* archiving ipmitool fork
@ 2019-01-15 16:02 Brad Bishop
2019-01-15 16:43 ` Ed Tanous
2019-01-15 17:49 ` Vernon Mauery
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Bishop @ 2019-01-15 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tanous, Ed; +Cc: OpenBMC Maillist
Hi Ed
I’m looking at https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/17307
Does this mean we can archive our ipmitool fork on GitHub?
thx -brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: archiving ipmitool fork
2019-01-15 16:02 archiving ipmitool fork Brad Bishop
@ 2019-01-15 16:43 ` Ed Tanous
2019-01-18 2:43 ` Brad Bishop
2019-01-15 17:49 ` Vernon Mauery
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ed Tanous @ 2019-01-15 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brad Bishop; +Cc: OpenBMC Maillist
On 1/15/19 8:02 AM, Brad Bishop wrote:
> Hi Ed
>
> I’m looking at https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/17307
>
> Does this mean we can archive our ipmitool fork on GitHub?
That was the hope, but I don't want to force it if JK had plans to work
on that repo some more. At the very least this patch gets us up to the
current release of ipmitool, gets us building against 2.6, and drops an
OpenBMC specific recipe.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: archiving ipmitool fork
2019-01-15 16:02 archiving ipmitool fork Brad Bishop
2019-01-15 16:43 ` Ed Tanous
@ 2019-01-15 17:49 ` Vernon Mauery
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vernon Mauery @ 2019-01-15 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brad Bishop; +Cc: Tanous, Ed, OpenBMC Maillist
On 15-Jan-2019 11:02 AM, Brad Bishop wrote:
>Hi Ed
>
>I’m looking at https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/17307
>
>Does this mean we can archive our ipmitool fork on GitHub?
Yes. Once we move to the yocto way of dealing with ipmitool, we can
simply manage our stack of patches.
For now, this means that we have a bunch of patches. Once the new ipmi
dbus interface is implemented, I plan on pushing the interface upstream
to ipmitool. Then we can just use the upstream ipmitool without any
patches.
--Vernon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: archiving ipmitool fork
2019-01-15 16:43 ` Ed Tanous
@ 2019-01-18 2:43 ` Brad Bishop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Brad Bishop @ 2019-01-18 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ed Tanous; +Cc: OpenBMC Maillist
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 08:43:34AM -0800, Ed Tanous wrote:
> On 1/15/19 8:02 AM, Brad Bishop wrote:
> > Hi Ed
> >
> > I’m looking at https://gerrit.openbmc-project.xyz/17307
> >
> > Does this mean we can archive our ipmitool fork on GitHub?
> That was the hope, but I don't want to force it if JK had plans to work
> on that repo some more. At the very least this patch gets us up to the
> current release of ipmitool, gets us building against 2.6, and drops an
> OpenBMC specific recipe.
Thanks. Archived!
-brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-01-18 2:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-01-15 16:02 archiving ipmitool fork Brad Bishop
2019-01-15 16:43 ` Ed Tanous
2019-01-18 2:43 ` Brad Bishop
2019-01-15 17:49 ` Vernon Mauery
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.