From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Cc: 0day robot <lkp@intel.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>, Walter Mack <walter.mack@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@lists.01.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, aubrey.li@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [sched/fair] ddb3b1126f: hackbench.throughput -25.9% regression Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:48:05 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7aa67fedb4b6dc9126bc59ee993fa18d0e472475.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220330094632.GB6999@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 17:46 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -25.9% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit: > Will try to check the regression seen. Thanks. Tim > > > commit: > d9ad181b93 ("sched/fair: Don't rely on ->exec_start for migration") > ddb3b1126f ("sched/fair: Simple runqueue order on migrate") > > d9ad181b93f83b36 ddb3b1126fe93e8d6e059600488 > ---------------- --------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ > 92566 -25.9% 68598 ± 2% hackbench.throughput > 85.50 +40.8% 120.35 ± 2% hackbench.time.elapsed_time > 85.50 +40.8% 120.35 ± 2% hackbench.time.elapsed_time.max > 9674391 ± 2% +466.2% 54780205 ± 2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches > 1240 +42.6% 1768 ± 3% hackbench.time.system_time > 89.58 +20.4% 107.85 hackbench.time.user_time > 36626407 +270.2% 1.356e+08 ± 2% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches > 2500490 ± 3% +78.2% 4456808 ± 3% cpuidle..usage > 118.45 ± 2% +29.2% 153.02 ± 2% uptime.boot >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [sched/fair] ddb3b1126f: hackbench.throughput -25.9% regression Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 16:48:05 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7aa67fedb4b6dc9126bc59ee993fa18d0e472475.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20220330094632.GB6999@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1284 bytes --] On Wed, 2022-03-30 at 17:46 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -25.9% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit: > Will try to check the regression seen. Thanks. Tim > > > commit: > d9ad181b93 ("sched/fair: Don't rely on ->exec_start for migration") > ddb3b1126f ("sched/fair: Simple runqueue order on migrate") > > d9ad181b93f83b36 ddb3b1126fe93e8d6e059600488 > ---------------- --------------------------- > %stddev %change %stddev > \ | \ > 92566 -25.9% 68598 ± 2% hackbench.throughput > 85.50 +40.8% 120.35 ± 2% hackbench.time.elapsed_time > 85.50 +40.8% 120.35 ± 2% hackbench.time.elapsed_time.max > 9674391 ± 2% +466.2% 54780205 ± 2% hackbench.time.involuntary_context_switches > 1240 +42.6% 1768 ± 3% hackbench.time.system_time > 89.58 +20.4% 107.85 hackbench.time.user_time > 36626407 +270.2% 1.356e+08 ± 2% hackbench.time.voluntary_context_switches > 2500490 ± 3% +78.2% 4456808 ± 3% cpuidle..usage > 118.45 ± 2% +29.2% 153.02 ± 2% uptime.boot >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-30 23:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-03-25 22:54 [PATCH 0/2] sched/fair: Fix starvation caused by task migration Tim Chen 2022-03-25 22:54 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Don't rely on ->exec_start for migration Tim Chen 2022-03-25 22:54 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched/fair: Simple runqueue order on migrate Tim Chen 2022-03-29 9:03 ` Vincent Guittot 2022-03-31 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra 2022-03-31 12:15 ` Vincent Guittot 2022-03-29 10:09 ` Abel Wu 2022-03-29 14:26 ` Tim Chen 2022-03-30 9:46 ` [sched/fair] ddb3b1126f: hackbench.throughput -25.9% regression kernel test robot 2022-03-30 9:46 ` kernel test robot 2022-03-30 23:48 ` Tim Chen [this message] 2022-03-30 23:48 ` Tim Chen 2022-04-01 18:04 ` Chen Yu 2022-04-01 18:04 ` Chen Yu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=7aa67fedb4b6dc9126bc59ee993fa18d0e472475.camel@linux.intel.com \ --to=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \ --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \ --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \ --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \ --cc=mgorman@suse.de \ --cc=mingo@elte.hu \ --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ --cc=walter.mack@intel.com \ --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \ --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \ --cc=zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.