From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Cc: <ezequiel@collabora.com>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <mchehab@kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: hantro: Fix PM reference leak in device_run() Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:35:47 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7ee3a948-8249-9f07-82ba-6d347037e50f@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YKInrIMZYGI1VKdl@hovoldconsulting.com> On 2021/05/17 16:22, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:15:16PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed. >> Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here. >> Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage >> counter balanced. >> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c >> index eea2009fa17b..7a6d3ef22096 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c >> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void device_run(void *priv) >> src = hantro_get_src_buf(ctx); >> dst = hantro_get_dst_buf(ctx); >> >> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctx->dev->dev); >> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ctx->dev->dev); >> if (ret < 0) { >> pm_runtime_put_noidle(ctx->dev->dev); > > This is clearly broken as there is no PM usage count leak here. > > Please try to understand the code you're changing before submitting any > more patches based on "robot" feedback. Hi, Sorry about the mistake, and thank you very much for your explanation Yu Kuai > >> goto err_cancel_job; > > Johan > . >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com> To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Cc: <ezequiel@collabora.com>, <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <mchehab@kernel.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-staging@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: hantro: Fix PM reference leak in device_run() Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:35:47 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <7ee3a948-8249-9f07-82ba-6d347037e50f@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YKInrIMZYGI1VKdl@hovoldconsulting.com> On 2021/05/17 16:22, Johan Hovold wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:15:16PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >> pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed. >> Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here. >> Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage >> counter balanced. >> >> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> >> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com> >> --- >> drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c >> index eea2009fa17b..7a6d3ef22096 100644 >> --- a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_drv.c >> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void device_run(void *priv) >> src = hantro_get_src_buf(ctx); >> dst = hantro_get_dst_buf(ctx); >> >> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctx->dev->dev); >> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ctx->dev->dev); >> if (ret < 0) { >> pm_runtime_put_noidle(ctx->dev->dev); > > This is clearly broken as there is no PM usage count leak here. > > Please try to understand the code you're changing before submitting any > more patches based on "robot" feedback. Hi, Sorry about the mistake, and thank you very much for your explanation Yu Kuai > >> goto err_cancel_job; > > Johan > . > _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 12:35 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-05-17 8:15 [PATCH] media: hantro: Fix PM reference leak in device_run() Yu Kuai 2021-05-17 8:15 ` Yu Kuai 2021-05-17 8:22 ` Johan Hovold 2021-05-17 8:22 ` Johan Hovold 2021-05-17 12:35 ` yukuai (C) [this message] 2021-05-17 12:35 ` yukuai (C)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=7ee3a948-8249-9f07-82ba-6d347037e50f@huawei.com \ --to=yukuai3@huawei.com \ --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=johan@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \ --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \ --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \ --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.