All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>,
	bhelgaas@google.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	hkallweit1@gmail.com, wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com,
	mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, kai.heng.feng@canonical.com,
	chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	treding@nvidia.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com, abhsahu@nvidia.com,
	sagupta@nvidia.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kthota@nvidia.com,
	mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com,
	"Kenneth R. Crudup" <kenny@panix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] PCI/ASPM: Save/restore L1SS Capability for suspend/resume
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:17:02 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b377c19-23-6793-5e43-b757cfd8437@panix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220204230234.GA226601@bhelgaas>


On Fri, 4 Feb 2022, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:

> Do we have a theory on what might have caused the regression before?
> Or at least something that is different this time around?

If you'd like, I could try re-applying the previous problem commit or your
attempted fix on top of Linus' master if you'd like to see if something was
fixed somewhere else in the PCIe subsystem, but if you think it's not worth-
while I'm satisfied with the current fix (or probably more-exactly for my
particular machine, lack of regression).

	-Kenny

-- 
Kenneth R. Crudup / Sr. SW Engineer, Scott County Consulting, Orange County CA

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-01 12:35 [PATCH V1] PCI/ASPM: Save/restore L1SS Capability for suspend/resume Vidya Sagar
2022-02-01 13:54 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-01 18:53 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-01 19:03   ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-01 19:05   ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-01 19:10   ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-01 19:24   ` Vidya Sagar
2022-02-01 22:25     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-02  4:17       ` Vidya Sagar
2022-02-04  1:18         ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-04  5:37           ` Vidya Sagar
2022-02-04 23:02         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-04 23:17           ` Kenneth R. Crudup [this message]
2022-02-05 16:44             ` Vidya Sagar
2022-02-05 17:30               ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-05 17:32                 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-05 17:33                 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-07 16:33                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-02-07 18:20                   ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-15 13:10                     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-16  4:40                       ` Vidya Sagar
2022-02-16  6:00                         ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-16 13:11                           ` Vidya Sagar
2022-04-12 22:50                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-13  0:19                               ` Kai-Heng Feng
2022-04-14 16:41                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-15 14:26                                   ` Kai-Heng Feng
2022-04-15 21:25                                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-21  6:16                                       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2022-04-21 20:36                                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-21 20:40                                         ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-04-21 21:11                                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-21 21:21                                             ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-04-13 13:26                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-11-23 21:44                               ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-11-23 22:01                                 ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-11-24  0:07                                   ` Matthias Kaehlcke
2022-02-15 13:12                     ` Kenneth R. Crudup
2022-02-04 11:23 ` Abhishek Sahu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7b377c19-23-6793-5e43-b757cfd8437@panix.com \
    --to=kenny@panix.com \
    --cc=abhsahu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sagupta@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    --cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.