diff for duplicates of <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A831841009@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 6705a66..9522c70 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 14:50:02, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>
> > After Ming Lie's comment, the point that I came to my mind was,
> > certainly there will be resolution difference between these two clocksources,
-> > if gptimer2 is sourced from sys_ck (26Mhz).
+> > if ?gptimer2 is sourced from sys_ck (26Mhz).
> >
> GPTIMER2 with sysclock is not an option. GPTIMER is not in wakeup domain
> and when sysclock is cut, it stops.
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ not sure whether we have such use-case available.
> >
> > In that case my original patch still holds good here. I would still request
-> > you to review the same and give your acked-by or tested-by.
+> > you to review the same and give your acked-by ?or tested-by.
> >
> I just looked at that.
> It looks fine to me. Can you repost that patch addressing Kevin and
@@ -77,9 +77,4 @@ Thanks for the review and discussion, I will submit revised version shortly.
Thanks,
-Vaibhav
-
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
-the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
\ No newline at end of file
+Vaibhav
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 56bda64..f78fe01 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -56,34 +56,16 @@
"ref\0CAMQu2gzOkE6LD0WZ_9bKe3J-=Dv89rWaMzvWWvJHPMSPe6MzNg\@mail.gmail.com\0"
]
[
- "From\0Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav\@ti.com>\0"
+ "From\0hvaibhav\@ti.com (Hiremath, Vaibhav)\0"
]
[
- "Subject\0RE: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: 32k-counter: Use hwmod lookup to check presence of 32k timer\0"
+ "Subject\0[PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: 32k-counter: Use hwmod lookup to check presence of 32k timer\0"
]
[
"Date\0Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:28:08 +0000\0"
]
[
- "To\0Shilimkar",
- " Santosh <santosh.shilimkar\@ti.com>\0"
-]
-[
- "Cc\0Ming Lei <tom.leiming\@gmail.com>",
- " Hilman",
- " Kevin <khilman\@ti.com>",
- " linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org <linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org>",
- " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org>",
- " marc.zyngier\@arm.com <marc.zyngier\@arm.com>",
- " johnstul\@us.ibm.com <johnstul\@us.ibm.com>",
- " Balbi",
- " Felipe <balbi\@ti.com>",
- " Cousson",
- " Benoit <b-cousson\@ti.com>",
- " Tony Lindgren <tony\@atomide.com>",
- " Paul Walmsley <paul\@pwsan.com>",
- " DebBarma",
- " Tarun Kanti <tarun.kanti\@ti.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org\0"
]
[
"\0000:1\0"
@@ -137,7 +119,7 @@
"> \n",
"> > After Ming Lie's comment, the point that I came to my mind was,\n",
"> > certainly there will be resolution difference between these two clocksources,\n",
- "> > if \302\240gptimer2 is sourced from sys_ck (26Mhz).\n",
+ "> > if ?gptimer2 is sourced from sys_ck (26Mhz).\n",
"> >\n",
"> GPTIMER2 with sysclock is not an option. GPTIMER is not in wakeup domain\n",
"> and when sysclock is cut, it stops.\n",
@@ -157,7 +139,7 @@
"\n",
"> >\n",
"> > In that case my original patch still holds good here. I would still request\n",
- "> > you to review the same and give your acked-by \302\240or tested-by.\n",
+ "> > you to review the same and give your acked-by ?or tested-by.\n",
"> >\n",
"> I just looked at that.\n",
"> It looks fine to me. Can you repost that patch addressing Kevin and\n",
@@ -171,12 +153,7 @@
"\n",
"\n",
"Thanks,\n",
- "Vaibhav\n",
- "\n",
- "--\n",
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-omap\" in\n",
- "the body of a message to majordomo\@vger.kernel.org\n",
- "More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html"
+ "Vaibhav"
]
-1e9914ef427e7b57d302f5f824bf4301b1ab704a570797119ae8e16bec7658bb
+8c92e012a934ed7d58d156e60c90e06c1743ff11be06163e1f9ecc2450bedbe6
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.