All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>,
	Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list\:LINUX FOR POWERPC \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" 
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: fix boot on BOOK3S_32 with CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:48:57 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8tm355i.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <141a04c4-a236-430d-f346-ad31252e146a@c-s.fr>

Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:

> Le 22/11/2017 à 00:07, Balbir Singh a écrit :
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Christophe Leroy
>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>> On powerpc32, patch_instruction() is called by apply_feature_fixups()
>>> which is called from early_init()
>>>
>>> There is the following note in front of early_init():
>>>   * Note that the kernel may be running at an address which is different
>>>   * from the address that it was linked at, so we must use RELOC/PTRRELOC
>>>   * to access static data (including strings).  -- paulus
>>>
>>> Therefore, slab_is_available() cannot be called yet, and
>>> text_poke_area must be addressed with PTRRELOC()
>>>
>>> Fixes: 37bc3e5fd764f ("powerpc/lib/code-patching: Use alternate map
>>> for patch_instruction()")
>>> Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
>>> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>>> ---
>>>   v2: Added missing asm/setup.h
>>>
>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 6 ++----
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>>> index c9de03e0c1f1..d469224c4ada 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>   #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>>>   #include <asm/page.h>
>>>   #include <asm/code-patching.h>
>>> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>>>
>>>   static int __patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned int instr)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -146,11 +147,8 @@ int patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned int instr)
>>>           * During early early boot patch_instruction is called
>>>           * when text_poke_area is not ready, but we still need
>>>           * to allow patching. We just do the plain old patching
>>> -        * We use slab_is_available and per cpu read * via this_cpu_read
>>> -        * of text_poke_area. Per-CPU areas might not be up early
>>> -        * this can create problems with just using this_cpu_read()
>>>           */
>>> -       if (!slab_is_available() || !this_cpu_read(text_poke_area))
>>> +       if (!this_cpu_read(*PTRRELOC(&text_poke_area)))
>>>                  return __patch_instruction(addr, instr);
>> 
>> On ppc64, we call apply_feature_fixups() in early_setup() after we've
>> relocated ourselves. Sorry for missing the ppc32 case. I would like to
>> avoid PTRRELOC when unnecessary.
>
> What do you suggest then ?
>
> Some #ifdef PPC32 around that ?

No I don't think that improves anything.

I think the comment about per-cpu not being up is wrong, you'll just get
the static version of text_poke_area, which should be NULL. So we don't
need the slab_available() check anyway.

So I'll take this as-is.

Having said that I absolutely hate PTRRELOC, so if it starts spreading
we will have to come up with something less bug prone.

cheers

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>,
	Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list\:LINUX FOR POWERPC \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)"
	<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: fix boot on BOOK3S_32 with CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 22:48:57 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h8tm355i.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <141a04c4-a236-430d-f346-ad31252e146a@c-s.fr>

Christophe LEROY <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:

> Le 22/11/2017 =C3=A0 00:07, Balbir Singh a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
>> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Christophe Leroy
>> <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> wrote:
>>> On powerpc32, patch_instruction() is called by apply_feature_fixups()
>>> which is called from early_init()
>>>
>>> There is the following note in front of early_init():
>>>   * Note that the kernel may be running at an address which is different
>>>   * from the address that it was linked at, so we must use RELOC/PTRREL=
OC
>>>   * to access static data (including strings).  -- paulus
>>>
>>> Therefore, slab_is_available() cannot be called yet, and
>>> text_poke_area must be addressed with PTRRELOC()
>>>
>>> Fixes: 37bc3e5fd764f ("powerpc/lib/code-patching: Use alternate map
>>> for patch_instruction()")
>>> Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
>>> Cc: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
>>> ---
>>>   v2: Added missing asm/setup.h
>>>
>>>   arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 6 ++----
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-p=
atching.c
>>> index c9de03e0c1f1..d469224c4ada 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c
>>> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>>>   #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
>>>   #include <asm/page.h>
>>>   #include <asm/code-patching.h>
>>> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>>>
>>>   static int __patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned int instr)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -146,11 +147,8 @@ int patch_instruction(unsigned int *addr, unsigned=
 int instr)
>>>           * During early early boot patch_instruction is called
>>>           * when text_poke_area is not ready, but we still need
>>>           * to allow patching. We just do the plain old patching
>>> -        * We use slab_is_available and per cpu read * via this_cpu_read
>>> -        * of text_poke_area. Per-CPU areas might not be up early
>>> -        * this can create problems with just using this_cpu_read()
>>>           */
>>> -       if (!slab_is_available() || !this_cpu_read(text_poke_area))
>>> +       if (!this_cpu_read(*PTRRELOC(&text_poke_area)))
>>>                  return __patch_instruction(addr, instr);
>>=20
>> On ppc64, we call apply_feature_fixups() in early_setup() after we've
>> relocated ourselves. Sorry for missing the ppc32 case. I would like to
>> avoid PTRRELOC when unnecessary.
>
> What do you suggest then ?
>
> Some #ifdef PPC32 around that ?

No I don't think that improves anything.

I think the comment about per-cpu not being up is wrong, you'll just get
the static version of text_poke_area, which should be NULL. So we don't
need the slab_available() check anyway.

So I'll take this as-is.

Having said that I absolutely hate PTRRELOC, so if it starts spreading
we will have to come up with something less bug prone.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-22 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-21 14:28 [PATCH v2] powerpc: fix boot on BOOK3S_32 with CONFIG_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX Christophe Leroy
2017-11-21 17:28 ` Meelis Roos
2017-11-21 22:22   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-11-21 23:07 ` Balbir Singh
2017-11-21 23:07   ` Balbir Singh
2017-11-22  7:16   ` Christophe LEROY
2017-11-22  7:16     ` Christophe LEROY
2017-11-22 11:48     ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-11-22 11:48       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-23  7:49       ` Christophe LEROY
2017-11-23  7:49         ` Christophe LEROY
2017-11-23 12:04         ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-23 12:04           ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-25 23:57           ` Balbir Singh
2017-11-25 23:57             ` Balbir Singh
2017-11-22 11:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-11-24  9:46 ` [v2] " Michael Ellerman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-21 14:26 [PATCH v2] " Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87h8tm355i.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mroos@linux.ee \
    --cc=oss@buserror.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.