All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 11:43:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czsyfo01.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2a33fc1-f519-653d-9230-b06506b961c5@roeck-us.net>

Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
> On 5/17/21 4:17 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
>>> On 3/18/21 10:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> Commit 92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support")
>>>> removed the last selector of CONFIG_MV64X60.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore CONFIG_MV64X60_WDT cannot be selected anymore and
>>>> can be removed.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/watchdog/Kconfig       |   4 -
>>>>   drivers/watchdog/Makefile      |   1 -
>>>>   drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c | 324 ---------------------------------
>>>>   include/linux/mv643xx.h        |   8 -
>>>>   4 files changed, 337 deletions(-)
>>>>   delete mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c
>> 
>> I assumed this would go via the watchdog tree, but seems like I
>> misinterpreted.
>> 
>
> Wim didn't send a pull request this time around.
>
> Guenter
>
>> Should I take this via the powerpc tree for v5.14 ?

I still don't see this in the watchdog tree, should I take it?

cheers

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2021 11:43:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czsyfo01.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2a33fc1-f519-653d-9230-b06506b961c5@roeck-us.net>

Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
> On 5/17/21 4:17 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> writes:
>>> On 3/18/21 10:25 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>> Commit 92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support")
>>>> removed the last selector of CONFIG_MV64X60.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore CONFIG_MV64X60_WDT cannot be selected anymore and
>>>> can be removed.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/watchdog/Kconfig       |   4 -
>>>>   drivers/watchdog/Makefile      |   1 -
>>>>   drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c | 324 ---------------------------------
>>>>   include/linux/mv643xx.h        |   8 -
>>>>   4 files changed, 337 deletions(-)
>>>>   delete mode 100644 drivers/watchdog/mv64x60_wdt.c
>> 
>> I assumed this would go via the watchdog tree, but seems like I
>> misinterpreted.
>> 
>
> Wim didn't send a pull request this time around.
>
> Guenter
>
>> Should I take this via the powerpc tree for v5.14 ?

I still don't see this in the watchdog tree, should I take it?

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-07  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18 17:25 [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver Christophe Leroy
2021-03-18 17:25 ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-18 17:25 ` [PATCH] powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove CONFIG_MV64X60 Christophe Leroy
2021-03-18 17:25   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-18 19:22   ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-18 19:22     ` Wolfram Sang
2021-03-31  1:09   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-31  1:09     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-03-18 17:25 ` [PATCH] net: marvell: Remove reference to CONFIG_MV64X60 Christophe Leroy
2021-03-18 17:25   ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-18 21:30   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-03-18 21:30     ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-03-18 18:32 ` [PATCH] watchdog: Remove MV64x60 watchdog driver Guenter Roeck
2021-03-18 18:32   ` Guenter Roeck
2021-05-17 11:17   ` Michael Ellerman
2021-05-17 11:17     ` Michael Ellerman
2021-05-17 13:39     ` Guenter Roeck
2021-05-17 13:39       ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-07  1:43       ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-06-07  1:43         ` Michael Ellerman
2021-06-07 11:29         ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-07 11:29           ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-20 13:30           ` gituser
2021-06-20 13:30             ` gituser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87czsyfo01.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.