From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:40:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871u6zkj7b.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373881967-16153-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes:
> First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
>
> The others are for fixing three bugs.
> Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
> for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
>
> These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
> passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?
-aneesh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:40:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871u6zkj7b.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373881967-16153-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes:
> First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
>
> The others are for fixing three bugs.
> Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
> for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
>
> These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
> passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-15 9:52 [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm, hugetlb: move up the code which check availability of free huge page Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 14:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:16 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 3:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 3:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 5:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 5:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-22 14:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-22 14:45 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm, hugetlb: trivial commenting fix Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 13:12 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-15 13:12 ` Hillf Danton
2013-07-15 14:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 14:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-22 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-22 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up alloc_huge_page() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-22 14:51 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-22 14:51 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-23 7:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-23 7:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm, hugetlb: fix and clean-up node iteration code to alloc or free Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 14:27 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-17 2:00 ` Jianguo Wu
2013-07-17 2:00 ` Jianguo Wu
2013-07-18 6:46 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-18 6:46 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm, hugetlb: remove redundant list_empty check in gather_surplus_pages() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 14:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:42 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-22 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-22 14:55 ` Michal Hocko
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm, hugetlb: do not use a page in page cache for cow optimization Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 13:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 13:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:56 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:56 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-17 8:55 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-17 8:55 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm, hugetlb: add VM_NORESERVE check in vma_has_reserves() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 14:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 15:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 15:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 2:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 2:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 5:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 5:47 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 7:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 7:12 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-18 2:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-18 2:03 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm, hugetlb: remove decrement_hugepage_resv_vma() Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 14:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 14:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-17 9:31 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-17 9:31 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 9:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm, hugetlb: decrement reserve count if VM_NORESERVE alloc page cache Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 9:52 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-15 15:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-15 15:11 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-18 2:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-18 2:02 ` Wanpeng Li
2013-07-15 14:10 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-07-15 14:10 ` [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-07-16 1:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:10 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:27 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 1:27 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 1:45 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:45 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 1:55 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 1:55 ` Sam Ben
2013-07-16 2:14 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16 2:14 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871u6zkj7b.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=js1304@gmail.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.