All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [lkp] [mm] 112b650f83e: -6.8% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
@ 2015-07-30  2:03 ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2015-07-30  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrea Arcangeli; +Cc: lkp, LKML

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9917 bytes --]

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andrea/aa.git master
commit 112b650f83e5ccea260708f8b7ca747580584659 ("mm: gup: make get_user_pages_fast and __get_user_pages_fast latency conscious")


=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/test:
  lkp-sbx04/will-it-scale/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/futex1

commit: 
  b7c3d6a0d545317e63ff58a1e60059ce79ac359e
  112b650f83e5ccea260708f8b7ca747580584659

b7c3d6a0d545317e 112b650f83e5ccea260708f8b7 
---------------- -------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
   5155618 ±  0%      -6.8%    4806190 ±  0%  will-it-scale.per_process_ops
   1203105 ±  1%      -3.0%    1166790 ±  0%  will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
     18828 ± 11%     +97.6%      37211 ±  5%  will-it-scale.time.involuntary_context_switches
     80265 ±  8%     -20.5%      63818 ± 11%  numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
     18828 ± 11%     +97.6%      37211 ±  5%  time.involuntary_context_switches
      3600 ±  3%     +20.6%       4341 ±  5%  vmstat.system.cs
    227062 ±  3%     +52.6%     346589 ±  1%  latency_stats.hits.pipe_wait.pipe_read.__vfs_read.vfs_read.SyS_read.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
   5878405 ±  0%     +19.7%    7035430 ±  0%  latency_stats.sum.pipe_wait.pipe_read.__vfs_read.vfs_read.SyS_read.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
      7597 ± 12%     -36.0%       4860 ± 32%  numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
      5012 ± 50%     +59.1%       7975 ± 31%  numa-meminfo.node2.Mapped
     12346 ± 14%     +24.2%      15338 ±  3%  numa-meminfo.node3.SReclaimable
      3516 ±  3%     +10.0%       3867 ±  3%  slabinfo.kmalloc-2048.active_objs
     20418 ±  3%     -10.9%      18198 ±  5%  slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
    344.25 ±  6%     -25.9%     255.00 ± 14%  slabinfo.kmem_cache.active_objs
    344.25 ±  6%     -25.9%     255.00 ± 14%  slabinfo.kmem_cache.num_objs
    683.00 ±  4%     -16.4%     571.00 ±  7%  slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.active_objs
    752.00 ±  3%     -14.9%     640.00 ±  7%  slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.num_objs
      1899 ± 12%     -36.0%       1214 ± 32%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
    113103 ±  8%     -11.7%      99882 ±  4%  numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
     78508 ± 13%     -16.9%      65214 ±  8%  numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
     95.75 ± 24%     -56.7%      41.50 ± 41%  numa-vmstat.node2.nr_dirtied
      1252 ± 50%     +59.1%       1993 ± 31%  numa-vmstat.node2.nr_mapped
     93.25 ± 24%     -57.1%      40.00 ± 44%  numa-vmstat.node2.nr_written
      3086 ± 14%     +24.2%       3834 ±  3%  numa-vmstat.node3.nr_slab_reclaimable
      2.26 ±  2%     -36.9%       1.42 ±  2%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.___might_sleep.__might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
      0.41 ±  5%    +140.2%       0.98 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.___might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
      0.00 ± -1%      +Inf%       3.65 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.___might_sleep.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
      3.21 ±  2%     -31.6%       2.20 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.__might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
      4.42 ±  1%     -11.8%       3.90 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.get_futex_key_refs.isra.10.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
     26.58 ±  0%     +18.8%      31.59 ±  0%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
     14.18 ±  1%      -9.6%      12.81 ±  0%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.unlock_page.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
    193.00 ± 55%     -60.1%      77.00 ± 87%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[10]:/.blocked_load_avg
    209.25 ± 51%     -73.2%      56.00 ±107%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[10]:/.tg_load_contrib
      0.50 ±100%    +350.0%       2.25 ± 72%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[14]:/.nr_spread_over
     65.00 ±154%     -96.2%       2.50 ±100%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[15]:/.blocked_load_avg
     81.00 ±124%     -79.9%      16.25 ± 13%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[15]:/.tg_load_contrib
    217.25 ± 96%     -61.4%      83.75 ±167%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[17]:/.blocked_load_avg
    219.75 ± 95%     -60.8%      86.25 ±161%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[17]:/.tg_load_contrib
      9485 ± 11%     +16.1%      11016 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[19]:/.tg_load_avg
      9453 ± 12%     +16.5%      11015 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.tg_load_avg
      8076 ±  0%     +13.7%       9178 ± 11%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[21]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
      9442 ± 11%     +16.6%      11010 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[21]:/.tg_load_avg
    175.00 ±  0%     +13.4%     198.50 ± 11%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[21]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
      9432 ± 12%     +16.7%      11010 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.tg_load_avg
      9473 ± 12%     +15.9%      10977 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.tg_load_avg
    175.00 ±  2%      +7.7%     188.50 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
     35551 ± 12%     -10.3%      31893 ±  1%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[50]:/.exec_clock
     21745 ±  6%      +8.6%      23612 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[56]:/.exec_clock
     73.75 ±100%    +526.4%     462.00 ± 54%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[63]:/.blocked_load_avg
     84.25 ± 88%    +460.8%     472.50 ± 52%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[63]:/.tg_load_contrib
      0.50 ±100%    +550.0%       3.25 ± 25%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.nr_spread_over
     10053 ± 27%    +101.2%      20226 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu#0.nr_switches
     19037 ± 14%     +54.0%      29326 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_count
      2136 ± 12%    +236.9%       7198 ± 32%  sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_goidle
     15374 ± 36%     -57.4%       6548 ± 67%  sched_debug.cpu#1.nr_switches
     15861 ± 35%     -54.4%       7236 ± 60%  sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_count
      6837 ± 44%     -55.2%       3060 ± 71%  sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
      2.00 ±  0%     +50.0%       3.00 ±  0%  sched_debug.cpu#17.cpu_load[2]
      3269 ± 52%    +182.5%       9233 ± 65%  sched_debug.cpu#19.ttwu_count
      1684 ± 13%     -29.3%       1191 ± 15%  sched_debug.cpu#23.ttwu_local
      1275 ± 20%    +203.1%       3865 ± 58%  sched_debug.cpu#24.ttwu_local
     -6.25 ±-54%    -100.0%       0.00 ±  0%  sched_debug.cpu#25.nr_uninterruptible
      1.50 ±233%    -650.0%      -8.25 ±-97%  sched_debug.cpu#30.nr_uninterruptible
     -1.00 ±-187%    -325.0%       2.25 ± 79%  sched_debug.cpu#32.nr_uninterruptible
      3.50 ± 47%    -114.3%      -0.50 ±-331%  sched_debug.cpu#34.nr_uninterruptible
      3.25 ± 39%     -76.9%       0.75 ±145%  sched_debug.cpu#37.nr_uninterruptible
    236.50 ± 25%    +597.6%       1649 ±131%  sched_debug.cpu#39.sched_goidle
      1.50 ±137%    +316.7%       6.25 ± 45%  sched_debug.cpu#41.nr_uninterruptible
    984.50 ± 80%     -63.9%     355.75 ± 40%  sched_debug.cpu#42.ttwu_local
    241.00 ±  7%    +102.3%     487.50 ± 25%  sched_debug.cpu#44.ttwu_local
    522.50 ±  6%    +385.2%       2535 ± 91%  sched_debug.cpu#45.sched_goidle
      1481 ± 17%    +972.4%      15890 ±117%  sched_debug.cpu#47.nr_switches
      1566 ± 16%    +925.2%      16056 ±117%  sched_debug.cpu#47.sched_count
    618.00 ± 19%   +1162.9%       7804 ±119%  sched_debug.cpu#47.sched_goidle
      4222 ± 70%     -61.6%       1619 ±  9%  sched_debug.cpu#5.nr_switches
      4705 ± 63%     -52.6%       2229 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_count
      1971 ± 76%     -65.4%     682.00 ±  9%  sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_goidle
      1835 ± 36%    +215.7%       5792 ± 36%  sched_debug.cpu#53.nr_switches
      1961 ± 37%    +197.9%       5843 ± 36%  sched_debug.cpu#53.sched_count
    396.00 ± 19%    +402.3%       1989 ± 71%  sched_debug.cpu#53.ttwu_local
      1803 ± 13%     -32.6%       1215 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu#6.nr_switches
    766.25 ± 13%     -34.5%     502.25 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu#6.sched_goidle
    395.50 ± 10%     -52.3%     188.50 ± 15%  sched_debug.cpu#6.ttwu_local
      1105 ± 33%    +788.4%       9823 ±107%  sched_debug.cpu#60.sched_goidle


lkp-sbx04: Sandy Bridge-EX
Memory: 64G

                             will-it-scale.per_process_ops

   5.2e+06 ++------------------*--------------------------------------------+
           *..      .*..*..*.                 .*..*..*...*                  |
  5.15e+06 ++ *...*.              *..*..*...*.                              |
   5.1e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  5.05e+06 ++                                                               |
     5e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  4.95e+06 ++                                                               |
   4.9e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                   O  O                         |
  4.85e+06 ++                                                               |
   4.8e+06 ++           O      O                     O   O  O  O  O      O  |
           O      O  O     O      O  O  O   O                         O     O
  4.75e+06 ++-O-------------------------------------------------------------+

	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample

To reproduce:

        git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
        cd lkp-tests
        bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
        bin/lkp run     job.yaml


Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


Thanks,
Ying Huang

[-- Attachment #2: job.yaml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3233 bytes --]

---
LKP_SERVER: inn
LKP_CGI_PORT: 80
LKP_CIFS_PORT: 139
testcase: will-it-scale
default-monitors:
  wait: activate-monitor
  kmsg: 
  uptime: 
  iostat: 
  vmstat: 
  numa-numastat: 
  numa-vmstat: 
  numa-meminfo: 
  proc-vmstat: 
  proc-stat:
    interval: 10
  meminfo: 
  slabinfo: 
  interrupts: 
  lock_stat: 
  latency_stats: 
  softirqs: 
  bdi_dev_mapping: 
  diskstats: 
  nfsstat: 
  cpuidle: 
  cpufreq-stats: 
  turbostat: 
  pmeter: 
  sched_debug:
    interval: 60
cpufreq_governor: performance
default-watchdogs:
  oom-killer: 
  watchdog: 
commit: 752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba
model: Sandy Bridge-EX
nr_cpu: 64
memory: 64G
nr_ssd_partitions: 4
ssd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSC2CW240A3_CVCV20430*-part1"
swap_partitions: 
category: benchmark
perf-profile:
  freq: 800
will-it-scale:
  test: futex1
queue: cyclic
testbox: lkp-sbx04
tbox_group: lkp-sbx04
kconfig: x86_64-rhel
enqueue_time: 2015-07-27 11:24:32.572062861 +08:00
user: lkp
compiler: gcc-4.9
head_commit: 752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba
base_commit: cbfe8fa6cd672011c755c3cd85c9ffd4e2d10a6f
branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2015072717
kernel: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/vmlinuz-4.2.0-rc4-wl-ath-02023-g752f49c"
rootfs: debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz
result_root: "/result/will-it-scale/performance-futex1/lkp-sbx04/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/0"
job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/lkp-sbx04/cyclic_will-it-scale-performance-futex1-x86_64-rhel-CYCLIC_HEAD-752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba-20150727-107044-1mg92jq-0.yaml"
dequeue_time: 2015-07-27 18:08:44.809469793 +08:00
max_uptime: 1500
initrd: "/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz"
bootloader_append:
- root=/dev/ram0
- user=lkp
- job=/lkp/scheduled/lkp-sbx04/cyclic_will-it-scale-performance-futex1-x86_64-rhel-CYCLIC_HEAD-752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba-20150727-107044-1mg92jq-0.yaml
- ARCH=x86_64
- kconfig=x86_64-rhel
- branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2015072717
- commit=752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba
- BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/vmlinuz-4.2.0-rc4-wl-ath-02023-g752f49c
- max_uptime=1500
- RESULT_ROOT=/result/will-it-scale/performance-futex1/lkp-sbx04/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/0
- LKP_SERVER=inn
- |2-


  earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 systemd.log_level=err
  debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100
  panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0
  console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 vga=normal

  rw
lkp_initrd: "/lkp/lkp/lkp-x86_64.cgz"
modules_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/modules.cgz"
bm_initrd: "/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/run-ipconfig.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/will-it-scale.cgz"
job_state: finished
loadavg: 46.70 20.74 8.06 1/624 11372
start_time: '1437991880'
end_time: '1437992189'
version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20150727-150448"

[-- Attachment #3: reproduce --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4773 bytes --]

echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu11/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu13/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu14/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu16/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu17/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu18/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu19/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu22/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu23/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu24/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu25/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu26/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu27/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu28/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu30/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu31/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu32/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu33/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu34/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu35/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu36/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu37/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu38/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu39/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu40/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu41/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu42/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu43/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu44/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu45/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu46/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu47/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu48/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu49/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu50/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu51/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu52/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu53/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu54/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu55/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu56/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu57/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu58/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu59/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu60/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu61/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu62/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu63/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu9/cpufreq/scaling_governor
./runtest.py futex1 16 both 1 8 16 24 32 48 64

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [mm] 112b650f83e: -6.8% will-it-scale.per_process_ops
@ 2015-07-30  2:03 ` kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2015-07-30  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: lkp

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 10085 bytes --]

FYI, we noticed the below changes on

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andrea/aa.git master
commit 112b650f83e5ccea260708f8b7ca747580584659 ("mm: gup: make get_user_pages_fast and __get_user_pages_fast latency conscious")


=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/test:
  lkp-sbx04/will-it-scale/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/futex1

commit: 
  b7c3d6a0d545317e63ff58a1e60059ce79ac359e
  112b650f83e5ccea260708f8b7ca747580584659

b7c3d6a0d545317e 112b650f83e5ccea260708f8b7 
---------------- -------------------------- 
         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \  
   5155618 ±  0%      -6.8%    4806190 ±  0%  will-it-scale.per_process_ops
   1203105 ±  1%      -3.0%    1166790 ±  0%  will-it-scale.per_thread_ops
     18828 ± 11%     +97.6%      37211 ±  5%  will-it-scale.time.involuntary_context_switches
     80265 ±  8%     -20.5%      63818 ± 11%  numa-numastat.node0.numa_hit
     18828 ± 11%     +97.6%      37211 ±  5%  time.involuntary_context_switches
      3600 ±  3%     +20.6%       4341 ±  5%  vmstat.system.cs
    227062 ±  3%     +52.6%     346589 ±  1%  latency_stats.hits.pipe_wait.pipe_read.__vfs_read.vfs_read.SyS_read.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
   5878405 ±  0%     +19.7%    7035430 ±  0%  latency_stats.sum.pipe_wait.pipe_read.__vfs_read.vfs_read.SyS_read.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
      7597 ± 12%     -36.0%       4860 ± 32%  numa-meminfo.node0.AnonPages
      5012 ± 50%     +59.1%       7975 ± 31%  numa-meminfo.node2.Mapped
     12346 ± 14%     +24.2%      15338 ±  3%  numa-meminfo.node3.SReclaimable
      3516 ±  3%     +10.0%       3867 ±  3%  slabinfo.kmalloc-2048.active_objs
     20418 ±  3%     -10.9%      18198 ±  5%  slabinfo.kmalloc-256.active_objs
    344.25 ±  6%     -25.9%     255.00 ± 14%  slabinfo.kmem_cache.active_objs
    344.25 ±  6%     -25.9%     255.00 ± 14%  slabinfo.kmem_cache.num_objs
    683.00 ±  4%     -16.4%     571.00 ±  7%  slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.active_objs
    752.00 ±  3%     -14.9%     640.00 ±  7%  slabinfo.kmem_cache_node.num_objs
      1899 ± 12%     -36.0%       1214 ± 32%  numa-vmstat.node0.nr_anon_pages
    113103 ±  8%     -11.7%      99882 ±  4%  numa-vmstat.node0.numa_hit
     78508 ± 13%     -16.9%      65214 ±  8%  numa-vmstat.node0.numa_local
     95.75 ± 24%     -56.7%      41.50 ± 41%  numa-vmstat.node2.nr_dirtied
      1252 ± 50%     +59.1%       1993 ± 31%  numa-vmstat.node2.nr_mapped
     93.25 ± 24%     -57.1%      40.00 ± 44%  numa-vmstat.node2.nr_written
      3086 ± 14%     +24.2%       3834 ±  3%  numa-vmstat.node3.nr_slab_reclaimable
      2.26 ±  2%     -36.9%       1.42 ±  2%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.___might_sleep.__might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
      0.41 ±  5%    +140.2%       0.98 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.___might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
      0.00 ± -1%      +Inf%       3.65 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.___might_sleep.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex
      3.21 ±  2%     -31.6%       2.20 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.__might_sleep.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
      4.42 ±  1%     -11.8%       3.90 ±  1%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.get_futex_key_refs.isra.10.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex.entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
     26.58 ±  0%     +18.8%      31.59 ±  0%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.get_user_pages_fast.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
     14.18 ±  1%      -9.6%      12.81 ±  0%  perf-profile.cpu-cycles.unlock_page.get_futex_key.futex_wake.do_futex.sys_futex
    193.00 ± 55%     -60.1%      77.00 ± 87%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[10]:/.blocked_load_avg
    209.25 ± 51%     -73.2%      56.00 ±107%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[10]:/.tg_load_contrib
      0.50 ±100%    +350.0%       2.25 ± 72%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[14]:/.nr_spread_over
     65.00 ±154%     -96.2%       2.50 ±100%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[15]:/.blocked_load_avg
     81.00 ±124%     -79.9%      16.25 ± 13%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[15]:/.tg_load_contrib
    217.25 ± 96%     -61.4%      83.75 ±167%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[17]:/.blocked_load_avg
    219.75 ± 95%     -60.8%      86.25 ±161%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[17]:/.tg_load_contrib
      9485 ± 11%     +16.1%      11016 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[19]:/.tg_load_avg
      9453 ± 12%     +16.5%      11015 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[20]:/.tg_load_avg
      8076 ±  0%     +13.7%       9178 ± 11%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[21]:/.avg->runnable_avg_sum
      9442 ± 11%     +16.6%      11010 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[21]:/.tg_load_avg
    175.00 ±  0%     +13.4%     198.50 ± 11%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[21]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
      9432 ± 12%     +16.7%      11010 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[22]:/.tg_load_avg
      9473 ± 12%     +15.9%      10977 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[23]:/.tg_load_avg
    175.00 ±  2%      +7.7%     188.50 ±  5%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[27]:/.tg_runnable_contrib
     35551 ± 12%     -10.3%      31893 ±  1%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[50]:/.exec_clock
     21745 ±  6%      +8.6%      23612 ±  6%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[56]:/.exec_clock
     73.75 ±100%    +526.4%     462.00 ± 54%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[63]:/.blocked_load_avg
     84.25 ± 88%    +460.8%     472.50 ± 52%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[63]:/.tg_load_contrib
      0.50 ±100%    +550.0%       3.25 ± 25%  sched_debug.cfs_rq[9]:/.nr_spread_over
     10053 ± 27%    +101.2%      20226 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu#0.nr_switches
     19037 ± 14%     +54.0%      29326 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_count
      2136 ± 12%    +236.9%       7198 ± 32%  sched_debug.cpu#0.sched_goidle
     15374 ± 36%     -57.4%       6548 ± 67%  sched_debug.cpu#1.nr_switches
     15861 ± 35%     -54.4%       7236 ± 60%  sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_count
      6837 ± 44%     -55.2%       3060 ± 71%  sched_debug.cpu#1.sched_goidle
      2.00 ±  0%     +50.0%       3.00 ±  0%  sched_debug.cpu#17.cpu_load[2]
      3269 ± 52%    +182.5%       9233 ± 65%  sched_debug.cpu#19.ttwu_count
      1684 ± 13%     -29.3%       1191 ± 15%  sched_debug.cpu#23.ttwu_local
      1275 ± 20%    +203.1%       3865 ± 58%  sched_debug.cpu#24.ttwu_local
     -6.25 ±-54%    -100.0%       0.00 ±  0%  sched_debug.cpu#25.nr_uninterruptible
      1.50 ±233%    -650.0%      -8.25 ±-97%  sched_debug.cpu#30.nr_uninterruptible
     -1.00 ±-187%    -325.0%       2.25 ± 79%  sched_debug.cpu#32.nr_uninterruptible
      3.50 ± 47%    -114.3%      -0.50 ±-331%  sched_debug.cpu#34.nr_uninterruptible
      3.25 ± 39%     -76.9%       0.75 ±145%  sched_debug.cpu#37.nr_uninterruptible
    236.50 ± 25%    +597.6%       1649 ±131%  sched_debug.cpu#39.sched_goidle
      1.50 ±137%    +316.7%       6.25 ± 45%  sched_debug.cpu#41.nr_uninterruptible
    984.50 ± 80%     -63.9%     355.75 ± 40%  sched_debug.cpu#42.ttwu_local
    241.00 ±  7%    +102.3%     487.50 ± 25%  sched_debug.cpu#44.ttwu_local
    522.50 ±  6%    +385.2%       2535 ± 91%  sched_debug.cpu#45.sched_goidle
      1481 ± 17%    +972.4%      15890 ±117%  sched_debug.cpu#47.nr_switches
      1566 ± 16%    +925.2%      16056 ±117%  sched_debug.cpu#47.sched_count
    618.00 ± 19%   +1162.9%       7804 ±119%  sched_debug.cpu#47.sched_goidle
      4222 ± 70%     -61.6%       1619 ±  9%  sched_debug.cpu#5.nr_switches
      4705 ± 63%     -52.6%       2229 ± 14%  sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_count
      1971 ± 76%     -65.4%     682.00 ±  9%  sched_debug.cpu#5.sched_goidle
      1835 ± 36%    +215.7%       5792 ± 36%  sched_debug.cpu#53.nr_switches
      1961 ± 37%    +197.9%       5843 ± 36%  sched_debug.cpu#53.sched_count
    396.00 ± 19%    +402.3%       1989 ± 71%  sched_debug.cpu#53.ttwu_local
      1803 ± 13%     -32.6%       1215 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu#6.nr_switches
    766.25 ± 13%     -34.5%     502.25 ± 10%  sched_debug.cpu#6.sched_goidle
    395.50 ± 10%     -52.3%     188.50 ± 15%  sched_debug.cpu#6.ttwu_local
      1105 ± 33%    +788.4%       9823 ±107%  sched_debug.cpu#60.sched_goidle


lkp-sbx04: Sandy Bridge-EX
Memory: 64G

                             will-it-scale.per_process_ops

   5.2e+06 ++------------------*--------------------------------------------+
           *..      .*..*..*.                 .*..*..*...*                  |
  5.15e+06 ++ *...*.              *..*..*...*.                              |
   5.1e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  5.05e+06 ++                                                               |
     5e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                                                |
  4.95e+06 ++                                                               |
   4.9e+06 ++                                                               |
           |                                   O  O                         |
  4.85e+06 ++                                                               |
   4.8e+06 ++           O      O                     O   O  O  O  O      O  |
           O      O  O     O      O  O  O   O                         O     O
  4.75e+06 ++-O-------------------------------------------------------------+

	[*] bisect-good sample
	[O] bisect-bad  sample

To reproduce:

        git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
        cd lkp-tests
        bin/lkp install job.yaml  # job file is attached in this email
        bin/lkp run     job.yaml


Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


Thanks,
Ying Huang

[-- Attachment #2: job.yaml --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3233 bytes --]

---
LKP_SERVER: inn
LKP_CGI_PORT: 80
LKP_CIFS_PORT: 139
testcase: will-it-scale
default-monitors:
  wait: activate-monitor
  kmsg: 
  uptime: 
  iostat: 
  vmstat: 
  numa-numastat: 
  numa-vmstat: 
  numa-meminfo: 
  proc-vmstat: 
  proc-stat:
    interval: 10
  meminfo: 
  slabinfo: 
  interrupts: 
  lock_stat: 
  latency_stats: 
  softirqs: 
  bdi_dev_mapping: 
  diskstats: 
  nfsstat: 
  cpuidle: 
  cpufreq-stats: 
  turbostat: 
  pmeter: 
  sched_debug:
    interval: 60
cpufreq_governor: performance
default-watchdogs:
  oom-killer: 
  watchdog: 
commit: 752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba
model: Sandy Bridge-EX
nr_cpu: 64
memory: 64G
nr_ssd_partitions: 4
ssd_partitions: "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSC2CW240A3_CVCV20430*-part1"
swap_partitions: 
category: benchmark
perf-profile:
  freq: 800
will-it-scale:
  test: futex1
queue: cyclic
testbox: lkp-sbx04
tbox_group: lkp-sbx04
kconfig: x86_64-rhel
enqueue_time: 2015-07-27 11:24:32.572062861 +08:00
user: lkp
compiler: gcc-4.9
head_commit: 752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba
base_commit: cbfe8fa6cd672011c755c3cd85c9ffd4e2d10a6f
branch: linux-devel/devel-hourly-2015072717
kernel: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/vmlinuz-4.2.0-rc4-wl-ath-02023-g752f49c"
rootfs: debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz
result_root: "/result/will-it-scale/performance-futex1/lkp-sbx04/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/0"
job_file: "/lkp/scheduled/lkp-sbx04/cyclic_will-it-scale-performance-futex1-x86_64-rhel-CYCLIC_HEAD-752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba-20150727-107044-1mg92jq-0.yaml"
dequeue_time: 2015-07-27 18:08:44.809469793 +08:00
max_uptime: 1500
initrd: "/osimage/debian/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz"
bootloader_append:
- root=/dev/ram0
- user=lkp
- job=/lkp/scheduled/lkp-sbx04/cyclic_will-it-scale-performance-futex1-x86_64-rhel-CYCLIC_HEAD-752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba-20150727-107044-1mg92jq-0.yaml
- ARCH=x86_64
- kconfig=x86_64-rhel
- branch=linux-devel/devel-hourly-2015072717
- commit=752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba
- BOOT_IMAGE=/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/vmlinuz-4.2.0-rc4-wl-ath-02023-g752f49c
- max_uptime=1500
- RESULT_ROOT=/result/will-it-scale/performance-futex1/lkp-sbx04/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/0
- LKP_SERVER=inn
- |2-


  earlyprintk=ttyS0,115200 systemd.log_level=err
  debug apic=debug sysrq_always_enabled rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_timeout=100
  panic=-1 softlockup_panic=1 nmi_watchdog=panic oops=panic load_ramdisk=2 prompt_ramdisk=0
  console=ttyS0,115200 console=tty0 vga=normal

  rw
lkp_initrd: "/lkp/lkp/lkp-x86_64.cgz"
modules_initrd: "/pkg/linux/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/752f49cf691de1a914be41c78111a0877af986ba/modules.cgz"
bm_initrd: "/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/lkp.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/run-ipconfig.cgz,/osimage/deps/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/turbostat.cgz,/lkp/benchmarks/will-it-scale.cgz"
job_state: finished
loadavg: 46.70 20.74 8.06 1/624 11372
start_time: '1437991880'
end_time: '1437992189'
version: "/lkp/lkp/.src-20150727-150448"

[-- Attachment #3: reproduce.ksh --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4773 bytes --]

echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu10/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu11/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu13/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu14/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu15/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu16/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu17/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu18/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu19/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu21/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu22/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu23/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu24/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu25/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu26/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu27/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu28/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu29/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu3/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu30/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu31/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu32/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu33/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu34/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu35/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu36/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu37/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu38/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu39/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu40/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu41/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu42/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu43/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu44/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu45/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu46/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu47/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu48/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu49/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu5/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu50/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu51/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu52/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu53/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu54/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu55/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu56/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu57/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu58/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu59/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu6/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu60/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu61/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu62/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu63/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu7/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu8/cpufreq/scaling_governor
echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu9/cpufreq/scaling_governor
./runtest.py futex1 16 both 1 8 16 24 32 48 64

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-07-30  2:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-30  2:03 [lkp] [mm] 112b650f83e: -6.8% will-it-scale.per_process_ops kernel test robot
2015-07-30  2:03 ` kernel test robot

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.