All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/33] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: convert to new driver bindings
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 22:19:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <793a88b8-148e-c9a0-3c21-4f15380e1085@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ykitm1uLmQtNy3b2@Red>

On 02/04/2022 22:10, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> Le Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 01/04/2022 22:17, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> The latest addition to the rockchip crypto driver need to update the
>>> driver bindings.
>>>

>>>  
>>>    reset-names:
>>> -    maxItems: 1
>>> +    deprecated: true
>>
>> Why reset-names are being deprecated? Did we talk about this?
>>
> 
> Since I use the devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive, there is no need to have reset-names.

The reset-names are not only for Linux driver. In any case, Linux driver
could get always reset/clock/gpio by index, not by name.

Additionally, there can be different implementation in different
system/user of bindings.

Therefore the driver implementation does not matter (or matters little)
for the bindings, so for multi entries the reset-names are needed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/33] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: convert to new driver bindings
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 22:19:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <793a88b8-148e-c9a0-3c21-4f15380e1085@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ykitm1uLmQtNy3b2@Red>

On 02/04/2022 22:10, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> Le Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 01/04/2022 22:17, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> The latest addition to the rockchip crypto driver need to update the
>>> driver bindings.
>>>

>>>  
>>>    reset-names:
>>> -    maxItems: 1
>>> +    deprecated: true
>>
>> Why reset-names are being deprecated? Did we talk about this?
>>
> 
> Since I use the devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive, there is no need to have reset-names.

The reset-names are not only for Linux driver. In any case, Linux driver
could get always reset/clock/gpio by index, not by name.

Additionally, there can be different implementation in different
system/user of bindings.

Therefore the driver implementation does not matter (or matters little)
for the bindings, so for multi entries the reset-names are needed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: LABBE Corentin <clabbe@baylibre.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: heiko@sntech.de, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/33] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: convert to new driver bindings
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2022 22:19:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <793a88b8-148e-c9a0-3c21-4f15380e1085@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ykitm1uLmQtNy3b2@Red>

On 02/04/2022 22:10, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> Le Sat, Apr 02, 2022 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 01/04/2022 22:17, Corentin Labbe wrote:
>>> The latest addition to the rockchip crypto driver need to update the
>>> driver bindings.
>>>

>>>  
>>>    reset-names:
>>> -    maxItems: 1
>>> +    deprecated: true
>>
>> Why reset-names are being deprecated? Did we talk about this?
>>
> 
> Since I use the devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive, there is no need to have reset-names.

The reset-names are not only for Linux driver. In any case, Linux driver
could get always reset/clock/gpio by index, not by name.

Additionally, there can be different implementation in different
system/user of bindings.

Therefore the driver implementation does not matter (or matters little)
for the bindings, so for multi entries the reset-names are needed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-02 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 157+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-01 20:17 [PATCH v4 00/33] crypto: rockchip: permit to pass self-tests Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 01/33] crypto: rockchip: use dev_err for error message about interrupt Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 02/33] crypto: rockchip: do not use uninitialized variable Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 03/33] crypto: rockchip: do not do custom power management Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 04/33] crypto: rockchip: fix privete/private typo Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 05/33] crypto: rockchip: do not store mode globally Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 06/33] crypto: rockchip: add fallback for cipher Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-04 11:26   ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:26     ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:26     ` John Keeping
2022-04-11  8:42     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  8:42       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  8:42       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 07/33] crypto: rockchip: add fallback for ahash Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 08/33] crypto: rockchip: better handle cipher key Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-04 11:31   ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:31     ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:31     ` John Keeping
2022-04-11  8:51     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  8:51       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  8:51       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 09/33] crypto: rockchip: remove non-aligned handling Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 10/33] crypto: rockchip: rework by using crypto_engine Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-02  8:22   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02  8:22     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02  8:22     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02 20:04     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:04       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:04       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:04       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 11/33] crypto: rockchip: rewrite type Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 12/33] crypto: rockchip: add debugfs Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 13/33] crypto: rockchip: introduce PM Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 14/33] crypto: rockchip: handle reset also in PM Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 15/33] crypto: rockchip: use clk_bulk to simplify clock management Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 16/33] crypto: rockchip: add myself as maintainer Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 17/33] crypto: rockchip: use read_poll_timeout Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-04 11:38   ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:38     ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:38     ` John Keeping
2022-04-11  8:33     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  8:33       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  8:33       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 18/33] crypto: rockchip: fix style issue Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-04 11:39   ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:39     ` John Keeping
2022-04-04 11:39     ` John Keeping
2022-04-11  7:40     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  7:40       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-11  7:40       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 19/33] crypto: rockchip: add support for rk3328 Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 20/33] crypto: rockchip: rename ablk functions to cipher Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 21/33] crypto: rockchip: rework rk_handle_req function Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 22/33] crypto: rockchip: use a rk_crypto_info variable instead of lot of indirection Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 23/33] crypto: rockchip: use the rk_crypto_info given as parameter Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 24/33] crypto: rockchip: rename crypto_info to main in TFM context Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 25/33] crypto: rockchip: store crypto_info in request context Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 26/33] crypto: rockchip: Add support for rk3399 Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 27/33] dt-bindings: crypto: convert rockchip-crypto to yaml Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-02 12:10   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 12:10     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 12:10     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 20:11     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:11       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:11       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-01 20:17 ` [PATCH v4 28/33] dt-bindings: crypto: rockchip: convert to new driver bindings Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:17   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-02 11:53   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 11:53     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 11:53     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 12:07     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 12:07       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 12:07       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-03 18:58       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-03 18:58         ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-03 18:58         ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:10     ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:10       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:10       ` LABBE Corentin
2022-04-02 20:19       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-04-02 20:19         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-02 20:19         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-04-01 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 29/33] clk: rk3399: use proper crypto0 name Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-06 16:07   ` Rob Herring
2022-04-06 16:07     ` Rob Herring
2022-04-06 16:07     ` Rob Herring
2022-04-01 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 30/33] ARM: dts: rk3288: crypto does not need reset-names anymore Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 31/33] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3328 crypto node Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 32/33] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: add " Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18 ` [PATCH v4 33/33] crypto: rockchip: Check for clocks numbers and their frequencies Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe
2022-04-01 20:18   ` Corentin Labbe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=793a88b8-148e-c9a0-3c21-4f15380e1085@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=clabbe@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.