All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cedric VONCKEN" <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr>
To: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: ATH10 firmware question
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:07:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901C5AFA5@sbs2003.acksys.local> (raw)

	Hi, 

	I have a simple test platform. 
	One PC connected to an equipment. This equipment is set in AP
mode.
	Another PC connected to another equipment. This equipment is set
in STA + WDS mode.

	Both equipment use the same openwrt Firmware (compat
2015-07-21), I only changed the ath10k firmware (in
/lib/firmware/ath10k/...).
	Both equipment has the same hardware.
	I used a clear channel, and VHT80.
	The radio was connected with a coaxial cable and I placed 40 dBm
attenuation per Rf chain.
	I used the WLN350NX radio card from compex.
	
	First test : ATH10K firmware 10.2.4.70-2 on both equipment
		An iperf from PC connected to the AP to the PC connected
to the STA give 919 Mbps.
		An iperf from PC connected to the STA to the PC
connected to the AP give 500 Mbps.

	Second test : ATHK firmware 10.2.4.70.10-2 on both equipment
		An iperf from PC connected to the AP to the PC connected
to the STA give 921 Mbps.
		An iperf from PC connected to the STA to the PC
connected to the AP give 441 Mbps.

	If I cross the computer I have the same result. I did several
time these test and I always have the same result.

	Is it the expected result?
	What is the recommanded firmware version for each mode?
	
	Thanks for your help.

	Cedric Voncken.
	







WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Cedric VONCKEN" <cedric.voncken@acksys.fr>
To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ATH10 firmware question
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 19:07:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901C5AFA5@sbs2003.acksys.local> (raw)

	Hi, 

	I have a simple test platform. 
	One PC connected to an equipment. This equipment is set in AP
mode.
	Another PC connected to another equipment. This equipment is set
in STA + WDS mode.

	Both equipment use the same openwrt Firmware (compat
2015-07-21), I only changed the ath10k firmware (in
/lib/firmware/ath10k/...).
	Both equipment has the same hardware.
	I used a clear channel, and VHT80.
	The radio was connected with a coaxial cable and I placed 40 dBm
attenuation per Rf chain.
	I used the WLN350NX radio card from compex.
	
	First test : ATH10K firmware 10.2.4.70-2 on both equipment
		An iperf from PC connected to the AP to the PC connected
to the STA give 919 Mbps.
		An iperf from PC connected to the STA to the PC
connected to the AP give 500 Mbps.

	Second test : ATHK firmware 10.2.4.70.10-2 on both equipment
		An iperf from PC connected to the AP to the PC connected
to the STA give 921 Mbps.
		An iperf from PC connected to the STA to the PC
connected to the AP give 441 Mbps.

	If I cross the computer I have the same result. I did several
time these test and I always have the same result.

	Is it the expected result?
	What is the recommanded firmware version for each mode?
	
	Thanks for your help.

	Cedric Voncken.
	







_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

             reply	other threads:[~2015-11-24 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 18:07 Cedric VONCKEN [this message]
2015-11-24 18:07 ` ATH10 firmware question Cedric VONCKEN
2015-11-24 21:29 ` Ben Greear
2015-11-24 21:29   ` Ben Greear
2015-11-25  4:19   ` Michal Kazior
2015-11-25  4:19     ` Michal Kazior
2015-11-25  6:19     ` Ben Greear
2015-11-25  6:19       ` Ben Greear
2015-11-25 10:41       ` voncken
2015-11-25 10:41         ` voncken

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901C5AFA5@sbs2003.acksys.local \
    --to=cedric.voncken@acksys.fr \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.