All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	nathanl@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imd5h5kb.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6862421a-5a14-2e38-b825-e39e6ad3d51d@csgroup.eu>

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 04/08/2020 à 13:17, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>> On 07/16/2020 02:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
>>>> The VDSO datapage and the text pages are always located immediately
>>>> next to each other, so it can be hardcoded without an indirection
>>>> through __kernel_datapage_offset
>>>>
>>>> In order to ease things, move the data page in front like other
>>>> arches, that way there is no need to know the size of the library
>>>> to locate the data page.
>>>>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> I merged this but then realised it breaks the display of the vdso in 
>>> /proc/self/maps.
>>>
>>> ie. the vdso vma gets no name:
>>>
>>>    # cat /proc/self/maps
>
> [...]
>
>>> And it's also going to break the logic in arch_unmap() to detect if
>>> we're unmapping (part of) the VDSO. And it will break arch_remap() too.
>>>
>>> And the logic to recognise the signal trampoline in
>>> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_*.c as well.
>> 
>> I don't think it breaks that one, because ->vdsobase is still the start 
>> of text.
>> 
>>>
>>> So I'm going to rebase and drop this for now.
>>>
>>> Basically we have a bunch of places that assume that vdso_base is == the
>>> start of the VDSO vma, and also that the code starts there. So that will
>>> need some work to tease out all those assumptions and make them work
>>> with this change.
>> 
>> Ok, one day I need to look at it in more details and see how other 
>> architectures handle it etc ...
>> 
>
> I just sent out a series which switches powerpc to the new 
> _install_special_mapping() API, the one powerpc uses being deprecated 
> since commit a62c34bd2a8a ("x86, mm: Improve _install_special_mapping
> and fix x86 vdso naming")
>
> arch_remap() gets replaced by vdso_remap()
>
> For arch_unmap(), I'm wondering how/what other architectures do, because 
> powerpc seems to be the only one to erase the vdso context pointer when 
> unmapping the vdso.

Yeah. The original unmap/remap stuff was added for CRIU, which I thought
people tested on other architectures (more than powerpc even).

Possibly no one really cares about vdso unmap though, vs just moving the
vdso.

We added a test for vdso unmap recently because it happened to trigger a
KAUP failure, and someone actually hit it & reported it.

Running that test on arm64 segfaults:

  # ./sigreturn_vdso 
  VDSO is at 0xffff8191f000-0xffff8191ffff (4096 bytes)
  Signal delivered OK with VDSO mapped
  VDSO moved to 0xffff8191a000-0xffff8191afff (4096 bytes)
  Signal delivered OK with VDSO moved
  Unmapped VDSO
  Remapped the stack executable
  [   48.556191] potentially unexpected fatal signal 11.
  [   48.556752] CPU: 0 PID: 140 Comm: sigreturn_vdso Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2-00057-g2ac69819ba9e #190
  [   48.556990] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
  [   48.557336] pstate: 60001000 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
  [   48.557475] pc : 0000ffff8191a7bc
  [   48.557603] lr : 0000ffff8191a7bc
  [   48.557697] sp : 0000ffffc13c9e90
  [   48.557873] x29: 0000ffffc13cb0e0 x28: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558201] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558337] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558754] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558893] x21: 00000000004009b0 x20: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.559046] x19: 0000000000400ff0 x18: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.559180] x17: 0000ffff817da300 x16: 0000000000412010 
  [   48.559312] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 000000000000001c 
  [   48.559443] x13: 656c626174756365 x12: 7865206b63617473 
  [   48.559625] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0101010101010101 
  [   48.559828] x9 : 0000ffff818afda8 x8 : 0000000000000081 
  [   48.559973] x7 : 6174732065687420 x6 : 64657070616d6552 
  [   48.560115] x5 : 000000000e0388bd x4 : 000000000040135d 
  [   48.560270] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000001 
  [   48.560412] x1 : 0000000000000003 x0 : 00000000004120b8 
  Segmentation fault
  #

So I think we need to keep the unmap hook. Maybe it should be handled by
the special_mapping stuff generically.

cheers

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	nathanl@linux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage()
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:58:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imd5h5kb.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6862421a-5a14-2e38-b825-e39e6ad3d51d@csgroup.eu>

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> Le 04/08/2020 à 13:17, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>> On 07/16/2020 02:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr> writes:
>>>> The VDSO datapage and the text pages are always located immediately
>>>> next to each other, so it can be hardcoded without an indirection
>>>> through __kernel_datapage_offset
>>>>
>>>> In order to ease things, move the data page in front like other
>>>> arches, that way there is no need to know the size of the library
>>>> to locate the data page.
>>>>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> I merged this but then realised it breaks the display of the vdso in 
>>> /proc/self/maps.
>>>
>>> ie. the vdso vma gets no name:
>>>
>>>    # cat /proc/self/maps
>
> [...]
>
>>> And it's also going to break the logic in arch_unmap() to detect if
>>> we're unmapping (part of) the VDSO. And it will break arch_remap() too.
>>>
>>> And the logic to recognise the signal trampoline in
>>> arch/powerpc/perf/callchain_*.c as well.
>> 
>> I don't think it breaks that one, because ->vdsobase is still the start 
>> of text.
>> 
>>>
>>> So I'm going to rebase and drop this for now.
>>>
>>> Basically we have a bunch of places that assume that vdso_base is == the
>>> start of the VDSO vma, and also that the code starts there. So that will
>>> need some work to tease out all those assumptions and make them work
>>> with this change.
>> 
>> Ok, one day I need to look at it in more details and see how other 
>> architectures handle it etc ...
>> 
>
> I just sent out a series which switches powerpc to the new 
> _install_special_mapping() API, the one powerpc uses being deprecated 
> since commit a62c34bd2a8a ("x86, mm: Improve _install_special_mapping
> and fix x86 vdso naming")
>
> arch_remap() gets replaced by vdso_remap()
>
> For arch_unmap(), I'm wondering how/what other architectures do, because 
> powerpc seems to be the only one to erase the vdso context pointer when 
> unmapping the vdso.

Yeah. The original unmap/remap stuff was added for CRIU, which I thought
people tested on other architectures (more than powerpc even).

Possibly no one really cares about vdso unmap though, vs just moving the
vdso.

We added a test for vdso unmap recently because it happened to trigger a
KAUP failure, and someone actually hit it & reported it.

Running that test on arm64 segfaults:

  # ./sigreturn_vdso 
  VDSO is at 0xffff8191f000-0xffff8191ffff (4096 bytes)
  Signal delivered OK with VDSO mapped
  VDSO moved to 0xffff8191a000-0xffff8191afff (4096 bytes)
  Signal delivered OK with VDSO moved
  Unmapped VDSO
  Remapped the stack executable
  [   48.556191] potentially unexpected fatal signal 11.
  [   48.556752] CPU: 0 PID: 140 Comm: sigreturn_vdso Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2-00057-g2ac69819ba9e #190
  [   48.556990] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
  [   48.557336] pstate: 60001000 (nZCv daif -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
  [   48.557475] pc : 0000ffff8191a7bc
  [   48.557603] lr : 0000ffff8191a7bc
  [   48.557697] sp : 0000ffffc13c9e90
  [   48.557873] x29: 0000ffffc13cb0e0 x28: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558201] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558337] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558754] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.558893] x21: 00000000004009b0 x20: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.559046] x19: 0000000000400ff0 x18: 0000000000000000 
  [   48.559180] x17: 0000ffff817da300 x16: 0000000000412010 
  [   48.559312] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 000000000000001c 
  [   48.559443] x13: 656c626174756365 x12: 7865206b63617473 
  [   48.559625] x11: 0000000000000003 x10: 0101010101010101 
  [   48.559828] x9 : 0000ffff818afda8 x8 : 0000000000000081 
  [   48.559973] x7 : 6174732065687420 x6 : 64657070616d6552 
  [   48.560115] x5 : 000000000e0388bd x4 : 000000000040135d 
  [   48.560270] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000001 
  [   48.560412] x1 : 0000000000000003 x0 : 00000000004120b8 
  Segmentation fault
  #

So I think we need to keep the unmap hook. Maybe it should be handled by
the special_mapping stuff generically.

cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-26 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-28 13:16 [PATCH v8 0/8] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] powerpc/vdso64: Switch from __get_datapage() to get_datapage inline macro Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove __kernel_datapage_offset and simplify __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-16  2:59   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-16  2:59     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-04 11:17     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-04 11:17       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-25 14:15       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-26 13:58         ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-08-26 13:58           ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-27 20:34           ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-08-27 20:34             ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-08-28  2:14             ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-28  2:14               ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-21 11:26               ` Will Deacon
2020-09-21 11:26                 ` Will Deacon
2020-09-27  7:43                 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-27  7:43                   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-28 15:08                   ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-09-28 15:08                     ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-10-23 11:22                     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-23 11:22                       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-23 11:25                       ` Will Deacon
2020-10-23 11:25                         ` Will Deacon
2020-10-23 11:57                         ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-23 11:57                           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-10-23 13:29                           ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-10-23 13:29                             ` Dmitry Safonov
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] powerpc/vdso: Remove unused \tmp param in __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] powerpc/processor: Move cpu_relax() into asm/vdso/processor.h Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] powerpc/vdso: Prepare for switching VDSO to generic C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-15  1:04   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-15  1:04     ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-15 18:47     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-15 18:47       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-07-16 23:18       ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2020-07-16 23:18         ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2020-08-04 11:14     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-04 11:14       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-05  6:24       ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-05  6:24         ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-05 13:35         ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-05 13:35           ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-06  2:03           ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-06  2:03             ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-06 18:33             ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-06 18:33               ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-08-07  2:44               ` Michael Ellerman
2020-08-07  2:44                 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] powerpc/vdso: Switch " Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] lib/vdso: force inlining of __cvdso_clock_gettime_common() Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] powerpc/vdso: Provide __kernel_clock_gettime64() on vdso32 Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 13:16   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 15:03   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-04-28 16:05   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-28 16:05     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-09 15:54     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-05-09 15:54       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-05-09 18:48       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-05-29 18:56 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-06-03 10:04   ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-16 12:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-07-16 12:55   ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87imd5h5kb.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.