From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> To: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> Cc: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: extend debug code for RX path Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:02:13 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87egxdv0u2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1405672472-16302-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> (Janusz Dziedzic's message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:34:31 +0200") Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> writes: > Print sequence number, AMSDU_MORE flag and AC when additional > debug enabled in RX path. This is usefull for debugging purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c > index 6db0e49..04140e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c > @@ -819,19 +819,46 @@ static bool ath10k_htt_rx_h_channel(struct ath10k *ar, > return true; > } > > +static char *tid_to_ac[] = { static const? > + "BE(0)", > + "BK(1)", > + "BK(2)", > + "BE(3)", > + "VI(4)", > + "VI(5)", > + "VO(6)", > + "VO(7)", > + "tid(8)", > + "tid(9)", > + "tid(10)", > + "tid(11)", > + "tid(12)", > + "tid(13)", > + "tid(14)", > + "tid(15)", > +}; I don't see much point of adding tid number to the string when you could print it with "%i". Also about the string format, maybe this would be clearer: "rx skb %p len %u peer %pM tid %i (%s) sn %u" For example "...tid 4 (VI)..." and for tid > 7 we don't print "(VI)" part at all, just the number. > static void ath10k_process_rx(struct ath10k *ar, > struct ieee80211_rx_status *rx_status, > struct sk_buff *skb) > { > struct ieee80211_rx_status *status; > + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data; > > status = IEEE80211_SKB_RXCB(skb); > *status = *rx_status; > > ath10k_dbg(ATH10K_DBG_DATA, > - "rx skb %p len %u %s%s%s%s%s %srate_idx %u vht_nss %u freq %u band %u flag 0x%x fcs-err %imic-err %i\n", > + "rx skb %p len %u peer %pM %s sn %u %s%s%s%s%s %srate_idx %u vht_nss %u freq %u band %u flag 0x%x fcs-err %i mic-err %i amsdu-more %i\n", > skb, > skb->len, > + ieee80211_get_SA(hdr), This looks ok. > + ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control) ? > + (tid_to_ac[*(ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr)) & > + IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK]) : > + (is_multicast_ether_addr(ieee80211_get_DA(hdr)) ? > + "mcast" : "ucast"), > + (__le16_to_cpu(hdr->seq_ctrl) & IEEE80211_SCTL_SEQ) >> 4, But this is hard to read. Is it possible to have a helper function for this? -- Kalle Valo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> To: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: extend debug code for RX path Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:02:13 +0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87egxdv0u2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1405672472-16302-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> (Janusz Dziedzic's message of "Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:34:31 +0200") Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> writes: > Print sequence number, AMSDU_MORE flag and AC when additional > debug enabled in RX path. This is usefull for debugging purpose. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c > index 6db0e49..04140e3 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c > @@ -819,19 +819,46 @@ static bool ath10k_htt_rx_h_channel(struct ath10k *ar, > return true; > } > > +static char *tid_to_ac[] = { static const? > + "BE(0)", > + "BK(1)", > + "BK(2)", > + "BE(3)", > + "VI(4)", > + "VI(5)", > + "VO(6)", > + "VO(7)", > + "tid(8)", > + "tid(9)", > + "tid(10)", > + "tid(11)", > + "tid(12)", > + "tid(13)", > + "tid(14)", > + "tid(15)", > +}; I don't see much point of adding tid number to the string when you could print it with "%i". Also about the string format, maybe this would be clearer: "rx skb %p len %u peer %pM tid %i (%s) sn %u" For example "...tid 4 (VI)..." and for tid > 7 we don't print "(VI)" part at all, just the number. > static void ath10k_process_rx(struct ath10k *ar, > struct ieee80211_rx_status *rx_status, > struct sk_buff *skb) > { > struct ieee80211_rx_status *status; > + struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data; > > status = IEEE80211_SKB_RXCB(skb); > *status = *rx_status; > > ath10k_dbg(ATH10K_DBG_DATA, > - "rx skb %p len %u %s%s%s%s%s %srate_idx %u vht_nss %u freq %u band %u flag 0x%x fcs-err %imic-err %i\n", > + "rx skb %p len %u peer %pM %s sn %u %s%s%s%s%s %srate_idx %u vht_nss %u freq %u band %u flag 0x%x fcs-err %i mic-err %i amsdu-more %i\n", > skb, > skb->len, > + ieee80211_get_SA(hdr), This looks ok. > + ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control) ? > + (tid_to_ac[*(ieee80211_get_qos_ctl(hdr)) & > + IEEE80211_QOS_CTL_TID_MASK]) : > + (is_multicast_ether_addr(ieee80211_get_DA(hdr)) ? > + "mcast" : "ucast"), > + (__le16_to_cpu(hdr->seq_ctrl) & IEEE80211_SCTL_SEQ) >> 4, But this is hard to read. Is it possible to have a helper function for this? -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-22 16:02 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-07-18 8:34 [PATCH] ath10k: extend debug code for RX path Janusz Dziedzic 2014-07-18 8:34 ` Janusz Dziedzic 2014-07-22 16:02 ` Kalle Valo [this message] 2014-07-22 16:02 ` Kalle Valo 2014-07-24 7:17 ` Janusz Dziedzic 2014-07-24 7:17 ` Janusz Dziedzic
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87egxdv0u2.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \ --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \ --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.