All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Schäfer" <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] em28xx: simplify ID-reading from Micron sensors
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:03:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84459d79-eccc-1888-1dad-6935cf85b18a@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170323095612.72216892@vento.lan>



Am 23.03.2017 um 13:56 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Em Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:01:32 +0100
> Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Am 22.03.2017 um 15:46 schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
>>> Em Sun, 19 Feb 2017 19:29:18 +0100
>>> Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com> escreveu:
>>>   
>>>> Use i2c_smbus_read_word_data() instead of i2c_master_send() and
>>>> i2c_master_recv() for reading the ID of Micorn sensors.
>>>> Bytes need to be swapped afterwards, because i2c_smbus_read_word_data()
>>>> assumes that the received bytes are little-endian byte order (as specified
>>>> by smbus), while Micron sensors with 16 bit register width use big endian
>>>> byte order.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-camera.c | 28 ++++------------------------
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-camera.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-camera.c
>>>> index 7b4129ab1cf9..4839479624e7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-camera.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-camera.c
>>>> @@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ static int em28xx_probe_sensor_micron(struct em28xx *dev)
>>>>    {
>>>>    	int ret, i;
>>>>    	char *name;
>>>> -	u8 reg;
>>>> -	__be16 id_be;
>>>>    	u16 id;
>>>>    
>>>>    	struct i2c_client *client = &dev->i2c_client[dev->def_i2c_bus];
>>>> @@ -115,10 +113,8 @@ static int em28xx_probe_sensor_micron(struct em28xx *dev)
>>>>    	dev->em28xx_sensor = EM28XX_NOSENSOR;
>>>>    	for (i = 0; micron_sensor_addrs[i] != I2C_CLIENT_END; i++) {
>>>>    		client->addr = micron_sensor_addrs[i];
>>>> -		/* NOTE: i2c_smbus_read_word_data() doesn't work with BE data */
>>>>    		/* Read chip ID from register 0x00 */
>>>> -		reg = 0x00;
>>>> -		ret = i2c_master_send(client, &reg, 1);
>>>> +		ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(client, 0x00); /* assumes LE */
>>>>    		if (ret < 0) {
>>>>    			if (ret != -ENXIO)
>>>>    				dev_err(&dev->intf->dev,
>>>> @@ -126,24 +122,9 @@ static int em28xx_probe_sensor_micron(struct em28xx *dev)
>>>>    				       client->addr << 1, ret);
>>>>    			continue;
>>>>    		}
>>>> -		ret = i2c_master_recv(client, (u8 *)&id_be, 2);
>>>> -		if (ret < 0) {
>>>> -			dev_err(&dev->intf->dev,
>>>> -				"couldn't read from i2c device 0x%02x: error %i\n",
>>>> -				client->addr << 1, ret);
>>>> -			continue;
>>>> -		}
>>>> -		id = be16_to_cpu(id_be);
>>>> +		id = swab16(ret); /* LE -> BE */
>>> That's wrong! You can't assume that CPU is BE, as some archs use LE.
>>>
>>> You should, instead, call le16_to_cpu(), to be sure that it will be
>>> doing the right thing.
>>>
>>> Something like:
>>>
>>> 	id = le16_to_cpu((__le16)ret);
>> SMBus read/write word transfers are always LE (see SMBus spec section
>> 6.5.5),
>> which is also what i2c_smbus_xfer_emulated() assumes:
>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c#L3485
> I got that part, but, if the CPU is also LE, doing swab16() is
> wrong. It should swap it *only* if the CPU is BE.
No, it should always be swapped, because the bytes are always transfered 
in the wrong order.
The cpu endianess doesn't matter, (0x12 << 8) | 0x34 is always 0x1234.

Regards,
Frank



> le16_to_cpu() should do the right thing, e. g. swap for BE
> CPUs or not swap otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Mauro

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-23 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-19 18:29 [PATCH 1/2] em28xx: reduce stack usage in sensor probing functions Frank Schäfer
2017-02-19 18:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] em28xx: simplify ID-reading from Micron sensors Frank Schäfer
     [not found]   ` <20170322114606.1feeb960@vento.lan>
     [not found]     ` <5107179d-74fd-3b98-5fc6-ba7051927ae2@googlemail.com>
     [not found]       ` <20170323095612.72216892@vento.lan>
2017-03-23 18:03         ` Frank Schäfer [this message]
2017-03-24 19:16           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-03-26 14:24             ` Frank Schäfer
2017-04-10 18:06               ` Frank Schäfer
2017-04-15 13:03                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84459d79-eccc-1888-1dad-6935cf85b18a@googlemail.com \
    --to=fschaefer.oss@googlemail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.