* [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule
@ 2015-09-07 10:50 Peter Maydell
2015-09-07 15:03 ` Markus Armbruster
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-07 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: QEMU Developers
Here's a suggested 2.5 release schedule, constructed fairly arbitrarily
by putting a week's margin for slippage in before everybody leaves for
Christmas, and having a four week softfreeze and four week hardfreeze:
Softfreeze 15 Oct
Hardfreeze 12 Nov
Release 10 Dec
(these are all Thursdays, and this gives us five and a half weeks til
softfreeze.)
Does anybody have any different preferences, want to suggest shorter
freeze periods, etc?
(Philosophical question: I tend to assume we will slip by a week, because
we pretty much have always done so over the last few weeks. If we made
the official hardfreeze a week longer, would we make our releases on
the scheduled date, or would we just end up slipping another week
anyhow? :-))
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule
2015-09-07 10:50 [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule Peter Maydell
@ 2015-09-07 15:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-09-09 9:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-09-11 16:55 ` Peter Maydell
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Markus Armbruster @ 2015-09-07 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: QEMU Developers
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> Here's a suggested 2.5 release schedule, constructed fairly arbitrarily
> by putting a week's margin for slippage in before everybody leaves for
> Christmas, and having a four week softfreeze and four week hardfreeze:
>
> Softfreeze 15 Oct
> Hardfreeze 12 Nov
> Release 10 Dec
>
> (these are all Thursdays, and this gives us five and a half weeks til
> softfreeze.)
>
> Does anybody have any different preferences, want to suggest shorter
> freeze periods, etc?
Sounds good to me.
> (Philosophical question: I tend to assume we will slip by a week, because
> we pretty much have always done so over the last few weeks. If we made
> the official hardfreeze a week longer, would we make our releases on
> the scheduled date, or would we just end up slipping another week
> anyhow? :-))
I wouldn't want to bet on the former :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule
2015-09-07 10:50 [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule Peter Maydell
2015-09-07 15:03 ` Markus Armbruster
@ 2015-09-09 9:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-09-11 16:55 ` Peter Maydell
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Hajnoczi @ 2015-09-09 9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: QEMU Developers
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:50:11AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Here's a suggested 2.5 release schedule, constructed fairly arbitrarily
> by putting a week's margin for slippage in before everybody leaves for
> Christmas, and having a four week softfreeze and four week hardfreeze:
>
> Softfreeze 15 Oct
> Hardfreeze 12 Nov
> Release 10 Dec
Sounds good.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule
2015-09-07 10:50 [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule Peter Maydell
2015-09-07 15:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-09-09 9:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
@ 2015-09-11 16:55 ` Peter Maydell
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-11 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: QEMU Developers
On 7 September 2015 at 11:50, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> Here's a suggested 2.5 release schedule, constructed fairly arbitrarily
> by putting a week's margin for slippage in before everybody leaves for
> Christmas, and having a four week softfreeze and four week hardfreeze:
>
> Softfreeze 15 Oct
> Hardfreeze 12 Nov
> Release 10 Dec
>
> (these are all Thursdays, and this gives us five and a half weeks til
> softfreeze.)
No countersuggestions, so I've removed the bit from the wiki page
that said 'provisional'.
NB: for this release I want to try recording release-critical issues
on the wiki page, so I don't miss them when rolling release candidates.
Hopefully this will be a fairly low-effort thing for everybody.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-11 16:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-07 10:50 [Qemu-devel] Proposed 2.5 release schedule Peter Maydell
2015-09-07 15:03 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-09-09 9:25 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-09-11 16:55 ` Peter Maydell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.