All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [LTP] [PATCH] [1/6] syscalls/sysfs: Convert sysfs01 to the new API
@ 2021-08-04  6:07 sujiaxun
  2021-08-05 11:54 ` Cyril Hrubis
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: sujiaxun @ 2021-08-04  6:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Signed-off-by: sujiaxun <sujiaxun@uniontech.com>
---
 testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c | 124 +++-------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c
index 85052dc2b..086d4a048 100644
--- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c
+++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/sysfs01.c
@@ -1,129 +1,37 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
 /*
  * Copyright (c) Wipro Technologies Ltd, 2002.  All Rights Reserved.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
- * under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public License as
- * published by the Free Software Foundation.
- *
- * This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, but
- * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
- * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
- *
- * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
- * with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
- * 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
- *
  */
-/**************************************************************************
- *
- *    TEST IDENTIFIER	: sysfs01
- *
- *    EXECUTED BY	: anyone
- *
- *    TEST TITLE	: Basic test for sysfs(2)
- *
- *    TEST CASE TOTAL	: 1
- *
- *    AUTHOR		: Aniruddha Marathe <aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com>
- *
- *    SIGNALS
- *	Uses SIGUSR1 to pause before test if option set.
- *	(See the parse_opts(3) man page).
- *
- *    DESCRIPTION
- *    This is a Phase I test for the sysfs(2) system call.
- *    This test is carried out for option 1 for sysfs(2).
- *    It is intended to provide a limited exposure of the system call.
- *
- *
- *	Setup:
- *	  Setup signal handling.
- *	  Pause for SIGUSR1 if option specified.
- *
- *	Test:
- *	 Loop if the proper options are given.
- *	  Execute system call
- *	  Check return code, if system call failed (return=-1)
- *		Log the errno and Issue a FAIL message.
- *	  Otherwise, Issue a PASS message.
- *
- *	Cleanup:
- *	  Print errno log and/or timing stats if options given
- *
- * USAGE:  <for command-line>
- * sysfs01 [-c n]  [-e] [-i n] [-I x] [-p x] [-t] [-h] [-f] [-p]
- *  where:
- *	-c n : run n copies simultaneously.
- *	-e   : Turn on errno logging.
- *	-i n : Execute test n times.
- *	-I x : Execute test for x seconds.
- *	-p   : Pause for SIGUSR1 before starting
- *	-P x : Pause for x seconds between iterations.
- *	-t   : Turn on syscall timing.
+
+/*\
+ * [DESCRIPTION]
  *
- *RESTRICTIONS:
- *There is no glibc or libc support
- *Kernel should be compiled with proc filesystem support
- ******************************************************************************/
+ *This testcase tests sysfs(2) for option 1
+ */

 #include <errno.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <sys/syscall.h>
-#include "test.h"
+#include "tst_test.h"
 #include "lapi/syscalls.h"

-static void setup();
-static void cleanup();

-char *TCID = "sysfs01";
-int TST_TOTAL = 1;
-
-int main(int ac, char **av)
+static void verify_sysfs01(void)
 {
-	int lc;
-
-	tst_parse_opts(ac, av, NULL, NULL);
-
-	setup();
-
-	for (lc = 0; TEST_LOOPING(lc); lc++) {
-
-		tst_count = 0;

 		/* option 1, buf holds fs name */
-		TEST(ltp_syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"));
+		TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"));

 		/* check return code */
-		if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
-			tst_resm(TFAIL, "sysfs(2) Failed for "
-				 "option 1 and set errno to %d", TEST_ERRNO);
+		if (TST_RET == -1) {
+			tst_res(TFAIL, "sysfs(2) Failed for "
+				 "option 1 and set errno to %d", TST_ERR);
 		} else {
-			tst_resm(TPASS, "sysfs(2) Passed for " "option 1");
+			tst_res(TPASS, "sysfs(2) Passed for " "option 1");
 		}
-	}			/*End of TEST_LOOPING */
-
-	/*Clean up and exit */
-	cleanup();
-	tst_exit();
-
-}
-
-/* setup() - performs all ONE TIME setup for this test */
-void setup(void)
-{
-
-	tst_sig(NOFORK, DEF_HANDLER, cleanup);
-
-	TEST_PAUSE;

 }

-/*
- * cleanup() - Performs one time cleanup for this test at
- * completion or premature exit
- */
-
-void cleanup(void)
-{
-
-}
+static struct tst_test test = {
+	.test_all = verify_sysfs01,
+};
--
2.20.1




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] [1/6] syscalls/sysfs: Convert sysfs01 to the new API
  2021-08-04  6:07 [LTP] [PATCH] [1/6] syscalls/sysfs: Convert sysfs01 to the new API sujiaxun
@ 2021-08-05 11:54 ` Cyril Hrubis
  2021-08-06  1:22   ` sujiaxun
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cyril Hrubis @ 2021-08-05 11:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Hi!
> +		TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"));
> 
>  		/* check return code */
> -		if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "sysfs(2) Failed for "
> -				 "option 1 and set errno to %d", TEST_ERRNO);
> +		if (TST_RET == -1) {
> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "sysfs(2) Failed for "
> +				 "option 1 and set errno to %d", TST_ERR);
>  		} else {
> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "sysfs(2) Passed for " "option 1");
> +			tst_res(TPASS, "sysfs(2) Passed for " "option 1");
>  		}

This could be just:

	TST_EXP_POSSITIVE(tst_syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"),
	                  "sysfs(1, "proc")");

-- 
Cyril Hrubis
chrubis@suse.cz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [LTP] [PATCH] [1/6] syscalls/sysfs: Convert sysfs01 to the new API
  2021-08-05 11:54 ` Cyril Hrubis
@ 2021-08-06  1:22   ` sujiaxun
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: sujiaxun @ 2021-08-06  1:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ltp

Okay, thank you for your meticulous guidance, I will revise and submit 
it again according to your suggestions.

? 2021/8/5 ??7:54, Cyril Hrubis ??:
> Hi!
>> +		TEST(tst_syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"));
>>
>>   		/* check return code */
>> -		if (TEST_RETURN == -1) {
>> -			tst_resm(TFAIL, "sysfs(2) Failed for "
>> -				 "option 1 and set errno to %d", TEST_ERRNO);
>> +		if (TST_RET == -1) {
>> +			tst_res(TFAIL, "sysfs(2) Failed for "
>> +				 "option 1 and set errno to %d", TST_ERR);
>>   		} else {
>> -			tst_resm(TPASS, "sysfs(2) Passed for " "option 1");
>> +			tst_res(TPASS, "sysfs(2) Passed for " "option 1");
>>   		}
> 
> This could be just:
> 
> 	TST_EXP_POSSITIVE(tst_syscall(__NR_sysfs, 1, "proc"),
> 	                  "sysfs(1, "proc")");
> 

-- 
Kind regards,

sujiaxun



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-08-06  1:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-04  6:07 [LTP] [PATCH] [1/6] syscalls/sysfs: Convert sysfs01 to the new API sujiaxun
2021-08-05 11:54 ` Cyril Hrubis
2021-08-06  1:22   ` sujiaxun

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.