All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
	AND 64-BIT))
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:58:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ily3br3n.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009095458.297191-2-coxu@redhat.com> (Coiby Xu's message of "Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:54:57 +0800")

Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> writes:

> The code in bzImage64_verify_sig could make use of system keyrings including
> .buitin_trusted_keys, .secondary_trusted_keys and .platform keyring to verify
> signed kernel image as PE file. Make it generic so both x86_64 and arm64 can 
> use it.

The naming is problematic.

At a minimum please name the new function kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig.
AKA what you named it without the "arch_" prefix.  A function named with
an "arch_" prefix  implies that it has an architecture specific
implementation.

It looks like arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig should be killed as well
as it only has one implementation in the generic code.  And the code
should always call kexec_image_verify_sig_default.  Not that you should
do that but I am pointing it out as it seems that is the bad example you
are copying.

Eric

> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 13 +------------
>  include/linux/kexec.h             |  3 +++
>  kernel/kexec_file.c               | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> index 170d0fd68b1f..4136dd3be5a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/efi.h>
> -#include <linux/verification.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/bootparam.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -531,17 +530,7 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_BZIMAGE_VERIFY_SIG
>  static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> -				      VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
> -				      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> -	if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
> -		ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> -					      VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
> -					      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> +	return arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(kernel, kernel_len);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 0c994ae37729..d45f32336dbe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/io.h>
>  
>  #include <uapi/linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/verification.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> @@ -199,6 +200,8 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
>  int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  				 unsigned long buf_len);
> +int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel,
> +				    unsigned long kernel_len);
>  #endif
>  int arch_kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 33400ff051a8..0530275b7aa3 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,23 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  {
>  	return kexec_image_verify_sig_default(image, buf, buf_len);
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION
> +int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> +				      VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
> +				      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> +	if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
> +		ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> +					      VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
> +					      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
>  #endif
>  
>  /*

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)),
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT
	AND 64-BIT))
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:58:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ily3br3n.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009095458.297191-2-coxu@redhat.com> (Coiby Xu's message of "Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:54:57 +0800")

Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> writes:

> The code in bzImage64_verify_sig could make use of system keyrings including
> .buitin_trusted_keys, .secondary_trusted_keys and .platform keyring to verify
> signed kernel image as PE file. Make it generic so both x86_64 and arm64 can 
> use it.

The naming is problematic.

At a minimum please name the new function kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig.
AKA what you named it without the "arch_" prefix.  A function named with
an "arch_" prefix  implies that it has an architecture specific
implementation.

It looks like arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig should be killed as well
as it only has one implementation in the generic code.  And the code
should always call kexec_image_verify_sig_default.  Not that you should
do that but I am pointing it out as it seems that is the bad example you
are copying.

Eric

> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 13 +------------
>  include/linux/kexec.h             |  3 +++
>  kernel/kexec_file.c               | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> index 170d0fd68b1f..4136dd3be5a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/efi.h>
> -#include <linux/verification.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/bootparam.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -531,17 +530,7 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_BZIMAGE_VERIFY_SIG
>  static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> -				      VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
> -				      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> -	if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
> -		ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> -					      VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
> -					      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> +	return arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(kernel, kernel_len);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 0c994ae37729..d45f32336dbe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/io.h>
>  
>  #include <uapi/linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/verification.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> @@ -199,6 +200,8 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
>  int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  				 unsigned long buf_len);
> +int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel,
> +				    unsigned long kernel_len);
>  #endif
>  int arch_kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 33400ff051a8..0530275b7aa3 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,23 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  {
>  	return kexec_image_verify_sig_default(image, buf, buf_len);
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION
> +int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> +				      VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
> +				      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> +	if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
> +		ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> +					      VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
> +					      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
>  #endif
>  
>  /*

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 08:58:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ily3br3n.fsf@disp2133> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211009095458.297191-2-coxu@redhat.com> (Coiby Xu's message of "Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:54:57 +0800")

Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com> writes:

> The code in bzImage64_verify_sig could make use of system keyrings including
> .buitin_trusted_keys, .secondary_trusted_keys and .platform keyring to verify
> signed kernel image as PE file. Make it generic so both x86_64 and arm64 can 
> use it.

The naming is problematic.

At a minimum please name the new function kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig.
AKA what you named it without the "arch_" prefix.  A function named with
an "arch_" prefix  implies that it has an architecture specific
implementation.

It looks like arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig should be killed as well
as it only has one implementation in the generic code.  And the code
should always call kexec_image_verify_sig_default.  Not that you should
do that but I am pointing it out as it seems that is the bad example you
are copying.

Eric

> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 13 +------------
>  include/linux/kexec.h             |  3 +++
>  kernel/kexec_file.c               | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> index 170d0fd68b1f..4136dd3be5a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  #include <linux/efi.h>
> -#include <linux/verification.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/bootparam.h>
>  #include <asm/setup.h>
> @@ -531,17 +530,7 @@ static int bzImage64_cleanup(void *loader_data)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_BZIMAGE_VERIFY_SIG
>  static int bzImage64_verify_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
>  {
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> -				      VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
> -				      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> -	if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
> -		ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> -					      VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
> -					      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> -	}
> -	return ret;
> +	return arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(kernel, kernel_len);
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 0c994ae37729..d45f32336dbe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/io.h>
>  
>  #include <uapi/linux/kexec.h>
> +#include <linux/verification.h>
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> @@ -199,6 +200,8 @@ int arch_kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(struct kimage *image);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_SIG
>  int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  				 unsigned long buf_len);
> +int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel,
> +				    unsigned long kernel_len);
>  #endif
>  int arch_kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>  
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 33400ff051a8..0530275b7aa3 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,23 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_kernel_verify_sig(struct kimage *image, void *buf,
>  {
>  	return kexec_image_verify_sig_default(image, buf, buf_len);
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION
> +int arch_kexec_kernel_verify_pe_sig(const char *kernel, unsigned long kernel_len)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> +				      VERIFY_USE_SECONDARY_KEYRING,
> +				      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> +	if (ret == -ENOKEY && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING)) {
> +		ret = verify_pefile_signature(kernel, kernel_len,
> +					      VERIFY_USE_PLATFORM_KEYRING,
> +					      VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE);
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
>  #endif
>  
>  /*

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-11 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-09  9:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] use more system keyrings to verify arm64 kdump kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54 ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kexec, KEYS: make the code in bzImage64_verify_sig generic Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54   ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54   ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-11 13:58   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-10-11 13:58     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-11 13:58     ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-10-12  3:53     ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-12  3:53       ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-12  3:53       ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: kexec_file: use more system keyrings to verify kernel image signature Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54   ` Coiby Xu
2021-10-09  9:54   ` Coiby Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ily3br3n.fsf@disp2133 \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.