All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2
@ 2017-10-29 16:36 Maciej S. Szmigiero
  2017-10-30 14:55   ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej S. Szmigiero @ 2017-10-29 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo, Li Zefan, Johannes Weiner, Jens Axboe
  Cc: Jonathan Corbet, cgroups, linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-block

CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
cgroup.

This behavior is documented in blkio-controller.txt for cgroups v1, however
as far as I know it isn't documented anywhere for cgroups v2 besides a
generic remark that "How resource consumption in the root cgroup is
governed is up to each controller" in cgroup-v2.txt.

By default, this implicit leaf child node has a (CFQ) weight which is two
times higher that the default weight of a child cgroup.

cgroups v1 provide a "leaf_weight" setting which allow changing this value.
However, this setting is missing from cgroups v2 and so the only way to
tweak how much IO time processes in the root cgroup get is to adapt
weight settings of all child cgroups accordingly.
Let's add a "leaf_weight" setting to the root cgroup in cgroups v2, too.

Note that new kernel threads appear in the root cgroup and there seems to
be no way to change this since kthreadd cannot be moved to another cgroup
(for a good reason).

Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
---
 Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt | 11 +++++++++++
 block/cfq-iosched.c         | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt b/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
index dc44785dc0fa..3190c5108c31 100644
--- a/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cgroup-v2.txt
@@ -1290,6 +1290,17 @@ IO Interface Files
 	  8:16 200
 	  8:0 50
 
+  io.leaf_weight
+	A read-write flat-keyed file which exists only on the root cgroup.
+	It operates the same way as io.weight but controls the weight of an
+	implicit leaf child node.
+	This implicit leaf child node hosts all the processes that are in
+	the root cgroup.
+	When distributing IO time this implicit child node is taken into
+	account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup.
+
+	The default is "default 200".
+
   io.max
 	A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
 	cgroups.
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 9f342ef1ad42..85b6970abb89 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2136,6 +2136,17 @@ static struct cftype cfq_blkcg_legacy_files[] = {
 	{ }	/* terminate */
 };
 
+static int cfq_print_leaf_weight_on_dfl(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
+{
+	struct blkcg *blkcg = css_to_blkcg(seq_css(sf));
+	struct cfq_group_data *cgd = blkcg_to_cfqgd(blkcg);
+
+	seq_printf(sf, "default %u\n", cgd->leaf_weight);
+	blkcg_print_blkgs(sf, blkcg, cfqg_prfill_leaf_weight_device,
+			  &blkcg_policy_cfq, 0, false);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int cfq_print_weight_on_dfl(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
 {
 	struct blkcg *blkcg = css_to_blkcg(seq_css(sf));
@@ -2147,8 +2158,9 @@ static int cfq_print_weight_on_dfl(struct seq_file *sf, void *v)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static ssize_t cfq_set_weight_on_dfl(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
-				     char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
+static ssize_t cfq_set_weight_on_dfl_common(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
+					    char *buf, size_t nbytes,
+					    loff_t off, bool is_leaf_weight)
 {
 	char *endp;
 	int ret;
@@ -2159,15 +2171,35 @@ static ssize_t cfq_set_weight_on_dfl(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
 	/* "WEIGHT" or "default WEIGHT" sets the default weight */
 	v = simple_strtoull(buf, &endp, 0);
 	if (*endp == '\0' || sscanf(buf, "default %llu", &v) == 1) {
-		ret = __cfq_set_weight(of_css(of), v, true, false, false);
+		ret = __cfq_set_weight(of_css(of), v, true, false,
+				       is_leaf_weight);
 		return ret ?: nbytes;
 	}
 
 	/* "MAJ:MIN WEIGHT" */
-	return __cfqg_set_weight_device(of, buf, nbytes, off, true, false);
+	return __cfqg_set_weight_device(of, buf, nbytes, off, true,
+					is_leaf_weight);
+}
+
+static ssize_t cfq_set_leaf_weight_on_dfl(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
+					  char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
+{
+	return cfq_set_weight_on_dfl_common(of, buf, nbytes, off, true);
+}
+
+static ssize_t cfq_set_weight_on_dfl(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
+				     char *buf, size_t nbytes, loff_t off)
+{
+	return cfq_set_weight_on_dfl_common(of, buf, nbytes, off, false);
 }
 
 static struct cftype cfq_blkcg_files[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "leaf_weight",
+		.flags = CFTYPE_ONLY_ON_ROOT,
+		.seq_show = cfq_print_leaf_weight_on_dfl,
+		.write = cfq_set_leaf_weight_on_dfl,
+	},
 	{
 		.name = "weight",
 		.flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2
@ 2017-10-30 14:55   ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2017-10-30 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maciej S. Szmigiero
  Cc: Li Zefan, Johannes Weiner, Jens Axboe, Jonathan Corbet, cgroups,
	linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-block

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
> cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
> cgroup.
> 
> This behavior is documented in blkio-controller.txt for cgroups v1, however
> as far as I know it isn't documented anywhere for cgroups v2 besides a
> generic remark that "How resource consumption in the root cgroup is
> governed is up to each controller" in cgroup-v2.txt.
> 
> By default, this implicit leaf child node has a (CFQ) weight which is two
> times higher that the default weight of a child cgroup.
> 
> cgroups v1 provide a "leaf_weight" setting which allow changing this value.
> However, this setting is missing from cgroups v2 and so the only way to
> tweak how much IO time processes in the root cgroup get is to adapt
> weight settings of all child cgroups accordingly.
> Let's add a "leaf_weight" setting to the root cgroup in cgroups v2, too.
> 
> Note that new kernel threads appear in the root cgroup and there seems to
> be no way to change this since kthreadd cannot be moved to another cgroup
> (for a good reason).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>

I don't think we wanna do this.  It's inconsistent with what other
controllers do and we want to charge the IOs in the root cgroup to the
right cgroup.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2
@ 2017-10-30 14:55   ` Tejun Heo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2017-10-30 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maciej S. Szmigiero
  Cc: Li Zefan, Johannes Weiner, Jens Axboe, Jonathan Corbet,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
> cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
> cgroup.
> 
> This behavior is documented in blkio-controller.txt for cgroups v1, however
> as far as I know it isn't documented anywhere for cgroups v2 besides a
> generic remark that "How resource consumption in the root cgroup is
> governed is up to each controller" in cgroup-v2.txt.
> 
> By default, this implicit leaf child node has a (CFQ) weight which is two
> times higher that the default weight of a child cgroup.
> 
> cgroups v1 provide a "leaf_weight" setting which allow changing this value.
> However, this setting is missing from cgroups v2 and so the only way to
> tweak how much IO time processes in the root cgroup get is to adapt
> weight settings of all child cgroups accordingly.
> Let's add a "leaf_weight" setting to the root cgroup in cgroups v2, too.
> 
> Note that new kernel threads appear in the root cgroup and there seems to
> be no way to change this since kthreadd cannot be moved to another cgroup
> (for a good reason).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail-APzI5cXaD1zVlRWJc41N0YvC60bnQu0Y@public.gmane.org>

I don't think we wanna do this.  It's inconsistent with what other
controllers do and we want to charge the IOs in the root cgroup to the
right cgroup.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2
@ 2017-10-30 16:02     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej S. Szmigiero @ 2017-10-30 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo
  Cc: Li Zefan, Johannes Weiner, Jens Axboe, Jonathan Corbet, cgroups,
	linux-doc, linux-kernel, linux-block

On 30.10.2017 15:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
>> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
>> cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
>> cgroup.
>>
>> This behavior is documented in blkio-controller.txt for cgroups v1, however
>> as far as I know it isn't documented anywhere for cgroups v2 besides a
>> generic remark that "How resource consumption in the root cgroup is
>> governed is up to each controller" in cgroup-v2.txt.
>>
>> By default, this implicit leaf child node has a (CFQ) weight which is two
>> times higher that the default weight of a child cgroup.
>>
>> cgroups v1 provide a "leaf_weight" setting which allow changing this value.
>> However, this setting is missing from cgroups v2 and so the only way to
>> tweak how much IO time processes in the root cgroup get is to adapt
>> weight settings of all child cgroups accordingly.
>> Let's add a "leaf_weight" setting to the root cgroup in cgroups v2, too.
>>
>> Note that new kernel threads appear in the root cgroup and there seems to
>> be no way to change this since kthreadd cannot be moved to another cgroup
>> (for a good reason).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
> 
> I don't think we wanna do this.  It's inconsistent with what other
> controllers do 

And what do other (cgroup v2) controllers do in this case?
The only other controller that I know about that divides a shared resource
by weights is the cpu controller but it isn't implemented for cgroups v2
yet.

If this controller (cpu) is going to behave the same way in cgroups v2 as
it is in cgroups v1 with respect to processes in the root cgroup (mapping
priorities to weights) then it won't have this problem.

The "leaf_weight" name is both consistent with how this setting is named
in cgroups v1 and also underlines that this isn't a normal "weight"
setting, which apply at a parent cgroup level.

> and we want to charge the IOs in the root cgroup to the
> right cgroup.

As long as it is possible to have process in the root cgroup there has to
be some policy how resources are distributed to these processes.

It's only that currently for cgroups v2 this policy is undocumented and
has a hardcoded weight setting (of 200).
This patch documents this behaviors and makes it adjustable, just as it
is in cgroups v1.

> Thanks.

Thanks,
Maciej

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2
@ 2017-10-30 16:02     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Maciej S. Szmigiero @ 2017-10-30 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tejun Heo
  Cc: Li Zefan, Johannes Weiner, Jens Axboe, Jonathan Corbet,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
	linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA

On 30.10.2017 15:55, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 05:36:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> CFQ scheduler has a property that processes (or tasks in cgroups v1) that
>> aren't assigned to any particular cgroup - that is, which stay in the root
>> cgroup - effectively form an implicit leaf child node attached to the root
>> cgroup.
>>
>> This behavior is documented in blkio-controller.txt for cgroups v1, however
>> as far as I know it isn't documented anywhere for cgroups v2 besides a
>> generic remark that "How resource consumption in the root cgroup is
>> governed is up to each controller" in cgroup-v2.txt.
>>
>> By default, this implicit leaf child node has a (CFQ) weight which is two
>> times higher that the default weight of a child cgroup.
>>
>> cgroups v1 provide a "leaf_weight" setting which allow changing this value.
>> However, this setting is missing from cgroups v2 and so the only way to
>> tweak how much IO time processes in the root cgroup get is to adapt
>> weight settings of all child cgroups accordingly.
>> Let's add a "leaf_weight" setting to the root cgroup in cgroups v2, too.
>>
>> Note that new kernel threads appear in the root cgroup and there seems to
>> be no way to change this since kthreadd cannot be moved to another cgroup
>> (for a good reason).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail-APzI5cXaD1zVlRWJc41N0YvC60bnQu0Y@public.gmane.org>
> 
> I don't think we wanna do this.  It's inconsistent with what other
> controllers do 

And what do other (cgroup v2) controllers do in this case?
The only other controller that I know about that divides a shared resource
by weights is the cpu controller but it isn't implemented for cgroups v2
yet.

If this controller (cpu) is going to behave the same way in cgroups v2 as
it is in cgroups v1 with respect to processes in the root cgroup (mapping
priorities to weights) then it won't have this problem.

The "leaf_weight" name is both consistent with how this setting is named
in cgroups v1 and also underlines that this isn't a normal "weight"
setting, which apply at a parent cgroup level.

> and we want to charge the IOs in the root cgroup to the
> right cgroup.

As long as it is possible to have process in the root cgroup there has to
be some policy how resources are distributed to these processes.

It's only that currently for cgroups v2 this policy is undocumented and
has a hardcoded weight setting (of 200).
This patch documents this behaviors and makes it adjustable, just as it
is in cgroups v1.

> Thanks.

Thanks,
Maciej

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-30 16:02 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-29 16:36 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: add "leaf_weight" setting for the root cgroup in cgroups v2 Maciej S. Szmigiero
2017-10-30 14:55 ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-30 14:55   ` Tejun Heo
2017-10-30 16:02   ` Maciej S. Szmigiero
2017-10-30 16:02     ` Maciej S. Szmigiero

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.