From: Hans Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Kurt Kanzenbach" <kurt@linutronix.de>,
"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
"Woojung Huh" <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
"maintainer:MICROCHIP KSZ SERIES ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER"
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Claudiu Manoil" <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Ivan Vecera" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
"Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:RENESAS RZ/N1 A5PSW SWITCH DRIVER"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:04:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6ua5mhe.fsf@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBgd1mgO36umXqoj@shredder>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:48, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that the consensus was to rename this to
> 'is_static' so that it is consistent with other flags.
>
I think the consensus was that the bridge maintainers would decide if it
should be changed, this according to Oltean. I still think that
is_dyn is more secure codewise in the long run and it is logical as that
is what the feature the flag concerns.
When you say consistent with other flags, I don't understand the
inconsistency. Could you please explain.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Kurt Kanzenbach" <kurt@linutronix.de>,
"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
"Woojung Huh" <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
"maintainer:MICROCHIP KSZ SERIES ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER"
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"Claudiu Manoil" <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Ivan Vecera" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
"Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:RENESAS RZ/N1 A5PSW SWITCH DRIVER"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:04:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6ua5mhe.fsf@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBgd1mgO36umXqoj@shredder>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:48, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that the consensus was to rename this to
> 'is_static' so that it is consistent with other flags.
>
I think the consensus was that the bridge maintainers would decide if it
should be changed, this according to Oltean. I still think that
is_dyn is more secure codewise in the long run and it is logical as that
is what the feature the flag concerns.
When you say consistent with other flags, I don't understand the
inconsistency. Could you please explain.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hans Schultz <netdev@kapio-technology.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"Nikolay Aleksandrov" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"Kurt Kanzenbach" <kurt@linutronix.de>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Ivan Vecera" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ETHERNET BRIDGE"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"Roopa Prabhu" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
kuba@kernel.org, "Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>,
"Christian Marangi" <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
"Woojung Huh" <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
"Landen Chao" <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Hauke Mehrtens" <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
"Sean Wang" <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
"DENG Qingfang" <dqfext@gmail.com>,
"Claudiu Manoil" <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"maintainer:MICROCHIP KSZ SERIES ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER"
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
"open list:RENESAS RZ/N1 A5PSW SWITCH DRIVER"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:04:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h6ua5mhe.fsf@kapio-technology.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBgd1mgO36umXqoj@shredder>
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:48, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that the consensus was to rename this to
> 'is_static' so that it is consistent with other flags.
>
I think the consensus was that the bridge maintainers would decide if it
should be changed, this according to Oltean. I still think that
is_dyn is more secure codewise in the long run and it is logical as that
is what the feature the flag concerns.
When you say consistent with other flags, I don't understand the
inconsistency. Could you please explain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 129+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-18 14:10 [PATCH v2 net-next 0/6] ATU and FDB synchronization on locked ports Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add dynamic flag to switchdev notifier Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-20 8:48 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-20 8:48 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-03-20 8:48 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-24 13:04 ` Hans Schultz [this message]
2023-03-24 13:04 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-24 13:04 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 2/6] net: dsa: propagate flags down towards drivers Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-27 11:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 11:52 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 11:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 15:31 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-27 15:31 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-27 15:31 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-27 16:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 16:00 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 16:00 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 21:49 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-27 21:49 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-27 21:49 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-27 22:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 22:59 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-27 22:59 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-28 11:04 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 11:04 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 11:04 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 11:49 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-28 11:49 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-28 11:49 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-28 19:45 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 19:45 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 19:45 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 12:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 12:43 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 12:43 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 12:59 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 12:59 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 12:59 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 13:09 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 13:09 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 13:09 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 14:54 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 14:54 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 14:54 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 15:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 15:07 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 15:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 15:34 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 15:34 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 15:34 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 15:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 15:44 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 15:44 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 15:17 ` Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 15:17 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 15:17 ` Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 15:21 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 15:21 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 15:21 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 16:20 ` Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 16:20 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 16:20 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add fdb entry flags incoming to switchcore drivers Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 4/6] net: bridge: ensure FDB offloaded flag is handled as needed Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implementation of dynamic ATU entries Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add dynamic FDB test Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-18 14:10 ` Hans J. Schultz
2023-03-20 8:44 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-20 8:44 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-03-20 8:44 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-26 15:41 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-26 15:41 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-26 15:41 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 16:40 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-28 16:40 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-03-28 16:40 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-28 19:30 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 19:30 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-28 19:30 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 6:37 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-30 6:37 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-03-30 6:37 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-03-30 10:29 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 10:29 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 10:29 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 10:45 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-03-30 10:45 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-03-30 10:45 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-03-30 19:07 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 19:07 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 19:07 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-30 19:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 19:27 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-30 19:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 7:43 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 7:43 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 7:43 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 8:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 8:58 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 8:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 8:06 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 8:06 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 8:06 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 9:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 9:37 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 9:37 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-03-31 12:43 ` Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 12:43 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-03-31 12:43 ` Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 15:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 15:24 ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 15:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2023-04-06 16:26 ` Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 16:26 ` [Bridge] " Hans Schultz
2023-04-06 16:26 ` Hans Schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h6ua5mhe.fsf@kapio-technology.com \
--to=netdev@kapio-technology.com \
--cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.