All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 23:52:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85b1b706-c3c2-6316-6dd5-ba1b4306d772@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021200120.175753-1-tony.luck@intel.com>



在 2022/10/22 AM4:01, Tony Luck 写道:
> Part 1 deals with the process that triggered the copy on write
> fault with a store to a shared read-only page. That process is
> send a SIGBUS with the usual machine check decoration to specify
> the virtual address of the lost page, together with the scope.
> 
> Part 2 sets up to asynchronously take the page with the uncorrected
> error offline to prevent additional machine check faults. H/t to
> Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> and Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> for pointing me to the existing function to queue a call to
> memory_failure().
> 
> On x86 there is some duplicate reporting (because the error is
> also signalled by the memory controller as well as by the core
> that triggered the machine check). Console logs look like this:
> 
> [ 1647.723403] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
> 	Machine check from kernel copy routine
> 
> [ 1647.723414] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3600 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
> 	x86 fault handler sends SIGBUS to child process
> 
> [ 1647.735183] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
> 	Async call to memory_failure() from copy on write path

The recovery action might also be handled asynchronously in CMCI uc_decode_notifier
handler signaled by memory controller, right?

I have a one more memory failure log than yours.

[ 3187.485742] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31746 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400
[ 3187.740620] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
	uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report

[ 3187.748272] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
	Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by ghes_do_memory_failure

[ 3187.754194] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
	Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by __wp_page_copy_user

[ 3188.615920] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31745 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400

Best Regards,
Shuai

> 
> [ 1647.748397] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: already hardware poisoned
> 	uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report
> 
> [ 1647.761313] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3599 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
> 	Parent process tries to read poisoned page. Page has been unmapped, so
> 	#PF handler sends SIGBUS
> 
> 
> Tony Luck (2):
>   mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults
>   mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline
> 
>  include/linux/highmem.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h      |  5 ++++-
>  mm/memory.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 23:52:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85b1b706-c3c2-6316-6dd5-ba1b4306d772@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221021200120.175753-1-tony.luck@intel.com>



在 2022/10/22 AM4:01, Tony Luck 写道:
> Part 1 deals with the process that triggered the copy on write
> fault with a store to a shared read-only page. That process is
> send a SIGBUS with the usual machine check decoration to specify
> the virtual address of the lost page, together with the scope.
> 
> Part 2 sets up to asynchronously take the page with the uncorrected
> error offline to prevent additional machine check faults. H/t to
> Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> and Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> for pointing me to the existing function to queue a call to
> memory_failure().
> 
> On x86 there is some duplicate reporting (because the error is
> also signalled by the memory controller as well as by the core
> that triggered the machine check). Console logs look like this:
> 
> [ 1647.723403] mce: [Hardware Error]: Machine check events logged
> 	Machine check from kernel copy routine
> 
> [ 1647.723414] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3600 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
> 	x86 fault handler sends SIGBUS to child process
> 
> [ 1647.735183] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
> 	Async call to memory_failure() from copy on write path

The recovery action might also be handled asynchronously in CMCI uc_decode_notifier
handler signaled by memory controller, right?

I have a one more memory failure log than yours.

[ 3187.485742] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31746 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400
[ 3187.740620] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: recovery action for dirty LRU page: Recovered
	uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report

[ 3187.748272] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
	Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by ghes_do_memory_failure

[ 3187.754194] Memory failure: 0x1a3b80: already hardware poisoned
	Workqueue: events memory_failure_work_func // queued by __wp_page_copy_user

[ 3188.615920] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:31745 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7fc4bf7cf400

Best Regards,
Shuai

> 
> [ 1647.748397] Memory failure: 0x905b92d: already hardware poisoned
> 	uc_decode_notifier() processes memory controller report
> 
> [ 1647.761313] MCE: Killing einj_mem_uc:3599 due to hardware memory corruption fault at 7f3309503400
> 	Parent process tries to read poisoned page. Page has been unmapped, so
> 	#PF handler sends SIGBUS
> 
> 
> Tony Luck (2):
>   mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults
>   mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline
> 
>  include/linux/highmem.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h      |  5 ++++-
>  mm/memory.c             | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-23 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-17 23:42 [RFC PATCH] mm, hwpoison: Recover from copy-on-write machine checks Tony Luck
2022-10-18  8:43 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-18 17:52   ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-19 17:08     ` [PATCH v2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-19 17:08       ` Tony Luck
2022-10-19 17:45       ` Dan Williams
2022-10-19 17:45         ` Dan Williams
2022-10-19 20:30         ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-19 20:30           ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-20  1:57       ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-20  1:57         ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-20 20:05         ` Tony Luck
2022-10-20 20:05           ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21  1:38           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-21  1:38             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-21  3:57             ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21  3:57               ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21  1:52           ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  1:52             ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  4:08             ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21  4:08               ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21  4:11               ` David Laight
2022-10-21  4:11                 ` David Laight
2022-10-21  4:41                 ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21  4:41                   ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21  9:29                   ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  9:29                     ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 16:30                     ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-21 16:30                       ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-23 15:04                       ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-23 15:04                         ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  6:57               ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21  6:57                 ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-21 20:01       ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery Tony Luck
2022-10-21 20:01         ` Tony Luck
2022-10-21 20:01         ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-21 20:01           ` Tony Luck
2022-10-25  5:46           ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-25  5:46             ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-10-28  2:11           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28  2:11             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28 16:09             ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-28 16:09               ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-02 14:27               ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-02 14:27                 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-02 14:30                 ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-11-02 14:30                   ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-10-21 20:01         ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline Tony Luck
2022-10-21 20:01           ` Tony Luck
2022-10-28  2:28           ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28  2:28             ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-28 16:13             ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-28 16:13               ` Luck, Tony
2022-10-29  1:55               ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-29  1:55                 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-10-23 15:52         ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2022-10-23 15:52           ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Copy-on-write poison recovery Shuai Xue
2022-10-26  5:19           ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-26  5:19             ` Shuai Xue
2022-10-31 20:10         ` [PATCH v4 " Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10           ` Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10           ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mm, hwpoison: Try to recover from copy-on write faults Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10             ` Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10           ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm, hwpoison: When copy-on-write hits poison, take page offline Tony Luck
2022-10-31 20:10             ` Tony Luck
2023-05-18 21:49             ` Jane Chu
2023-05-18 22:10               ` Luck, Tony
2023-05-19  7:28               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85b1b706-c3c2-6316-6dd5-ba1b4306d772@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.