* [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
@ 2017-01-20 15:55 Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2017-01-20 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: jani.nikula
There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
drive-by cleanups while at it.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index e80d620846c8..d4557cfaf4eb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
- uint8_t rxdata = 0;
- int status = 0;
+ uint8_t request = 0;
+ int status;
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
if (status <= 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
goto update_status;
}
- switch (rxdata) {
+ switch (request) {
case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
default:
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
break;
}
+ if (response == DP_TEST_ACK)
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
+
update_status:
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
- DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
- &response, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
if (status <= 0)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
@ 2017-01-20 16:54 ` Patchwork
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 17:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2) Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-01-20 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/18305/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 18305v1 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/18305/revisions/1/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:246 pass:232 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-bsw-n3050 total:246 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
fi-bxt-j4205 total:246 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-bxt-t5700 total:79 pass:66 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
fi-byt-j1900 total:246 pass:219 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-byt-n2820 total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-hsw-4770 total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-hsw-4770r total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-ivb-3520m total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-ivb-3770 total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-kbl-7500u total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6260u total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-skl-6700hq total:246 pass:226 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-skl-6700k total:246 pass:222 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-snb-2520m total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-snb-2600 total:246 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
aa012aa081f6a6d2dd5a1df0f3c3736017df0d56 drm-tip: 2017y-01m-20d-09h-33m-30s UTC integration manifest
e52b416 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3561/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
@ 2017-01-20 17:04 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-20 17:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2) Patchwork
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2017-01-20 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula, intel-gfx
There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
drive-by cleanups while at it.
v2: look at the ACK bit, as the result may also contain
TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index e80d620846c8..247fbf352576 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
{
uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
- uint8_t rxdata = 0;
- int status = 0;
+ uint8_t request = 0;
+ int status;
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
if (status <= 0) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
goto update_status;
}
- switch (rxdata) {
+ switch (request) {
case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
break;
case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
- intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
break;
default:
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
break;
}
+ if (response & DP_TEST_ACK)
+ intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
+
update_status:
- status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
- DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
- &response, 1);
+ status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
if (status <= 0)
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
}
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2)
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
@ 2017-01-20 17:54 ` Patchwork
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-01-20 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/18305/
State : success
== Summary ==
Series 18305v2 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/18305/revisions/2/mbox/
fi-bdw-5557u total:246 pass:232 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:14
fi-bsw-n3050 total:246 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39
fi-bxt-j4205 total:246 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-bxt-t5700 total:79 pass:66 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:12
fi-byt-j1900 total:246 pass:219 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27
fi-byt-n2820 total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-hsw-4770 total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-hsw-4770r total:246 pass:227 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19
fi-ivb-3520m total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-kbl-7500u total:246 pass:225 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6260u total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-skl-6700hq total:246 pass:226 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20
fi-skl-6700k total:246 pass:222 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21
fi-skl-6770hq total:246 pass:233 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:13
fi-snb-2520m total:246 pass:215 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31
fi-snb-2600 total:246 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32
aa012aa081f6a6d2dd5a1df0f3c3736017df0d56 drm-tip: 2017y-01m-20d-09h-33m-30s UTC integration manifest
3576a31 drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_3563/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
@ 2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-24 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Manasi Navare @ 2017-01-23 22:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jani Nikula; +Cc: intel-gfx
Thanks for this patch. I have tested this on DPR 120 compliance test device
and verified that it works as expected.
Manasi
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 07:04:06PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
> proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
> drive-by cleanups while at it.
>
> v2: look at the ACK bit, as the result may also contain
> TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE
>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index e80d620846c8..247fbf352576 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
> - uint8_t rxdata = 0;
> - int status = 0;
> + uint8_t request = 0;
> + int status;
>
> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
> if (status <= 0) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
> goto update_status;
> }
>
> - switch (rxdata) {
> + switch (request) {
> case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
> break;
> case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
> break;
> case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
> break;
> case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
> response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
> break;
> default:
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
> break;
> }
>
> + if (response & DP_TEST_ACK)
> + intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
> +
> update_status:
> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
> - DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
> - &response, 1);
> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
> if (status <= 0)
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
> }
> --
> 2.1.4
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them
2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
@ 2017-01-24 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jani Nikula @ 2017-01-24 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Manasi Navare; +Cc: intel-gfx
On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> wrote:
> Thanks for this patch. I have tested this on DPR 120 compliance test device
> and verified that it works as expected.
>
> Manasi
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 07:04:06PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> There is no point in setting intel_dp->compliance.test_type, and
>> proceeding with the autotests, if we're about to NAK the request. Some
>> drive-by cleanups while at it.
>>
>> v2: look at the ACK bit, as the result may also contain
>> TEST_EDID_CHECKSUM_WRITE
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Thanks for the review and testing, pushed to drm-intel-next-queued.
BR,
Jani.
>> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 21 +++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index e80d620846c8..247fbf352576 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -3985,45 +3985,42 @@ static uint8_t intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>> {
>> uint8_t response = DP_TEST_NAK;
>> - uint8_t rxdata = 0;
>> - int status = 0;
>> + uint8_t request = 0;
>> + int status;
>>
>> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &rxdata, 1);
>> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_REQUEST, &request);
>> if (status <= 0) {
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not read test request from sink\n");
>> goto update_status;
>> }
>>
>> - switch (rxdata) {
>> + switch (request) {
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("LINK_TRAINING test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_TRAINING;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_link_training(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("TEST_PATTERN test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_VIDEO_PATTERN;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_video_pattern(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("EDID test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_EDID_READ;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_edid(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> case DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN:
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PHY_PATTERN test requested\n");
>> - intel_dp->compliance.test_type = DP_TEST_LINK_PHY_TEST_PATTERN;
>> response = intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(intel_dp);
>> break;
>> default:
>> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", rxdata);
>> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Invalid test request '%02x'\n", request);
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> + if (response & DP_TEST_ACK)
>> + intel_dp->compliance.test_type = request;
>> +
>> update_status:
>> - status = drm_dp_dpcd_write(&intel_dp->aux,
>> - DP_TEST_RESPONSE,
>> - &response, 1);
>> + status = drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&intel_dp->aux, DP_TEST_RESPONSE, response);
>> if (status <= 0)
>> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not write test response to sink\n");
>> }
>> --
>> 2.1.4
>>
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-01-24 14:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-20 15:55 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 16:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-01-20 17:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 22:49 ` Manasi Navare
2017-01-24 14:40 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 17:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/dp: do not proceed with autotests if we don't ACK them (rev2) Patchwork
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.