[PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

During the review of my MT8365 support patchset
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/),
the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up.

This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and
doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers
simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to
true).

There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects
using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the
flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere).

There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application
relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on
any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other
chipsets use numbered pins).

This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered.

[PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

During the review of my MT8365 support patchset
(https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/),
the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up.

This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and
doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers
simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to
true).

There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects
using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the
flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere).

There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application
relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on
any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other
chipsets use numbered pins).

This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered.



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
index 076ae0b38e3d7..553d16703475b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
@@ -1057,7 +1057,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
 	struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl;
 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
-	struct property *prop;
 	int ret, i;
 
 	pctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1066,11 +1065,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
 
-	prop = of_find_property(np, "pins-are-numbered", NULL);
-	if (!prop)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
-				     "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
-
 	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "mediatek,pctl-regmap", 0);
 	if (node) {
 		pctl->regmap1 = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
index 076ae0b38e3d7..553d16703475b 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
@@ -1057,7 +1057,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
 	struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl;
 	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
-	struct property *prop;
 	int ret, i;
 
 	pctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -1066,11 +1065,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
 
-	prop = of_find_property(np, "pins-are-numbered", NULL);
-	if (!prop)
-		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
-				     "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
-
 	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "mediatek,pctl-regmap", 0);
 	if (node) {
 		pctl->regmap1 = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered
DeviceTree property

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
index cc9472b284047..1cddca506ad7e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
@@ -1499,11 +1499,6 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!match_data)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!device_property_present(dev, "pins-are-numbered")) {
-		dev_err(dev, "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	pctl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pctl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered
DeviceTree property

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
index cc9472b284047..1cddca506ad7e 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
@@ -1499,11 +1499,6 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!match_data)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (!device_property_present(dev, "pins-are-numbered")) {
-		dev_err(dev, "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
 	pctl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pctl)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml     | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
index 33b5f79e741ab..cca9cc58a6934 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ properties:
 
 required:
   - compatible
-  - pins-are-numbered
   - gpio-controller
   - "#gpio-cells"
 
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml     | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
index 33b5f79e741ab..cca9cc58a6934 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@ properties:
 
 required:
   - compatible
-  - pins-are-numbered
   - gpio-controller
   - "#gpio-cells"
 
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: Don't list pins-are-numbered as required

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
index 9d59208d83c18..7c08d362132a4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -206,7 +206,6 @@ required:
   - '#address-cells'
   - '#size-cells'
   - ranges
-  - pins-are-numbered
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: Don't list pins-are-numbered as required

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
index 9d59208d83c18..7c08d362132a4 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -206,7 +206,6 @@ required:
   - '#address-cells'
   - '#size-cells'
   - ranges
-  - pins-are-numbered
 
 additionalProperties: false
 
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
arm64 Mediatek DeviceTrees

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi    | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi     | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi     | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi     | 1 -
 5 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
index 9dc0794fcd2e6..ace8e751c8ea4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
@@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 		mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-		pins-are-numbered;
 		gpio-controller;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi
index fbe1a1128cc6a..6a54315cf6502 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
index e21feb85d822b..18e214464a2d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
@@ -929,7 +929,6 @@ clock: mt6397clock {
 
 		pio6397: pinctrl {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-pinctrl";
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
index 7640b5158ff9d..c47d7d900f283 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
@@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi
index d1b67c82d7617..118025263a29b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi
@@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8516-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
arm64 Mediatek DeviceTrees

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi    | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi     | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi     | 1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi     | 1 -
 5 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
index 9dc0794fcd2e6..ace8e751c8ea4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt2712e.dtsi
@@ -270,7 +270,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 		mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-		pins-are-numbered;
 		gpio-controller;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi
index fbe1a1128cc6a..6a54315cf6502 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8167.dtsi
@@ -117,7 +117,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
index e21feb85d822b..18e214464a2d3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtsi
@@ -929,7 +929,6 @@ clock: mt6397clock {
 
 		pio6397: pinctrl {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-pinctrl";
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
index 7640b5158ff9d..c47d7d900f283 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi
@@ -375,7 +375,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi
index d1b67c82d7617..118025263a29b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8516.dtsi
@@ -229,7 +229,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8516-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
Mediatek ARM DeviceTrees

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi | 1 -
 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
index b8eba3ba153c2..0a0fe8c5a4059 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 		mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-		pins-are-numbered;
 		gpio-controller;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
index 25d31e40a5535..11379c3e6b4ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
@@ -253,7 +253,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 		mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-		pins-are-numbered;
 		gpio-controller;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi
index a031b36363187..0f291ad22d3af 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a &syscfg_pctl_b>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
Mediatek ARM DeviceTrees

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi | 1 -
 3 files changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
index b8eba3ba153c2..0a0fe8c5a4059 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi
@@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@1000b000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 		mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-		pins-are-numbered;
 		gpio-controller;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
index 25d31e40a5535..11379c3e6b4ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623.dtsi
@@ -253,7 +253,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
 		compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-pinctrl";
 		reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 		mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>;
-		pins-are-numbered;
 		gpio-controller;
 		#gpio-cells = <2>;
 		interrupt-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi
index a031b36363187..0f291ad22d3af 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/mt8135.dtsi
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@ pio: pinctrl@10005000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-pinctrl";
 			reg = <0 0x1000b000 0 0x1000>;
 			mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a &syscfg_pctl_b>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			gpio-controller;
 			#gpio-cells = <2>;
 			interrupt-controller;
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: Remove the pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the pins-are-numbered property from STM32 DeviceTrees

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi       | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi      | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi      | 2 --
 5 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
index 500bcc302d422..4523c63475e4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@40020000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x40020000 0x3000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@40020000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi
index 8f37aefa73150..c8e6c52fb248e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@40020000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x40020000 0x3000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@40020000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
index 28e3deb20e1e1..f30796f7adf36 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
@@ -588,7 +588,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@58020000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x58020000 0x3000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@58020000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi
index 2a9b3a5bba830..adaee0f9e1263 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi
@@ -549,7 +549,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@50002000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x50002000 0x8400>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&exti 0x60 0xff>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@50002000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
index 5491b6c4dec20..4e437d3f2ed66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
@@ -1660,7 +1660,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@50002000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x50002000 0xa400>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&exti 0x60 0xff>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@50002000 {
 				gpio-controller;
@@ -1789,7 +1788,6 @@ pinctrl_z: pinctrl@54004000 {
 			#size-cells = <1>;
 			compatible = "st,stm32mp157-z-pinctrl";
 			ranges = <0 0x54004000 0x400>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&exti 0x60 0xff>;
 
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: stm32: Remove the pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the pins-are-numbered property from STM32 DeviceTrees

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi       | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi      | 1 -
 arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi      | 2 --
 5 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
index 500bcc302d422..4523c63475e4c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f4-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@40020000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x40020000 0x3000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@40020000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi
index 8f37aefa73150..c8e6c52fb248e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32f7-pinctrl.dtsi
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@40020000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x40020000 0x3000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@40020000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
index 28e3deb20e1e1..f30796f7adf36 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32h743.dtsi
@@ -588,7 +588,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@58020000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x58020000 0x3000>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&syscfg 0x8>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@58020000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi
index 2a9b3a5bba830..adaee0f9e1263 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp131.dtsi
@@ -549,7 +549,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@50002000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x50002000 0x8400>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&exti 0x60 0xff>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@50002000 {
 				gpio-controller;
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
index 5491b6c4dec20..4e437d3f2ed66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
@@ -1660,7 +1660,6 @@ pinctrl: pinctrl@50002000 {
 			ranges = <0 0x50002000 0xa400>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&exti 0x60 0xff>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 
 			gpioa: gpio@50002000 {
 				gpio-controller;
@@ -1789,7 +1788,6 @@ pinctrl_z: pinctrl@54004000 {
 			#size-cells = <1>;
 			compatible = "st,stm32mp157-z-pinctrl";
 			ranges = <0 0x54004000 0x400>;
-			pins-are-numbered;
 			interrupt-parent = <&exti>;
 			st,syscfg = <&exti 0x60 0xff>;
 
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Drop the pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Drop the pins-are-numbered property from the Mediatek MT65xx DeviceTree
schema

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 .../bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml           | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
index cca9cc58a6934..cb450da49e6e9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -28,11 +28,6 @@ properties:
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
 
-  pins-are-numbered:
-    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
-    description: |
-      Specify the subnodes are using numbered pinmux to specify pins.
-
   gpio-controller: true
 
   "#gpio-cells":
@@ -149,7 +144,6 @@ examples:
           compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-pinctrl";
           reg = <0 0x1000B000 0 0x1000>;
           mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>, <&syscfg_pctl_b>;
-          pins-are-numbered;
           gpio-controller;
           #gpio-cells = <2>;
           interrupt-controller;
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Drop the pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Drop the pins-are-numbered property from the Mediatek MT65xx DeviceTree
schema

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 .../bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml           | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
index cca9cc58a6934..cb450da49e6e9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -28,11 +28,6 @@ properties:
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
 
-  pins-are-numbered:
-    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
-    description: |
-      Specify the subnodes are using numbered pinmux to specify pins.
-
   gpio-controller: true
 
   "#gpio-cells":
@@ -149,7 +144,6 @@ examples:
           compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-pinctrl";
           reg = <0 0x1000B000 0 0x1000>;
           mediatek,pctl-regmap = <&syscfg_pctl_a>, <&syscfg_pctl_b>;
-          pins-are-numbered;
           gpio-controller;
           #gpio-cells = <2>;
           interrupt-controller;
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 9/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: Remove the pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the pins-are-numbered property from the STM32 DeviceTree schema

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml          | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
index 7c08d362132a4..dc111122ff5d2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ properties:
     const: 1
 
   ranges: true
-  pins-are-numbered: true
   hwlocks: true
 
   interrupts:
@@ -219,7 +218,6 @@ examples:
               #size-cells = <1>;
               compatible = "st,stm32f429-pinctrl";
               ranges = <0 0x40020000 0x3000>;
-              pins-are-numbered;
 
               gpioa: gpio@0 {
                       gpio-controller;
@@ -237,7 +235,6 @@ examples:
               #size-cells = <1>;
               compatible = "st,stm32f429-pinctrl";
               ranges = <0 0x50020000 0x3000>;
-              pins-are-numbered;
 
               gpiob: gpio@1000 {
                       gpio-controller;
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 9/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: st,stm32: Remove the pins-are-numbered property

[Bernhard Rosenkränzer]

Remove the pins-are-numbered property from the STM32 DeviceTree schema

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml          | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
index 7c08d362132a4..dc111122ff5d2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/st,stm32-pinctrl.yaml
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ properties:
     const: 1
 
   ranges: true
-  pins-are-numbered: true
   hwlocks: true
 
   interrupts:
@@ -219,7 +218,6 @@ examples:
               #size-cells = <1>;
               compatible = "st,stm32f429-pinctrl";
               ranges = <0 0x40020000 0x3000>;
-              pins-are-numbered;
 
               gpioa: gpio@0 {
                       gpio-controller;
@@ -237,7 +235,6 @@ examples:
               #size-cells = <1>;
               compatible = "st,stm32f429-pinctrl";
               ranges = <0 0x50020000 0x3000>;
-              pins-are-numbered;
 
               gpiob: gpio@1000 {
                       gpio-controller;
-- 
2.38.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---

And how about making them deprecated? (deprecated: true)

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---

And how about making them deprecated? (deprecated: true)

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 21/11/22 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer ha scritto:
> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> arm64 Mediatek DeviceTrees
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 21/11/22 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer ha scritto:
> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> arm64 Mediatek DeviceTrees
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 21/11/22 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer ha scritto:
> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> Mediatek ARM DeviceTrees
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 21/11/22 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer ha scritto:
> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> Mediatek ARM DeviceTrees
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 21/11/22 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer ha scritto:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 21/11/22 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer ha scritto:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[Matthias Brugger]

Hi Bernhard,

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> During the review of my MT8365 support patchset
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/),
> the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up.
> 
> This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and
> doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers
> simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to
> true).
> 
> There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects
> using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the
> flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere).
> 
> There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application
> relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on
> any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other
> chipsets use numbered pins).
> 
> This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered.
> 
> 

My personal preference is to add a summary of the files touched by the series in 
the cover letter (the tools will do that for you). This allows maintainers to 
easier understand if they have to look deeper into the series or can ignore it.

No need to send again, just saying for the future.

Regards,
Matthias

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[Matthias Brugger]

Hi Bernhard,

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> During the review of my MT8365 support patchset
> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/),
> the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up.
> 
> This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and
> doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers
> simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to
> true).
> 
> There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects
> using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the
> flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere).
> 
> There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application
> relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on
> any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other
> chipsets use numbered pins).
> 
> This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered.
> 
> 

My personal preference is to add a summary of the files touched by the series in 
the cover letter (the tools will do that for you). This allows maintainers to 
easier understand if they have to look deeper into the series or can ignore it.

No need to send again, just saying for the future.

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 09:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
>> Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
>> ---
> 
> And how about making them deprecated? (deprecated: true)
> 

I think that's we want to do.

Regards,
Matthias

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 09:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
>> Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
>> ---
> 
> And how about making them deprecated? (deprecated: true)
> 

I think that's we want to do.

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>

> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------
>   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
> index 076ae0b38e3d7..553d16703475b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
> @@ -1057,7 +1057,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
>   	struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl;
>   	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
> -	struct property *prop;
>   	int ret, i;
>   
>   	pctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1066,11 +1065,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
>   
> -	prop = of_find_property(np, "pins-are-numbered", NULL);
> -	if (!prop)
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> -				     "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
> -
>   	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "mediatek,pctl-regmap", 0);
>   	if (node) {
>   		pctl->regmap1 = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>

> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------
>   1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
> index 076ae0b38e3d7..553d16703475b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c
> @@ -1057,7 +1057,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   	struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pins;
>   	struct mtk_pinctrl *pctl;
>   	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
> -	struct property *prop;
>   	int ret, i;
>   
>   	pctl = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1066,11 +1065,6 @@ int mtk_pctrl_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>   
>   	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pctl);
>   
> -	prop = of_find_property(np, "pins-are-numbered", NULL);
> -	if (!prop)
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> -				     "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
> -
>   	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "mediatek,pctl-regmap", 0);
>   	if (node) {
>   		pctl->regmap1 = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered
> DeviceTree property
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>


Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>


> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 5 -----
>   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> index cc9472b284047..1cddca506ad7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -1499,11 +1499,6 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!match_data)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (!device_property_present(dev, "pins-are-numbered")) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>   	pctl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!pctl)
>   		return -ENOMEM;

Re: [PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered
> DeviceTree property
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>


Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>


> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c | 5 -----
>   1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> index cc9472b284047..1cddca506ad7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c
> @@ -1499,11 +1499,6 @@ int stm32_pctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	if (!match_data)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   
> -	if (!device_property_present(dev, "pins-are-numbered")) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "only support pins-are-numbered format\n");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> -
>   	pctl = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pctl), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (!pctl)
>   		return -ENOMEM;

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 

FWIW:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 

FWIW:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered
> DeviceTree property
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---

FWIW:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: stm32: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered
> DeviceTree property
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---

FWIW:

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 13:32, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/11/2022 09:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
>>> Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> And how about making them deprecated? (deprecated: true)
>>
> 
> I think that's we want to do.
> 

Also squash 8/9 into this patch.
Same comments holds for 4/9.

Regards,
Matthias

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Make pins-are-numbered optional

[Matthias Brugger]

On 21/11/2022 13:32, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21/11/2022 09:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
>>> Don't list the pins-are-numbered property as required
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> And how about making them deprecated? (deprecated: true)
>>
> 
> I think that's we want to do.
> 

Also squash 8/9 into this patch.
Same comments holds for 4/9.

Regards,
Matthias

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Drop the pins-are-numbered property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Drop the pins-are-numbered property from the Mediatek MT65xx DeviceTree
> schema
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml           | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
> index cca9cc58a6934..cb450da49e6e9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -28,11 +28,6 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> -  pins-are-numbered:
> -    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> -    description: |
> -      Specify the subnodes are using numbered pinmux to specify pins.

Oh, I missed that patch. There is no need to split it. Squash it with
your first and rather mark it as "deprecated: true"

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt65xx: Drop the pins-are-numbered property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
> Drop the pins-are-numbered property from the Mediatek MT65xx DeviceTree
> schema
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml           | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
> index cca9cc58a6934..cb450da49e6e9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt65xx-pinctrl.yaml
> @@ -28,11 +28,6 @@ properties:
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> -  pins-are-numbered:
> -    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> -    description: |
> -      Specify the subnodes are using numbered pinmux to specify pins.

Oh, I missed that patch. There is no need to split it. Squash it with
your first and rather mark it as "deprecated: true"

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 13:31, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
> 
> On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
>> During the review of my MT8365 support patchset
>> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/),
>> the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up.
>>
>> This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and
>> doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers
>> simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to
>> true).
>>
>> There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects
>> using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the
>> flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere).
>>
>> There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application
>> relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on
>> any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other
>> chipsets use numbered pins).
>>
>> This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered.
>>
>>
> 
> My personal preference is to add a summary of the files touched by the series in 
> the cover letter (the tools will do that for you). This allows maintainers to 
> easier understand if they have to look deeper into the series or can ignore it.
> 
> No need to send again, just saying for the future.

Yep. And git format-patch does it automatically in both common cases -
writing cover letter manually or taking it from branch description
(which is absolutely cool, IMHO).

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 0/9] Remove the pins-are-numbered DT property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 21/11/2022 13:31, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Hi Bernhard,
> 
> On 21/11/2022 02:54, Bernhard Rosenkränzer wrote:
>> During the review of my MT8365 support patchset
>> (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mediatek/20221117210356.3178578-1-bero@baylibre.com/),
>> the issue of the "pins-are-numbered" DeviceTree property has come up.
>>
>> This property is unique to Mediatek MT65xx and STM32 pinctrls, and
>> doesn't seem to serve any purpose (both the Mediatek and STM32 drivers
>> simply refuse to deal with a device unless pins-are-numbered is set to
>> true).
>>
>> There is no other use of this property in the kernel or in other projects
>> using DeviceTrees (checked u-boot and FreeBSD -- in both of those, the
>> flag is present in Mediatek and STM devicetrees, but not used anywhere).
>>
>> There is also no known use in userspace (in fact, a userland application
>> relying on the property would be broken because it would get true on
>> any Mediatek or STM chipset and false on all others, even though other
>> chipsets use numbered pins).
>>
>> This patchset removes all uses of pins-are-numbered.
>>
>>
> 
> My personal preference is to add a summary of the files touched by the series in 
> the cover letter (the tools will do that for you). This allows maintainers to 
> easier understand if they have to look deeper into the series or can ignore it.
> 
> No need to send again, just saying for the future.

Yep. And git format-patch does it automatically in both common cases -
writing cover letter manually or taking it from branch description
(which is absolutely cool, IMHO).

Best regards,
Krzysztof


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Kevin Hilman]

Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com> writes:

> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

Re: [PATCH 1/9] pinctrl: mediatek: common: Remove check for pins-are-numbered

[Kevin Hilman]

Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com> writes:

> Remove the check for the unnecessary pins-are-numbered Devicetree property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Kevin Hilman]

Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com> writes:

> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> arm64 Mediatek DeviceTrees
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

Re: [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Kevin Hilman]

Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com> writes:

> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> arm64 Mediatek DeviceTrees
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Kevin Hilman]

Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com> writes:

> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> Mediatek ARM DeviceTrees
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: mediatek: Remove pins-are-numbered property

[Kevin Hilman]

Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com> writes:

> Remove the unnecessary pins-are-numbered property from
> Mediatek ARM DeviceTrees
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Rosenkränzer <bero@baylibre.com>

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel