All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: ngupta@vflare.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mm-cc@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] compcache: xvmalloc memory allocator
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:43:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020908241243y11f10e8eudc758b61527e0e9c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A92EBB4.1070101@vflare.org>

Hi Nitin,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Nitin Gupta<ngupta@vflare.org> wrote:
> On 08/24/2009 11:03 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nitin Gupta<ngupta@vflare.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * xv_malloc - Allocate block of given size from pool.
>>> + * @pool: pool to allocate from
>>> + * @size: size of block to allocate
>>> + * @pagenum: page no. that holds the object
>>> + * @offset: location of object within pagenum
>>> + *
>>> + * On success,<pagenum, offset>  identifies block allocated
>>> + * and 0 is returned. On failure,<pagenum, offset>  is set to
>>> + * 0 and -ENOMEM is returned.
>>> + *
>>> + * Allocation requests with size>  XV_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE will fail.
>>> + */
>>> +int xv_malloc(struct xv_pool *pool, u32 size, u32 *pagenum, u32 *offset,
>>> +                                                       gfp_t flags)
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> What's the purpose of passing PFNs around? There's quite a lot of PFN
>> to struct page conversion going on because of it. Wouldn't it make
>> more sense to return (and pass) a pointer to struct page instead?
>
> PFNs are 32-bit on all archs while for 'struct page *', we require 32-bit or
> 64-bit depending on arch. ramzswap allocates a table entry <pagenum, offset>
> corresponding to every swap slot. So, the size of table will unnecessarily
> increase on 64-bit archs. Same is the argument for xvmalloc free list sizes.
>
> Also, xvmalloc and ramzswap itself does PFN -> 'struct page *' conversion
> only when freeing the page or to get a deferencable pointer.

I still don't see why the APIs have work on PFNs. You can obviously do
the conversion once for store and load. Look at what the code does,
it's converting struct page to PFN just to do the reverse for kmap().
I think that could be cleaned by passing struct page around.

                        Pekka

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: ngupta@vflare.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mm-cc@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] compcache: xvmalloc memory allocator
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:43:53 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020908241243y11f10e8eudc758b61527e0e9c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A92EBB4.1070101@vflare.org>

Hi Nitin,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Nitin Gupta<ngupta@vflare.org> wrote:
> On 08/24/2009 11:03 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Nitin Gupta<ngupta@vflare.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * xv_malloc - Allocate block of given size from pool.
>>> + * @pool: pool to allocate from
>>> + * @size: size of block to allocate
>>> + * @pagenum: page no. that holds the object
>>> + * @offset: location of object within pagenum
>>> + *
>>> + * On success,<pagenum, offset>  identifies block allocated
>>> + * and 0 is returned. On failure,<pagenum, offset>  is set to
>>> + * 0 and -ENOMEM is returned.
>>> + *
>>> + * Allocation requests with size>  XV_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE will fail.
>>> + */
>>> +int xv_malloc(struct xv_pool *pool, u32 size, u32 *pagenum, u32 *offset,
>>> +                                                       gfp_t flags)
>
> <snip>
>
>>
>> What's the purpose of passing PFNs around? There's quite a lot of PFN
>> to struct page conversion going on because of it. Wouldn't it make
>> more sense to return (and pass) a pointer to struct page instead?
>
> PFNs are 32-bit on all archs while for 'struct page *', we require 32-bit or
> 64-bit depending on arch. ramzswap allocates a table entry <pagenum, offset>
> corresponding to every swap slot. So, the size of table will unnecessarily
> increase on 64-bit archs. Same is the argument for xvmalloc free list sizes.
>
> Also, xvmalloc and ramzswap itself does PFN -> 'struct page *' conversion
> only when freeing the page or to get a deferencable pointer.

I still don't see why the APIs have work on PFNs. You can obviously do
the conversion once for store and load. Look at what the code does,
it's converting struct page to PFN just to do the reverse for kmap().
I think that could be cleaned by passing struct page around.

                        Pekka

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-24 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-24  4:37 [PATCH 1/4] compcache: xvmalloc memory allocator Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24  4:37 ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 17:33 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 17:33   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 17:52   ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 17:52     ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 18:08     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 18:08       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 18:11       ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 18:11         ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 18:27         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 18:27           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 18:40           ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 18:40             ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 19:36   ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 19:36     ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 19:43     ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2009-08-24 19:43       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 21:16       ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 21:16         ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-25  4:26         ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-25  4:26           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-24 20:39     ` Hugh Dickins
2009-08-24 20:39       ` Hugh Dickins
2009-08-24 21:16       ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 21:16         ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-24 21:46         ` Hugh Dickins
2009-08-24 21:46           ` Hugh Dickins
2009-08-25 14:52           ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-25 14:52             ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-25 19:03             ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-25 19:03               ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-26 16:10               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 16:10                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 16:17                 ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-26 16:17                   ` Nitin Gupta
2009-08-26 16:19                 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-26 16:19                   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-08-26 16:07     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-08-26 16:07       ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84144f020908241243y11f10e8eudc758b61527e0e9c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-cc@laptop.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.