From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm: Use VMALLOC_START to validate addr Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:14:37 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <877d52zpe2.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87bkui6apn.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes: > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes: >> Instead of high_memory use VMALLOC_START to validate that the address is >> not in the vmalloc range. >> >> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> >> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> > > Isn't this really the fix for ffa0b64e3be5 ("powerpc: Fix > virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit Book3E & 32-bit") ? If we are looking for a simpler backport yet. But what commit ffa0b64e3be5 does is correct. high_memory is suppose to be the top of direct mapped address range. Hence checking for high_meory will also avoid vmalloc address. If we take patch 1 then patch 3 is not really a fix. I would consider it a cleanup to switch to a more familiar VMALLOC_START variable. > > cheers > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h >> index e5f75c70eda8..256cad69e42e 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h >> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline bool pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) >> >> #define virt_addr_valid(vaddr) ({ \ >> unsigned long _addr = (unsigned long)vaddr; \ >> - _addr >= PAGE_OFFSET && _addr < (unsigned long)high_memory && \ >> + _addr >= PAGE_OFFSET && _addr < (unsigned long)VMALLOC_START && \ >> pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(_addr)); \ >> }) >> >> -- >> 2.36.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm: Use VMALLOC_START to validate addr Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:14:37 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <877d52zpe2.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87bkui6apn.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes: > "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes: >> Instead of high_memory use VMALLOC_START to validate that the address is >> not in the vmalloc range. >> >> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> >> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> > > Isn't this really the fix for ffa0b64e3be5 ("powerpc: Fix > virt_addr_valid() for 64-bit Book3E & 32-bit") ? If we are looking for a simpler backport yet. But what commit ffa0b64e3be5 does is correct. high_memory is suppose to be the top of direct mapped address range. Hence checking for high_meory will also avoid vmalloc address. If we take patch 1 then patch 3 is not really a fix. I would consider it a cleanup to switch to a more familiar VMALLOC_START variable. > > cheers > >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h >> index e5f75c70eda8..256cad69e42e 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h >> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static inline bool pfn_valid(unsigned long pfn) >> >> #define virt_addr_valid(vaddr) ({ \ >> unsigned long _addr = (unsigned long)vaddr; \ >> - _addr >= PAGE_OFFSET && _addr < (unsigned long)high_memory && \ >> + _addr >= PAGE_OFFSET && _addr < (unsigned long)VMALLOC_START && \ >> pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(_addr)); \ >> }) >> >> -- >> 2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-27 4:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-06-23 12:29 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/memhotplug: Add add_pages override for PPC Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-23 12:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-23 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/mm: Update max/min_low_pfn in the same function Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-23 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/mm: Use VMALLOC_START to validate addr Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-23 12:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-24 2:45 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-06-24 2:45 ` Michael Ellerman 2022-06-27 4:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message] 2022-06-27 4:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-24 11:51 ` Christophe Leroy 2022-06-24 11:51 ` Christophe Leroy 2022-06-27 4:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-27 4:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-27 5:42 ` Christophe Leroy 2022-06-27 5:42 ` Christophe Leroy 2022-06-27 6:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V 2022-06-27 6:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=877d52zpe2.fsf@linux.ibm.com \ --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \ --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=mhocko@suse.com \ --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \ --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.