All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:41:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com>

>> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests
>> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for.
> 
> That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction.

>From which places did you get this impression?


> You've gotten _many_ replies to your patches

I got the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance for
my selection of change possibilities.
Some constructive feedback was also provided which might need
further software development considerations.
Is the situation improvable here?


> to which you have seemingly decided to ignore.

You might eventually notice that I react to special information
occasionally with a big delay.

For which concrete details are you still waiting for a better
response from me?

Regards,
Markus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:41:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com>

>> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests
>> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for.
> 
> That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction.

From which places did you get this impression?


> You've gotten _many_ replies to your patches

I got the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance for
my selection of change possibilities.
Some constructive feedback was also provided which might need
further software development considerations.
Is the situation improvable here?


> to which you have seemingly decided to ignore.

You might eventually notice that I react to special information
occasionally with a big delay.

For which concrete details are you still waiting for a better
response from me?

Regards,
Markus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
	Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:41:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com>

>> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests
>> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for.
> 
> That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction.

From which places did you get this impression?


> You've gotten _many_ replies to your patches

I got the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance for
my selection of change possibilities.
Some constructive feedback was also provided which might need
further software development considerations.
Is the situation improvable here?


> to which you have seemingly decided to ignore.

You might eventually notice that I react to special information
occasionally with a big delay.

For which concrete details are you still waiting for a better
response from me?

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-28  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-26 18:55 [PATCH] omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-26 18:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-26 18:55 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 16:43 ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-11-27 16:43   ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-11-27 16:43   ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-11-27 17:27   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 17:27     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 17:27     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 17:44     ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 17:44       ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 17:44       ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 18:12       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 18:12         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 18:12         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 18:56         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-11-27 18:56           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-11-27 18:56           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-11-27 19:22         ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 19:22           ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 22:20           ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 22:20             ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 19:07   ` [PATCH] " Joe Perches
2017-11-27 19:07     ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 21:33     ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-11-27 21:33       ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-11-27 21:33       ` Andrew F. Davis
2017-11-27 21:45       ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 21:45         ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-27 21:48     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 21:48       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 21:48       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-27 21:48       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  1:45       ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28  1:45         ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28  1:45         ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28  7:41         ` SF Markus Elfring [this message]
2017-11-28  7:41           ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  7:41           ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  7:49           ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  7:49             ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  8:49             ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  8:49               ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  9:26               ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  9:26                 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  9:26                 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  9:56                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  9:56                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  9:56                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  8:04           ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28  8:04             ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28  8:49             ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28  8:49               ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28  9:11             ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  9:11               ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  9:11               ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28  9:28               ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  9:28                 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28  9:28                 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-28 10:15                 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 10:15                   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 10:23                   ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28 10:23                     ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28 10:50                     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 10:50                       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 10:50                       ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 11:41                       ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28 11:41                         ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28 12:13                         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 12:13                           ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 12:13                           ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 17:50                           ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28 17:50                             ` Ladislav Michl
2017-11-28 18:09                             ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 18:09                               ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 18:09                               ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-28 14:36                     ` Joe Perches
2017-11-28 14:36                       ` Joe Perches
2017-12-03 18:20             ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-12-03 18:20               ` SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net \
    --to=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.