All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: p.yadav@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: Rework spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_enable()
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:43:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87be34dac82aaeaf7c72c0c606b91723@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411091033.98754-8-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>

Am 2022-04-11 11:10, schrieb Tudor Ambarus:
> Introduce template operation to remove code duplication.
> Split spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_enable() in 
> spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_en()
> and spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_dis() as it no longer made sense to try to
> keep everything alltogether: too many "if (enable)" throughout the 
> code,
> which made the code difficult to follow. Add dev_dbg messages in case
> spi_nor_read_id() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

There is now
micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_en()
micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_dis()
and
micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable()

Now what does what? :) Maybe we should rename that octal_dtr_enable
op. (Or use two?)

Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>

> ---
> v3: collect R-b, update commit message, add dev_dbg message in case
> spi_nor_read_id() fails.
> 
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c
> index 41b87868ecf9..a447762c0d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c
> @@ -28,75 +28,78 @@
>  #define FSR_P_ERR		BIT(4)	/* Program operation status */
>  #define FSR_PT_ERR		BIT(1)	/* Protection error bit */
> 
> -static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable(struct spi_nor *nor, bool 
> enable)
> +/* Micron ST SPI NOR flash operations. */
> +#define MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(naddr, addr, ndata, buf)		\
> +	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_MT_WR_ANY_REG, 0),		\
> +		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(naddr, addr, 0),			\
> +		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,					\
> +		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(ndata, buf, 0))
> +
> +static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_en(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
>  	struct spi_mem_op op;
>  	u8 *buf = nor->bouncebuf;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	if (enable) {
> -		/* Use 20 dummy cycles for memory array reads. */
> -		ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -
> -		*buf = 20;
> -		op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> -			SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_MT_WR_ANY_REG, 1),
> -				   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V, 1),
> -				   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> -				   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(1, buf, 1));
> -
> -		ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -
> -		ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> +	/* Use 20 dummy cycles for memory array reads. */
> +	*buf = 20;
> +	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> +		MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(3, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V, 1, buf);
> +	ret = spi_nor_write_reg(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> 
> -	ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
> +	buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_OCT_DTR;
> +	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> +		MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(3, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR0V, 1, buf);
> +	ret = spi_nor_write_reg(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> 
> -	if (enable) {
> -		buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_OCT_DTR;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * The register is 1-byte wide, but 1-byte transactions are not
> -		 * allowed in 8D-8D-8D mode. The next register is the dummy
> -		 * cycle configuration register. Since the transaction needs to
> -		 * be at least 2 bytes wide, set the next register to its
> -		 * default value. This also makes sense because the value was
> -		 * changed when enabling 8D-8D-8D mode, it should be reset when
> -		 * disabling.
> -		 */
> -		buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_EXSPI;
> -		buf[1] = SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V_DEF;
> +	/* Read flash ID to make sure the switch was successful. */
> +	ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 8, buf, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_dbg(nor->dev, "error %d reading JEDEC ID after enabling
> 8D-8D-8D mode\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
>  	}
> 
> -	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> -		SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_MT_WR_ANY_REG, 1),
> -			   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(enable ? 3 : 4,
> -					   SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR0V, 1),
> -			   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> -			   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(enable ? 1 : 2, buf, 1));
> +	if (memcmp(buf, nor->info->id, nor->info->id_len))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> -	if (!enable)
> -		spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_dis(struct spi_nor *nor)
> +{
> +	struct spi_mem_op op;
> +	u8 *buf = nor->bouncebuf;
> +	int ret;
> 
> -	ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> +	/*
> +	 * The register is 1-byte wide, but 1-byte transactions are not 
> allowed
> +	 * in 8D-8D-8D mode. The next register is the dummy cycle 
> configuration
> +	 * register. Since the transaction needs to be at least 2 bytes wide,
> +	 * set the next register to its default value. This also makes sense
> +	 * because the value was changed when enabling 8D-8D-8D mode, it 
> should
> +	 * be reset when disabling.
> +	 */
> +	buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_EXSPI;
> +	buf[1] = SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V_DEF;
> +	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> +		MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(4, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR0V, 2, buf);
> +	ret = spi_nor_write_reg(nor, &op, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> 
>  	/* Read flash ID to make sure the switch was successful. */
> -	if (enable)
> -		ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 8, buf, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
> -	else
> -		ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 0, buf, SNOR_PROTO_1_1_1);
> -	if (ret)
> +	ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 0, buf, SNOR_PROTO_1_1_1);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_dbg(nor->dev, "error %d reading JEDEC ID after disabling
> 8D-8D-8D mode\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
> +	}
> 
>  	if (memcmp(buf, nor->info->id, nor->info->id_len))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -104,6 +107,12 @@ static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable(struct
> spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable(struct spi_nor *nor, bool 
> enable)
> +{
> +	return enable ? micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_en(nor) :
> +			micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_dis(nor);
> +}
> +
>  static void mt35xu512aba_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
>  	nor->params->octal_dtr_enable = micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable;

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: p.yadav@ti.com, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
	vigneshr@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: Rework spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_enable()
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:43:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87be34dac82aaeaf7c72c0c606b91723@walle.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411091033.98754-8-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>

Am 2022-04-11 11:10, schrieb Tudor Ambarus:
> Introduce template operation to remove code duplication.
> Split spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_enable() in 
> spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_en()
> and spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_dis() as it no longer made sense to try to
> keep everything alltogether: too many "if (enable)" throughout the 
> code,
> which made the code difficult to follow. Add dev_dbg messages in case
> spi_nor_read_id() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

There is now
micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_en()
micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_dis()
and
micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable()

Now what does what? :) Maybe we should rename that octal_dtr_enable
op. (Or use two?)

Reviewed-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>

> ---
> v3: collect R-b, update commit message, add dev_dbg message in case
> spi_nor_read_id() fails.
> 
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c 
> b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c
> index 41b87868ecf9..a447762c0d78 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c
> @@ -28,75 +28,78 @@
>  #define FSR_P_ERR		BIT(4)	/* Program operation status */
>  #define FSR_PT_ERR		BIT(1)	/* Protection error bit */
> 
> -static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable(struct spi_nor *nor, bool 
> enable)
> +/* Micron ST SPI NOR flash operations. */
> +#define MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(naddr, addr, ndata, buf)		\
> +	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_MT_WR_ANY_REG, 0),		\
> +		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(naddr, addr, 0),			\
> +		   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,					\
> +		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(ndata, buf, 0))
> +
> +static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_en(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
>  	struct spi_mem_op op;
>  	u8 *buf = nor->bouncebuf;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	if (enable) {
> -		/* Use 20 dummy cycles for memory array reads. */
> -		ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -
> -		*buf = 20;
> -		op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> -			SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_MT_WR_ANY_REG, 1),
> -				   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V, 1),
> -				   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> -				   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(1, buf, 1));
> -
> -		ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -
> -		ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> +	/* Use 20 dummy cycles for memory array reads. */
> +	*buf = 20;
> +	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> +		MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(3, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V, 1, buf);
> +	ret = spi_nor_write_reg(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +	ret = spi_nor_wait_till_ready(nor);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> 
> -	ret = spi_nor_write_enable(nor);
> +	buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_OCT_DTR;
> +	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> +		MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(3, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR0V, 1, buf);
> +	ret = spi_nor_write_reg(nor, &op, nor->reg_proto);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> 
> -	if (enable) {
> -		buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_OCT_DTR;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * The register is 1-byte wide, but 1-byte transactions are not
> -		 * allowed in 8D-8D-8D mode. The next register is the dummy
> -		 * cycle configuration register. Since the transaction needs to
> -		 * be at least 2 bytes wide, set the next register to its
> -		 * default value. This also makes sense because the value was
> -		 * changed when enabling 8D-8D-8D mode, it should be reset when
> -		 * disabling.
> -		 */
> -		buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_EXSPI;
> -		buf[1] = SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V_DEF;
> +	/* Read flash ID to make sure the switch was successful. */
> +	ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 8, buf, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_dbg(nor->dev, "error %d reading JEDEC ID after enabling
> 8D-8D-8D mode\n", ret);
> +		return ret;
>  	}
> 
> -	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> -		SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(SPINOR_OP_MT_WR_ANY_REG, 1),
> -			   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(enable ? 3 : 4,
> -					   SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR0V, 1),
> -			   SPI_MEM_OP_NO_DUMMY,
> -			   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_OUT(enable ? 1 : 2, buf, 1));
> +	if (memcmp(buf, nor->info->id, nor->info->id_len))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> -	if (!enable)
> -		spi_nor_spimem_setup_op(nor, &op, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_dis(struct spi_nor *nor)
> +{
> +	struct spi_mem_op op;
> +	u8 *buf = nor->bouncebuf;
> +	int ret;
> 
> -	ret = spi_mem_exec_op(nor->spimem, &op);
> +	/*
> +	 * The register is 1-byte wide, but 1-byte transactions are not 
> allowed
> +	 * in 8D-8D-8D mode. The next register is the dummy cycle 
> configuration
> +	 * register. Since the transaction needs to be at least 2 bytes wide,
> +	 * set the next register to its default value. This also makes sense
> +	 * because the value was changed when enabling 8D-8D-8D mode, it 
> should
> +	 * be reset when disabling.
> +	 */
> +	buf[0] = SPINOR_MT_EXSPI;
> +	buf[1] = SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR1V_DEF;
> +	op = (struct spi_mem_op)
> +		MICRON_ST_NOR_WR_ANY_REG_OP(4, SPINOR_REG_MT_CFR0V, 2, buf);
> +	ret = spi_nor_write_reg(nor, &op, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
> 
>  	/* Read flash ID to make sure the switch was successful. */
> -	if (enable)
> -		ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 8, buf, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
> -	else
> -		ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 0, buf, SNOR_PROTO_1_1_1);
> -	if (ret)
> +	ret = spi_nor_read_id(nor, 0, 0, buf, SNOR_PROTO_1_1_1);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_dbg(nor->dev, "error %d reading JEDEC ID after disabling
> 8D-8D-8D mode\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
> +	}
> 
>  	if (memcmp(buf, nor->info->id, nor->info->id_len))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -104,6 +107,12 @@ static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable(struct
> spi_nor *nor, bool enable)
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +static int micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable(struct spi_nor *nor, bool 
> enable)
> +{
> +	return enable ? micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_en(nor) :
> +			micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_dis(nor);
> +}
> +
>  static void mt35xu512aba_default_init(struct spi_nor *nor)
>  {
>  	nor->params->octal_dtr_enable = micron_st_nor_octal_dtr_enable;

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-19 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-11  9:10 [PATCH v3 0/9] mtd: spi-nor: Rework Octal DTR methods Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10 ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mtd: spi-nor: Rename method, s/spi_nor_match_id/spi_nor_match_name Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_match_id() Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mtd: spi-nor: core: Use auto-detection only once Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 10:18   ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 10:18     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mtd: spi-nor: core: Introduce method for RDID op Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 11:10   ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:10     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mtd: spi-nor: manufacturers: Use spi_nor_read_id() core method Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 11:14   ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:14     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mtd: spi-nor: core: Add helpers to read/write any register Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 11:19   ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:19     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:46     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:46       ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 12:08       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 12:08         ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 12:32         ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-19 12:32           ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-19 12:46           ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 12:46             ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 12:56             ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 12:56               ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-20  4:34               ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-20  4:34                 ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-20  5:20                 ` Takahiro Kuwano
2022-04-20  5:20                   ` Takahiro Kuwano
2022-04-20  5:25                 ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-20  5:25                   ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 13:02           ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 13:02             ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 12:59     ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-19 12:59       ` Tudor.Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] mtd: spi-nor: micron-st: Rework spi_nor_micron_octal_dtr_enable() Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 11:43   ` Michael Walle [this message]
2022-04-19 11:43     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] mtd: spi-nor: spansion: Rework spi_nor_cypress_octal_dtr_enable() Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 11:44   ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:44     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-11  9:10 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] mtd: spi-nor: Introduce templates for SPI NOR operations Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-11  9:10   ` Tudor Ambarus
2022-04-19 11:45   ` Michael Walle
2022-04-19 11:45     ` Michael Walle
2022-04-20  7:49     ` Pratyush Yadav
2022-04-20  7:49       ` Pratyush Yadav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87be34dac82aaeaf7c72c0c606b91723@walle.cc \
    --to=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.