[PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Luca Coelho]

From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
removes them.

Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---

I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)

 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 9 ---------
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 9 ---------
 2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index d1df993..a1c4e5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -4035,14 +4035,6 @@ static int ath10k_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 					   fixed_nss, force_sgi);
 }
 
-static void ath10k_channel_switch_beacon(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-					 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
-					 struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
-{
-	/* there's no need to do anything here. vif->csa_active is enough */
-	return;
-}
-
 static void ath10k_sta_rc_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 				 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 				 struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
@@ -4158,7 +4150,6 @@ static const struct ieee80211_ops ath10k_ops = {
 	.restart_complete		= ath10k_restart_complete,
 	.get_survey			= ath10k_get_survey,
 	.set_bitrate_mask		= ath10k_set_bitrate_mask,
-	.channel_switch_beacon		= ath10k_channel_switch_beacon,
 	.sta_rc_update			= ath10k_sta_rc_update,
 	.get_tsf			= ath10k_get_tsf,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 49265c6..8dc9c77 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2085,14 +2085,6 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_complete(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	clear_bit(ATH_OP_SCANNING, &common->op_flags);
 }
 
-static void ath9k_channel_switch_beacon(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-					struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
-					struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
-{
-	/* depend on vif->csa_active only */
-	return;
-}
-
 struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {
 	.tx 		    = ath9k_tx,
 	.start 		    = ath9k_start,
@@ -2140,5 +2132,4 @@ struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {
 #endif
 	.sw_scan_start	    = ath9k_sw_scan_start,
 	.sw_scan_complete   = ath9k_sw_scan_complete,
-	.channel_switch_beacon     = ath9k_channel_switch_beacon,
 };
-- 
2.0.0.rc0

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Luca Coelho]

From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
removes them.

Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---

I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)

 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 9 ---------
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 9 ---------
 2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index d1df993..a1c4e5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -4035,14 +4035,6 @@ static int ath10k_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 					   fixed_nss, force_sgi);
 }
 
-static void ath10k_channel_switch_beacon(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-					 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
-					 struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
-{
-	/* there's no need to do anything here. vif->csa_active is enough */
-	return;
-}
-
 static void ath10k_sta_rc_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 				 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 				 struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
@@ -4158,7 +4150,6 @@ static const struct ieee80211_ops ath10k_ops = {
 	.restart_complete		= ath10k_restart_complete,
 	.get_survey			= ath10k_get_survey,
 	.set_bitrate_mask		= ath10k_set_bitrate_mask,
-	.channel_switch_beacon		= ath10k_channel_switch_beacon,
 	.sta_rc_update			= ath10k_sta_rc_update,
 	.get_tsf			= ath10k_get_tsf,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 49265c6..8dc9c77 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2085,14 +2085,6 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_complete(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	clear_bit(ATH_OP_SCANNING, &common->op_flags);
 }
 
-static void ath9k_channel_switch_beacon(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-					struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
-					struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
-{
-	/* depend on vif->csa_active only */
-	return;
-}
-
 struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {
 	.tx 		    = ath9k_tx,
 	.start 		    = ath9k_start,
@@ -2140,5 +2132,4 @@ struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {
 #endif
 	.sw_scan_start	    = ath9k_sw_scan_start,
 	.sw_scan_complete   = ath9k_sw_scan_complete,
-	.channel_switch_beacon     = ath9k_channel_switch_beacon,
 };
-- 
2.0.0.rc0

[PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Luca Coelho]

From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
removes them.

Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
---

I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)

 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 9 ---------
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c | 9 ---------
 2 files changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index d1df993..a1c4e5e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -4035,14 +4035,6 @@ static int ath10k_set_bitrate_mask(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 					   fixed_nss, force_sgi);
 }
 
-static void ath10k_channel_switch_beacon(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-					 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
-					 struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
-{
-	/* there's no need to do anything here. vif->csa_active is enough */
-	return;
-}
-
 static void ath10k_sta_rc_update(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 				 struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
 				 struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
@@ -4158,7 +4150,6 @@ static const struct ieee80211_ops ath10k_ops = {
 	.restart_complete		= ath10k_restart_complete,
 	.get_survey			= ath10k_get_survey,
 	.set_bitrate_mask		= ath10k_set_bitrate_mask,
-	.channel_switch_beacon		= ath10k_channel_switch_beacon,
 	.sta_rc_update			= ath10k_sta_rc_update,
 	.get_tsf			= ath10k_get_tsf,
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
index 49265c6..8dc9c77 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c
@@ -2085,14 +2085,6 @@ static void ath9k_sw_scan_complete(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	clear_bit(ATH_OP_SCANNING, &common->op_flags);
 }
 
-static void ath9k_channel_switch_beacon(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
-					struct ieee80211_vif *vif,
-					struct cfg80211_chan_def *chandef)
-{
-	/* depend on vif->csa_active only */
-	return;
-}
-
 struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {
 	.tx 		    = ath9k_tx,
 	.start 		    = ath9k_start,
@@ -2140,5 +2132,4 @@ struct ieee80211_ops ath9k_ops = {
 #endif
 	.sw_scan_start	    = ath9k_sw_scan_start,
 	.sw_scan_complete   = ath9k_sw_scan_complete,
-	.channel_switch_beacon     = ath9k_channel_switch_beacon,
 };
-- 
2.0.0.rc0


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> removes them.
>
> Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> ---
>
> I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)

John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

-- 
Kalle Valo

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> removes them.
>
> Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> ---
>
> I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)

John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> removes them.
>
> Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> ---
>
> I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)

John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[John W. Linville]

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:26:13PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:
> 
> > From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> >
> > The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> > be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> > ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> > removes them.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> > replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> > iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)
> 
> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[John W. Linville]

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:26:13PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:
> 
> > From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> >
> > The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> > be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> > ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> > removes them.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> > replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> > iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)
> 
> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville at tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[John W. Linville]

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:26:13PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:
> 
> > From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> >
> > The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> > be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> > ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> > removes them.
> >
> > Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > I'm plannnig to remove the channel_switch_beacon callback (actually,
> > replace it with a more generic one that can be used for STA and other
> > iftypes too) and ath9k/ath10k are the only (non) users of it. ;)
> 
> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.

No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> writes:

>> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
>> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.
>
> No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

Yes. I'll take the full patch.

-- 
Kalle Valo

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> writes:

>> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
>> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.
>
> No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

Yes. I'll take the full patch.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com> writes:

>> John, I'm planning to take this as I think we will get less conflicts
>> that way. But let me know if you want it instead.
>
> No, that's good.  You will take the ath9k part too, right?

Yes. I'll take the full patch.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> removes them.
>
> Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Kalle Valo

[ath9k-devel] [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> removes them.
>
> Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Re: [PATCH] ath9k/ath10k: remove unnecessary channel_switch_beacon callbacks

[Kalle Valo]

Luca Coelho <luca@coelho.fi> writes:

> From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
>
> The channel_switch_beacon callback is optional, so it doesn't have to
> be defined if it's not going to do anything useful with it.  Both
> ath9k and ath10k define the callback and just returns.  This commit
> removes them.
>
> Cc: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k