All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	jasowang@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:02:24 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gs8jbav.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346154857-12487-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>
> Instead of storing the queue index in transport-specific virtio structs,
> this patch moves them to vring_virtqueue and introduces an helper to get
> the value.  This lets drivers simplify their management and tracing of
> virtqueues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Sorry for the delay, I was at Kernel Summit and am only now actually
reading (vs skimming) my backlog.

Putting it in vring_virtqueue rather than virtqueue seems weird, though.
But I've applied as-is, we can clean up that later if we want (probably
by merging the two structures, I'll have to think harder on that).

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Cheers,
Rusty.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:02:24 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gs8jbav.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346154857-12487-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:

> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
>
> Instead of storing the queue index in transport-specific virtio structs,
> this patch moves them to vring_virtqueue and introduces an helper to get
> the value.  This lets drivers simplify their management and tracing of
> virtqueues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

Sorry for the delay, I was at Kernel Summit and am only now actually
reading (vs skimming) my backlog.

Putting it in vring_virtqueue rather than virtqueue seems weird, though.
But I've applied as-is, we can clean up that later if we want (probably
by merging the two structures, I'll have to think harder on that).

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Cheers,
Rusty.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-06  3:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 11:54 [PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-scsi Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 1/5] virtio-ring: move queue_index to vring_virtqueue Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-29  7:54   ` Jason Wang
2012-08-29  7:54     ` Jason Wang
2012-09-05 23:32   ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-09-05 23:32     ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce an API to set affinity for a virtqueue Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-05 23:32   ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-05 23:32     ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 3/5] virtio-scsi: allocate target pointers in a separate memory block Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 14:07   ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-28 14:07     ` Sasha Levin
2012-08-28 14:25     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 14:25       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 4/5] virtio-scsi: pass struct virtio_scsi to virtqueue completion function Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54 ` [PATCH 5/5] virtio-scsi: introduce multiqueue support Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-28 11:54   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04  2:21   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-04  2:21     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-04  6:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04  6:46       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04  8:46       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04  8:46         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 10:25         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 10:25           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 11:09           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 11:09             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 11:18             ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 11:18               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:35               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 13:35                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 13:45                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:45                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:19                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:19                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:25                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:25                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 20:11       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-04 20:11         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-09-05  7:03         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-05  7:03           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 12:48   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 12:48     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 13:49     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 13:49       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:21       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:21         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:30         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:30           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:41           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:41             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:47   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:47     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 14:55     ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 14:55       ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-09-04 15:03       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-09-04 15:03         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-30  7:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue virtio-scsi Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-30  7:13   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-30 14:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-30 14:53   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-08-30 15:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-08-30 15:45     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877gs8jbav.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.