All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: "make check-acceptance" takes way too long
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2021 13:55:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <878s1kgg2f.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YQeu+Jm2Q0NlQ2Im@redhat.com>


Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 04:12:27PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> "make check-acceptance" takes way way too long. I just did a run
>> on an arm-and-aarch64-targets-only debug build and it took over
>> half an hour, and this despite it skipping or cancelling 26 out
>> of 58 tests!
>> 
>> I think that ~10 minutes runtime is reasonable. 30 is not;
>> ideally no individual test would take more than a minute or so.
>> 
>> Output saying where the time went. The first two tests take
>> more than 10 minutes *each*. I think a good start would be to find
>> a way of testing what they're testing that is less heavyweight.
>
> While there is certainly value in testing with a real world "full" guest
> OS, I think it is overkill as the default setup. I reckon we would get
> 80-90% of the value, by making our own test image repo, containing minimal
> kernel builds for each machine/target combo we need, together with a tiny
> initrd containing busybox.

Also another minor wrinkle for this test is because we are booting via
firmware we need a proper disk image with bootloader and the rest of it
which involves more faff than a simple kernel+initrd (which is my goto
format for the local zoo of testing images I have).

-- 
Alex Bennée


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30 15:12 "make check-acceptance" takes way too long Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 15:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-30 15:42 ` Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 22:04   ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31  6:39     ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-31 17:58       ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 18:41 ` Alex Bennée
2021-07-31 20:32   ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 22:55     ` Cleber Rosa
2021-08-02  8:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:47   ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 12:59     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:55   ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2021-08-02 13:00     ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 13:04       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:25         ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:00     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:27       ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:43         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-01-20 15:13 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-20 15:35   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-21  7:56   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 10:50     ` Markus Armbruster
2022-01-21 11:33       ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-21 12:23         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-21 12:41           ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 15:21           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-25  9:20             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01  6:31               ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01  7:49                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01  9:06                 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 10:27                   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 11:17                     ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 16:01                       ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 16:19                         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:47                           ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:03                             ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 19:04                               ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:35                             ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 17:59                         ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-02-01 11:06               ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2022-02-01 15:54                 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01  5:29             ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 17:01               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:59                 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-15 18:14 ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=878s1kgg2f.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.