All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
	Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:52:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87365s9ysj.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466091925.24747.6840028682768745598.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>


Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:

>  /**
> + * get_usable_memory_ranges - Get usable memory ranges. This list includes
> + *                            regions like crashkernel, opal/rtas & tce-table,
> + *                            that kdump kernel could use.
> + * @mem_ranges:               Range list to add the memory ranges to.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int get_usable_memory_ranges(struct crash_mem **mem_ranges)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* First memory block & crashkernel region */
> +	ret = add_mem_range(mem_ranges, 0, crashk_res.end + 1);

This is a bit surprising. I guess I don't have a complete big picture of
the patch series yet. What prevents the crashkernel from using memory at
the [0, _end] range and overwriting the crashed kernel's memory?

Shouldn't the above range start at crashk_res.start?

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_rtas_mem_range(mem_ranges);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_opal_mem_range(mem_ranges);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_tce_mem_ranges(mem_ranges);
> +out:
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_err("Failed to setup usable memory ranges\n");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * __locate_mem_hole_top_down - Looks top down for a large enough memory hole
>   *                              in the memory regions between buf_min & buf_max
>   *                              for the buffer. If found, sets kbuf->mem.
> @@ -261,6 +305,322 @@ static int locate_mem_hole_bottom_up_ppc64(struct kexec_buf *kbuf,
>  }
>
>  /**
> + * check_realloc_usable_mem - Reallocate buffer if it can't accommodate entries
> + * @um_info:                  Usable memory buffer and ranges info.
> + * @cnt:                      No. of entries to accommodate.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.

It actually returns the buffer on success, and NULL on error.

> + */
> +static uint64_t *check_realloc_usable_mem(struct umem_info *um_info, int cnt)
> +{
> +	void *tbuf;
> +
> +	if (um_info->size >=
> +	    ((um_info->idx + cnt) * sizeof(*(um_info->buf))))
> +		return um_info->buf;
> +
> +	um_info->size += MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
> +	tbuf = krealloc(um_info->buf, um_info->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!tbuf) {
> +		um_info->size -= MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(tbuf + um_info->idx, 0, MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ);
> +	return tbuf;
> +}

<snip>

> +/**
> + * get_node_path - Get the full path of the given node.
> + * @dn:            Node.
> + * @path:          Updated with the full path of the node.
> + *
> + * Returns nothing.
> + */
> +static void get_node_path(struct device_node *dn, char *path)
> +{
> +	if (!dn)
> +		return;
> +
> +	get_node_path(dn->parent, path);

Is it ok to do recursion in the kernel? In this case I believe it's not
problematic since the maximum call depth will be the maximum depth of a
device tree node which shouldn't be too much. Also, there are no local
variables in this function. But I thought it was worth mentioning.

> +	sprintf(path, "/%s", dn->full_name);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * get_node_pathlen - Get the full path length of the given node.
> + * @dn:               Node.
> + *
> + * Returns the length of the full path of the node.
> + */
> +static int get_node_pathlen(struct device_node *dn)
> +{
> +	int len = 0;
> +
> +	while (dn) {
> +		len += strlen(dn->full_name) + 1;
> +		dn = dn->parent;
> +	}
> +	len++;
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * add_usable_mem_property - Add usable memory property for the given
> + *                           memory node.
> + * @fdt:                     Flattened device tree for the kdump kernel.
> + * @dn:                      Memory node.
> + * @um_info:                 Usable memory buffer and ranges info.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int add_usable_mem_property(void *fdt, struct device_node *dn,
> +				   struct umem_info *um_info)
> +{
> +	int n_mem_addr_cells, n_mem_size_cells, node;
> +	int i, len, ranges, cnt, ret;
> +	uint64_t base, end, *buf;
> +	const __be32 *prop;
> +	char *pathname;
> +
> +	/* Allocate memory for node path */
> +	pathname = kzalloc(ALIGN(get_node_pathlen(dn), 8), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pathname)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Get the full path of the memory node */
> +	get_node_path(dn, pathname);
> +	pr_debug("Memory node path: %s\n", pathname);
> +
> +	/* Now that we know the path, find its offset in kdump kernel's fdt */
> +	node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, pathname);
> +	if (node < 0) {
> +		pr_err("Malformed device tree: error reading %s\n",
> +		       pathname);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Get the address & size cells */
> +	n_mem_addr_cells = of_n_addr_cells(dn);
> +	n_mem_size_cells = of_n_size_cells(dn);
> +	pr_debug("address cells: %d, size cells: %d\n", n_mem_addr_cells,
> +		 n_mem_size_cells);
> +
> +	um_info->idx  = 0;
> +	buf = check_realloc_usable_mem(um_info, 2);
> +	if (!buf) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	um_info->buf = buf;
> +
> +	prop = of_get_property(dn, "reg", &len);
> +	if (!prop || len <= 0) {
> +		ret = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * "reg" property represents sequence of (addr,size) duples

s/duples/tuples/ ?

> +	 * each representing a memory range.
> +	 */
> +	ranges = (len >> 2) / (n_mem_addr_cells + n_mem_size_cells);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ranges; i++) {
> +		base = of_read_number(prop, n_mem_addr_cells);
> +		prop += n_mem_addr_cells;
> +		end = base + of_read_number(prop, n_mem_size_cells) - 1;

You need to `prop += n_mem_size_cells` here.

> +
> +		ret = add_usable_mem(um_info, base, end, &cnt);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = ret;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * No kdump kernel usable memory found in this memory node.
> +	 * Write (0,0) duple in linux,usable-memory property for

s/duple/tuple/ ?

> +	 * this region to be ignored.
> +	 */
> +	if (um_info->idx == 0) {
> +		um_info->buf[0] = 0;
> +		um_info->buf[1] = 0;
> +		um_info->idx = 2;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "linux,usable-memory", um_info->buf,
> +			  (um_info->idx * sizeof(*(um_info->buf))));
> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(pathname);
> +	return ret;
> +}

--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>, Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:52:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87365s9ysj.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466091925.24747.6840028682768745598.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>


Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:

>  /**
> + * get_usable_memory_ranges - Get usable memory ranges. This list includes
> + *                            regions like crashkernel, opal/rtas & tce-table,
> + *                            that kdump kernel could use.
> + * @mem_ranges:               Range list to add the memory ranges to.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int get_usable_memory_ranges(struct crash_mem **mem_ranges)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* First memory block & crashkernel region */
> +	ret = add_mem_range(mem_ranges, 0, crashk_res.end + 1);

This is a bit surprising. I guess I don't have a complete big picture of
the patch series yet. What prevents the crashkernel from using memory at
the [0, _end] range and overwriting the crashed kernel's memory?

Shouldn't the above range start at crashk_res.start?

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_rtas_mem_range(mem_ranges);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_opal_mem_range(mem_ranges);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_tce_mem_ranges(mem_ranges);
> +out:
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_err("Failed to setup usable memory ranges\n");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * __locate_mem_hole_top_down - Looks top down for a large enough memory hole
>   *                              in the memory regions between buf_min & buf_max
>   *                              for the buffer. If found, sets kbuf->mem.
> @@ -261,6 +305,322 @@ static int locate_mem_hole_bottom_up_ppc64(struct kexec_buf *kbuf,
>  }
>
>  /**
> + * check_realloc_usable_mem - Reallocate buffer if it can't accommodate entries
> + * @um_info:                  Usable memory buffer and ranges info.
> + * @cnt:                      No. of entries to accommodate.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.

It actually returns the buffer on success, and NULL on error.

> + */
> +static uint64_t *check_realloc_usable_mem(struct umem_info *um_info, int cnt)
> +{
> +	void *tbuf;
> +
> +	if (um_info->size >=
> +	    ((um_info->idx + cnt) * sizeof(*(um_info->buf))))
> +		return um_info->buf;
> +
> +	um_info->size += MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
> +	tbuf = krealloc(um_info->buf, um_info->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!tbuf) {
> +		um_info->size -= MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(tbuf + um_info->idx, 0, MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ);
> +	return tbuf;
> +}

<snip>

> +/**
> + * get_node_path - Get the full path of the given node.
> + * @dn:            Node.
> + * @path:          Updated with the full path of the node.
> + *
> + * Returns nothing.
> + */
> +static void get_node_path(struct device_node *dn, char *path)
> +{
> +	if (!dn)
> +		return;
> +
> +	get_node_path(dn->parent, path);

Is it ok to do recursion in the kernel? In this case I believe it's not
problematic since the maximum call depth will be the maximum depth of a
device tree node which shouldn't be too much. Also, there are no local
variables in this function. But I thought it was worth mentioning.

> +	sprintf(path, "/%s", dn->full_name);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * get_node_pathlen - Get the full path length of the given node.
> + * @dn:               Node.
> + *
> + * Returns the length of the full path of the node.
> + */
> +static int get_node_pathlen(struct device_node *dn)
> +{
> +	int len = 0;
> +
> +	while (dn) {
> +		len += strlen(dn->full_name) + 1;
> +		dn = dn->parent;
> +	}
> +	len++;
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * add_usable_mem_property - Add usable memory property for the given
> + *                           memory node.
> + * @fdt:                     Flattened device tree for the kdump kernel.
> + * @dn:                      Memory node.
> + * @um_info:                 Usable memory buffer and ranges info.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int add_usable_mem_property(void *fdt, struct device_node *dn,
> +				   struct umem_info *um_info)
> +{
> +	int n_mem_addr_cells, n_mem_size_cells, node;
> +	int i, len, ranges, cnt, ret;
> +	uint64_t base, end, *buf;
> +	const __be32 *prop;
> +	char *pathname;
> +
> +	/* Allocate memory for node path */
> +	pathname = kzalloc(ALIGN(get_node_pathlen(dn), 8), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pathname)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Get the full path of the memory node */
> +	get_node_path(dn, pathname);
> +	pr_debug("Memory node path: %s\n", pathname);
> +
> +	/* Now that we know the path, find its offset in kdump kernel's fdt */
> +	node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, pathname);
> +	if (node < 0) {
> +		pr_err("Malformed device tree: error reading %s\n",
> +		       pathname);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Get the address & size cells */
> +	n_mem_addr_cells = of_n_addr_cells(dn);
> +	n_mem_size_cells = of_n_size_cells(dn);
> +	pr_debug("address cells: %d, size cells: %d\n", n_mem_addr_cells,
> +		 n_mem_size_cells);
> +
> +	um_info->idx  = 0;
> +	buf = check_realloc_usable_mem(um_info, 2);
> +	if (!buf) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	um_info->buf = buf;
> +
> +	prop = of_get_property(dn, "reg", &len);
> +	if (!prop || len <= 0) {
> +		ret = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * "reg" property represents sequence of (addr,size) duples

s/duples/tuples/ ?

> +	 * each representing a memory range.
> +	 */
> +	ranges = (len >> 2) / (n_mem_addr_cells + n_mem_size_cells);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ranges; i++) {
> +		base = of_read_number(prop, n_mem_addr_cells);
> +		prop += n_mem_addr_cells;
> +		end = base + of_read_number(prop, n_mem_size_cells) - 1;

You need to `prop += n_mem_size_cells` here.

> +
> +		ret = add_usable_mem(um_info, base, end, &cnt);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = ret;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * No kdump kernel usable memory found in this memory node.
> +	 * Write (0,0) duple in linux,usable-memory property for

s/duple/tuple/ ?

> +	 * this region to be ignored.
> +	 */
> +	if (um_info->idx == 0) {
> +		um_info->buf[0] = 0;
> +		um_info->buf[1] = 0;
> +		um_info->idx = 2;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "linux,usable-memory", um_info->buf,
> +			  (um_info->idx * sizeof(*(um_info->buf))));
> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(pathname);
> +	return ret;
> +}

--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
	Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 19:52:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87365s9ysj.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466091925.24747.6840028682768745598.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>


Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:

>  /**
> + * get_usable_memory_ranges - Get usable memory ranges. This list includes
> + *                            regions like crashkernel, opal/rtas & tce-table,
> + *                            that kdump kernel could use.
> + * @mem_ranges:               Range list to add the memory ranges to.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int get_usable_memory_ranges(struct crash_mem **mem_ranges)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* First memory block & crashkernel region */
> +	ret = add_mem_range(mem_ranges, 0, crashk_res.end + 1);

This is a bit surprising. I guess I don't have a complete big picture of
the patch series yet. What prevents the crashkernel from using memory at
the [0, _end] range and overwriting the crashed kernel's memory?

Shouldn't the above range start at crashk_res.start?

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_rtas_mem_range(mem_ranges);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_opal_mem_range(mem_ranges);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	ret = add_tce_mem_ranges(mem_ranges);
> +out:
> +	if (ret)
> +		pr_err("Failed to setup usable memory ranges\n");
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/**
>   * __locate_mem_hole_top_down - Looks top down for a large enough memory hole
>   *                              in the memory regions between buf_min & buf_max
>   *                              for the buffer. If found, sets kbuf->mem.
> @@ -261,6 +305,322 @@ static int locate_mem_hole_bottom_up_ppc64(struct kexec_buf *kbuf,
>  }
>
>  /**
> + * check_realloc_usable_mem - Reallocate buffer if it can't accommodate entries
> + * @um_info:                  Usable memory buffer and ranges info.
> + * @cnt:                      No. of entries to accommodate.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.

It actually returns the buffer on success, and NULL on error.

> + */
> +static uint64_t *check_realloc_usable_mem(struct umem_info *um_info, int cnt)
> +{
> +	void *tbuf;
> +
> +	if (um_info->size >=
> +	    ((um_info->idx + cnt) * sizeof(*(um_info->buf))))
> +		return um_info->buf;
> +
> +	um_info->size += MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
> +	tbuf = krealloc(um_info->buf, um_info->size, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!tbuf) {
> +		um_info->size -= MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ;
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(tbuf + um_info->idx, 0, MEM_RANGE_CHUNK_SZ);
> +	return tbuf;
> +}

<snip>

> +/**
> + * get_node_path - Get the full path of the given node.
> + * @dn:            Node.
> + * @path:          Updated with the full path of the node.
> + *
> + * Returns nothing.
> + */
> +static void get_node_path(struct device_node *dn, char *path)
> +{
> +	if (!dn)
> +		return;
> +
> +	get_node_path(dn->parent, path);

Is it ok to do recursion in the kernel? In this case I believe it's not
problematic since the maximum call depth will be the maximum depth of a
device tree node which shouldn't be too much. Also, there are no local
variables in this function. But I thought it was worth mentioning.

> +	sprintf(path, "/%s", dn->full_name);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * get_node_pathlen - Get the full path length of the given node.
> + * @dn:               Node.
> + *
> + * Returns the length of the full path of the node.
> + */
> +static int get_node_pathlen(struct device_node *dn)
> +{
> +	int len = 0;
> +
> +	while (dn) {
> +		len += strlen(dn->full_name) + 1;
> +		dn = dn->parent;
> +	}
> +	len++;
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * add_usable_mem_property - Add usable memory property for the given
> + *                           memory node.
> + * @fdt:                     Flattened device tree for the kdump kernel.
> + * @dn:                      Memory node.
> + * @um_info:                 Usable memory buffer and ranges info.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +static int add_usable_mem_property(void *fdt, struct device_node *dn,
> +				   struct umem_info *um_info)
> +{
> +	int n_mem_addr_cells, n_mem_size_cells, node;
> +	int i, len, ranges, cnt, ret;
> +	uint64_t base, end, *buf;
> +	const __be32 *prop;
> +	char *pathname;
> +
> +	/* Allocate memory for node path */
> +	pathname = kzalloc(ALIGN(get_node_pathlen(dn), 8), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!pathname)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	/* Get the full path of the memory node */
> +	get_node_path(dn, pathname);
> +	pr_debug("Memory node path: %s\n", pathname);
> +
> +	/* Now that we know the path, find its offset in kdump kernel's fdt */
> +	node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, pathname);
> +	if (node < 0) {
> +		pr_err("Malformed device tree: error reading %s\n",
> +		       pathname);
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Get the address & size cells */
> +	n_mem_addr_cells = of_n_addr_cells(dn);
> +	n_mem_size_cells = of_n_size_cells(dn);
> +	pr_debug("address cells: %d, size cells: %d\n", n_mem_addr_cells,
> +		 n_mem_size_cells);
> +
> +	um_info->idx  = 0;
> +	buf = check_realloc_usable_mem(um_info, 2);
> +	if (!buf) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	um_info->buf = buf;
> +
> +	prop = of_get_property(dn, "reg", &len);
> +	if (!prop || len <= 0) {
> +		ret = 0;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * "reg" property represents sequence of (addr,size) duples

s/duples/tuples/ ?

> +	 * each representing a memory range.
> +	 */
> +	ranges = (len >> 2) / (n_mem_addr_cells + n_mem_size_cells);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ranges; i++) {
> +		base = of_read_number(prop, n_mem_addr_cells);
> +		prop += n_mem_addr_cells;
> +		end = base + of_read_number(prop, n_mem_size_cells) - 1;

You need to `prop += n_mem_size_cells` here.

> +
> +		ret = add_usable_mem(um_info, base, end, &cnt);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			ret = ret;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * No kdump kernel usable memory found in this memory node.
> +	 * Write (0,0) duple in linux,usable-memory property for

s/duple/tuple/ ?

> +	 * this region to be ignored.
> +	 */
> +	if (um_info->idx == 0) {
> +		um_info->buf[0] = 0;
> +		um_info->buf[1] = 0;
> +		um_info->idx = 2;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, node, "linux,usable-memory", um_info->buf,
> +			  (um_info->idx * sizeof(*(um_info->buf))));
> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(pathname);
> +	return ret;
> +}

--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-15 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-13 17:20 [PATCH v3 00/12] ppc64: enable kdump support for kexec_file_load syscall Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-14 21:00   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 21:00     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 21:00     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] powerpc/kexec_file: mark PPC64 specific code Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  1:49   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:49     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:49     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17  4:46     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17  4:46       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17  4:46       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 18:34       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17 18:34         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] powerpc/kexec_file: add helper functions for getting memory ranges Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-14 23:49   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 23:49     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 23:49     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:08     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:08       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17  4:32     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17  4:32       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17  4:32       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 20:00       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 20:00         ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ppc64/kexec_file: avoid stomping memory used by special regions Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-15  2:39   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15  2:39     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15  2:39     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  5:58     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  5:58       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  5:58       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:09     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:09       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:59       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:59         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:59         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] powerpc/drmem: make lmb walk a bit more flexible Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-15  3:50   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15  3:50     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15  3:50     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:09     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:09       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:01       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:01         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:01         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 22:52   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2020-07-15 22:52     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 22:52     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:10     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:10       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:03       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:03         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:03         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17  4:17         ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17  4:17           ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  0:20   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  0:20     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  0:20     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:11     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:11       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:12       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:12         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:12         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ppc64/kexec_file: setup the stack for purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  0:35   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  0:35     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  0:35     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:40   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:40     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:40     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ppc64/kexec_file: setup backup region for kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  1:38   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:38     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  1:38     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:10     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:10       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:06       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:06         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:06         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ppc64/kexec_file: prepare elfcore header for crashing kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  2:22   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  2:22     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  2:22     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:07     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:07       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:57       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:57         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:57         ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add appropriate regions for memory reserve map Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  2:27   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  2:27     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  2:27     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ppc64/kexec_file: fix kexec load failure with lack of memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23   ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16  5:43   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  5:43     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16  5:43     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87365s9ysj.fsf@morokweng.localdomain \
    --to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=piliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.