All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dim-tools@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Subject: Re: [PULL] topic/i915-gem-next
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:31:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kgy2g9m.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YF24MHoOSjpKFEXA@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> The rough plan we discussed somewhat ad-hoc with Jani&Rodrigo (Joonas was
> out this week, but back next) is that they send out a pull with what's
> there right now. Then once both this branch here and the -gt-next pull are
> in drm-next they will backmerge, and the -gt-next tree is open for
> business again.

I guess worth noting is that drm-intel-gt-next is now rebased on top of
current drm-next. Since the topic branch is part of drm-tip, I presume
the conflicts are manageable.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: dim-tools@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] topic/i915-gem-next
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:31:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874kgy2g9m.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YF24MHoOSjpKFEXA@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> The rough plan we discussed somewhat ad-hoc with Jani&Rodrigo (Joonas was
> out this week, but back next) is that they send out a pull with what's
> there right now. Then once both this branch here and the -gt-next pull are
> in drm-next they will backmerge, and the -gt-next tree is open for
> business again.

I guess worth noting is that drm-intel-gt-next is now rebased on top of
current drm-next. Since the topic branch is part of drm-tip, I presume
the conflicts are manageable.

BR,
Jani.

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-26 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 13:16 [PULL] topic/i915-gem-next Daniel Vetter
2021-03-26 13:16 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-03-26 13:31 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2021-03-26 13:31   ` Jani Nikula
2021-03-26 14:13   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-03-26 14:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874kgy2g9m.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dim-tools@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.