[Buildroot] [PATCH] host-lua: fix bug #5354

[Buildroot] [PATCH] host-lua: fix bug #5354

[Francois Perrad]

see https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5354

Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
---
 package/lua/lua.mk |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/package/lua/lua.mk b/package/lua/lua.mk
index 9e0d387..3ce9867 100644
--- a/package/lua/lua.mk
+++ b/package/lua/lua.mk
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ endif
 # We never want to have host-readline and host-ncurses as dependencies
 # of host-lua.
 HOST_LUA_DEPENDENCIES =
-HOST_LUA_CFLAGS = -Wall -fPIC -DLUA_USE_DLOPEN -DLUA_USE_POSIX
+HOST_LUA_CFLAGS = -Wall -fPIC -fno-stack-protector -DLUA_USE_DLOPEN -DLUA_USE_POSIX
 HOST_LUA_MYLIBS = -ldl
 
 define LUA_BUILD_CMDS
-- 
1.7.9.5

[Buildroot] [PATCH] host-lua: fix bug #5354

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Francois" == Francois Perrad <fperrad@gmail.com> writes:

 Francois> see https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5354

Thanks, but I don't get the problem in the first place. Lua links
lua/luac using gcc, so why doesn't it pick up the stack protection bits?

 Francois> Signed-off-by: Francois Perrad <francois.perrad@gadz.org>
 Francois> ---
 Francois>  package/lua/lua.mk |    2 +-
 Francois>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

 Francois> diff --git a/package/lua/lua.mk b/package/lua/lua.mk
 Francois> index 9e0d387..3ce9867 100644
 Francois> --- a/package/lua/lua.mk
 Francois> +++ b/package/lua/lua.mk
 Francois> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ endif
 Francois>  # We never want to have host-readline and host-ncurses as dependencies
 Francois>  # of host-lua.
 Francois>  HOST_LUA_DEPENDENCIES =
 Francois> -HOST_LUA_CFLAGS = -Wall -fPIC -DLUA_USE_DLOPEN -DLUA_USE_POSIX
 Francois> +HOST_LUA_CFLAGS = -Wall -fPIC -fno-stack-protector -DLUA_USE_DLOPEN -DLUA_USE_POSIX
 Francois>  HOST_LUA_MYLIBS = -ldl
 
 Francois>  define LUA_BUILD_CMDS
 Francois> -- 
 Francois> 1.7.9.5

 Francois> _______________________________________________
 Francois> buildroot mailing list
 Francois> buildroot at busybox.net
 Francois> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot


-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] host-lua: fix bug #5354

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> writes:

 Francois> see https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5354

 Peter> Thanks, but I don't get the problem in the first place. Lua links
 Peter> lua/luac using gcc, so why doesn't it pick up the stack protection bits?

Ahh, I see it now - It's because we're passing -nostdlib -lgcc when
creating the shared library. Why are we doing that in the first place?

Gustavo, it seems to date back to 46913a2d4. Do you have any idea why it
was done like that?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] [PATCH] host-lua: fix bug #5354

[Gustavo Zacarias]

On 11/17/2012 04:56 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote:

> Ahh, I see it now - It's because we're passing -nostdlib -lgcc when
> creating the shared library. Why are we doing that in the first place?
> 
> Gustavo, it seems to date back to 46913a2d4. Do you have any idea why it
> was done like that?

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=803 has rvpaasen's work, i just
reworked it IIRC.
OpenWRT doesn't try to link to libgcc or ditch the standard startup and
libraries, it's worth a try to kill that bit.
Regards.

[Buildroot] [PATCH] host-lua: fix bug #5354

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Gustavo" == Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> writes:

Hi,

 >> Ahh, I see it now - It's because we're passing -nostdlib -lgcc when
 >> creating the shared library. Why are we doing that in the first place?
 >> 
 >> Gustavo, it seems to date back to 46913a2d4. Do you have any idea why it
 >> was done like that?

 Gustavo> https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=803 has rvpaasen's
 Gustavo> work, i just reworked it IIRC.  OpenWRT doesn't try to link to
 Gustavo> libgcc or ditch the standard startup and libraries, it's worth
 Gustavo> a try to kill that bit.

Ok, done.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard