All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-numa: optionally ignore runtime cpumask
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 18:07:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ye7c2cWSNJvdegmq@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ye7WkRKz9Ha/ROP1@fuller.cnet>

On 2022-01-24 13:40:49 [-0300], Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Uses the $CPU (mask) specified. If $CPU is not part of the current CPU
> > mask, why shouldn't it work?
> 
>        -a, --affinity[=PROC-SET]
>               Run threads on the set of processors given by PROC-SET.  If PROC-SET is not specified, all processors will be used.  Threads will be assigned to processors
>               in the set in numeric order, in a round-robin fashion.
>               The set of processors can be specified as A,B,C, or A-C, or A-B,D-F, and so on*.  The ! character can be used to negate a set.  For example, !B-D means to
>               use all available CPUs except B through D.  The cpu numbers are the same as shown in the processor field in /proc/cpuinfo.  See numa(3) for more
>               information on specifying CPU sets.  * Support for CPU sets requires libnuma version >= 2.  For libnuma v1, PROC-SET, if specified, must be a single CPU
>               number.
> 
> 
> /*
>  * After this function is called, affinity_mask is the intersection of
>  * the user supplied affinity mask and the affinity mask from the run
>  * time environment
>  */
> static void use_current_cpuset(int max_cpus, struct bitmask *cpumask)
> {
>         struct bitmask *curmask;
>         int i;
> 
>         curmask = numa_allocate_cpumask();
>         numa_sched_getaffinity(getpid(), curmask);
> 
>         /*
>          * Clear bits that are not set in both the cpuset from the
>          * environment, and in the user specified affinity.
>          */
>         for (i = 0; i < max_cpus; i++) {
>                 if ((!numa_bitmask_isbitset(cpumask, i)) ||
>                     (!numa_bitmask_isbitset(curmask, i)))
>                         numa_bitmask_clearbit(cpumask, i);
>         }
> 
>         numa_bitmask_free(curmask);
> }
> 
> Consider 8 CPU system booted with isolcpus=3-7, and execution of 
> "cyclictest -a 3-7".
> 
> sched_getaffinity() returns mask with bits set for CPUs 0 and 1.
> The user supplied mask has bits 3-7 set.
> 
> The intersection between the user supplied mask and the affinity mask
> from the run time environment has no bits set.

Okay. But does this make to keep? I understand that the current CPU-mask
needs to be kept for masks like !B or !B-D. But is there a need to use
the current CPU-mask when a specific mask has been specified by the user?

Sebastian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-24 17:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-21 14:16 [PATCH] rt-numa: optionally ignore runtime cpumask Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-21 18:16 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 12:58   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 16:26     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-24 16:40       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 16:44         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-24 17:07         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-01-24 17:50           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-25 18:40 ` [PATCH] rt-numa: ignore runtime cpumask if -a CPULIST is specified Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-25 18:46   ` [PATCH v2] " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-26  7:21     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-28 17:44     ` John Kacur
2022-01-28 18:17       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-28 21:08         ` John Kacur
2022-01-28 18:39       ` [PATCH v3] " Marcelo Tosatti
2022-01-28 21:11         ` John Kacur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ye7c2cWSNJvdegmq@linutronix.de \
    --to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.