> In our internal testing we have found that the >>>>> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should >>>>> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported >>>>> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values >>>>> but they have been made suffiently large. >>>>> >>>>> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. >>>>> >>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 >>>>> ++++++++++++++------------ >>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>>>> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h >>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ >>>>> >>>>> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> >>>>> >>>>> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) >>>>> >>>>> Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Zhu Yanjun >>>>> >>>>> + >>>>> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) >>>>> { >>>>> if (mtu < 256) >>>>> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int >>>>> mtu) >>>>> enum rxe_device_param { >>>>> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, >>>>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR >>>>> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR >>>>> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG >>>>> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { >>>>> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - >>>>> sizeof(struct >>>>> rxe_send_wqe), >>>>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, >>>>> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, >>>>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, >>>>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, >>>>> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, >>>>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, >>>>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, >>>>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, >>>>> >>>>> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> >>>>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, >>>>> >>>>> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, >>>>> >>>>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, >>>>> >>>>> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, >>>>> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, >>>>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, >>>>> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, >>>>> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, >>>>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, >>>>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 2.27.0 >>>>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs 2021-07-19 4:20 ` Shoaib Rao @ 2021-07-19 8:12 ` Zhu Yanjun 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Zhu Yanjun @ 2021-07-19 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shoaib Rao; +Cc: RDMA mailing list, Jason Gunthorpe On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:20 PM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > > > On 7/18/21 7:25 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:00 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for reporting the issue. I was able to reproduce the issue and > >> have fixed it. Kindly try gain. > > Do you make tests with rdma-core? > > > > IMHO, it is important to make tests with rdma-core before the commit > > is sent to the community. > > Yes I did. However the issue shows up only when I configure an interface > not just when module is loading. Anyways, my apologies. Thanks. In my test environment, it can pass rdma-core tests. But in this commit, a lot of default maximum values are changed. Not sure if this will cause other issues. Please wait for others' comments. Thank you Zhu Yanjun > > Shoaib > > > > > Zhu Yanjun > > > >> Regards, > >> > >> Shoaib > >> > >> > >> On 7/18/21 12:46 PM, Shoaib Rao wrote: > >>> Your urls are garbled, so I can not make any sense out of them. > >>> > >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git remote --v > >>> origin > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!dGmB_LFQF6at31F0sVXbfyjtAlgNTWzBEaIER13mVG0ZAWBomLdmWXUe6DxoVFcz$ > >>> (fetch) > >>> origin > >>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!dGmB_LFQF6at31F0sVXbfyjtAlgNTWzBEaIER13mVG0ZAWBomLdmWXUe6DxoVFcz$ (push) > >>> > >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git show 8c1b4316c3fa > >>> fatal: ambiguous argument '8c1b4316c3fa': unknown revision or path not > >>> in the working tree. > >>> > >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git log --grep='RDMA/efa: Split hardware' > >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# > >>> > >>> [root@ca-dev141 linux]# git describe > >>> v5.14-rc1-17-gc06676b5953b > >>> > >>> You need to do a little bit more work on your end and tell me which > >>> value rxe is complaining about. Also provide a kernel version that you > >>> are using as I have provided above. > >>> > >>> Shoaib > >>> > >>> On 7/18/21 12:59 AM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 2:09 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> On 7/15/21 9:07 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 12:44 AM Shoaib Rao <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Following is a link > >>>>> > >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://marc.info/?l=linux-rdma&m=162395437604846&w=2__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!f9TPWtgUxambtSeQ_L3h-IH7CW3SifyiumB3kjc2v_w6Ec_WYVtjWyusEtgQ60iw$ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Or just search for my name in the archive. > >>>>> > >>>>> Do you see any issues with this value? > >>>>> > >>>>> After this commit is applied, I confronted the following problem > >>>>> " > >>>>> [ 639.943561] rdma_rxe: unloaded > >>>>> [ 679.717143] rdma_rxe: loaded > >>>>> [ 691.721055] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem > >>>>> " > >>>>> Not sure if this problem is introduced by this commit. Please help to > >>>>> check this problem. > >>>>> Thanks a lot. > >>>>> > >>>>> Zhu Yanjun > >>>>> > >>>>> I do not see the issue. > >>>>> > >>>>> [root@ca-dev66 rxe]# lsmod | grep rdma_rxe > >>>>> rdma_rxe 126976 0 > >>>>> ip6_udp_tunnel 16384 1 rdma_rxe > >>>>> udp_tunnel 20480 1 rdma_rxe > >>>>> ib_uverbs 147456 3 rdma_rxe,rdma_ucm,mlx5_ib > >>>>> ib_core 364544 10 > >>>>> rdma_cm,ib_ipoib,rdma_rxe,rds_rdma,iw_cm,ib_umad,rdma_ucm,ib_uverbs,mlx5_ib,ib_cm > >>>>> > >>>>> I am using gdb to dump the values > >>>>> > >>>>> (gdb) ptype RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA > >>>>> type = enum rxe_device_param {RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1, > >>>>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 4294963200, RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 1048576, > >>>>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = 137466362998, RXE_MAX_SGE = 32, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE = 720, RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = 512, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_CQ = 1048576, RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, RXE_MAX_PD = 1048576, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 258048, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = > >>>>> 458752, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_AH = 1048576, RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR > >>>>> = 1, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > >>>>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 1048576, > >>>>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP = 1048576, RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = > >>>>> 262144, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ = 1048576, RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 131073, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 262144, RXE_MAX_MR = 1048576, RXE_MAX_MW = > >>>>> 4096, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 1, RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 262144, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 65537, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 131072, RXE_MAX_PKT_PER_ACK = 64, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_UNACKED_PSNS = 128, RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_HIGH = 64, > >>>>> RXE_INFLIGHT_SKBS_PER_QP_LOW = 16, RXE_NSEC_ARB_TIMER_DELAY = 200, > >>>>> RXE_VENDOR_ID = 16777215} > >>>>> > >>>>> It is possible that you are changing some values. > >>>> I git clone the source code from > >>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!efPsL9fikzm6Ob1-zsmbsAzPkfqRpxYkp9oJXF9csPOJgoei9njj8RmA5IyuH447$ > >>>> again. > >>>> And the first 3 commits are as below. One is your commit. > >>>> " > >>>> 6163ad3208c8 (HEAD -> for-next) RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum > >>>> values used via uverbs > >>>> 8c1b4316c3fa (origin/for-next, origin/HEAD) RDMA/efa: Split hardware > >>>> stats to device and port stats > >>>> 916071185b17 MAINTAINERS: Update maintainers of HiSilicon RoCE > >>>> " > >>>> > >>>> And when I tried to add a new rxe0, > >>>> " > >>>> error: Invalid argument > >>>> " > >>>> And the dmesg logs are as below: > >>>> > >>>> # dmesg > >>>> " > >>>> [ 70.782302] e1000: enp0s8 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, > >>>> Flow Control: RX > >>>> [ 70.782744] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp0s8: link becomes ready > >>>> [ 79.467652] rdma_rxe: loaded > >>>> [ 79.468348] rdma_rxe: not enough indices for max_elem > >>>> [ 79.468356] rdma_rxe: failed to add enp0s8 > >>>> " > >>>> > >>>> Please follow my steps to reproduce this problem again. > >>>> > >>>> Zhu Yanjun > >>>> > >>>>> Shoaib > >>>>> > >>>>> Shoaib > >>>>> > >>>>> On 7/14/21 10:02 PM, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:36 PM Rao Shoaib <Rao.Shoaib@oracle.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> From: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> In our internal testing we have found that the > >>>>> current maximum are too smalls. Ideally there should > >>>>> be no limits but currently maximum values are reported > >>>>> via ibv_query_device, so we have to keep maximum values > >>>>> but they have been made suffiently large. > >>>>> > >>>>> Resubmitting after fixing an issue reported by test robot. > >>>>> > >>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rao Shoaib <rshoaib@ca-dev141.us.oracle.com> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h | 26 > >>>>> ++++++++++++++------------ > >>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >>>>> > >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>>>> b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>>>> index 742e6ec93686..092dbff890f2 100644 > >>>>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_param.h > >>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ > >>>>> > >>>>> #include <uapi/rdma/rdma_user_rxe.h> > >>>>> > >>>>> +#define DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE (1 << 20) > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you let me know the link in which the above value is discussed? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Zhu Yanjun > >>>>> > >>>>> + > >>>>> static inline enum ib_mtu rxe_mtu_int_to_enum(int mtu) > >>>>> { > >>>>> if (mtu < 256) > >>>>> @@ -37,7 +39,7 @@ static inline enum ib_mtu eth_mtu_int_to_enum(int > >>>>> mtu) > >>>>> enum rxe_device_param { > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MR_SIZE = -1ull, > >>>>> RXE_PAGE_SIZE_CAP = 0xfffff000, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_QP_WR = 0x4000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_QP_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_DEVICE_CAP_FLAGS = IB_DEVICE_BAD_PKEY_CNTR > >>>>> | IB_DEVICE_BAD_QKEY_CNTR > >>>>> | IB_DEVICE_AUTO_PATH_MIG > >>>>> @@ -58,40 +60,40 @@ enum rxe_device_param { > >>>>> RXE_MAX_INLINE_DATA = RXE_MAX_WQE_SIZE - > >>>>> sizeof(struct > >>>>> rxe_send_wqe), > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SGE_RD = 32, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_CQ = 16384, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_CQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_LOG_CQE = 15, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_PD = 0x7ffc, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_PD = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_RD_ATOM = 128, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_RES_RD_ATOM = 0x3f000, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_QP_INIT_RD_ATOM = 128, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_GRP = 8192, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 56, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_TOT_MCAST_QP_ATTACH = 0x70000, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_AH = 100, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = 0x4000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_AH = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ_WR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_WR = 1, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_SGE = 27, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_SGE = 1, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_FMR_PAGE_LIST_LEN = 512, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 1, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_PKEYS = 64, > >>>>> RXE_LOCAL_CA_ACK_DELAY = 15, > >>>>> > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = 512, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_UCONTEXT = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> > >>>>> RXE_NUM_PORT = 1, > >>>>> > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_QP = 0x10000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_QP = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_QP_INDEX = 16, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00020000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_QP_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >>>>> > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_SRQ = 0x00001000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_SRQ = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00020001, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_SRQ_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >>>>> > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_MR = 0x00001000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_MR = DEFAULT_MAX_VALUE, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MW = 0x00001000, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_MR_INDEX = 0x00000001, > >>>>> - RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00010000, > >>>>> + RXE_MAX_MR_INDEX = 0x00040000, > >>>>> RXE_MIN_MW_INDEX = 0x00010001, > >>>>> RXE_MAX_MW_INDEX = 0x00020000, > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> 2.27.0 > >>>>> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-19 9:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-07-14 8:35 [PATCH v2 0/1] RDMA/rxe: Bump up default maximum values used via uverbs Rao Shoaib
2021-07-14 8:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Rao Shoaib
2021-07-15 5:02 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-07-15 16:43 ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-16 4:07 ` Zhu Yanjun
[not found] ` <8eba2b02-36c5-e14c-3503-0e1cfeea4dd9@oracle.com>
2021-07-18 7:59 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-07-18 19:46 ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-18 23:00 ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-19 2:25 ` Zhu Yanjun
2021-07-19 4:20 ` Shoaib Rao
2021-07-19 8:12 ` Zhu Yanjun
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.