From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, bhelgaas@google.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, andrew.murray@arm.com, treding@nvidia.com Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kthota@nvidia.com, mmaddireddy@nvidia.com, sagar.tv@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] arm64: tegra: Re-order PCIe aperture mappings to support ACPI boot Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:22:03 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7c946e2a-6fd4-f4c8-8afe-f9d0125fdaa0@nvidia.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <d52db35b-dbf8-a706-9611-95448cf6a69e@nvidia.com> On 29-Jun-20 7:01 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Sagar, > > On 10/01/2020 19:14, Vidya Sagar wrote: >> Re-order Tegra194's PCIe aperture mappings to have IO window moved to >> 64-bit aperture and have the entire 32-bit aperture used for accessing >> the configuration space. This makes it to use the entire 32MB of the 32-bit >> aperture for ECAM purpose while booting through ACPI. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > > Any reason why we should not merge this change, even if patch 2/2 is not > accepted? If there is no harm in us merging this, this would be one less > change for us to carry out-of-tree. If so, can you update and re-post > for 5.9? There is no issue in merging this change alone. I'll send a patch for review for 5.9 soon. Thanks, Vidya Sagar > > Cheers > Jon >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <bhelgaas@google.com>, <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>, <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <andrew.murray@arm.com>, <treding@nvidia.com> Cc: <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kthota@nvidia.com>, <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>, <sagar.tv@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] arm64: tegra: Re-order PCIe aperture mappings to support ACPI boot Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 16:22:03 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7c946e2a-6fd4-f4c8-8afe-f9d0125fdaa0@nvidia.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <d52db35b-dbf8-a706-9611-95448cf6a69e@nvidia.com> On 29-Jun-20 7:01 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Sagar, > > On 10/01/2020 19:14, Vidya Sagar wrote: >> Re-order Tegra194's PCIe aperture mappings to have IO window moved to >> 64-bit aperture and have the entire 32-bit aperture used for accessing >> the configuration space. This makes it to use the entire 32MB of the 32-bit >> aperture for ECAM purpose while booting through ACPI. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com> > > Any reason why we should not merge this change, even if patch 2/2 is not > accepted? If there is no harm in us merging this, this would be one less > change for us to carry out-of-tree. If so, can you update and re-post > for 5.9? There is no issue in merging this change alone. I'll send a patch for review for 5.9 soon. Thanks, Vidya Sagar > > Cheers > Jon >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 10:52 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-01-03 17:49 [PATCH] PCI: Add MCFG quirks for Tegra194 host controllers Vidya Sagar 2020-01-03 17:49 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-01-03 18:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-01-04 3:44 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-01-04 3:44 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-01-17 12:17 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2020-01-20 11:10 ` Thierry Reding 2020-01-20 15:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2020-01-20 15:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [not found] ` <20200120151849.GA24402-LhTu/34fCX3ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org> 2020-01-21 13:44 ` Thierry Reding 2020-01-21 13:44 ` Thierry Reding 2020-01-23 10:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2020-01-23 10:49 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi 2020-02-06 16:46 ` Thierry Reding 2020-02-07 14:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-02-07 16:51 ` Thierry Reding 2020-02-07 18:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2020-01-04 21:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-01-04 21:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-01-04 21:53 ` kbuild test robot 2020-01-06 8:27 ` [PATCH V2] " Vidya Sagar 2020-01-06 8:27 ` Vidya Sagar [not found] ` <20200106082709.14370-1-vidyas-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2020-01-10 19:14 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] " Vidya Sagar 2020-01-10 19:14 ` Vidya Sagar [not found] ` <20200110191500.9538-1-vidyas-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2020-01-10 19:14 ` [PATCH V3 1/2] arm64: tegra: Re-order PCIe aperture mappings to support ACPI boot Vidya Sagar 2020-01-10 19:14 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-06-29 13:31 ` Jon Hunter 2020-06-29 13:31 ` Jon Hunter 2020-06-30 10:52 ` Vidya Sagar [this message] 2020-06-30 10:52 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-01-10 19:15 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] PCI: Add MCFG quirks for Tegra194 host controllers Vidya Sagar 2020-01-10 19:15 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-01-17 11:42 ` Thierry Reding 2021-03-05 21:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-03-05 23:04 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński 2021-04-16 13:45 ` Vidya Sagar 2021-04-16 13:45 ` [PATCH V4] " Vidya Sagar 2021-04-16 19:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas 2021-05-13 9:40 ` [PATCH V3 2/2] " Qu Wenruo 2021-05-13 13:05 ` Vidya Sagar 2020-01-16 17:18 ` [PATCH V3 0/2] " Vidya Sagar 2020-01-16 17:18 ` Vidya Sagar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=7c946e2a-6fd4-f4c8-8afe-f9d0125fdaa0@nvidia.com \ --to=vidyas@nvidia.com \ --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \ --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \ --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \ --cc=kthota@nvidia.com \ --cc=lenb@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \ --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \ --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \ --cc=sagar.tv@gmail.com \ --cc=treding@nvidia.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.