All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rt-numa: ignore runtime cpumask if -a CPULIST is specified
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:44:14 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ba75eb3-8a8d-65fa-8458-f7f38bad2cb4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfBFaNrP/1LCgWoN@fuller.cnet>



On Tue, 25 Jan 2022, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

>  
> When using isolcpus kernel command line option, the CPUs
> specified at isolcpus= are not part of the run time environment
> cpumask.
> 
> This causes "cyclictest -a isolatedcpus" to fail with:
> 
> WARN: Couldn't setaffinity in main thread: Invalid argument
> FATAL: No allowable cpus to run on
> # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us
> 
> To fix this, ignore the runtime cpumask if neither "+", "!"
> or "all" are specified in the cpu list string.
> 
> Suggested by Sebastian Andrzej Siewior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v2: fix changelog typo
> 
> diff --git a/src/lib/rt-numa.c b/src/lib/rt-numa.c
> index ee5ab99..d887355 100644
> --- a/src/lib/rt-numa.c
> +++ b/src/lib/rt-numa.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <sched.h>
>  #include <pthread.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
>  
>  #include "rt-error.h"
>  #include "rt-numa.h"
> @@ -96,13 +97,21 @@ int cpu_for_thread_ua(int thread_num, int max_cpus)
>   * the user supplied affinity mask and the affinity mask from the run
>   * time environment
>   */
> -static void use_current_cpuset(int max_cpus, struct bitmask *cpumask)
> +static void use_current_cpuset(char *str, int max_cpus, struct bitmask *cpumask)
>  {
>  	struct bitmask *curmask;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	curmask = numa_allocate_cpumask();
> -	numa_sched_getaffinity(getpid(), curmask);
> +
> +	if (strchr(str, '!') == NULL && strchr(str, '+') == NULL &&
> +	    strstr(str, "all") == NULL) {
> +		int conf_cpus = numa_num_configured_cpus();
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < conf_cpus; i++)
> +			numa_bitmask_setbit(curmask, i);
> +	} else
> +		numa_sched_getaffinity(getpid(), curmask);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Clear bits that are not set in both the cpuset from the
> @@ -131,7 +140,7 @@ int parse_cpumask(char *str, int max_cpus, struct bitmask **cpumask)
>  		return 0;
>  	}
>  
> -	use_current_cpuset(max_cpus, mask);
> +	use_current_cpuset(str, max_cpus, mask);
>  	*cpumask = mask;
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
> 

I agree that our current method is too restrictive, so I like the basic 
idea here.

I think we also need to differentiate between -a with no arguments
and -a all. -a with no arguments should inherit the cpumask from the 
runtime environment but -a all, should be the same as specifying all the 
cpus and ignoring the inherited cpumask.

The work of the function parse_cpumask() is essentially in the call to 
numa_parse_cpustring_all() and then pointing the affinity_mask to the 
result. So your patch is unnecessarily complicated. Just don't call 
use_current_cpuset(). All that is needed is to change parse_cpumask()
with

-       use_current_cpuset(max_cpus, mask);
+       if (strchr(str, '!') != NULL || strchr(str, '+') != NULL)
+               use_current_cpuset(max_cpus, mask);

So, if you want to send me the above patch, I'll apply it.

While testing, I noticed that there is a bug in calling parse_cpumask
such that -aall works but -a all (with a space) was not working correctly.
I will send a patch for that.

Thanks

John


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-28 17:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 14:16 [PATCH] rt-numa: optionally ignore runtime cpumask Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-21 18:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 12:58   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 16:26     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 16:40       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 16:44         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 17:07         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 17:50           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-25 18:40 ` [PATCH] rt-numa: ignore runtime cpumask if -a CPULIST is specified Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-25 18:46   ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-26  7:21     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-28 17:44     ` John Kacur [this message]
2022-01-28 18:17       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-28 21:08         ` John Kacur
2022-01-28 18:39       ` [PATCH v3] " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-28 21:11         ` John Kacur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ba75eb3-8a8d-65fa-8458-f7f38bad2cb4@redhat.com \
    --to=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.