All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
@ 2020-04-01  7:47 Santosh Sivaraj
  2020-04-09  7:40 ` Santosh Sivaraj
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Santosh Sivaraj @ 2020-04-01  7:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Ganesh Goudar, Oliver, Mahesh Salgaonkar, Aneesh Kumar K.V

Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which
generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range.

Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
---

This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].

Unlike the previous series[2], the patch adds badblock registration only for
pseries scm driver. Handling badblocks for baremetal (powernv) PMEM will be done
later and if possible get the badblock handling as a common code.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190820023030.18232-1-santosh@fossix.org/

arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
index 0b4467e378e5..5012cbf4606e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
 #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/nd.h>
+#include <asm/mce.h>
 
 #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
 
@@ -39,8 +41,12 @@ struct papr_scm_priv {
 	struct resource res;
 	struct nd_region *region;
 	struct nd_interleave_set nd_set;
+	struct list_head region_list;
 };
 
+LIST_HEAD(papr_nd_regions);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(papr_ndr_lock);
+
 static int drc_pmem_bind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
 {
 	unsigned long ret[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
@@ -372,6 +378,10 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
 		dev_info(dev, "Region registered with target node %d and online node %d",
 			 target_nid, online_nid);
 
+	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
+	list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions);
+	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
+
 	return 0;
 
 err:	nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
@@ -379,6 +389,68 @@ err:	nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
 	return -ENXIO;
 }
 
+void papr_scm_add_badblock(struct nd_region *region, struct nvdimm_bus *bus,
+			   u64 phys_addr)
+{
+	u64 aligned_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(phys_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
+
+	if (nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(bus, aligned_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES)) {
+		pr_err("Bad block registration for 0x%llx failed\n", phys_addr);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("Add memory range (0x%llx - 0x%llx) as bad range\n",
+		 aligned_addr, aligned_addr + L1_CACHE_BYTES);
+
+	nvdimm_region_notify(region, NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON);
+}
+
+static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
+			 void *data)
+{
+	struct machine_check_event *evt = data;
+	struct papr_scm_priv *p;
+	u64 phys_addr;
+	bool found = false;
+
+	if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE)
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions))
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address +
+		(evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK);
+
+	if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided ||
+	    !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	/* mce notifier is called from a process context, so mutex is safe */
+	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, region_list) {
+		struct resource res = p->res;
+
+		if (phys_addr >= res.start && phys_addr <= res.end) {
+			found = true;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
+
+	if (!found)
+		return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+	papr_scm_add_badblock(p->region, p->bus, phys_addr);
+
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = {
+	.notifier_call = handle_mce_ue
+};
+
 static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
@@ -476,6 +548,10 @@ static int papr_scm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct papr_scm_priv *p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
 
+	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
+	list_del(&(p->region_list));
+	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
+
 	nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
 	drc_pmem_unbind(p);
 	kfree(p->bus_desc.provider_name);
@@ -498,7 +574,25 @@ static struct platform_driver papr_scm_driver = {
 	},
 };
 
-module_platform_driver(papr_scm_driver);
+static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
+	if (!ret)
+		mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+module_init(papr_scm_init);
+
+static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
+{
+	mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
+	platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
+}
+module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
+
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, papr_scm_match);
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges Santosh Sivaraj
@ 2020-04-09  7:40 ` Santosh Sivaraj
  2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Santosh Sivaraj @ 2020-04-09  7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Ganesh Goudar, Oliver, Mahesh Salgaonkar, Aneesh Kumar K.V

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5603 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 1:18 PM Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org> wrote:

> Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which
> generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
> ---
>

Any comments on this?

Thanks,
Santosh


> This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].
>
> Unlike the previous series[2], the patch adds badblock registration only
> for
> pseries scm driver. Handling badblocks for baremetal (powernv) PMEM will
> be done
> later and if possible get the badblock handling as a common code.
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
> [2]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190820023030.18232-1-santosh@fossix.org/
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> index 0b4467e378e5..5012cbf4606e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>  #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/nd.h>
> +#include <asm/mce.h>
>
>  #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
>
> @@ -39,8 +41,12 @@ struct papr_scm_priv {
>         struct resource res;
>         struct nd_region *region;
>         struct nd_interleave_set nd_set;
> +       struct list_head region_list;
>  };
>
> +LIST_HEAD(papr_nd_regions);
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(papr_ndr_lock);
> +
>  static int drc_pmem_bind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>  {
>         unsigned long ret[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
> @@ -372,6 +378,10 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv
> *p)
>                 dev_info(dev, "Region registered with target node %d and
> online node %d",
>                          target_nid, online_nid);
>
> +       mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +       list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions);
> +       mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
>         return 0;
>
>  err:   nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
> @@ -379,6 +389,68 @@ err:       nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
>         return -ENXIO;
>  }
>
> +void papr_scm_add_badblock(struct nd_region *region, struct nvdimm_bus
> *bus,
> +                          u64 phys_addr)
> +{
> +       u64 aligned_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(phys_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
> +
> +       if (nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(bus, aligned_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES)) {
> +               pr_err("Bad block registration for 0x%llx failed\n",
> phys_addr);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       pr_debug("Add memory range (0x%llx - 0x%llx) as bad range\n",
> +                aligned_addr, aligned_addr + L1_CACHE_BYTES);
> +
> +       nvdimm_region_notify(region, NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON);
> +}
> +
> +static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> +                        void *data)
> +{
> +       struct machine_check_event *evt = data;
> +       struct papr_scm_priv *p;
> +       u64 phys_addr;
> +       bool found = false;
> +
> +       if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE)
> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +       if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions))
> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +       phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address +
> +               (evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK);
> +
> +       if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided ||
> +           !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +       /* mce notifier is called from a process context, so mutex is safe
> */
> +       mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +       list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, region_list) {
> +               struct resource res = p->res;
> +
> +               if (phys_addr >= res.start && phys_addr <= res.end) {
> +                       found = true;
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
> +       if (!found)
> +               return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +       papr_scm_add_badblock(p->region, p->bus, phys_addr);
> +
> +       return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = {
> +       .notifier_call = handle_mce_ue
> +};
> +
>  static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>         struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
> @@ -476,6 +548,10 @@ static int papr_scm_remove(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>  {
>         struct papr_scm_priv *p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> +       mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +       list_del(&(p->region_list));
> +       mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
>         nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
>         drc_pmem_unbind(p);
>         kfree(p->bus_desc.provider_name);
> @@ -498,7 +574,25 @@ static struct platform_driver papr_scm_driver = {
>         },
>  };
>
> -module_platform_driver(papr_scm_driver);
> +static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
> +       if (!ret)
> +               mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +module_init(papr_scm_init);
> +
> +static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
> +{
> +       mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> +       platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
> +
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, papr_scm_match);
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7541 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges Santosh Sivaraj
@ 2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
  2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-04-13  3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santosh Sivaraj
  Cc: kbuild-all, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Mahesh Salgaonkar, Oliver,
	Ganesh Goudar, linuxppc-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2596 bytes --]

Hi Santosh,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Santosh-Sivaraj/papr-scm-Add-bad-memory-ranges-to-nvdimm-bad-ranges/20200401-171233
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_init':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:584:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_register_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_register_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     584 |   mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |   bus_register_notifier
   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_exit':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:592:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_unregister_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_unregister_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     592 |  mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |  bus_unregister_notifier
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +584 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c

   577	
   578	static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
   579	{
   580		int ret;
   581	
   582		ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
   583		if (!ret)
 > 584			mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
   585	
   586		return ret;
   587	}
   588	module_init(papr_scm_init);
   589	
   590	static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
   591	{
 > 592		mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
   593		platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
   594	}
   595	module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
   596	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 65029 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
@ 2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2020-04-13  3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2661 bytes --]

Hi Santosh,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
[also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Santosh-Sivaraj/papr-scm-Add-bad-memory-ranges-to-nvdimm-bad-ranges/20200401-171233
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
config: powerpc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_init':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:584:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_register_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_register_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     584 |   mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |   bus_register_notifier
   arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_exit':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:592:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_unregister_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_unregister_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     592 |  mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |  bus_unregister_notifier
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +584 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c

   577	
   578	static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
   579	{
   580		int ret;
   581	
   582		ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
   583		if (!ret)
 > 584			mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
   585	
   586		return ret;
   587	}
   588	module_init(papr_scm_init);
   589	
   590	static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
   591	{
 > 592		mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
   593		platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
   594	}
   595	module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
   596	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org

[-- Attachment #2: config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 65029 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
  (?)
@ 2020-04-13 11:20   ` Santosh Sivaraj
  2020-04-20  3:02       ` Philip Li
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Santosh Sivaraj @ 2020-04-13 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild test robot
  Cc: kbuild-all, Aneesh Kumar K.V, Mahesh Salgaonkar, Oliver,
	Ganesh Goudar, linuxppc-dev

kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:

> Hi Santosh,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/

Thanks,
Santosh

>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Santosh-Sivaraj/papr-scm-Add-bad-memory-ranges-to-nvdimm-bad-ranges/20200401-171233
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> config: powerpc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc 
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>    arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_init':
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:584:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_register_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_register_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      584 |   mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>          |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |   bus_register_notifier
>    arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_exit':
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:592:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_unregister_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_unregister_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>      592 |  mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>          |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>          |  bus_unregister_notifier
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +584 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>
>    577	
>    578	static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
>    579	{
>    580		int ret;
>    581	
>    582		ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
>    583		if (!ret)
>  > 584			mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>    585	
>    586		return ret;
>    587	}
>    588	module_init(papr_scm_init);
>    589	
>    590	static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
>    591	{
>  > 592		mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>    593		platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
>    594	}
>    595	module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
>    596	
>
> ---
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges Santosh Sivaraj
  2020-04-09  7:40 ` Santosh Sivaraj
  2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
@ 2020-04-13 14:24 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
  2020-04-13 15:37   ` Santosh Sivaraj
  2020-04-16  3:41 ` Vaibhav Jain
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Mahesh J Salgaonkar @ 2020-04-13 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santosh Sivaraj; +Cc: Oliver, Ganesh Goudar, linuxppc-dev, Aneesh Kumar K.V

On 2020-04-01 13:17:41 Wed, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which
> generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
> ---
> 
> This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].
> 
> Unlike the previous series[2], the patch adds badblock registration only for
> pseries scm driver. Handling badblocks for baremetal (powernv) PMEM will be done
> later and if possible get the badblock handling as a common code.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190820023030.18232-1-santosh@fossix.org/
> 
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> index 0b4467e378e5..5012cbf4606e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
[...]
> +static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> +			 void *data)
> +{
> +	struct machine_check_event *evt = data;
> +	struct papr_scm_priv *p;
> +	u64 phys_addr;
> +	bool found = false;
> +
> +	if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;

Do you really need this check ?

> +
> +	phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address +
> +		(evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK);
> +
> +	if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided ||
> +	    !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	/* mce notifier is called from a process context, so mutex is safe */
> +	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, region_list) {
> +		struct resource res = p->res;
> +
> +		if (phys_addr >= res.start && phys_addr <= res.end) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
> +	if (!found)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	papr_scm_add_badblock(p->region, p->bus, phys_addr);
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = {
> +	.notifier_call = handle_mce_ue
> +};
> +
[...]
> -module_platform_driver(papr_scm_driver);
> +static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +module_init(papr_scm_init);
> +
> +static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
> +{
> +	mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> +	platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(papr_scm_exit);

Rest Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks,
-Mahesh.

> +
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, papr_scm_match);
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Mahesh J Salgaonkar


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-13 14:24 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
@ 2020-04-13 15:37   ` Santosh Sivaraj
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Santosh Sivaraj @ 2020-04-13 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mahesh; +Cc: Oliver, Ganesh Goudar, linuxppc-dev, Aneesh Kumar K.V

Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> On 2020-04-01 13:17:41 Wed, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
>> Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which
>> generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
>> ---
>> 
>> This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].
>> 
>> Unlike the previous series[2], the patch adds badblock registration only for
>> pseries scm driver. Handling badblocks for baremetal (powernv) PMEM will be done
>> later and if possible get the badblock handling as a common code.
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190820023030.18232-1-santosh@fossix.org/
>> 
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> index 0b4467e378e5..5012cbf4606e 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> [...]
>> +static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>> +			 void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct machine_check_event *evt = data;
>> +	struct papr_scm_priv *p;
>> +	u64 phys_addr;
>> +	bool found = false;
>> +
>> +	if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE)
>> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +	if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions))
>> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>
> Do you really need this check ?

Quite harmless I guess, atleast it saves a branch and mutex_lock/unlock.

>
>> +
>> +	phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address +
>> +		(evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK);
>> +
>> +	if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided ||
>> +	    !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
>> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +	/* mce notifier is called from a process context, so mutex is safe */
>> +	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>> +	list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, region_list) {
>> +		struct resource res = p->res;
>> +
>> +		if (phys_addr >= res.start && phys_addr <= res.end) {
>> +			found = true;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
>> +
>> +	if (!found)
>> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
>> +
>> +	papr_scm_add_badblock(p->region, p->bus, phys_addr);
>> +
>> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = {
>> +	.notifier_call = handle_mce_ue
>> +};
>> +
> [...]
>> -module_platform_driver(papr_scm_driver);
>> +static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
>> +	if (!ret)
>> +		mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +module_init(papr_scm_init);
>> +
>> +static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
>> +{
>> +	mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
>> +	platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
>> +}
>> +module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
>
> Rest Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks for the review.

Santosh
>
> Thanks,
> -Mahesh.
>
>> +
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, papr_scm_match);
>>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>>  MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>> 
>
> -- 
> Mahesh J Salgaonkar

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges Santosh Sivaraj
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-04-13 14:24 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
@ 2020-04-16  3:41 ` Vaibhav Jain
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vaibhav Jain @ 2020-04-16  3:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santosh Sivaraj, linuxppc-dev
  Cc: Oliver, Ganesh Goudar, Mahesh Salgaonkar, Aneesh Kumar K.V

Hi Santosh,

Some review comments below.

Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org> writes:

> Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which
> generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@fossix.org>
> ---
>
> This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].
>
> Unlike the previous series[2], the patch adds badblock registration only for
> pseries scm driver. Handling badblocks for baremetal (powernv) PMEM will be done
> later and if possible get the badblock handling as a common code.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20190820023030.18232-1-santosh@fossix.org/
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> index 0b4467e378e5..5012cbf4606e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
>  #include <linux/libnvdimm.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/nd.h>
> +#include <asm/mce.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
>  
> @@ -39,8 +41,12 @@ struct papr_scm_priv {
>  	struct resource res;
>  	struct nd_region *region;
>  	struct nd_interleave_set nd_set;
> +	struct list_head region_list;
>  };
>  
> +LIST_HEAD(papr_nd_regions);
> +DEFINE_MUTEX(papr_ndr_lock);
> +
>  static int drc_pmem_bind(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>  {
>  	unsigned long ret[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE];
> @@ -372,6 +378,10 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p)
>  		dev_info(dev, "Region registered with target node %d and online node %d",
>  			 target_nid, online_nid);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +	list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions);
> +	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err:	nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
> @@ -379,6 +389,68 @@ err:	nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
>  	return -ENXIO;
>  }
>  
> +void papr_scm_add_badblock(struct nd_region *region, struct nvdimm_bus *bus,
> +			   u64 phys_addr)
> +{
> +	u64 aligned_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(phys_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
> +
> +	if (nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(bus, aligned_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES)) {
> +		pr_err("Bad block registration for 0x%llx failed\n", phys_addr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_debug("Add memory range (0x%llx - 0x%llx) as bad range\n",
> +		 aligned_addr, aligned_addr + L1_CACHE_BYTES);
> +
> +	nvdimm_region_notify(region, NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON);
> +}
> +
> +static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
> +			 void *data)
> +{
> +	struct machine_check_event *evt = data;
> +	struct papr_scm_priv *p;
> +	u64 phys_addr;
> +	bool found = false;
> +
> +	if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address +
> +		(evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK);
Though it seems that you are trying to get the actual physical address
from the page aligned evt->u.ue_error.physical_address, it would be nice
if you could put a comment as to why you are doing this seemingly wierd
math with real and effective addresses here.
> +
> +	if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided ||
> +	    !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT)))
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	/* mce notifier is called from a process context, so mutex is safe */
> +	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, region_list) {
> +		struct resource res = p->res;
> +
> +		if (phys_addr >= res.start && phys_addr <= res.end) {
> +			found = true;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
> +	if (!found)
> +		return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +
> +	papr_scm_add_badblock(p->region, p->bus, phys_addr);
I see a possible race between papr_scm_add_badblock() and
papr_scm_remove() as a bad block may be reported just remove a region is
disabled. Would recomment calling papr_scm_bad_block() in context of
papr_ndr_lock.

> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = {
> +	.notifier_call = handle_mce_ue
> +};
> +
>  static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
> @@ -476,6 +548,10 @@ static int papr_scm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct papr_scm_priv *p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +	list_del(&(p->region_list));
> +	mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock);
> +
>  	nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus);
>  	drc_pmem_unbind(p);
>  	kfree(p->bus_desc.provider_name);
> @@ -498,7 +574,25 @@ static struct platform_driver papr_scm_driver = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> -module_platform_driver(papr_scm_driver);
> +static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +module_init(papr_scm_init);
> +
> +static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
> +{
> +	mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> +	platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
> +
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, papr_scm_match);
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation");
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>

-- 
Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Linux Technology Center, IBM India Pvt. Ltd.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
  2020-04-13 11:20   ` Santosh Sivaraj
@ 2020-04-20  3:02       ` Philip Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Philip Li @ 2020-04-20  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Santosh Sivaraj
  Cc: kbuild-all, kbuild test robot, Aneesh Kumar K.V,
	Mahesh Salgaonkar, Oliver, Ganesh Goudar, linuxppc-dev

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:50:38PM +0530, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Santosh,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
> > [also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> > base tree in git format-patch, please see
> > https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].
got it, thanks for input, though currently the bot is not able to figure
out this yet for two separated patch sets, here the --base may help.

> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Thanks,
> Santosh
> 
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Santosh-Sivaraj/papr-scm-Add-bad-memory-ranges-to-nvdimm-bad-ranges/20200401-171233
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> > config: powerpc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> > reproduce:
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc 
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_init':
> >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:584:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_register_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_register_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >      584 |   mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >          |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >          |   bus_register_notifier
> >    arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_exit':
> >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:592:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_unregister_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_unregister_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >      592 |  mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >          |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >          |  bus_unregister_notifier
> >    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > vim +584 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> >
> >    577	
> >    578	static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
> >    579	{
> >    580		int ret;
> >    581	
> >    582		ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
> >    583		if (!ret)
> >  > 584			mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >    585	
> >    586		return ret;
> >    587	}
> >    588	module_init(papr_scm_init);
> >    589	
> >    590	static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
> >    591	{
> >  > 592		mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >    593		platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
> >    594	}
> >    595	module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
> >    596	
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges
@ 2020-04-20  3:02       ` Philip Li
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Philip Li @ 2020-04-20  3:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kbuild-all

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3374 bytes --]

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 04:50:38PM +0530, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Hi Santosh,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> >
> > [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
> > [also build test ERROR on v5.7-rc1 next-20200412]
> > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> > improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> > base tree in git format-patch, please see
> > https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
> 
> This patch depends on "powerpc/mce: Add MCE notification chain" [1].
got it, thanks for input, though currently the bot is not able to figure
out this yet for two separated patch sets, here the --base may help.

> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20200330071219.12284-1-ganeshgr(a)linux.ibm.com/
> 
> Thanks,
> Santosh
> 
> >
> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Santosh-Sivaraj/papr-scm-Add-bad-memory-ranges-to-nvdimm-bad-ranges/20200401-171233
> > base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
> > config: powerpc-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> > compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
> > reproduce:
> >         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> >         GCC_VERSION=9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=powerpc 
> >
> > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >
> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> >    arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_init':
> >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:584:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_register_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_register_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >      584 |   mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >          |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >          |   bus_register_notifier
> >    arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c: In function 'papr_scm_exit':
> >>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c:592:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'mce_unregister_notifier'; did you mean 'bus_unregister_notifier'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >      592 |  mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >          |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >          |  bus_unregister_notifier
> >    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > vim +584 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c
> >
> >    577	
> >    578	static int __init papr_scm_init(void)
> >    579	{
> >    580		int ret;
> >    581	
> >    582		ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver);
> >    583		if (!ret)
> >  > 584			mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >    585	
> >    586		return ret;
> >    587	}
> >    588	module_init(papr_scm_init);
> >    589	
> >    590	static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void)
> >    591	{
> >  > 592		mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb);
> >    593		platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver);
> >    594	}
> >    595	module_exit(papr_scm_exit);
> >    596	
> >
> > ---
> > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
> > https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-20  3:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-01  7:47 [PATCH] papr/scm: Add bad memory ranges to nvdimm bad ranges Santosh Sivaraj
2020-04-09  7:40 ` Santosh Sivaraj
2020-04-13  3:35 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13  3:35   ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-13 11:20   ` Santosh Sivaraj
2020-04-20  3:02     ` Philip Li
2020-04-20  3:02       ` Philip Li
2020-04-13 14:24 ` Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2020-04-13 15:37   ` Santosh Sivaraj
2020-04-16  3:41 ` Vaibhav Jain

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.