All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
@ 2022-12-28 14:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-12-28 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy, Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel

The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h            |  41 ------
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c | 134 +++++-------------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
index 5ea16a71c2f0..01ae6c351e50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
@@ -285,47 +285,6 @@ extern int mpc52xx_gpt_start_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt, u64 period,
 extern u64 mpc52xx_gpt_timer_period(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 extern int mpc52xx_gpt_stop_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 
-/* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ		(0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT	(1<<1)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
-
-struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
-	struct list_head list;
-
-	/* localplus bus address */
-	unsigned int cs;
-	size_t offset;
-
-	/* Memory address */
-	void *data;
-	phys_addr_t data_phys;
-
-	/* Details of transfer */
-	size_t size;
-	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
-	int flags;
-	int defer_xfer_start;
-
-	/* What to do when finished */
-	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
-
-	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
-
-	/* statistics */
-	int irq_count;
-	int irq_ticks;
-	u8 last_byte;
-	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
-};
-
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void);
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-
 /* mpc52xx_pic.c */
 extern void mpc52xx_init_irq(void);
 extern unsigned int mpc52xx_get_irq(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
index 6d1dd6e87478..32fd1345ffeb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
@@ -38,6 +38,39 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL	(0x48)
 #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM		(0x4C)
 
+#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
+#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
+#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
+
+struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
+	struct list_head list;
+
+	/* localplus bus address */
+	unsigned int cs;
+	size_t offset;
+
+	/* Memory address */
+	void *data;
+	phys_addr_t data_phys;
+
+	/* Details of transfer */
+	size_t size;
+	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
+	int flags;
+	int defer_xfer_start;
+
+	/* What to do when finished */
+	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
+
+	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
+
+	/* statistics */
+	int irq_count;
+	int irq_ticks;
+	u8 last_byte;
+	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
+};
+
 struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo {
 	struct device *dev;
 	phys_addr_t regs_phys;
@@ -381,107 +414,6 @@ static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll - Poll for DMA completion
- */
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req = lpbfifo.req;
-	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-
-	/*
-	 * For more information, see comments on the "Fat Lady" 
-	 */
-	if (dma && write)
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(0, NULL);
-	else 
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(0, NULL);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll);
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit - Submit an LPB FIFO transfer request.
- * @req: Pointer to request structure
- *
- * Return: %0 on success, -errno code on error
- */
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/* If the req pointer is already set, then a transfer is in progress */
-	if (lpbfifo.req) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/* Setup the transfer */
-	lpbfifo.req = req;
-	req->irq_count = 0;
-	req->irq_ticks = 0;
-	req->buffer_not_done_cnt = 0;
-	req->pos = 0;
-
-	mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit);
-
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req pointer is already set and a transfer was
-	 * started on submit, then this transfer is in progress
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && !lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req was previously submitted but not
-	 * started, start it now
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && lpbfifo.req == req &&
-	    lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer);
-
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	if (lpbfifo.req == req) {
-		/* Put it into reset and clear the state */
-		bcom_gen_bd_rx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
-		bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort);
-
 static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 {
 	struct resource res;
-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
@ 2022-12-28 14:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-12-28 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev, Nicholas Piggin, linux-kernel

The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h            |  41 ------
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c | 134 +++++-------------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
index 5ea16a71c2f0..01ae6c351e50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
@@ -285,47 +285,6 @@ extern int mpc52xx_gpt_start_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt, u64 period,
 extern u64 mpc52xx_gpt_timer_period(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 extern int mpc52xx_gpt_stop_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 
-/* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ		(0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT	(1<<1)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
-
-struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
-	struct list_head list;
-
-	/* localplus bus address */
-	unsigned int cs;
-	size_t offset;
-
-	/* Memory address */
-	void *data;
-	phys_addr_t data_phys;
-
-	/* Details of transfer */
-	size_t size;
-	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
-	int flags;
-	int defer_xfer_start;
-
-	/* What to do when finished */
-	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
-
-	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
-
-	/* statistics */
-	int irq_count;
-	int irq_ticks;
-	u8 last_byte;
-	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
-};
-
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void);
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-
 /* mpc52xx_pic.c */
 extern void mpc52xx_init_irq(void);
 extern unsigned int mpc52xx_get_irq(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
index 6d1dd6e87478..32fd1345ffeb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
@@ -38,6 +38,39 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL	(0x48)
 #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM		(0x4C)
 
+#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
+#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
+#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
+
+struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
+	struct list_head list;
+
+	/* localplus bus address */
+	unsigned int cs;
+	size_t offset;
+
+	/* Memory address */
+	void *data;
+	phys_addr_t data_phys;
+
+	/* Details of transfer */
+	size_t size;
+	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
+	int flags;
+	int defer_xfer_start;
+
+	/* What to do when finished */
+	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
+
+	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
+
+	/* statistics */
+	int irq_count;
+	int irq_ticks;
+	u8 last_byte;
+	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
+};
+
 struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo {
 	struct device *dev;
 	phys_addr_t regs_phys;
@@ -381,107 +414,6 @@ static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll - Poll for DMA completion
- */
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req = lpbfifo.req;
-	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-
-	/*
-	 * For more information, see comments on the "Fat Lady" 
-	 */
-	if (dma && write)
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(0, NULL);
-	else 
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(0, NULL);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll);
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit - Submit an LPB FIFO transfer request.
- * @req: Pointer to request structure
- *
- * Return: %0 on success, -errno code on error
- */
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/* If the req pointer is already set, then a transfer is in progress */
-	if (lpbfifo.req) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/* Setup the transfer */
-	lpbfifo.req = req;
-	req->irq_count = 0;
-	req->irq_ticks = 0;
-	req->buffer_not_done_cnt = 0;
-	req->pos = 0;
-
-	mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit);
-
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req pointer is already set and a transfer was
-	 * started on submit, then this transfer is in progress
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && !lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req was previously submitted but not
-	 * started, start it now
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && lpbfifo.req == req &&
-	    lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer);
-
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	if (lpbfifo.req == req) {
-		/* Put it into reset and clear the state */
-		bcom_gen_bd_rx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
-		bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort);
-
 static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 {
 	struct resource res;
-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
  2022-12-28 14:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2022-12-29 17:28   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-12-29 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: linux-kernel, Nicholas Piggin, kernel, Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 785 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---

I forgot to note here that maybe without these four exported functions
the driver is useless and can be removed completely.

I didn't look in detail, but maybe one of the recipents might know.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
@ 2022-12-29 17:28   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2022-12-29 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy, Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel, kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 785 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---

I forgot to note here that maybe without these four exported functions
the driver is useless and can be removed completely.

I didn't look in detail, but maybe one of the recipents might know.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
  2022-12-28 14:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2023-04-12 15:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2023-04-12 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy, Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7036 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?

Best regards
Uwe

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h            |  41 ------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c | 134 +++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
> index 5ea16a71c2f0..01ae6c351e50 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
> @@ -285,47 +285,6 @@ extern int mpc52xx_gpt_start_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt, u64 period,
>  extern u64 mpc52xx_gpt_timer_period(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
>  extern int mpc52xx_gpt_stop_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
>  
> -/* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ		(0)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT	(1<<1)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
> -
> -struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
> -	struct list_head list;
> -
> -	/* localplus bus address */
> -	unsigned int cs;
> -	size_t offset;
> -
> -	/* Memory address */
> -	void *data;
> -	phys_addr_t data_phys;
> -
> -	/* Details of transfer */
> -	size_t size;
> -	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
> -	int flags;
> -	int defer_xfer_start;
> -
> -	/* What to do when finished */
> -	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
> -
> -	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
> -
> -	/* statistics */
> -	int irq_count;
> -	int irq_ticks;
> -	u8 last_byte;
> -	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
> -};
> -
> -extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
> -extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
> -extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void);
> -extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
> -
>  /* mpc52xx_pic.c */
>  extern void mpc52xx_init_irq(void);
>  extern unsigned int mpc52xx_get_irq(void);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
> index 6d1dd6e87478..32fd1345ffeb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,39 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL	(0x48)
>  #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM		(0x4C)
>  
> +#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
> +#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
> +#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
> +
> +struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +
> +	/* localplus bus address */
> +	unsigned int cs;
> +	size_t offset;
> +
> +	/* Memory address */
> +	void *data;
> +	phys_addr_t data_phys;
> +
> +	/* Details of transfer */
> +	size_t size;
> +	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
> +	int flags;
> +	int defer_xfer_start;
> +
> +	/* What to do when finished */
> +	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
> +
> +	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
> +
> +	/* statistics */
> +	int irq_count;
> +	int irq_ticks;
> +	u8 last_byte;
> +	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
> +};
> +
>  struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	phys_addr_t regs_phys;
> @@ -381,107 +414,6 @@ static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll - Poll for DMA completion
> - */
> -void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void)
> -{
> -	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req = lpbfifo.req;
> -	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
> -	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * For more information, see comments on the "Fat Lady" 
> -	 */
> -	if (dma && write)
> -		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(0, NULL);
> -	else 
> -		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(0, NULL);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll);
> -
> -/**
> - * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit - Submit an LPB FIFO transfer request.
> - * @req: Pointer to request structure
> - *
> - * Return: %0 on success, -errno code on error
> - */
> -int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -
> -	/* If the req pointer is already set, then a transfer is in progress */
> -	if (lpbfifo.req) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Setup the transfer */
> -	lpbfifo.req = req;
> -	req->irq_count = 0;
> -	req->irq_ticks = 0;
> -	req->buffer_not_done_cnt = 0;
> -	req->pos = 0;
> -
> -	mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit);
> -
> -int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If the req pointer is already set and a transfer was
> -	 * started on submit, then this transfer is in progress
> -	 */
> -	if (lpbfifo.req && !lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If the req was previously submitted but not
> -	 * started, start it now
> -	 */
> -	if (lpbfifo.req && lpbfifo.req == req &&
> -	    lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
> -		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
> -	}
> -
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer);
> -
> -void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -	if (lpbfifo.req == req) {
> -		/* Put it into reset and clear the state */
> -		bcom_gen_bd_rx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
> -		bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
> -		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
> -		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort);
> -
>  static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>  {
>  	struct resource res;
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
@ 2023-04-12 15:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2023-04-12 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev, Nicholas Piggin, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7036 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?

Best regards
Uwe

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h            |  41 ------
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c | 134 +++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
> index 5ea16a71c2f0..01ae6c351e50 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
> @@ -285,47 +285,6 @@ extern int mpc52xx_gpt_start_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt, u64 period,
>  extern u64 mpc52xx_gpt_timer_period(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
>  extern int mpc52xx_gpt_stop_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
>  
> -/* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ		(0)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT	(1<<1)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
> -#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
> -
> -struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
> -	struct list_head list;
> -
> -	/* localplus bus address */
> -	unsigned int cs;
> -	size_t offset;
> -
> -	/* Memory address */
> -	void *data;
> -	phys_addr_t data_phys;
> -
> -	/* Details of transfer */
> -	size_t size;
> -	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
> -	int flags;
> -	int defer_xfer_start;
> -
> -	/* What to do when finished */
> -	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
> -
> -	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
> -
> -	/* statistics */
> -	int irq_count;
> -	int irq_ticks;
> -	u8 last_byte;
> -	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
> -};
> -
> -extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
> -extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
> -extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void);
> -extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
> -
>  /* mpc52xx_pic.c */
>  extern void mpc52xx_init_irq(void);
>  extern unsigned int mpc52xx_get_irq(void);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
> index 6d1dd6e87478..32fd1345ffeb 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,39 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL	(0x48)
>  #define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM		(0x4C)
>  
> +#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
> +#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
> +#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
> +
> +struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +
> +	/* localplus bus address */
> +	unsigned int cs;
> +	size_t offset;
> +
> +	/* Memory address */
> +	void *data;
> +	phys_addr_t data_phys;
> +
> +	/* Details of transfer */
> +	size_t size;
> +	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
> +	int flags;
> +	int defer_xfer_start;
> +
> +	/* What to do when finished */
> +	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
> +
> +	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
> +
> +	/* statistics */
> +	int irq_count;
> +	int irq_ticks;
> +	u8 last_byte;
> +	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
> +};
> +
>  struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	phys_addr_t regs_phys;
> @@ -381,107 +414,6 @@ static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll - Poll for DMA completion
> - */
> -void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void)
> -{
> -	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req = lpbfifo.req;
> -	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
> -	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * For more information, see comments on the "Fat Lady" 
> -	 */
> -	if (dma && write)
> -		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(0, NULL);
> -	else 
> -		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(0, NULL);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll);
> -
> -/**
> - * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit - Submit an LPB FIFO transfer request.
> - * @req: Pointer to request structure
> - *
> - * Return: %0 on success, -errno code on error
> - */
> -int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -
> -	/* If the req pointer is already set, then a transfer is in progress */
> -	if (lpbfifo.req) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Setup the transfer */
> -	lpbfifo.req = req;
> -	req->irq_count = 0;
> -	req->irq_ticks = 0;
> -	req->buffer_not_done_cnt = 0;
> -	req->pos = 0;
> -
> -	mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit);
> -
> -int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If the req pointer is already set and a transfer was
> -	 * started on submit, then this transfer is in progress
> -	 */
> -	if (lpbfifo.req && !lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -		return -EBUSY;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * If the req was previously submitted but not
> -	 * started, start it now
> -	 */
> -	if (lpbfifo.req && lpbfifo.req == req &&
> -	    lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
> -		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
> -	}
> -
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer);
> -
> -void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
> -{
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -	if (lpbfifo.req == req) {
> -		/* Put it into reset and clear the state */
> -		bcom_gen_bd_rx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
> -		bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
> -		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
> -		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
> -	}
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort);
> -
>  static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>  {
>  	struct resource res;
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
  2023-04-12 15:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2023-04-13  0:11     ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-04-13  0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy, Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev,
	linux-kernel

Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
>> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>
> I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?

Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
driver.

Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
provided by this driver?

I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions
@ 2023-04-13  0:11     ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-04-13  0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König, Anatolij Gustschin
  Cc: Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev, Nicholas Piggin, linux-kernel

Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
>> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>
> I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?

Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
driver.

Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
provided by this driver?

I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
  2023-04-13  0:11     ` Michael Ellerman
@ 2023-04-13  6:16       ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2023-04-13  6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 22690 bytes --]

While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---

Hello Michael,

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
> 
> Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
> driver.
> 
> Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
> provided by this driver?

I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
references to this thread :-)

> I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
> it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
> driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.

fair enough, here it is.

Best regards
Uwe

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h            |  41 --
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig           |   5 -
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile          |   2 -
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c | 594 ------------------
 4 files changed, 642 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
index 5ea16a71c2f0..01ae6c351e50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
@@ -285,47 +285,6 @@ extern int mpc52xx_gpt_start_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt, u64 period,
 extern u64 mpc52xx_gpt_timer_period(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 extern int mpc52xx_gpt_stop_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 
-/* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ		(0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT	(1<<1)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
-
-struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
-	struct list_head list;
-
-	/* localplus bus address */
-	unsigned int cs;
-	size_t offset;
-
-	/* Memory address */
-	void *data;
-	phys_addr_t data_phys;
-
-	/* Details of transfer */
-	size_t size;
-	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
-	int flags;
-	int defer_xfer_start;
-
-	/* What to do when finished */
-	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
-
-	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
-
-	/* statistics */
-	int irq_count;
-	int irq_ticks;
-	u8 last_byte;
-	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
-};
-
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void);
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-
 /* mpc52xx_pic.c */
 extern void mpc52xx_init_irq(void);
 extern unsigned int mpc52xx_get_irq(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig
index b72ed2950ca8..384e4bef2c28 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig
@@ -54,8 +54,3 @@ config PPC_MPC5200_BUGFIX
 	  for MPC5200B based boards.
 
 	  It is safe to say 'Y' here
-
-config PPC_MPC5200_LPBFIFO
-	tristate "MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver"
-	depends on PPC_MPC52xx && PPC_BESTCOMM
-	select PPC_BESTCOMM_GEN_BD
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile
index f40d48eab779..1b1f72d83342 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile
@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= mpc52xx_sleep.o mpc52xx_pm.o
 ifdef CONFIG_PPC_LITE5200
 	obj-$(CONFIG_PM)	+= lite5200_sleep.o lite5200_pm.o
 endif
-
-obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_LPBFIFO)	+= mpc52xx_lpbfifo.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 6d1dd6e87478..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,594 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-/*
- * LocalPlus Bus FIFO driver for the Freescale MPC52xx.
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2009 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
- *
- * Todo:
- * - Add support for multiple requests to be queued.
- */
-
-#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
-#include <linux/of_platform.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <asm/io.h>
-#include <asm/mpc52xx.h>
-#include <asm/time.h>
-
-#include <linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h>
-#include <linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h>
-#include <linux/fsl/bestcomm/gen_bd.h>
-
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MPC5200 LocalPlus FIFO device driver");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE		(0x00)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_START_ADDRESS	(0x04)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_CONTROL		(0x08)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE		(0x0C)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS	(0x14)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA		(0x40)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_STATUS		(0x44)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL	(0x48)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM		(0x4C)
-
-struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo {
-	struct device *dev;
-	phys_addr_t regs_phys;
-	void __iomem *regs;
-	int irq;
-	spinlock_t lock;
-
-	struct bcom_task *bcom_tx_task;
-	struct bcom_task *bcom_rx_task;
-	struct bcom_task *bcom_cur_task;
-
-	/* Current state data */
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req;
-	int dma_irqs_enabled;
-};
-
-/* The MPC5200 has only one fifo, so only need one instance structure */
-static struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo lpbfifo;
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick - Trigger the next block of data to be transferred
- *
- * @req: Pointer to request structure
- */
-static void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	size_t transfer_size = req->size - req->pos;
-	struct bcom_bd *bd;
-	void __iomem *reg;
-	u32 *data;
-	int i;
-	int bit_fields;
-	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-	int poll_dma = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA;
-
-	/* Set and clear the reset bits; is good practice in User Manual */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-
-	/* set master enable bit */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x00000001);
-	if (!dma) {
-		/* While the FIFO can be setup for transfer sizes as large as
-		 * 16M-1, the FIFO itself is only 512 bytes deep and it does
-		 * not generate interrupts for FIFO full events (only transfer
-		 * complete will raise an IRQ).  Therefore when not using
-		 * Bestcomm to drive the FIFO it needs to either be polled, or
-		 * transfers need to constrained to the size of the fifo.
-		 *
-		 * This driver restricts the size of the transfer
-		 */
-		if (transfer_size > 512)
-			transfer_size = 512;
-
-		/* Load the FIFO with data */
-		if (write) {
-			reg = lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA;
-			data = req->data + req->pos;
-			for (i = 0; i < transfer_size; i += 4)
-				out_be32(reg, *data++);
-		}
-
-		/* Unmask both error and completion irqs */
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x00000301);
-	} else {
-		/* Choose the correct direction
-		 *
-		 * Configure the watermarks so DMA will always complete correctly.
-		 * It may be worth experimenting with the ALARM value to see if
-		 * there is a performance impact.  However, if it is wrong there
-		 * is a risk of DMA not transferring the last chunk of data
-		 */
-		if (write) {
-			out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM, 0x1e4);
-			out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL, 7);
-			lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task = lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task;
-		} else {
-			out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM, 0x1ff);
-			out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL, 0);
-			lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task = lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task;
-
-			if (poll_dma) {
-				if (lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled) {
-					disable_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task));
-					lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled = 0;
-				}
-			} else {
-				if (!lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled) {
-					enable_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task));
-					lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled = 1;
-				}
-			}
-		}
-
-		bd = bcom_prepare_next_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task);
-		bd->status = transfer_size;
-		if (!write) {
-			/*
-			 * In the DMA read case, the DMA doesn't complete,
-			 * possibly due to incorrect watermarks in the ALARM
-			 * and CONTROL regs. For now instead of trying to
-			 * determine the right watermarks that will make this
-			 * work, just increase the number of bytes the FIFO is
-			 * expecting.
-			 *
-			 * When submitting another operation, the FIFO will get
-			 * reset, so the condition of the FIFO waiting for a
-			 * non-existent 4 bytes will get cleared.
-			 */
-			transfer_size += 4; /* BLECH! */
-		}
-		bd->data[0] = req->data_phys + req->pos;
-		bcom_submit_next_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task, NULL);
-
-		/* error irq & master enabled bit */
-		bit_fields = 0x00000201;
-
-		/* Unmask irqs */
-		if (write && (!poll_dma))
-			bit_fields |= 0x00000100; /* completion irq too */
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, bit_fields);
-	}
-
-	/* Set transfer size, width, chip select and READ mode */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_START_ADDRESS,
-		 req->offset + req->pos);
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, transfer_size);
-
-	bit_fields = req->cs << 24 | 0x000008;
-	if (!write)
-		bit_fields |= 0x010000; /* read mode */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_CONTROL, bit_fields);
-
-	/* Kick it off */
-	if (!lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start)
-		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
-	if (dma)
-		bcom_enable(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task);
-}
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq - IRQ handler for LPB FIFO
- * @irq: IRQ number to be handled
- * @dev_id: device ID cookie
- *
- * On transmit, the dma completion irq triggers before the fifo completion
- * triggers.  Handle the dma completion here instead of the LPB FIFO Bestcomm
- * task completion irq because everything is not really done until the LPB FIFO
- * completion irq triggers.
- *
- * In other words:
- * For DMA, on receive, the "Fat Lady" is the bestcom completion irq. on
- * transmit, the fifo completion irq is the "Fat Lady". The opera (or in this
- * case the DMA/FIFO operation) is not finished until the "Fat Lady" sings.
- *
- * Reasons for entering this routine:
- * 1) PIO mode rx and tx completion irq
- * 2) DMA interrupt mode tx completion irq
- * 3) DMA polled mode tx
- *
- * Exit conditions:
- * 1) Transfer aborted
- * 2) FIFO complete without DMA; more data to do
- * 3) FIFO complete without DMA; all data transferred
- * 4) FIFO complete using DMA
- *
- * Condition 1 can occur regardless of whether or not DMA is used.
- * It requires executing the callback to report the error and exiting
- * immediately.
- *
- * Condition 2 requires programming the FIFO with the next block of data
- *
- * Condition 3 requires executing the callback to report completion
- *
- * Condition 4 means the same as 3, except that we also retrieve the bcom
- * buffer so DMA doesn't get clogged up.
- *
- * To make things trickier, the spinlock must be dropped before
- * executing the callback, otherwise we could end up with a deadlock
- * or nested spinlock condition.  The out path is non-trivial, so
- * extra fiddling is done to make sure all paths lead to the same
- * outbound code.
- *
- * Return: irqreturn code (%IRQ_HANDLED)
- */
-static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req;
-	u32 status = in_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS);
-	void __iomem *reg;
-	u32 *data;
-	int count, i;
-	int do_callback = 0;
-	u32 ts;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int dma, write, poll_dma;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	ts = mftb();
-
-	req = lpbfifo.req;
-	if (!req) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		pr_err("bogus LPBFIFO IRQ\n");
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-	poll_dma = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA;
-
-	if (dma && !write) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		pr_err("bogus LPBFIFO IRQ (dma and not writing)\n");
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	if ((status & 0x01) == 0) {
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* check abort bit */
-	if (status & 0x10) {
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-		do_callback = 1;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* Read result from hardware */
-	count = in_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS);
-	count &= 0x00ffffff;
-
-	if (!dma && !write) {
-		/* copy the data out of the FIFO */
-		reg = lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA;
-		data = req->data + req->pos;
-		for (i = 0; i < count; i += 4)
-			*data++ = in_be32(reg);
-	}
-
-	/* Update transfer position and count */
-	req->pos += count;
-
-	/* Decide what to do next */
-	if (req->size - req->pos)
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req); /* more work to do */
-	else
-		do_callback = 1;
-
- out:
-	/* Clear the IRQ */
-	out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS, 0x01);
-
-	if (dma && (status & 0x11)) {
-		/*
-		 * Count the DMA as complete only when the FIFO completion
-		 * status or abort bits are set.
-		 *
-		 * (status & 0x01) should always be the case except sometimes
-		 * when using polled DMA.
-		 *
-		 * (status & 0x10) {transfer aborted}: This case needs more
-		 * testing.
-		 */
-		bcom_retrieve_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task, &status, NULL);
-	}
-	req->last_byte = ((u8 *)req->data)[req->size - 1];
-
-	/* When the do_callback flag is set; it means the transfer is finished
-	 * so set the FIFO as idle */
-	if (do_callback)
-		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-
-	if (irq != 0) /* don't increment on polled case */
-		req->irq_count++;
-
-	req->irq_ticks += mftb() - ts;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/* Spinlock is released; it is now safe to call the callback */
-	if (do_callback && req->callback)
-		req->callback(req);
-
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq - IRQ handler for LPB FIFO Bestcomm task
- * @irq: IRQ number to be handled
- * @dev_id: device ID cookie
- *
- * Only used when receiving data.
- *
- * Return: irqreturn code (%IRQ_HANDLED)
- */
-static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	u32 status;
-	u32 ts;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	ts = mftb();
-
-	req = lpbfifo.req;
-	if (!req || (req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA)) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	if (irq != 0) /* don't increment on polled case */
-		req->irq_count++;
-
-	if (!bcom_buffer_done(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task)) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-		req->buffer_not_done_cnt++;
-		if ((req->buffer_not_done_cnt % 1000) == 0)
-			pr_err("transfer stalled\n");
-
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	bcom_retrieve_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task, &status, NULL);
-
-	req->last_byte = ((u8 *)req->data)[req->size - 1];
-
-	req->pos = status & 0x00ffffff;
-
-	/* Mark the FIFO as idle */
-	lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-
-	/* Release the lock before calling out to the callback. */
-	req->irq_ticks += mftb() - ts;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	if (req->callback)
-		req->callback(req);
-
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll - Poll for DMA completion
- */
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req = lpbfifo.req;
-	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-
-	/*
-	 * For more information, see comments on the "Fat Lady" 
-	 */
-	if (dma && write)
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(0, NULL);
-	else 
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(0, NULL);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll);
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit - Submit an LPB FIFO transfer request.
- * @req: Pointer to request structure
- *
- * Return: %0 on success, -errno code on error
- */
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/* If the req pointer is already set, then a transfer is in progress */
-	if (lpbfifo.req) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/* Setup the transfer */
-	lpbfifo.req = req;
-	req->irq_count = 0;
-	req->irq_ticks = 0;
-	req->buffer_not_done_cnt = 0;
-	req->pos = 0;
-
-	mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit);
-
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req pointer is already set and a transfer was
-	 * started on submit, then this transfer is in progress
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && !lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req was previously submitted but not
-	 * started, start it now
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && lpbfifo.req == req &&
-	    lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer);
-
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	if (lpbfifo.req == req) {
-		/* Put it into reset and clear the state */
-		bcom_gen_bd_rx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
-		bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort);
-
-static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe(struct platform_device *op)
-{
-	struct resource res;
-	int rc = -ENOMEM;
-
-	if (lpbfifo.dev != NULL)
-		return -ENOSPC;
-
-	lpbfifo.irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
-	if (!lpbfifo.irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	if (of_address_to_resource(op->dev.of_node, 0, &res))
-		return -ENODEV;
-	lpbfifo.regs_phys = res.start;
-	lpbfifo.regs = of_iomap(op->dev.of_node, 0);
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	spin_lock_init(&lpbfifo.lock);
-
-	/* Put FIFO into reset */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-
-	/* Register the interrupt handler */
-	rc = request_irq(lpbfifo.irq, mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq, 0,
-			 "mpc52xx-lpbfifo", &lpbfifo);
-	if (rc)
-		goto err_irq;
-
-	/* Request the Bestcomm receive (fifo --> memory) task and IRQ */
-	lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task =
-		bcom_gen_bd_rx_init(2, res.start + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA,
-				    BCOM_INITIATOR_SCLPC, BCOM_IPR_SCLPC,
-				    16*1024*1024);
-	if (!lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task)
-		goto err_bcom_rx;
-
-	rc = request_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task),
-			 mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq, 0,
-			 "mpc52xx-lpbfifo-rx", &lpbfifo);
-	if (rc)
-		goto err_bcom_rx_irq;
-
-	lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled = 1;
-
-	/* Request the Bestcomm transmit (memory --> fifo) task and IRQ */
-	lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task =
-		bcom_gen_bd_tx_init(2, res.start + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA,
-				    BCOM_INITIATOR_SCLPC, BCOM_IPR_SCLPC);
-	if (!lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task)
-		goto err_bcom_tx;
-
-	lpbfifo.dev = &op->dev;
-	return 0;
-
- err_bcom_tx:
-	free_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task), &lpbfifo);
- err_bcom_rx_irq:
-	bcom_gen_bd_rx_release(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
- err_bcom_rx:
-	free_irq(lpbfifo.irq, &lpbfifo);
- err_irq:
-	iounmap(lpbfifo.regs);
-	lpbfifo.regs = NULL;
-
-	dev_err(&op->dev, "mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe() failed\n");
-	return -ENODEV;
-}
-
-
-static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_remove(struct platform_device *op)
-{
-	if (lpbfifo.dev != &op->dev)
-		return 0;
-
-	/* Put FIFO in reset */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-
-	/* Release the bestcomm transmit task */
-	free_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task), &lpbfifo);
-	bcom_gen_bd_tx_release(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
-	
-	/* Release the bestcomm receive task */
-	free_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task), &lpbfifo);
-	bcom_gen_bd_rx_release(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
-
-	free_irq(lpbfifo.irq, &lpbfifo);
-	iounmap(lpbfifo.regs);
-	lpbfifo.regs = NULL;
-	lpbfifo.dev = NULL;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static const struct of_device_id mpc52xx_lpbfifo_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-lpbfifo", },
-	{},
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpc52xx_lpbfifo_match);
-
-static struct platform_driver mpc52xx_lpbfifo_driver = {
-	.driver = {
-		.name = "mpc52xx-lpbfifo",
-		.of_match_table = mpc52xx_lpbfifo_match,
-	},
-	.probe = mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe,
-	.remove = mpc52xx_lpbfifo_remove,
-};
-module_platform_driver(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_driver);

base-commit: fe15c26ee26efa11741a7b632e9f23b01aca4cc6
-- 
2.39.2

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
@ 2023-04-13  6:16       ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2023-04-13  6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, linux-kernel, Nicholas Piggin,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 22690 bytes --]

While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---

Hello Michael,

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> >
> > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
> 
> Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
> driver.
> 
> Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
> provided by this driver?

I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
references to this thread :-)

> I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
> it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
> driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.

fair enough, here it is.

Best regards
Uwe

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h            |  41 --
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig           |   5 -
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile          |   2 -
 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c | 594 ------------------
 4 files changed, 642 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
index 5ea16a71c2f0..01ae6c351e50 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mpc52xx.h
@@ -285,47 +285,6 @@ extern int mpc52xx_gpt_start_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt, u64 period,
 extern u64 mpc52xx_gpt_timer_period(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 extern int mpc52xx_gpt_stop_timer(struct mpc52xx_gpt_priv *gpt);
 
-/* mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c */
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_READ		(0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE		(1<<0)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_INCREMENT	(1<<1)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA		(1<<2)
-#define MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA		(1<<3)
-
-struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request {
-	struct list_head list;
-
-	/* localplus bus address */
-	unsigned int cs;
-	size_t offset;
-
-	/* Memory address */
-	void *data;
-	phys_addr_t data_phys;
-
-	/* Details of transfer */
-	size_t size;
-	size_t pos;	/* current position of transfer */
-	int flags;
-	int defer_xfer_start;
-
-	/* What to do when finished */
-	void (*callback)(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *);
-
-	void *priv;		/* Driver private data */
-
-	/* statistics */
-	int irq_count;
-	int irq_ticks;
-	u8 last_byte;
-	int buffer_not_done_cnt;
-};
-
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-extern void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void);
-extern int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req);
-
 /* mpc52xx_pic.c */
 extern void mpc52xx_init_irq(void);
 extern unsigned int mpc52xx_get_irq(void);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig
index b72ed2950ca8..384e4bef2c28 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Kconfig
@@ -54,8 +54,3 @@ config PPC_MPC5200_BUGFIX
 	  for MPC5200B based boards.
 
 	  It is safe to say 'Y' here
-
-config PPC_MPC5200_LPBFIFO
-	tristate "MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver"
-	depends on PPC_MPC52xx && PPC_BESTCOMM
-	select PPC_BESTCOMM_GEN_BD
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile
index f40d48eab779..1b1f72d83342 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/Makefile
@@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PM)		+= mpc52xx_sleep.o mpc52xx_pm.o
 ifdef CONFIG_PPC_LITE5200
 	obj-$(CONFIG_PM)	+= lite5200_sleep.o lite5200_pm.o
 endif
-
-obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_MPC5200_LPBFIFO)	+= mpc52xx_lpbfifo.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 6d1dd6e87478..000000000000
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/52xx/mpc52xx_lpbfifo.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,594 +0,0 @@
-// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-/*
- * LocalPlus Bus FIFO driver for the Freescale MPC52xx.
- *
- * Copyright (C) 2009 Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
- *
- * Todo:
- * - Add support for multiple requests to be queued.
- */
-
-#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
-#include <linux/of_platform.h>
-#include <linux/spinlock.h>
-#include <linux/module.h>
-#include <asm/io.h>
-#include <asm/mpc52xx.h>
-#include <asm/time.h>
-
-#include <linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm.h>
-#include <linux/fsl/bestcomm/bestcomm_priv.h>
-#include <linux/fsl/bestcomm/gen_bd.h>
-
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MPC5200 LocalPlus FIFO device driver");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE		(0x00)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_START_ADDRESS	(0x04)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_CONTROL		(0x08)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE		(0x0C)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS	(0x14)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA		(0x40)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_STATUS		(0x44)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL	(0x48)
-#define LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM		(0x4C)
-
-struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo {
-	struct device *dev;
-	phys_addr_t regs_phys;
-	void __iomem *regs;
-	int irq;
-	spinlock_t lock;
-
-	struct bcom_task *bcom_tx_task;
-	struct bcom_task *bcom_rx_task;
-	struct bcom_task *bcom_cur_task;
-
-	/* Current state data */
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req;
-	int dma_irqs_enabled;
-};
-
-/* The MPC5200 has only one fifo, so only need one instance structure */
-static struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo lpbfifo;
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick - Trigger the next block of data to be transferred
- *
- * @req: Pointer to request structure
- */
-static void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	size_t transfer_size = req->size - req->pos;
-	struct bcom_bd *bd;
-	void __iomem *reg;
-	u32 *data;
-	int i;
-	int bit_fields;
-	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-	int poll_dma = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA;
-
-	/* Set and clear the reset bits; is good practice in User Manual */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-
-	/* set master enable bit */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x00000001);
-	if (!dma) {
-		/* While the FIFO can be setup for transfer sizes as large as
-		 * 16M-1, the FIFO itself is only 512 bytes deep and it does
-		 * not generate interrupts for FIFO full events (only transfer
-		 * complete will raise an IRQ).  Therefore when not using
-		 * Bestcomm to drive the FIFO it needs to either be polled, or
-		 * transfers need to constrained to the size of the fifo.
-		 *
-		 * This driver restricts the size of the transfer
-		 */
-		if (transfer_size > 512)
-			transfer_size = 512;
-
-		/* Load the FIFO with data */
-		if (write) {
-			reg = lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA;
-			data = req->data + req->pos;
-			for (i = 0; i < transfer_size; i += 4)
-				out_be32(reg, *data++);
-		}
-
-		/* Unmask both error and completion irqs */
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x00000301);
-	} else {
-		/* Choose the correct direction
-		 *
-		 * Configure the watermarks so DMA will always complete correctly.
-		 * It may be worth experimenting with the ALARM value to see if
-		 * there is a performance impact.  However, if it is wrong there
-		 * is a risk of DMA not transferring the last chunk of data
-		 */
-		if (write) {
-			out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM, 0x1e4);
-			out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL, 7);
-			lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task = lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task;
-		} else {
-			out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_ALARM, 0x1ff);
-			out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_CONTROL, 0);
-			lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task = lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task;
-
-			if (poll_dma) {
-				if (lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled) {
-					disable_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task));
-					lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled = 0;
-				}
-			} else {
-				if (!lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled) {
-					enable_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task));
-					lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled = 1;
-				}
-			}
-		}
-
-		bd = bcom_prepare_next_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task);
-		bd->status = transfer_size;
-		if (!write) {
-			/*
-			 * In the DMA read case, the DMA doesn't complete,
-			 * possibly due to incorrect watermarks in the ALARM
-			 * and CONTROL regs. For now instead of trying to
-			 * determine the right watermarks that will make this
-			 * work, just increase the number of bytes the FIFO is
-			 * expecting.
-			 *
-			 * When submitting another operation, the FIFO will get
-			 * reset, so the condition of the FIFO waiting for a
-			 * non-existent 4 bytes will get cleared.
-			 */
-			transfer_size += 4; /* BLECH! */
-		}
-		bd->data[0] = req->data_phys + req->pos;
-		bcom_submit_next_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task, NULL);
-
-		/* error irq & master enabled bit */
-		bit_fields = 0x00000201;
-
-		/* Unmask irqs */
-		if (write && (!poll_dma))
-			bit_fields |= 0x00000100; /* completion irq too */
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, bit_fields);
-	}
-
-	/* Set transfer size, width, chip select and READ mode */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_START_ADDRESS,
-		 req->offset + req->pos);
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, transfer_size);
-
-	bit_fields = req->cs << 24 | 0x000008;
-	if (!write)
-		bit_fields |= 0x010000; /* read mode */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_CONTROL, bit_fields);
-
-	/* Kick it off */
-	if (!lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start)
-		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
-	if (dma)
-		bcom_enable(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task);
-}
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq - IRQ handler for LPB FIFO
- * @irq: IRQ number to be handled
- * @dev_id: device ID cookie
- *
- * On transmit, the dma completion irq triggers before the fifo completion
- * triggers.  Handle the dma completion here instead of the LPB FIFO Bestcomm
- * task completion irq because everything is not really done until the LPB FIFO
- * completion irq triggers.
- *
- * In other words:
- * For DMA, on receive, the "Fat Lady" is the bestcom completion irq. on
- * transmit, the fifo completion irq is the "Fat Lady". The opera (or in this
- * case the DMA/FIFO operation) is not finished until the "Fat Lady" sings.
- *
- * Reasons for entering this routine:
- * 1) PIO mode rx and tx completion irq
- * 2) DMA interrupt mode tx completion irq
- * 3) DMA polled mode tx
- *
- * Exit conditions:
- * 1) Transfer aborted
- * 2) FIFO complete without DMA; more data to do
- * 3) FIFO complete without DMA; all data transferred
- * 4) FIFO complete using DMA
- *
- * Condition 1 can occur regardless of whether or not DMA is used.
- * It requires executing the callback to report the error and exiting
- * immediately.
- *
- * Condition 2 requires programming the FIFO with the next block of data
- *
- * Condition 3 requires executing the callback to report completion
- *
- * Condition 4 means the same as 3, except that we also retrieve the bcom
- * buffer so DMA doesn't get clogged up.
- *
- * To make things trickier, the spinlock must be dropped before
- * executing the callback, otherwise we could end up with a deadlock
- * or nested spinlock condition.  The out path is non-trivial, so
- * extra fiddling is done to make sure all paths lead to the same
- * outbound code.
- *
- * Return: irqreturn code (%IRQ_HANDLED)
- */
-static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req;
-	u32 status = in_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS);
-	void __iomem *reg;
-	u32 *data;
-	int count, i;
-	int do_callback = 0;
-	u32 ts;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int dma, write, poll_dma;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	ts = mftb();
-
-	req = lpbfifo.req;
-	if (!req) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		pr_err("bogus LPBFIFO IRQ\n");
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-	poll_dma = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_POLL_DMA;
-
-	if (dma && !write) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		pr_err("bogus LPBFIFO IRQ (dma and not writing)\n");
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	if ((status & 0x01) == 0) {
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* check abort bit */
-	if (status & 0x10) {
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-		do_callback = 1;
-		goto out;
-	}
-
-	/* Read result from hardware */
-	count = in_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS);
-	count &= 0x00ffffff;
-
-	if (!dma && !write) {
-		/* copy the data out of the FIFO */
-		reg = lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA;
-		data = req->data + req->pos;
-		for (i = 0; i < count; i += 4)
-			*data++ = in_be32(reg);
-	}
-
-	/* Update transfer position and count */
-	req->pos += count;
-
-	/* Decide what to do next */
-	if (req->size - req->pos)
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req); /* more work to do */
-	else
-		do_callback = 1;
-
- out:
-	/* Clear the IRQ */
-	out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_BYTES_DONE_STATUS, 0x01);
-
-	if (dma && (status & 0x11)) {
-		/*
-		 * Count the DMA as complete only when the FIFO completion
-		 * status or abort bits are set.
-		 *
-		 * (status & 0x01) should always be the case except sometimes
-		 * when using polled DMA.
-		 *
-		 * (status & 0x10) {transfer aborted}: This case needs more
-		 * testing.
-		 */
-		bcom_retrieve_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task, &status, NULL);
-	}
-	req->last_byte = ((u8 *)req->data)[req->size - 1];
-
-	/* When the do_callback flag is set; it means the transfer is finished
-	 * so set the FIFO as idle */
-	if (do_callback)
-		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-
-	if (irq != 0) /* don't increment on polled case */
-		req->irq_count++;
-
-	req->irq_ticks += mftb() - ts;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/* Spinlock is released; it is now safe to call the callback */
-	if (do_callback && req->callback)
-		req->callback(req);
-
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq - IRQ handler for LPB FIFO Bestcomm task
- * @irq: IRQ number to be handled
- * @dev_id: device ID cookie
- *
- * Only used when receiving data.
- *
- * Return: irqreturn code (%IRQ_HANDLED)
- */
-static irqreturn_t mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req;
-	unsigned long flags;
-	u32 status;
-	u32 ts;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	ts = mftb();
-
-	req = lpbfifo.req;
-	if (!req || (req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA)) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	if (irq != 0) /* don't increment on polled case */
-		req->irq_count++;
-
-	if (!bcom_buffer_done(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task)) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-		req->buffer_not_done_cnt++;
-		if ((req->buffer_not_done_cnt % 1000) == 0)
-			pr_err("transfer stalled\n");
-
-		return IRQ_HANDLED;
-	}
-
-	bcom_retrieve_buffer(lpbfifo.bcom_cur_task, &status, NULL);
-
-	req->last_byte = ((u8 *)req->data)[req->size - 1];
-
-	req->pos = status & 0x00ffffff;
-
-	/* Mark the FIFO as idle */
-	lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-
-	/* Release the lock before calling out to the callback. */
-	req->irq_ticks += mftb() - ts;
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	if (req->callback)
-		req->callback(req);
-
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll - Poll for DMA completion
- */
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(void)
-{
-	struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req = lpbfifo.req;
-	int dma = !(req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_NO_DMA);
-	int write = req->flags & MPC52XX_LPBFIFO_FLAG_WRITE;
-
-	/*
-	 * For more information, see comments on the "Fat Lady" 
-	 */
-	if (dma && write)
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq(0, NULL);
-	else 
-		mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq(0, NULL);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll);
-
-/**
- * mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit - Submit an LPB FIFO transfer request.
- * @req: Pointer to request structure
- *
- * Return: %0 on success, -errno code on error
- */
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/* If the req pointer is already set, then a transfer is in progress */
-	if (lpbfifo.req) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/* Setup the transfer */
-	lpbfifo.req = req;
-	req->irq_count = 0;
-	req->irq_ticks = 0;
-	req->buffer_not_done_cnt = 0;
-	req->pos = 0;
-
-	mpc52xx_lpbfifo_kick(req);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit);
-
-int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req pointer is already set and a transfer was
-	 * started on submit, then this transfer is in progress
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && !lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-		return -EBUSY;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * If the req was previously submitted but not
-	 * started, start it now
-	 */
-	if (lpbfifo.req && lpbfifo.req == req &&
-	    lpbfifo.req->defer_xfer_start) {
-		out_8(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_PACKET_SIZE, 0x01);
-	}
-
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer);
-
-void mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(struct mpc52xx_lpbfifo_request *req)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-	if (lpbfifo.req == req) {
-		/* Put it into reset and clear the state */
-		bcom_gen_bd_rx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
-		bcom_gen_bd_tx_reset(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
-		out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-		lpbfifo.req = NULL;
-	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpbfifo.lock, flags);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort);
-
-static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe(struct platform_device *op)
-{
-	struct resource res;
-	int rc = -ENOMEM;
-
-	if (lpbfifo.dev != NULL)
-		return -ENOSPC;
-
-	lpbfifo.irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(op->dev.of_node, 0);
-	if (!lpbfifo.irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	if (of_address_to_resource(op->dev.of_node, 0, &res))
-		return -ENODEV;
-	lpbfifo.regs_phys = res.start;
-	lpbfifo.regs = of_iomap(op->dev.of_node, 0);
-	if (!lpbfifo.regs)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	spin_lock_init(&lpbfifo.lock);
-
-	/* Put FIFO into reset */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-
-	/* Register the interrupt handler */
-	rc = request_irq(lpbfifo.irq, mpc52xx_lpbfifo_irq, 0,
-			 "mpc52xx-lpbfifo", &lpbfifo);
-	if (rc)
-		goto err_irq;
-
-	/* Request the Bestcomm receive (fifo --> memory) task and IRQ */
-	lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task =
-		bcom_gen_bd_rx_init(2, res.start + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA,
-				    BCOM_INITIATOR_SCLPC, BCOM_IPR_SCLPC,
-				    16*1024*1024);
-	if (!lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task)
-		goto err_bcom_rx;
-
-	rc = request_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task),
-			 mpc52xx_lpbfifo_bcom_irq, 0,
-			 "mpc52xx-lpbfifo-rx", &lpbfifo);
-	if (rc)
-		goto err_bcom_rx_irq;
-
-	lpbfifo.dma_irqs_enabled = 1;
-
-	/* Request the Bestcomm transmit (memory --> fifo) task and IRQ */
-	lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task =
-		bcom_gen_bd_tx_init(2, res.start + LPBFIFO_REG_FIFO_DATA,
-				    BCOM_INITIATOR_SCLPC, BCOM_IPR_SCLPC);
-	if (!lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task)
-		goto err_bcom_tx;
-
-	lpbfifo.dev = &op->dev;
-	return 0;
-
- err_bcom_tx:
-	free_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task), &lpbfifo);
- err_bcom_rx_irq:
-	bcom_gen_bd_rx_release(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
- err_bcom_rx:
-	free_irq(lpbfifo.irq, &lpbfifo);
- err_irq:
-	iounmap(lpbfifo.regs);
-	lpbfifo.regs = NULL;
-
-	dev_err(&op->dev, "mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe() failed\n");
-	return -ENODEV;
-}
-
-
-static int mpc52xx_lpbfifo_remove(struct platform_device *op)
-{
-	if (lpbfifo.dev != &op->dev)
-		return 0;
-
-	/* Put FIFO in reset */
-	out_be32(lpbfifo.regs + LPBFIFO_REG_ENABLE, 0x01010000);
-
-	/* Release the bestcomm transmit task */
-	free_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task), &lpbfifo);
-	bcom_gen_bd_tx_release(lpbfifo.bcom_tx_task);
-	
-	/* Release the bestcomm receive task */
-	free_irq(bcom_get_task_irq(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task), &lpbfifo);
-	bcom_gen_bd_rx_release(lpbfifo.bcom_rx_task);
-
-	free_irq(lpbfifo.irq, &lpbfifo);
-	iounmap(lpbfifo.regs);
-	lpbfifo.regs = NULL;
-	lpbfifo.dev = NULL;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static const struct of_device_id mpc52xx_lpbfifo_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "fsl,mpc5200-lpbfifo", },
-	{},
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mpc52xx_lpbfifo_match);
-
-static struct platform_driver mpc52xx_lpbfifo_driver = {
-	.driver = {
-		.name = "mpc52xx-lpbfifo",
-		.of_match_table = mpc52xx_lpbfifo_match,
-	},
-	.probe = mpc52xx_lpbfifo_probe,
-	.remove = mpc52xx_lpbfifo_remove,
-};
-module_platform_driver(mpc52xx_lpbfifo_driver);

base-commit: fe15c26ee26efa11741a7b632e9f23b01aca4cc6
-- 
2.39.2

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
  2023-04-13  6:16       ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2023-05-09  8:21         ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2023-05-09  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2304 bytes --]

Hello,

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:16:42AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
> only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
> and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
> function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
> Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
> now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello Michael,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> > >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > >
> > > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> > > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
> > 
> > Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
> > driver.
> > 
> > Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
> > provided by this driver?
> 
> I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
> references to this thread :-)
> 
> > I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
> > it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
> > driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.
> 
> fair enough, here it is.

What is your thought about this patch? If you (also) think getting it
into next soon after a merge window closed, around now would be a good
opportunity to do so ..

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
@ 2023-05-09  8:21         ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2023-05-09  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Ellerman
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, linux-kernel, Nicholas Piggin,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2304 bytes --]

Hello,

On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:16:42AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
> only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
> and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
> function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
> Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
> now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello Michael,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
> > >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
> > >> 
> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > >
> > > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
> > > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
> > 
> > Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
> > driver.
> > 
> > Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
> > provided by this driver?
> 
> I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
> references to this thread :-)
> 
> > I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
> > it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
> > driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.
> 
> fair enough, here it is.

What is your thought about this patch? If you (also) think getting it
into next soon after a merge window closed, around now would be a good
opportunity to do so ..

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
  2023-05-09  8:21         ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2023-05-12  2:42           ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-05-12  2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, Nicholas Piggin, Christophe Leroy,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev, linux-kernel

Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:16:42AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
>> only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
>> and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
>> function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
>> Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
>> now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
>> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> > >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
>> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
>> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
>> > >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
>> > >> 
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> > >
>> > > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
>> > > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
>> > 
>> > Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
>> > driver.
>> > 
>> > Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
>> > provided by this driver?
>> 
>> I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
>> references to this thread :-)
>> 
>> > I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
>> > it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
>> > driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.
>> 
>> fair enough, here it is.
>
> What is your thought about this patch? If you (also) think getting it
> into next soon after a merge window closed, around now would be a good
> opportunity to do so ..

I was hoping someone would explain why we have a driver that does
nothing useful :) But I guess it's too old for anyone to remember/care.

So yeah I'll take this, we can always put it back if someone needs it.

I base my next on rc2, so I'll pick this up next week.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
@ 2023-05-12  2:42           ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-05-12  2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, linux-kernel, Nicholas Piggin,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev

Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 08:16:42AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
>> only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
>> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
>> and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
>> function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
>> Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
>> now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 10:11:25AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> writes:
>> > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 03:51:29PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> > >> The four exported functions mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(),
>> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll(), and
>> > >> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer() are not used. So they can be dropped and the
>> > >> definitions needed to call them can be moved into the driver file.
>> > >> 
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> > >
>> > > I never got feedback about this driver and it has not appeared in next
>> > > up to now. Did it fell through the cracks?
>> > 
>> > Yeah. I was hoping someone would explain what's going on with the
>> > driver.
>> > 
>> > Presumably there are some out-of-tree drivers that use the routines
>> > provided by this driver?
>> 
>> I googled for the function names but the only related hits were
>> references to this thread :-)
>> 
>> > I think rather than merging this patch, which keeps the code but makes
>> > it completely useless, do you mind sending a patch to remove the whole
>> > driver? Maybe that will get someone's attention.
>> 
>> fair enough, here it is.
>
> What is your thought about this patch? If you (also) think getting it
> into next soon after a merge window closed, around now would be a good
> opportunity to do so ..

I was hoping someone would explain why we have a driver that does
nothing useful :) But I guess it's too old for anyone to remember/care.

So yeah I'll take this, we can always put it back if someone needs it.

I base my next on rc2, so I'll pick this up next week.

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
  2023-04-13  6:16       ` Uwe Kleine-König
  (?)
  (?)
@ 2023-07-03  5:26       ` Michael Ellerman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2023-07-03  5:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Anatolij Gustschin, linux-kernel, Nicholas Piggin,
	Andy Shevchenko, linuxppc-dev

On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 08:16:42 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> While mpc5200b.dtsi contains a device that this driver can bind to, the
> only purpose of a bound device is to be used by the four exported functions
> mpc52xx_lpbfifo_submit(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_abort(), mpc52xx_lpbfifo_poll()
> and mpc52xx_lpbfifo_start_xfer(). However there are no callers to this
> function and so the driver is effectively superfluous and can be deleted.
> Also drop some defines and a struct from <asm/mpc52xx.h> that are unused
> now together with the declarations of the four mentioned functions.
> 
> [...]

Applied to powerpc/next.

[1/1] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7d3ee229ea51a17afc1e53272e2a8f377cc82ba2

cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-03  6:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-28 14:51 [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx_lpbfifo: Drop unused functions Uwe Kleine-König
2022-12-28 14:51 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-12-29 17:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-12-29 17:28   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-12 15:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-12 15:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-13  0:11   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-13  0:11     ` Michael Ellerman
2023-04-13  6:16     ` [PATCH] powerpc: Drop MPC5200 LocalPlus bus FIFO driver Uwe Kleine-König
2023-04-13  6:16       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-09  8:21       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-09  8:21         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-05-12  2:42         ` Michael Ellerman
2023-05-12  2:42           ` Michael Ellerman
2023-07-03  5:26       ` Michael Ellerman

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.