Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: add support for Amlogic NAND flash controller

[Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>]

On 2018/12/10 19:38, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:23:46 +0800
> Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> +			mtd->ecc_stats.failed++;
>>>> +			continue;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +		mtd->ecc_stats.corrected += ECC_ERR_CNT(*info);
>>>> +		bitflips = max_t(u32, bitflips, ECC_ERR_CNT(*info));
>>>> +	}
>>>
>>> Are you sure you handle correctly empty pages with bf?
>>>    
>> if scramble is enable, i would say yes here.
>> when scramble is disabled, i am considering how to use the helper
>> nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk, but it seems that i can't get the ecc
>> bytes which is caculated by ecc engine.by the way, nfc dma doesn't send
>> out the ecc parity bytes.
> 
> Even if the ECC engine is disabled?
> 
No.
When ECC engine is disabled, it can read the ecc parity bytes ; but 
there is another problem that i need to consider how code struct looks 
better when reading error with ecc opened and then try to raw read.
Is there a good idea?

>> so i would suggest using scramble.
>>
> 
> No, please don't force people to use the scrambler.
> 
>>>> +
>>>> +const void *
>>>> +meson_nand_op_get_dma_safe_output_buf(const struct nand_op_instr *instr)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	if (WARN_ON(instr->type != NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR))
>>>> +		return NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (virt_addr_valid(instr->ctx.data.buf.out) &&
>>>> +	    !object_is_on_stack(instr->ctx.data.buf.out))
>>>
>>> Can you please create helpers for that? I guess it will help removing
>>> these checks once the core will have a DMA-safe approach.
>>>    
>> I will use below definition:
>> #define BUFFER_IS_DMA_SAFE(x)	\
>> 	(virt_addr_valid((x)) && (!object_is_on_stack((x))))
>>
>> Is it ok?
> 
> Please define a function, not a macro.
> ok
> .
>