All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>,
	"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: "make check-acceptance" takes way too long
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 19:41:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfzuwchl.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA9cMZoj18gq7Ksv5PRoU1wRmXvW_e9UE73C_MEB7wTroQ@mail.gmail.com>


Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> "make check-acceptance" takes way way too long. I just did a run
> on an arm-and-aarch64-targets-only debug build and it took over
> half an hour, and this despite it skipping or cancelling 26 out
> of 58 tests!
>
> I think that ~10 minutes runtime is reasonable. 30 is not;
> ideally no individual test would take more than a minute or so.
>
> Output saying where the time went. The first two tests take
> more than 10 minutes *each*. I think a good start would be to find
> a way of testing what they're testing that is less heavyweight.
>
>  (01/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv2:
> PASS (629.74 s)
>  (02/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv3:
> PASS (628.75 s)
>  (03/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm:
> CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (1.18 s)

For these tests which purport to exercise the various GIC configurations
I think we would be much better served by running kvm-unit-tests which
at least try and exercise all the features rather than rely on the side
effect of booting an entire OS.

>  (04/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_aarch64_virt:
> PASS (3.53 s)
>  (05/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_aarch64_xlnx_versal_virt:
> PASS (41.13 s)
>  (06/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_virt:
> PASS (5.22 s)
>  (07/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_emcraft_sf2:
> PASS (18.88 s)
>  (08/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_raspi2_uart0:
> PASS (11.30 s)
>  (09/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_raspi2_initrd:
> PASS (22.66 s)
>  (10/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_exynos4210_initrd:
> PASS (31.89 s)
>  (11/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd:
> PASS (27.86 s)
>  (12/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_sata:
> PASS (27.19 s)
>  (13/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_quanta_gsj:
> SKIP: Test might timeout
>  (14/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_quanta_gsj_initrd:
> PASS (22.53 s)
>  (15/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi:
> PASS (4.86 s)
>  (16/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_initrd:
> PASS (39.85 s)
>  (17/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_sd:
> PASS (53.57 s)
>  (18/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08:
> SKIP: storage limited
>  (19/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_uboot_netbsd9:
> SKIP: storage limited
>  (20/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_aarch64_raspi3_atf:
> PASS (1.50 s)
>  (21/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_vexpressa9:
> PASS (10.74 s)
>  (22/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_ast2400_palmetto_openbmc_v2_9_0:
> PASS (39.43 s)
>  (23/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_ast2500_romulus_openbmc_v2_9_0:
> PASS (54.01 s)
>  (24/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_ast2600_debian:
> PASS (40.60 s)
>  (25/58) tests/acceptance/boot_xen.py:BootXen.test_arm64_xen_411_and_dom0:
> PASS (20.22 s)
>  (26/58) tests/acceptance/boot_xen.py:BootXen.test_arm64_xen_414_and_dom0:
> PASS (17.37 s)
>  (27/58) tests/acceptance/boot_xen.py:BootXen.test_arm64_xen_415_and_dom0:
> PASS (23.82 s)
>  (28/58) tests/acceptance/empty_cpu_model.py:EmptyCPUModel.test:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (29/58) tests/acceptance/info_usernet.py:InfoUsernet.test_hostfwd:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (30/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_canona1100.py:CanonA1100Machine.test_arm_canona1100:
> PASS (0.20 s)
>  (31/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py:IntegratorMachine.test_integratorcp_console:
> SKIP: untrusted code
>  (32/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py:IntegratorMachine.test_framebuffer_tux_logo:
> SKIP: Python NumPy not installed
>  (33/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py:N8x0Machine.test_n800:
> SKIP: untrusted code
>  (34/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py:N8x0Machine.test_n810:
> SKIP: untrusted code
>  (35/58) tests/acceptance/migration.py:Migration.test_migration_with_tcp_localhost:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (36/58) tests/acceptance/migration.py:Migration.test_migration_with_unix:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (37/58) tests/acceptance/migration.py:Migration.test_migration_with_exec:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (38/58) tests/acceptance/multiprocess.py:Multiprocess.test_multiprocess_aarch64:
> CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (0.06 s)
>  (39/58) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt:
> PASS (19.59 s)
>  (40/58) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_virt:
> PASS (28.73 s)
>  (41/58) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd:
> PASS (52.00 s)
>  (42/58) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_vexpressa9:
> PASS (25.69 s)
>  (43/58) tests/acceptance/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_AArch64.test_aarch64_virt:
> PASS (2.16 s)
>  (44/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_noril: CANCEL: kvm
> accelerator does not seem to be available (0.90 s)
>  (45/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_noril_passthrough:
> CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (0.70 s)
>  (46/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_noril_nostrict:
> CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (1.02 s)
>  (47/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_ril: CANCEL: kvm
> accelerator does not seem to be available (0.68 s)
>  (48/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_ril_passthrough:
> CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (0.98 s)
>  (49/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_ril_nostrict: CANCEL:
> kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (1.00 s)
>  (50/58) tests/acceptance/tcg_plugins.py:PluginKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt_insn:
> PASS (12.19 s)
>  (51/58) tests/acceptance/tcg_plugins.py:PluginKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt_insn_icount:
> PASS (12.35 s)
>  (52/58) tests/acceptance/tcg_plugins.py:PluginKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt_mem_icount:
> PASS (10.21 s)
>  (53/58) tests/acceptance/version.py:Version.test_qmp_human_info_version:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (54/58) tests/acceptance/virtio_check_params.py:VirtioMaxSegSettingsCheck.test_machine_types:
> SKIP: break multi-arch CI
>  (55/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_no_vnc: CANCEL: No QEMU
> binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (56/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_no_vnc_change_password:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (57/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_change_password_requires_a_password:
> CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
>  (58/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_change_password: CANCEL: No
> QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s)
> RESULTS    : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 8 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT
> 0 | CANCEL 18
> JOB TIME   : 1967.44 s
>
> thanks
> -- PMM


-- 
Alex Bennée


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-31 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30 15:12 "make check-acceptance" takes way too long Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 15:41 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-07-30 15:42 ` Peter Maydell
2021-07-30 22:04   ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31  6:39     ` Thomas Huth
2021-07-31 17:58       ` Cleber Rosa
2021-07-31 18:41 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2021-07-31 20:32   ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 22:55     ` Cleber Rosa
2021-08-02  8:38 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:47   ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 12:59     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 12:55   ` Alex Bennée
2021-08-02 13:00     ` Peter Maydell
2021-08-02 13:04       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:25         ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:00     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-08-02 13:27       ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-02 13:43         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-01-20 15:13 ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-20 15:35   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via
2022-01-21  7:56   ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 10:50     ` Markus Armbruster
2022-01-21 11:33       ` Peter Maydell
2022-01-21 12:23         ` Alex Bennée
2022-01-21 12:41           ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-21 15:21           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-01-25  9:20             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01  6:31               ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01  7:49                 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2022-02-01  9:06                 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 10:27                   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 11:17                     ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 16:01                       ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 16:19                         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:47                           ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:03                             ` Alex Bennée
2022-02-01 19:04                               ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 18:35                             ` Stefano Brivio
2022-02-01 17:59                         ` Cédric Le Goater
2022-02-01 11:06               ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2022-02-01 15:54                 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01  5:29             ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-01 17:01               ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-01 17:59                 ` Cleber Rosa
2022-02-15 18:14 ` Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sfzuwchl.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=f4bug@amsat.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.