All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, mauro.chehab@huawei.com,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: [PATCH 35/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: add a driver-specific debug macro
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:56:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cb10b3910e9fa3e52d36e4e416030175cc761ab.1597247164.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1597247164.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Using dev_dbg() is not too nice, as, instead of printing the
name of the regulator, it prints "regulator.<number>", making
harder to associate what is happening with each ldo line.

So, add a debug-specific macro, which will print the rdev's
name, just like the regulator core.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
 .../staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c   | 61 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c
index 31b8ff19fd31..5ddaf7f8cacc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/spmi.h>
 
+#define rdev_dbg(rdev, fmt, arg...)	\
+		 pr_debug("%s: %s: " fmt, rdev->desc->name, __func__, ##arg)
+
 struct hi6421v600_regulator {
 	struct regulator_desc rdesc;
 	struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic;
@@ -60,10 +63,10 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 
 	reg_val = hi6421_spmi_pmic_read(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg);
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: enable_reg=0x%x, val= 0x%x, enable_state=%d\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
-		reg_val, (reg_val & rdev->desc->enable_mask));
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		 "enable_reg=0x%x, val= 0x%x, enable_state=%d\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg,
+		 reg_val, (reg_val & rdev->desc->enable_mask));
 
 	return ((reg_val & rdev->desc->enable_mask) != 0);
 }
@@ -73,21 +76,20 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	struct hi6421v600_regulator *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
 	struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic = sreg->pmic;
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: off_on_delay=%d us\n",
-		__func__, rdev->desc->off_on_delay);
-
 	/* cannot enable more than one regulator at one time */
 	mutex_lock(&enable_mutex);
 	usleep_range(HISI_REGS_ENA_PROTECT_TIME,
 		     HISI_REGS_ENA_PROTECT_TIME + 1000);
 
 	/* set enable register */
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		 "off_on_delay=%d us, enable_reg=0x%x, enable_mask=0x%x\n",
+		 rdev->desc->off_on_delay, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
+		 rdev->desc->enable_mask);
+
 	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
 			     rdev->desc->enable_mask,
 			     rdev->desc->enable_mask);
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: enable_reg=0x%x, enable_mask=0x%x\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
-		 rdev->desc->enable_mask);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&enable_mutex);
 
@@ -100,6 +102,9 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic = sreg->pmic;
 
 	/* set enable register to 0 */
+	rdev_dbg(rdev, "enable_reg=0x%x, enable_mask=0x%x\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg, rdev->desc->enable_mask);
+
 	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
 		      rdev->desc->enable_mask, 0);
 
@@ -117,9 +122,9 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 
 	selector = (reg_val & rdev->desc->vsel_mask) >>	(ffs(rdev->desc->vsel_mask) - 1);
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: vsel_reg=0x%x, value=0x%x, entry=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->vsel_reg, reg_val, selector,
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		"vsel_reg=0x%x, value=0x%x, entry=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
+		 rdev->desc->vsel_reg, reg_val, selector,
 		rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage(rdev, selector) / 1000);
 
 	return selector;
@@ -139,15 +144,14 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	reg_val = selector << (ffs(rdev->desc->vsel_mask) - 1);
 
 	/* set voltage selector */
-	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->vsel_reg,
-			     rdev->desc->vsel_mask, reg_val);
-
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: vsel_reg=0x%x, mask=0x%x, value=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
-		 __func__,
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		"vsel_reg=0x%x, mask=0x%x, value=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
 		 rdev->desc->vsel_reg, rdev->desc->vsel_mask, reg_val,
 		 rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage(rdev, selector) / 1000);
 
+	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->vsel_reg,
+			     rdev->desc->vsel_mask, reg_val);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -165,9 +169,9 @@ static unsigned int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	else
 		mode = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, reg_val=0x%x, %s mode\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, reg_val,
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		"enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, reg_val=0x%x, %s mode\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, reg_val,
 		 mode == REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE ? "idle" : "normal");
 
 	return mode;
@@ -192,13 +196,12 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	}
 
 	/* set mode */
+	rdev_dbg(rdev, "enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, value=0x%x\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, val);
+
 	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
 			     sreg->eco_mode_mask, val);
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, value=0x%x\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, val);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -209,10 +212,10 @@ static unsigned int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_optimum_mode(struct regulator_dev
 	struct hi6421v600_regulator *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
 
 	if (load_uA || ((unsigned int)load_uA > sreg->eco_uA)) {
-		dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: normal mode", __func__);
+		rdev_dbg(rdev, "normal mode");
 		return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
 	} else {
-		dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: idle mode", __func__);
+		rdev_dbg(rdev, "idle mode");
 		return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE;
 	}
 }
@@ -373,7 +376,7 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_probe_ldo(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		goto probe_end;
 	}
 
-	dev_dbg(dev, "valid_modes_mask: 0x%x, valid_ops_mask: 0x%x\n",
+	rdev_dbg(rdev, "valid_modes_mask: 0x%x, valid_ops_mask: 0x%x\n",
 		 constraint->valid_modes_mask, constraint->valid_ops_mask);
 
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, rdev);
-- 
2.26.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mauro.chehab@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 35/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: add a driver-specific debug macro
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:56:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cb10b3910e9fa3e52d36e4e416030175cc761ab.1597247164.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1597247164.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>

Using dev_dbg() is not too nice, as, instead of printing the
name of the regulator, it prints "regulator.<number>", making
harder to associate what is happening with each ldo line.

So, add a debug-specific macro, which will print the rdev's
name, just like the regulator core.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
 .../staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c   | 61 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c
index 31b8ff19fd31..5ddaf7f8cacc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/hikey9xx/hi6421v600-regulator.c
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 #include <linux/uaccess.h>
 #include <linux/spmi.h>
 
+#define rdev_dbg(rdev, fmt, arg...)	\
+		 pr_debug("%s: %s: " fmt, rdev->desc->name, __func__, ##arg)
+
 struct hi6421v600_regulator {
 	struct regulator_desc rdesc;
 	struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic;
@@ -60,10 +63,10 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 
 	reg_val = hi6421_spmi_pmic_read(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg);
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: enable_reg=0x%x, val= 0x%x, enable_state=%d\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
-		reg_val, (reg_val & rdev->desc->enable_mask));
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		 "enable_reg=0x%x, val= 0x%x, enable_state=%d\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg,
+		 reg_val, (reg_val & rdev->desc->enable_mask));
 
 	return ((reg_val & rdev->desc->enable_mask) != 0);
 }
@@ -73,21 +76,20 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	struct hi6421v600_regulator *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
 	struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic = sreg->pmic;
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: off_on_delay=%d us\n",
-		__func__, rdev->desc->off_on_delay);
-
 	/* cannot enable more than one regulator at one time */
 	mutex_lock(&enable_mutex);
 	usleep_range(HISI_REGS_ENA_PROTECT_TIME,
 		     HISI_REGS_ENA_PROTECT_TIME + 1000);
 
 	/* set enable register */
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		 "off_on_delay=%d us, enable_reg=0x%x, enable_mask=0x%x\n",
+		 rdev->desc->off_on_delay, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
+		 rdev->desc->enable_mask);
+
 	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
 			     rdev->desc->enable_mask,
 			     rdev->desc->enable_mask);
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: enable_reg=0x%x, enable_mask=0x%x\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
-		 rdev->desc->enable_mask);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&enable_mutex);
 
@@ -100,6 +102,9 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	struct hi6421_spmi_pmic *pmic = sreg->pmic;
 
 	/* set enable register to 0 */
+	rdev_dbg(rdev, "enable_reg=0x%x, enable_mask=0x%x\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg, rdev->desc->enable_mask);
+
 	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
 		      rdev->desc->enable_mask, 0);
 
@@ -117,9 +122,9 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 
 	selector = (reg_val & rdev->desc->vsel_mask) >>	(ffs(rdev->desc->vsel_mask) - 1);
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: vsel_reg=0x%x, value=0x%x, entry=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->vsel_reg, reg_val, selector,
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		"vsel_reg=0x%x, value=0x%x, entry=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
+		 rdev->desc->vsel_reg, reg_val, selector,
 		rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage(rdev, selector) / 1000);
 
 	return selector;
@@ -139,15 +144,14 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	reg_val = selector << (ffs(rdev->desc->vsel_mask) - 1);
 
 	/* set voltage selector */
-	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->vsel_reg,
-			     rdev->desc->vsel_mask, reg_val);
-
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: vsel_reg=0x%x, mask=0x%x, value=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
-		 __func__,
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		"vsel_reg=0x%x, mask=0x%x, value=0x%x, voltage=%d mV\n",
 		 rdev->desc->vsel_reg, rdev->desc->vsel_mask, reg_val,
 		 rdev->desc->ops->list_voltage(rdev, selector) / 1000);
 
+	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->vsel_reg,
+			     rdev->desc->vsel_mask, reg_val);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -165,9 +169,9 @@ static unsigned int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	else
 		mode = REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, reg_val=0x%x, %s mode\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, reg_val,
+	rdev_dbg(rdev,
+		"enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, reg_val=0x%x, %s mode\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, reg_val,
 		 mode == REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE ? "idle" : "normal");
 
 	return mode;
@@ -192,13 +196,12 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_set_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 	}
 
 	/* set mode */
+	rdev_dbg(rdev, "enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, value=0x%x\n",
+		 rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, val);
+
 	hi6421_spmi_pmic_rmw(pmic, rdev->desc->enable_reg,
 			     sreg->eco_mode_mask, val);
 
-	dev_dbg(&rdev->dev,
-		"%s: enable_reg=0x%x, eco_mode_mask=0x%x, value=0x%x\n",
-		 __func__, rdev->desc->enable_reg, sreg->eco_mode_mask, val);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -209,10 +212,10 @@ static unsigned int hi6421_spmi_regulator_get_optimum_mode(struct regulator_dev
 	struct hi6421v600_regulator *sreg = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
 
 	if (load_uA || ((unsigned int)load_uA > sreg->eco_uA)) {
-		dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: normal mode", __func__);
+		rdev_dbg(rdev, "normal mode");
 		return REGULATOR_MODE_NORMAL;
 	} else {
-		dev_dbg(&rdev->dev, "%s: idle mode", __func__);
+		rdev_dbg(rdev, "idle mode");
 		return REGULATOR_MODE_IDLE;
 	}
 }
@@ -373,7 +376,7 @@ static int hi6421_spmi_regulator_probe_ldo(struct platform_device *pdev,
 		goto probe_end;
 	}
 
-	dev_dbg(dev, "valid_modes_mask: 0x%x, valid_ops_mask: 0x%x\n",
+	rdev_dbg(rdev, "valid_modes_mask: 0x%x, valid_ops_mask: 0x%x\n",
 		 constraint->valid_modes_mask, constraint->valid_ops_mask);
 
 	dev_set_drvdata(dev, rdev);
-- 
2.26.2

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12 15:56 [PATCH 00/44] SPMI patches needed by Hikey 970 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 01/44] staging: spmi: add Hikey 970 SPMI controller driver Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 16:28   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-12 16:28     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-08-12 18:59     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 18:59       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 02/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: coding style fixup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 03/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: fix it to probe successfully Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 04/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: fix a typo Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 05/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: adjust whitespaces at defines Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 06/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: use le32 macros where needed Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 16:21   ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 16:21     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 19:02     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 19:02       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 07/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: add debug when values are read/write Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 08/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: fix the dev_foo() logic Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 09/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: add it to the building system Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 10/44] staging: spmi: hisi-spmi-controller: do some code cleanups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 16:17   ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 16:17     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 11/44] staging: mfd: add a PMIC driver for HiSilicon 6421 SPMI version Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 12/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: get rid of unused code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 13/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: deal with non-static functions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 14/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: get rid of the static vars Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 15/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup hi6421-spmi-pmic.h header Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 16/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: change the binding logic Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 17/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: get rid of unused OF properties Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 18/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 19/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: change namespace on its functions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 20/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: fix some coding style issues Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 16:12   ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 16:12     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 21/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: add it to the building system Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 22/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: cleanup the code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 23/44] staging: regulator: add a regulator driver for HiSilicon 6421v600 SPMI PMIC Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 24/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: get rid of unused code Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 25/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: port it to upstream Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 26/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: coding style fixups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 27/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: change the binding logic Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 28/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: cleanup struct hisi_regulator Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 29/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: cleanup debug messages Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 30/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: use shorter names for OF properties Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 31/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: better handle modes Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 32/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: change namespace Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 33/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: convert to use get/set voltage_sel Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 34/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: don't use usleep_range for off_on_delay Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2020-08-12 15:56   ` [PATCH 35/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: add a driver-specific debug macro Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 16:10   ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 16:10     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-13 10:10     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-13 10:10       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-13 15:07       ` Joe Perches
2020-08-13 15:07         ` Joe Perches
2020-08-14  4:01       ` [PATCH] media: debugging logging cleanup Joe Perches
2020-08-14  4:01         ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 36/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: initialize ramp_delay Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 37/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: cleanup DT settings Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 38/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: fix some coding style issues Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 39/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: add it to the building system Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 40/44] staging: regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: code cleanup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 41/44] staging: hikey9xx: add a TODO list Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 42/44] MAINTAINERS: add an entry for HiSilicon 6421v600 drivers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 43/44] dt: document HiSilicon SPMI controller and mfd/regulator properties Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-14 20:17   ` Rob Herring
2020-08-15  9:55     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-17 14:13       ` Rob Herring
2020-08-12 15:56 ` [PATCH 44/44] dt: hisilicon: add support for the PMIC found on Hikey 970 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 15:56   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 17:13 ` [PATCH 00/44] SPMI patches needed by " Joe Perches
2020-08-12 17:13   ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 17:13   ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 18:47   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 18:47     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 18:47     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 18:58     ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 18:58       ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 18:58       ` Joe Perches
2020-08-12 19:07       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 19:07         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-12 19:07         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-13  7:58 ` Lee Jones
2020-08-13  7:58   ` Lee Jones
2020-08-13  7:58   ` Lee Jones
2020-08-13  9:58   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-13  9:58     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-08-13  9:58     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7cb10b3910e9fa3e52d36e4e416030175cc761ab.1597247164.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mauro.chehab@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.