* Mini-OS and force_evtchn_callback()
@ 2006-01-27 14:27 Simon Kagstrom
2006-01-27 14:41 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Kagstrom @ 2006-01-27 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
Hello!
I'm trying to understand the event channel handling more in detail, and was
playing around a bit with the Mini-OS. However, it does not behave quite as
I had expected.
After having done a sti(), I do a force_evtchn_callback() which I though would
cause an event to be sent to hypervisor_callback(), which was registered as
the channel callback with HYPERVISOR_set_callacks().
The callback is not called until the domain issues a HYPERVISOR_set_timer_op() and
thereafter blocks with HYPERVISOR_sched_op(). Is this the expected behavior,
or is there something wrong with the Mini-OS or did I simply miss something?
--
// Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Mini-OS and force_evtchn_callback()
2006-01-27 14:27 Mini-OS and force_evtchn_callback() Simon Kagstrom
@ 2006-01-27 14:41 ` Keir Fraser
2006-01-30 8:53 ` Simon Kagstrom
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2006-01-27 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Kagstrom; +Cc: xen-devel
On 27 Jan 2006, at 14:27, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the event channel handling more in detail,
> and was
> playing around a bit with the Mini-OS. However, it does not behave
> quite as
> I had expected.
>
> After having done a sti(), I do a force_evtchn_callback() which I
> though would
> cause an event to be sent to hypervisor_callback(), which was
> registered as
> the channel callback with HYPERVISOR_set_callacks().
It'll only force a callback if an event is pending.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Mini-OS and force_evtchn_callback()
2006-01-27 14:41 ` Keir Fraser
@ 2006-01-30 8:53 ` Simon Kagstrom
2006-01-30 10:21 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Kagstrom @ 2006-01-30 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
On 2006-01-27, 14:41, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> On 27 Jan 2006, at 14:27, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
>
> >After having done a sti(), I do a force_evtchn_callback() which I though
> >would cause an event to be sent to hypervisor_callback(), which was
> >registered as the channel callback with HYPERVISOR_set_callacks().
>
> It'll only force a callback if an event is pending.
Is it possible to insert an event through e.g., xm on dom0?
--
// Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Mini-OS and force_evtchn_callback()
2006-01-30 8:53 ` Simon Kagstrom
@ 2006-01-30 10:21 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2006-01-30 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Simon Kagstrom; +Cc: xen-devel
On 30 Jan 2006, at 08:53, Simon Kagstrom wrote:
>> It'll only force a callback if an event is pending.
>
> Is it possible to insert an event through e.g., xm on dom0?
You have console and xenstore event channels set up for you. You can
unmask those in the mini-os and then trigger them in dom0, sure.
-- Keir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-01-30 10:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-01-27 14:27 Mini-OS and force_evtchn_callback() Simon Kagstrom
2006-01-27 14:41 ` Keir Fraser
2006-01-30 8:53 ` Simon Kagstrom
2006-01-30 10:21 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.