All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lokeshgidra@google.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, dancol@google.com,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
	hughd@google.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, elfring@users.sourceforge.net,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ingo
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016194313.GA247930@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 10/16/18 9:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:29:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 12:33 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:42:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>>>> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
>>>>> related operations.
>>>>
>>>> Just curious: why?
>>>
>>> In Android we have a requirement of moving a large (up to a GB now, but may
>>> grow bigger in future) memory range from one location to another.
>>
>> I think Christoph's "why?" was about the requirement, not why it hurts
>> applications. I admit I'm now also curious :)
> 
> This issue was discovered when we wanted to be able to move the physical
> pages of a memory range to another location quickly so that, after the
> application threads are resumed, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING userfaultfd
> faults can be received on the original memory range. The actual operations
> performed on the memory range are beyond the scope of this discussion. The
> user threads continue to refer to the old address which will now fault. The
> reason we want retain the old memory range and receives faults there is to
> avoid the need to fix the addresses all over the address space of the threads
> after we finish with performing operations on them in the fault handlers, so
> we mremap it and receive faults at the old addresses.
> 
> Does that answer your question?

Yes, interesting, thanks!

Vlastimil

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lokeshgidra@google.com,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, elfring@users.sourceforge.net,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, dancol@google.com,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
	hughd@google.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
	Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>,
	Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, pantin@google.com,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	minchan@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016194313.GA247930@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 10/16/18 9:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:29:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 12:33 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:42:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>>>> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
>>>>> related operations.
>>>>
>>>> Just curious: why?
>>>
>>> In Android we have a requirement of moving a large (up to a GB now, but may
>>> grow bigger in future) memory range from one location to another.
>>
>> I think Christoph's "why?" was about the requirement, not why it hurts
>> applications. I admit I'm now also curious :)
> 
> This issue was discovered when we wanted to be able to move the physical
> pages of a memory range to another location quickly so that, after the
> application threads are resumed, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING userfaultfd
> faults can be received on the original memory range. The actual operations
> performed on the memory range are beyond the scope of this discussion. The
> user threads continue to refer to the old address which will now fault. The
> reason we want retain the old memory range and receives faults there is to
> avoid the need to fix the addresses all over the address space of the threads
> after we finish with performing operations on them in the fault handlers, so
> we mremap it and receive faults at the old addresses.
> 
> Does that answer your question?

Yes, interesting, thanks!

Vlastimil

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vbabka@suse.cz (Vlastimil Babka)
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016194313.GA247930@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 10/16/18 9:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:29:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 12:33 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:42:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>>>> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
>>>>> related operations.
>>>>
>>>> Just curious: why?
>>>
>>> In Android we have a requirement of moving a large (up to a GB now, but may
>>> grow bigger in future) memory range from one location to another.
>>
>> I think Christoph's "why?" was about the requirement, not why it hurts
>> applications. I admit I'm now also curious :)
> 
> This issue was discovered when we wanted to be able to move the physical
> pages of a memory range to another location quickly so that, after the
> application threads are resumed, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING userfaultfd
> faults can be received on the original memory range. The actual operations
> performed on the memory range are beyond the scope of this discussion. The
> user threads continue to refer to the old address which will now fault. The
> reason we want retain the old memory range and receives faults there is to
> avoid the need to fix the addresses all over the address space of the threads
> after we finish with performing operations on them in the fault handlers, so
> we mremap it and receive faults at the old addresses.
> 
> Does that answer your question?

Yes, interesting, thanks!

Vlastimil

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lokeshgidra@google.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, dancol@google.com,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
	hughd@google.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, elfring@users.sourceforge.net,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>,
	kirill@shutemov.name, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, pantin@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	minchan@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk, nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz> (raw)
Message-ID: <20181017073816.ksY08kTuAy4n_vKd8cl0NNincBIMWWxipblA2f4wLRw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016194313.GA247930@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 10/16/18 9:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:29:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 12:33 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:42:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>>>> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
>>>>> related operations.
>>>>
>>>> Just curious: why?
>>>
>>> In Android we have a requirement of moving a large (up to a GB now, but may
>>> grow bigger in future) memory range from one location to another.
>>
>> I think Christoph's "why?" was about the requirement, not why it hurts
>> applications. I admit I'm now also curious :)
> 
> This issue was discovered when we wanted to be able to move the physical
> pages of a memory range to another location quickly so that, after the
> application threads are resumed, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING userfaultfd
> faults can be received on the original memory range. The actual operations
> performed on the memory range are beyond the scope of this discussion. The
> user threads continue to refer to the old address which will now fault. The
> reason we want retain the old memory range and receives faults there is to
> avoid the need to fix the addresses all over the address space of the threads
> after we finish with performing operations on them in the fault handlers, so
> we mremap it and receive faults at the old addresses.
> 
> Does that answer your question?

Yes, interesting, thanks!

Vlastimil

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	mhocko@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, lokeshgidra@google.com,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, dancol@google.com,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
	hughd@google.com, "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, elfring@users.sourceforge.net,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Sam Creasey <sammy@sammy.net>,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>,
	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>,
	kirill@shutemov.name, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, pantin@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	minchan@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk, nios2-dev@lists.rocketboards.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016194313.GA247930@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 10/16/18 9:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 01:29:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 12:33 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:42:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>>>> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
>>>>> related operations.
>>>>
>>>> Just curious: why?
>>>
>>> In Android we have a requirement of moving a large (up to a GB now, but may
>>> grow bigger in future) memory range from one location to another.
>>
>> I think Christoph's "why?" was about the requirement, not why it hurts
>> applications. I admit I'm now also curious :)
> 
> This issue was discovered when we wanted to be able to move the physical
> pages of a memory range to another location quickly so that, after the
> application threads are resumed, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING userfaultfd
> faults can be received on the original memory range. The actual operations
> performed on the memory range are beyond the scope of this discussion. The
> user threads continue to refer to the old address which will now fault. The
> reason we want retain the old memory range and receives faults there is to
> avoid the need to fix the addresses all over the address space of the threads
> after we finish with performing operations on them in the fault handlers, so
> we mremap it and receive faults at the old addresses.
> 
> Does that answer your question?

Yes, interesting, thanks!

Vlastimil

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vbabka@suse.cz (Vlastimil Babka)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 09:38:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181016194313.GA247930@joelaf.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 10/16/18 9:43 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2018@01:29:52PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 10/16/18 12:33 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018@02:42:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018@06:31:58PM -0700, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>>>>> Android needs to mremap large regions of memory during memory management
>>>>> related operations.
>>>>
>>>> Just curious: why?
>>>
>>> In Android we have a requirement of moving a large (up to a GB now, but may
>>> grow bigger in future) memory range from one location to another.
>>
>> I think Christoph's "why?" was about the requirement, not why it hurts
>> applications. I admit I'm now also curious :)
> 
> This issue was discovered when we wanted to be able to move the physical
> pages of a memory range to another location quickly so that, after the
> application threads are resumed, UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_MISSING userfaultfd
> faults can be received on the original memory range. The actual operations
> performed on the memory range are beyond the scope of this discussion. The
> user threads continue to refer to the old address which will now fault. The
> reason we want retain the old memory range and receives faults there is to
> avoid the need to fix the addresses all over the address space of the threads
> after we finish with performing operations on them in the fault handlers, so
> we mremap it and receive faults at the old addresses.
> 
> Does that answer your question?

Yes, interesting, thanks!

Vlastimil

> thanks,
> 
> - Joel
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-17  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 192+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-13  1:31 [PATCH 0/4] Add support for fast mremap Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions (v2) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-24  8:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-24  8:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-25  2:21     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:21       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:21       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:21       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:21       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:21       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:21       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26  8:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:52         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-25 10:47     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:47       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-26  8:50       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-26  8:50         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-10-13  1:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: speed up mremap by 500x on large regions (v2) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-15  9:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15  9:42     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-10-15 22:33     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-15 22:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-15 22:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-15 22:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-15 22:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-15 22:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-15 22:33       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 11:29       ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 11:29         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 11:29         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 11:29         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 11:29         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 11:29         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 11:29         ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-16 19:43         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 19:43           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 19:43           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 19:43           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 19:43           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-16 19:43           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-17  7:38           ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2018-10-17  7:38             ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-17  7:38             ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-17  7:38             ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-17  7:38             ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-17  7:38             ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-10-24 10:12   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 10:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 10:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 10:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 10:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 10:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 10:12     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 11:57     ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 11:57       ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 11:57       ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 11:57       ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 11:57       ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 11:57       ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 11:57       ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-24 12:57       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 12:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 12:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 12:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 12:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 12:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-24 12:57         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25  2:09         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:09           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25 10:19           ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-25 10:19             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2018-10-26 21:11             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 21:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-29 10:28               ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 10:28                 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 10:28                 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 10:28                 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 10:28                 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 10:28                 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-29 10:28                 ` Will Deacon
2018-10-25  2:13       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:13         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:13         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:13         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:13         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:13         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-25  2:13         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 10:21         ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 10:21           ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 10:21           ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 10:21           ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 10:21           ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 10:21           ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 10:21           ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-27 19:39           ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 19:39             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 19:39             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 19:39             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 19:39             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 19:39             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-27 19:39             ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-28 22:40             ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-28 22:40               ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-28 22:40               ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-28 22:40               ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-28 22:40               ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-28 22:40               ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-28 22:40               ` Balbir Singh
2018-10-13  1:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: select HAVE_MOVE_PMD for faster mremap (v1) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:31   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-13  1:32   ` Joel Fernandes (Google)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80a7d851-51ca-2d81-1273-393d4f701bc4@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=dancol@google.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshgidra@google.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.