All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-05 13:33 ` Yogesh Lal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-05 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mark.rutland, maz, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

Hi,

We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.

On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading 
arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during 
timer register using following path.

arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 
1);

[code snap]
564 static
565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct 
arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
566                               bool local)
567 {
568     int i;
569
570     if (local) {
571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
572     } else {
573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
575     }
576
577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);


and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get 
counter is used.

1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
1009 {
1010     u64 start_count;
1011
1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
1015
1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
1020             else
1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
1022         } else {
1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
1025             else
1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
1027         }
[snap]
1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);


As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register() will 
register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.

Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register already 
register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so arch_timer_read_counter 
will always point to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.


Looks like this bug is side effect of following patch:

commit 0ea415390cd345b7d09e8c9ebd4b68adfe873043
Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 8 16:49:07 2019 +0100

     clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access 
stable counters

     Instead of always going via arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable to 
access the
     counter workaround, let's have arch_timer_read_counter point to the
     right method.

     For that, we need to track whether any CPU in the system has a
     workaround for the counter. This is done by having an atomic variable
     tracking this.

     Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
     Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
     Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>


Thanks

Yogesh Lal



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-05 13:33 ` Yogesh Lal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-05 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mark.rutland, maz, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

Hi,

We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.

On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading 
arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during 
timer register using following path.

arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 
1);

[code snap]
564 static
565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct 
arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
566                               bool local)
567 {
568     int i;
569
570     if (local) {
571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
572     } else {
573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
575     }
576
577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);


and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get 
counter is used.

1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
1009 {
1010     u64 start_count;
1011
1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
1015
1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
1020             else
1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
1022         } else {
1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
1025             else
1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
1027         }
[snap]
1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);


As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register() will 
register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.

Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register already 
register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so arch_timer_read_counter 
will always point to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.


Looks like this bug is side effect of following patch:

commit 0ea415390cd345b7d09e8c9ebd4b68adfe873043
Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date:   Mon Apr 8 16:49:07 2019 +0100

     clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access 
stable counters

     Instead of always going via arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable to 
access the
     counter workaround, let's have arch_timer_read_counter point to the
     right method.

     For that, we need to track whether any CPU in the system has a
     workaround for the counter. This is done by having an atomic variable
     tracking this.

     Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
     Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
     Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>


Thanks

Yogesh Lal



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
  2023-01-05 13:33 ` Yogesh Lal
@ 2023-01-05 14:12   ` Mark Rutland
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2023-01-05 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yogesh Lal
  Cc: maz, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:03:48PM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.

Do you *only* see this issue on v5.15.y, or is mainline (e.g. v6.2-rc2) also
broken?

I don't see any fix that fits your exact description below, but I do see that
we've made a bunch of changes in this area since.

> 
> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during timer
> register using following path.
> 
> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
> 1);
> 
> [code snap]
> 564 static
> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
> 566                               bool local)
> 567 {
> 568     int i;
> 569
> 570     if (local) {
> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
> 572     } else {
> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
> 575     }
> 576
> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> 
> 
> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
> counter is used.
> 
> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
> 1009 {
> 1010     u64 start_count;
> 1011
> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
> 1015
> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> 1020             else
> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> 1022         } else {
> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> 1025             else
> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> 1027         }
> [snap]
> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
> 
> 
> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register() will
> register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.

It would be helpful to mention this fact (that the system is big.LITTLE, and
the boot cores are not Cortex-A73) earlier in the report.

> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register already
> register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so arch_timer_read_counter will
> always point to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.

Hmm... yes, AFAICT this cannot work unless the affected CPUs are up before we
probe, and it doesn't make much sense for arch_counter_register() to look at
arch_timer_counter_has_wa() since it can be called before all CPUs are up.

> Looks like this bug is side effect of following patch:
> 
> commit 0ea415390cd345b7d09e8c9ebd4b68adfe873043
> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 8 16:49:07 2019 +0100
> 
>     clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access stable
> counters
> 
>     Instead of always going via arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable to access the
>     counter workaround, let's have arch_timer_read_counter point to the
>     right method.
> 
>     For that, we need to track whether any CPU in the system has a
>     workaround for the counter. This is done by having an atomic variable
>     tracking this.
> 
>     Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 

Yeah, that does look to be broken, but I think there are futher issues anyway
(e.g. late onlining).

AFAICT we need to detect this *stupidly early* in the CPU bringup path in order
to handle this safely, which is quite painful.

What a great.

Thanks,
Mark.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-05 14:12   ` Mark Rutland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2023-01-05 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yogesh Lal
  Cc: maz, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:03:48PM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.

Do you *only* see this issue on v5.15.y, or is mainline (e.g. v6.2-rc2) also
broken?

I don't see any fix that fits your exact description below, but I do see that
we've made a bunch of changes in this area since.

> 
> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during timer
> register using following path.
> 
> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
> 1);
> 
> [code snap]
> 564 static
> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
> 566                               bool local)
> 567 {
> 568     int i;
> 569
> 570     if (local) {
> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
> 572     } else {
> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
> 575     }
> 576
> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> 
> 
> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
> counter is used.
> 
> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
> 1009 {
> 1010     u64 start_count;
> 1011
> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
> 1015
> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> 1020             else
> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> 1022         } else {
> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> 1025             else
> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> 1027         }
> [snap]
> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
> 
> 
> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register() will
> register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.

It would be helpful to mention this fact (that the system is big.LITTLE, and
the boot cores are not Cortex-A73) earlier in the report.

> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register already
> register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so arch_timer_read_counter will
> always point to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.

Hmm... yes, AFAICT this cannot work unless the affected CPUs are up before we
probe, and it doesn't make much sense for arch_counter_register() to look at
arch_timer_counter_has_wa() since it can be called before all CPUs are up.

> Looks like this bug is side effect of following patch:
> 
> commit 0ea415390cd345b7d09e8c9ebd4b68adfe873043
> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Date:   Mon Apr 8 16:49:07 2019 +0100
> 
>     clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access stable
> counters
> 
>     Instead of always going via arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable to access the
>     counter workaround, let's have arch_timer_read_counter point to the
>     right method.
> 
>     For that, we need to track whether any CPU in the system has a
>     workaround for the counter. This is done by having an atomic variable
>     tracking this.
> 
>     Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> 

Yeah, that does look to be broken, but I think there are futher issues anyway
(e.g. late onlining).

AFAICT we need to detect this *stupidly early* in the CPU bringup path in order
to handle this safely, which is quite painful.

What a great.

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
  2023-01-05 13:33 ` Yogesh Lal
@ 2023-01-05 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-01-05 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yogesh Lal
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:33:48 +0000,
Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.
> 
> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during
> timer register using following path.

Have you checked whether the issue is still present on 6.1?

> 
> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
> 1);
> 
> [code snap]
> 564 static
> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
> 566                               bool local)
> 567 {
> 568     int i;
> 569
> 570     if (local) {
> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
> 572     } else {
> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
> 575     }
> 576
> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> 
> 
> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
> counter is used.
> 
> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
> 1009 {
> 1010     u64 start_count;
> 1011
> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
> 1015
> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> 1020             else
> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> 1022         } else {
> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> 1025             else
> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> 1027         }
> [snap]
> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
> 
> 
> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register()
> will register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.
> 
> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register
> already register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so
> arch_timer_read_counter will always point to
> !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.

Please try the following hack, only compile tested as I do not have
access to any affected HW, and report whether this solves your issue
or not. Note that this is based on 6.2-rc2.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index e09d4427f604..a7cf0a2c86d3 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ static u64 arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
 	return arch_timer_read_counter();
 }
 
+static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void);
+
+static u64 (*arch_counter_get_read_fn(void))(void)
+{
+	u64 (*rd)(void);
+
+	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
+	    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
+		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
+		else
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
+	} else {
+		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
+		else
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
+	}
+
+	return rd;
+}
+
 static struct clocksource clocksource_counter = {
 	.name	= "arch_sys_counter",
 	.id	= CSID_ARM_ARCH_COUNTER,
@@ -571,8 +593,10 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
 			per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
 	}
 
-	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
+	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
 		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
+		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Don't use the vdso fastpath if errata require using the
@@ -641,7 +665,7 @@ static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)
 #else
 #define arch_timer_check_ool_workaround(t,a)		do { } while(0)
 #define arch_timer_this_cpu_has_cntvct_wa()		({false;})
-#define arch_timer_counter_has_wa()			({false;})
+static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)		{ return false; }
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER_OOL_WORKAROUND */
 
 static __always_inline irqreturn_t timer_handler(const int access,
@@ -1079,22 +1103,7 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
 
 	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
 	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
-		u64 (*rd)(void);
-
-		if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
-		    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
-			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
-			else
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
-		} else {
-			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
-			else
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
-		}
-
-		arch_timer_read_counter = rd;
+		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
 		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
 	} else {
 		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-05 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-01-05 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yogesh Lal
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:33:48 +0000,
Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.
> 
> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during
> timer register using following path.

Have you checked whether the issue is still present on 6.1?

> 
> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
> 1);
> 
> [code snap]
> 564 static
> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
> 566                               bool local)
> 567 {
> 568     int i;
> 569
> 570     if (local) {
> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
> 572     } else {
> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
> 575     }
> 576
> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> 
> 
> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
> counter is used.
> 
> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
> 1009 {
> 1010     u64 start_count;
> 1011
> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
> 1015
> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> 1020             else
> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> 1022         } else {
> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> 1025             else
> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> 1027         }
> [snap]
> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
> 
> 
> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register()
> will register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.
> 
> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register
> already register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so
> arch_timer_read_counter will always point to
> !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.

Please try the following hack, only compile tested as I do not have
access to any affected HW, and report whether this solves your issue
or not. Note that this is based on 6.2-rc2.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index e09d4427f604..a7cf0a2c86d3 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ static u64 arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
 	return arch_timer_read_counter();
 }
 
+static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void);
+
+static u64 (*arch_counter_get_read_fn(void))(void)
+{
+	u64 (*rd)(void);
+
+	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
+	    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
+		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
+		else
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
+	} else {
+		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
+		else
+			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
+	}
+
+	return rd;
+}
+
 static struct clocksource clocksource_counter = {
 	.name	= "arch_sys_counter",
 	.id	= CSID_ARM_ARCH_COUNTER,
@@ -571,8 +593,10 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
 			per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
 	}
 
-	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
+	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
 		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
+		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Don't use the vdso fastpath if errata require using the
@@ -641,7 +665,7 @@ static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)
 #else
 #define arch_timer_check_ool_workaround(t,a)		do { } while(0)
 #define arch_timer_this_cpu_has_cntvct_wa()		({false;})
-#define arch_timer_counter_has_wa()			({false;})
+static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)		{ return false; }
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER_OOL_WORKAROUND */
 
 static __always_inline irqreturn_t timer_handler(const int access,
@@ -1079,22 +1103,7 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
 
 	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
 	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
-		u64 (*rd)(void);
-
-		if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
-		    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
-			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
-			else
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
-		} else {
-			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
-			else
-				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
-		}
-
-		arch_timer_read_counter = rd;
+		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
 		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
 	} else {
 		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
  2023-01-05 14:12   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2023-01-06 16:38     ` Yogesh Lal
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-06 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland
  Cc: maz, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm


On 1/5/2023 7:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:03:48PM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.
> Do you *only* see this issue on v5.15.y, or is mainline (e.g. v6.2-rc2) also
> broken?

Checked the code path and looks like its broken on mainline also.

> I don't see any fix that fits your exact description below, but I do see that
> we've made a bunch of changes in this area since.
>
>> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
>> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during timer
>> register using following path.
>>
>> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
>> 1);
>>
>> [code snap]
>> 564 static
>> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
>> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
>> 566                               bool local)
>> 567 {
>> 568     int i;
>> 569
>> 570     if (local) {
>> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
>> 572     } else {
>> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
>> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
>> 575     }
>> 576
>> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
>> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
>>
>>
>> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
>> counter is used.
>>
>> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>> 1009 {
>> 1010     u64 start_count;
>> 1011
>> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
>> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
>> 1015
>> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
>> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
>> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
>> 1020             else
>> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
>> 1022         } else {
>> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
>> 1025             else
>> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
>> 1027         }
>> [snap]
>> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
>> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
>>
>>
>> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register() will
>> register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.
> It would be helpful to mention this fact (that the system is big.LITTLE, and
> the boot cores are not Cortex-A73) earlier in the report.
will take care
>
>> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register already
>> register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
>> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so arch_timer_read_counter will
>> always point to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.
> Hmm... yes, AFAICT this cannot work unless the affected CPUs are up before we
> probe, and it doesn't make much sense for arch_counter_register() to look at
> arch_timer_counter_has_wa() since it can be called before all CPUs are up.
>
>> Looks like this bug is side effect of following patch:
>>
>> commit 0ea415390cd345b7d09e8c9ebd4b68adfe873043
>> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Date:   Mon Apr 8 16:49:07 2019 +0100
>>
>>      clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access stable
>> counters
>>
>>      Instead of always going via arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable to access the
>>      counter workaround, let's have arch_timer_read_counter point to the
>>      right method.
>>
>>      For that, we need to track whether any CPU in the system has a
>>      workaround for the counter. This is done by having an atomic variable
>>      tracking this.
>>
>>      Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>      Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>      Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>
> Yeah, that does look to be broken, but I think there are futher issues anyway
> (e.g. late onlining).
>
> AFAICT we need to detect this *stupidly early* in the CPU bringup path in order
> to handle this safely, which is quite painful.
>
> What a great.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-06 16:38     ` Yogesh Lal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-06 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland
  Cc: maz, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm


On 1/5/2023 7:42 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:03:48PM +0530, Yogesh Lal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.
> Do you *only* see this issue on v5.15.y, or is mainline (e.g. v6.2-rc2) also
> broken?

Checked the code path and looks like its broken on mainline also.

> I don't see any fix that fits your exact description below, but I do see that
> we've made a bunch of changes in this area since.
>
>> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
>> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during timer
>> register using following path.
>>
>> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
>> 1);
>>
>> [code snap]
>> 564 static
>> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
>> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
>> 566                               bool local)
>> 567 {
>> 568     int i;
>> 569
>> 570     if (local) {
>> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
>> 572     } else {
>> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
>> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
>> 575     }
>> 576
>> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
>> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
>>
>>
>> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
>> counter is used.
>>
>> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>> 1009 {
>> 1010     u64 start_count;
>> 1011
>> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
>> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
>> 1015
>> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
>> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
>> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
>> 1020             else
>> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
>> 1022         } else {
>> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
>> 1025             else
>> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
>> 1027         }
>> [snap]
>> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
>> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
>>
>>
>> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register() will
>> register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.
> It would be helpful to mention this fact (that the system is big.LITTLE, and
> the boot cores are not Cortex-A73) earlier in the report.
will take care
>
>> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register already
>> register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
>> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so arch_timer_read_counter will
>> always point to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.
> Hmm... yes, AFAICT this cannot work unless the affected CPUs are up before we
> probe, and it doesn't make much sense for arch_counter_register() to look at
> arch_timer_counter_has_wa() since it can be called before all CPUs are up.
>
>> Looks like this bug is side effect of following patch:
>>
>> commit 0ea415390cd345b7d09e8c9ebd4b68adfe873043
>> Author: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>> Date:   Mon Apr 8 16:49:07 2019 +0100
>>
>>      clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Use arch_timer_read_counter to access stable
>> counters
>>
>>      Instead of always going via arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable to access the
>>      counter workaround, let's have arch_timer_read_counter point to the
>>      right method.
>>
>>      For that, we need to track whether any CPU in the system has a
>>      workaround for the counter. This is done by having an atomic variable
>>      tracking this.
>>
>>      Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>>      Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>      Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>>
> Yeah, that does look to be broken, but I think there are futher issues anyway
> (e.g. late onlining).
>
> AFAICT we need to detect this *stupidly early* in the CPU bringup path in order
> to handle this safely, which is quite painful.
>
> What a great.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
  2023-01-05 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-01-09  6:52     ` Yogesh Lal
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-09  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm


On 1/5/2023 7:52 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:33:48 +0000,
> Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.
>>
>> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
>> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during
>> timer register using following path.
> Have you checked whether the issue is still present on 6.1?
yes, its preset there as well.
>
>> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
>> 1);
>>
>> [code snap]
>> 564 static
>> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
>> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
>> 566                               bool local)
>> 567 {
>> 568     int i;
>> 569
>> 570     if (local) {
>> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
>> 572     } else {
>> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
>> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
>> 575     }
>> 576
>> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
>> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
>>
>>
>> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
>> counter is used.
>>
>> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>> 1009 {
>> 1010     u64 start_count;
>> 1011
>> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
>> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
>> 1015
>> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
>> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
>> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
>> 1020             else
>> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
>> 1022         } else {
>> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
>> 1025             else
>> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
>> 1027         }
>> [snap]
>> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
>> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
>>
>>
>> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register()
>> will register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.
>>
>> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register
>> already register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
>> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so
>> arch_timer_read_counter will always point to
>> !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.
> Please try the following hack, only compile tested as I do not have
> access to any affected HW, and report whether this solves your issue
> or not. Note that this is based on 6.2-rc2.

tested it on affected h/w but looks like sched_clock is still pointing 
to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls,
may be due to sched_clock_register will register once during non errata 
impacted core booting.

1007 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
1008 {
[snap]
1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);


Also update_clock_read_data will called with 
!arch_timer_counter_has_wa() read function calls.

153 void sched_clock_register(u64 (*read)(void), int bits, unsigned long 
rate)
[snap]
183     cd.actual_read_sched_clock = read;
184
185     rd.read_sched_clock    = read;
186     rd.sched_clock_mask    = new_mask;
187     rd.mult            = new_mult;
188     rd.shift        = new_shift;
189     rd.epoch_cyc        = new_epoch;
190     rd.epoch_ns        = ns;
191
192     update_clock_read_data(&rd);

> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index e09d4427f604..a7cf0a2c86d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ static u64 arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
>   	return arch_timer_read_counter();
>   }
>   
> +static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void);
> +
> +static u64 (*arch_counter_get_read_fn(void))(void)
> +{
> +	u64 (*rd)(void);
> +
> +	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> +	    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> +		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> +		else
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> +	} else {
> +		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> +		else
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> +	}
> +
> +	return rd;
> +}
> +
>   static struct clocksource clocksource_counter = {
>   	.name	= "arch_sys_counter",
>   	.id	= CSID_ARM_ARCH_COUNTER,
> @@ -571,8 +593,10 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
>   			per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
> +	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
>   		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> +		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
> +	}
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Don't use the vdso fastpath if errata require using the
> @@ -641,7 +665,7 @@ static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)
>   #else
>   #define arch_timer_check_ool_workaround(t,a)		do { } while(0)
>   #define arch_timer_this_cpu_has_cntvct_wa()		({false;})
> -#define arch_timer_counter_has_wa()			({false;})
> +static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)		{ return false; }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER_OOL_WORKAROUND */
>   
>   static __always_inline irqreturn_t timer_handler(const int access,
> @@ -1079,22 +1103,7 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>   
>   	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>   	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> -		u64 (*rd)(void);
> -
> -		if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> -		    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> -			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> -			else
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> -		} else {
> -			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> -			else
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> -		}
> -
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = rd;
> +		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
>   		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
>   	} else {
>   		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-09  6:52     ` Yogesh Lal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-09  6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm


On 1/5/2023 7:52 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 13:33:48 +0000,
> Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are observing issue on A73 core where ERRATUM_858921 is broken.
>>
>> On 5.15 kernel arch_timer_enable_workaround is set by reading
>> arm64_858921_read_cntpct_el0 and arm64_858921_read_cntvct_el0 during
>> timer register using following path.
> Have you checked whether the issue is still present on 6.1?
yes, its preset there as well.
>
>> arch_timer_enable_workaround->atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use,
>> 1);
>>
>> [code snap]
>> 564 static
>> 565 void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct
>> arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa,
>> 566                               bool local)
>> 567 {
>> 568     int i;
>> 569
>> 570     if (local) {
>> 571 __this_cpu_write(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, wa);
>> 572     } else {
>> 573             for_each_possible_cpu(i)
>> 574                     per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
>> 575     }
>> 576
>> 577     if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
>> 578 atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
>>
>>
>> and based on above workaround enablement , appropriate function to get
>> counter is used.
>>
>> 1008 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>> 1009 {
>> 1010     u64 start_count;
>> 1011
>> 1012     /* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>> 1013     if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
>> 1014         u64 (*rd)(void);
>> 1015
>> 1016         if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
>> 1017             arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
>> 1018             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1019                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
>> 1020             else
>> 1021                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
>> 1022         } else {
>> 1023             if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
>> 1024                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
>> 1025             else
>> 1026                 rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
>> 1027         }
>> [snap]
>> 1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
>> 1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);
>>
>>
>> As our boot cores are not impacted by errata sched_clock_register()
>> will register !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() callback.
>>
>> Now when errata impacted core boots up and sched_clock_register
>> already register will !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() path.
>> As sched_clock_register is not per_cpu bases so
>> arch_timer_read_counter will always point to
>> !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls.
> Please try the following hack, only compile tested as I do not have
> access to any affected HW, and report whether this solves your issue
> or not. Note that this is based on 6.2-rc2.

tested it on affected h/w but looks like sched_clock is still pointing 
to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls,
may be due to sched_clock_register will register once during non errata 
impacted core booting.

1007 static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
1008 {
[snap]
1043     /* 56 bits minimum, so we assume worst case rollover */
1044     sched_clock_register(arch_timer_read_counter, 56, arch_timer_rate);


Also update_clock_read_data will called with 
!arch_timer_counter_has_wa() read function calls.

153 void sched_clock_register(u64 (*read)(void), int bits, unsigned long 
rate)
[snap]
183     cd.actual_read_sched_clock = read;
184
185     rd.read_sched_clock    = read;
186     rd.sched_clock_mask    = new_mask;
187     rd.mult            = new_mult;
188     rd.shift        = new_shift;
189     rd.epoch_cyc        = new_epoch;
190     rd.epoch_ns        = ns;
191
192     update_clock_read_data(&rd);

> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index e09d4427f604..a7cf0a2c86d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,28 @@ static u64 arch_counter_read_cc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
>   	return arch_timer_read_counter();
>   }
>   
> +static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void);
> +
> +static u64 (*arch_counter_get_read_fn(void))(void)
> +{
> +	u64 (*rd)(void);
> +
> +	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> +	    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> +		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> +		else
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> +	} else {
> +		if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> +		else
> +			rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> +	}
> +
> +	return rd;
> +}
> +
>   static struct clocksource clocksource_counter = {
>   	.name	= "arch_sys_counter",
>   	.id	= CSID_ARM_ARCH_COUNTER,
> @@ -571,8 +593,10 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
>   			per_cpu(timer_unstable_counter_workaround, i) = wa;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0)
> +	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
>   		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> +		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
> +	}
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Don't use the vdso fastpath if errata require using the
> @@ -641,7 +665,7 @@ static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)
>   #else
>   #define arch_timer_check_ool_workaround(t,a)		do { } while(0)
>   #define arch_timer_this_cpu_has_cntvct_wa()		({false;})
> -#define arch_timer_counter_has_wa()			({false;})
> +static bool arch_timer_counter_has_wa(void)		{ return false; }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER_OOL_WORKAROUND */
>   
>   static __always_inline irqreturn_t timer_handler(const int access,
> @@ -1079,22 +1103,7 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>   
>   	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>   	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> -		u64 (*rd)(void);
> -
> -		if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64) && !is_hyp_mode_available()) ||
> -		    arch_timer_uses_ppi == ARCH_TIMER_VIRT_PPI) {
> -			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct_stable;
> -			else
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> -		} else {
> -			if (arch_timer_counter_has_wa())
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct_stable;
> -			else
> -				rd = arch_counter_get_cntpct;
> -		}
> -
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = rd;
> +		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
>   		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
>   	} else {
>   		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
  2023-01-09  6:52     ` Yogesh Lal
@ 2023-01-09 10:39       ` Marc Zyngier
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-01-09 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yogesh Lal
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:52:20 +0000,
Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
> 
> tested it on affected h/w but looks like sched_clock is still pointing
> to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls,
> may be due to sched_clock_register will register once during non
> errata impacted core booting.

Ah, of course. We register the function itself instead of an
indirection. Please try this on top of the previous patch.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index a7cf0a2c86d3..8232c86b9e7c 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -217,7 +217,12 @@ static notrace u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
  * to exist on arm64. arm doesn't use this before DT is probed so even
  * if we don't have the cp15 accessors we won't have a problem.
  */
-u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
+static u64 (*__arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
+
+u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void)
+{
+	return __arch_timer_read_counter();
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_timer_read_counter);
 
 static u64 arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs)
@@ -595,7 +600,7 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
 
 	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
 		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
-		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
+		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1103,10 +1108,10 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
 
 	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
 	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
-		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
+		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
 		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
 	} else {
-		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
+		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
 	}
 
 	width = arch_counter_get_width();
diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
index e3c3816d19ba..3ac297a756e8 100644
--- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
+++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct arch_timer_mem {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
 
 extern u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void);
-extern u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void);
+extern u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void);
 extern struct arch_timer_kvm_info *arch_timer_get_kvm_info(void);
 extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
 

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-09 10:39       ` Marc Zyngier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-01-09 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yogesh Lal
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm

On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:52:20 +0000,
Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
> 
> tested it on affected h/w but looks like sched_clock is still pointing
> to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls,
> may be due to sched_clock_register will register once during non
> errata impacted core booting.

Ah, of course. We register the function itself instead of an
indirection. Please try this on top of the previous patch.

Thanks,

	M.

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
index a7cf0a2c86d3..8232c86b9e7c 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
@@ -217,7 +217,12 @@ static notrace u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
  * to exist on arm64. arm doesn't use this before DT is probed so even
  * if we don't have the cp15 accessors we won't have a problem.
  */
-u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
+static u64 (*__arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
+
+u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void)
+{
+	return __arch_timer_read_counter();
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_timer_read_counter);
 
 static u64 arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs)
@@ -595,7 +600,7 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
 
 	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
 		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
-		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
+		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -1103,10 +1108,10 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
 
 	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
 	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
-		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
+		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
 		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
 	} else {
-		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
+		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
 	}
 
 	width = arch_counter_get_width();
diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
index e3c3816d19ba..3ac297a756e8 100644
--- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
+++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct arch_timer_mem {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
 
 extern u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void);
-extern u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void);
+extern u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void);
 extern struct arch_timer_kvm_info *arch_timer_get_kvm_info(void);
 extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
 

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
  2023-01-09 10:39       ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-01-12 12:47         ` Yogesh Lal
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-12 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm


On 1/9/2023 4:09 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:52:20 +0000,
> Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> tested it on affected h/w but looks like sched_clock is still pointing
>> to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls,
>> may be due to sched_clock_register will register once during non
>> errata impacted core booting.
> Ah, of course. We register the function itself instead of an
> indirection. Please try this on top of the previous patch.
Thanks for the patch, its working fine now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index a7cf0a2c86d3..8232c86b9e7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,12 @@ static notrace u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
>    * to exist on arm64. arm doesn't use this before DT is probed so even
>    * if we don't have the cp15 accessors we won't have a problem.
>    */
> -u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> +static u64 (*__arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> +
> +u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void)
> +{
> +	return __arch_timer_read_counter();
> +}
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_timer_read_counter);
>   
>   static u64 arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs)
> @@ -595,7 +600,7 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
>   
>   	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
>   		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
> +		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
>   	}
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1103,10 +1108,10 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>   
>   	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>   	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
> +		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
>   		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
>   	} else {
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
> +		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
>   	}
>   
>   	width = arch_counter_get_width();
> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> index e3c3816d19ba..3ac297a756e8 100644
> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct arch_timer_mem {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>   
>   extern u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void);
> -extern u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void);
> +extern u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void);
>   extern struct arch_timer_kvm_info *arch_timer_get_kvm_info(void);
>   extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
>   
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel
@ 2023-01-12 12:47         ` Yogesh Lal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Yogesh Lal @ 2023-01-12 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marc Zyngier
  Cc: mark.rutland, daniel.lezcano, tglx, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-arm-msm


On 1/9/2023 4:09 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 06:52:20 +0000,
> Yogesh Lal <quic_ylal@quicinc.com> wrote:
>> tested it on affected h/w but looks like sched_clock is still pointing
>> to !arch_timer_counter_has_wa() function calls,
>> may be due to sched_clock_register will register once during non
>> errata impacted core booting.
> Ah, of course. We register the function itself instead of an
> indirection. Please try this on top of the previous patch.
Thanks for the patch, its working fine now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 	M.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index a7cf0a2c86d3..8232c86b9e7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -217,7 +217,12 @@ static notrace u64 arch_counter_get_cntvct(void)
>    * to exist on arm64. arm doesn't use this before DT is probed so even
>    * if we don't have the cp15 accessors we won't have a problem.
>    */
> -u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> +static u64 (*__arch_timer_read_counter)(void) __ro_after_init = arch_counter_get_cntvct;
> +
> +u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void)
> +{
> +	return __arch_timer_read_counter();
> +}
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_timer_read_counter);
>   
>   static u64 arch_counter_read(struct clocksource *cs)
> @@ -595,7 +600,7 @@ void arch_timer_enable_workaround(const struct arch_timer_erratum_workaround *wa
>   
>   	if (wa->read_cntvct_el0 || wa->read_cntpct_el0) {
>   		atomic_set(&timer_unstable_counter_workaround_in_use, 1);
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
> +		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
>   	}
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1103,10 +1108,10 @@ static void __init arch_counter_register(unsigned type)
>   
>   	/* Register the CP15 based counter if we have one */
>   	if (type & ARCH_TIMER_TYPE_CP15) {
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
> +		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_read_fn();
>   		clocksource_counter.vdso_clock_mode = vdso_default;
>   	} else {
> -		arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
> +		__arch_timer_read_counter = arch_counter_get_cntvct_mem;
>   	}
>   
>   	width = arch_counter_get_width();
> diff --git a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> index e3c3816d19ba..3ac297a756e8 100644
> --- a/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ struct arch_timer_mem {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_ARCH_TIMER
>   
>   extern u32 arch_timer_get_rate(void);
> -extern u64 (*arch_timer_read_counter)(void);
> +extern u64 arch_timer_read_counter(void);
>   extern struct arch_timer_kvm_info *arch_timer_get_kvm_info(void);
>   extern bool arch_timer_evtstrm_available(void);
>   
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-12 12:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-05 13:33 ERRATUM_858921 is broken on 5.15 kernel Yogesh Lal
2023-01-05 13:33 ` Yogesh Lal
2023-01-05 14:12 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-05 14:12   ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-06 16:38   ` Yogesh Lal
2023-01-06 16:38     ` Yogesh Lal
2023-01-05 14:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-05 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09  6:52   ` Yogesh Lal
2023-01-09  6:52     ` Yogesh Lal
2023-01-09 10:39     ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-09 10:39       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-12 12:47       ` Yogesh Lal
2023-01-12 12:47         ` Yogesh Lal

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.