All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"kyungmin.park@samsung.com" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:26:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80303c89-3306-c4fd-1bfd-a11268bf553b@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR04MB4966CC15309EA6F0D78EC6BB80649@AM6PR04MB4966.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On 3/23/21 3:11 PM, Aisheng Dong wrote:
>> From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:11 PM
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A few small fixes and improvements
>>>>
>>>> ChangeLog:
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>  * squash a few patches
>>>>  * rebase to devfreq-testing
>>>
>>> I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because
>>> below two patches only exist in devfreq-testing.
>>> 5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add
>>> devfreq_transitions debugfs file
>>> dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential
>>> sysfs attrs My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your
>>> suggestion. So i have to rebase to that branch.
>>>
>>> However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled.
>>> Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply.
>>>
>>> Please help take a look at this new series.
>>
>> Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git Because
>> devfreq-testing branch is not official.
> 
> Okay, then how about the patch 5 below?
> [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
> 
> Should I also rebase it to devfreq-next or drop it first and then resend when your patch
> merged into mainline?

Yes. Thanks.

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, Dong Aisheng <dongas86@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"myungjoo.ham@samsung.com" <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	"kyungmin.park@samsung.com" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:26:56 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80303c89-3306-c4fd-1bfd-a11268bf553b@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR04MB4966CC15309EA6F0D78EC6BB80649@AM6PR04MB4966.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

On 3/23/21 3:11 PM, Aisheng Dong wrote:
>> From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:11 PM
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 3/23/21 12:25 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:13 AM Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A few small fixes and improvements
>>>>
>>>> ChangeLog:
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>>  * squash a few patches
>>>>  * rebase to devfreq-testing
>>>
>>> I have to rebase to devfreq-testing instead of devfreq-next because
>>> below two patches only exist in devfreq-testing.
>>> 5cc75e9252e9 (devfreq/devfreq-testing) PM / devfreq: Add
>>> devfreq_transitions debugfs file
>>> dc9e557845c1 PM / devfreq: Add new up_threshold and down_differential
>>> sysfs attrs My patch 5 needs change based on it according to your
>>> suggestion. So i have to rebase to that branch.
>>>
>>> However, i found devfreq-testing can't build with GOV_PASSVIE enabled.
>>> Patch 1 fixed it. You can squash to the original one when apply.
>>>
>>> Please help take a look at this new series.
>>
>> Please rebase your patches either devfreq-next or linux-next.git Because
>> devfreq-testing branch is not official.
> 
> Okay, then how about the patch 5 below?
> [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq
> 
> Should I also rebase it to devfreq-next or drop it first and then resend when your patch
> merged into mainline?

Yes. Thanks.

[snip]

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-23  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-23  2:59 [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] PM / devfreq: fix build error when DEVFREQ_GOV_PASSIVE enabled Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] PM / devfreq: Use more accurate returned new_freq as resume_freq Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] PM / devfreq: Remove the invalid description for get_target_freq Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] PM / devfreq: bail out early if no freq changes in devfreq_set_target Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] PM / devfreq: governor: optimize simpleondemand get_target_freq Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] PM / devfreq: imx8m-ddrc: remove imx8m_ddrc_get_dev_status Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  2:59   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  3:25 ` [PATCH V2 0/6] PM / devfreq: a few small fixes and improvements Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  3:25   ` Dong Aisheng
2021-03-23  4:11   ` Chanwoo Choi
2021-03-23  4:11     ` Chanwoo Choi
2021-03-23  6:11     ` Aisheng Dong
2021-03-23  6:11       ` Aisheng Dong
2021-03-23  7:26       ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2021-03-23  7:26         ` Chanwoo Choi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80303c89-3306-c4fd-1bfd-a11268bf553b@samsung.com \
    --to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=abel.vesa@nxp.com \
    --cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
    --cc=dongas86@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.