All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, riku.voipio@iki.fi,
	laurent@vivier.eu, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement x86_64 vsyscalls
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 14:30:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87imlblbi3.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114210921.11216-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org>


Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:

> The x86_64 abi has a legacy vsyscall page.  The kernel folk
> have been trying to deprecate this since at least v3.1, but
>
> (1) We don't implement the vdso that replaces vsyscalls,
> (2) As of v5.5, the vsyscall page is still enabled by default.
>
> This lack is affecting Peter's linux-user testing.
>
> The dependency is not obvious because Peter is running the tests
> on x86_64, so the host is providing a vsyscall page to qemu.
>
> Because of how user-only memory operations are handled, with no
> validation of guest vs host pages, so long as qemu chooses to
> run with guest_base == 0, the guest may Just So Happen to read
> the host's vsyscall page.
>
> Complicating this, new OS releases may use a kernel configured
> with CONFIG_LEGACY_VSYSCALL_XONLY=y, which means the the vsyscall
> page cannot be read, only executed.  Which means that the guest
> then cannot read the host vsyscall page during translation and
> will SIGSEGV.
>
> Exactly which of these many variables is affecting Peter's testing
> with Ubuntu 18.04 of my TCG merge, I'm not exactly sure.  I suspect
> that it is the change to drop the textseg_addr adjustment to user-only
> static binaries.  IIRC bionic does not support -static-pie, which is
> the preferred replacement.  This could mean that the host and guest
> binaries overlap, which leads to guest_base != 0.
>
> I vaguely remember someone (Paolo?) implementing something like
> this many years ago, but clearly it never got merged.
>
> In any case, this emulation has been missing for too long.
>
>
> r~
>
>
> Richard Henderson (3):
>   target/i386: Renumber EXCP_SYSCALL
>   linux-user/i386: Split out gen_signal
>   linux-user/i386: Emulate x86_64 vsyscalls

And realising I didn't read it properly:

/x86_64-linux-user/qemu-x86_64 ~/lsrc/linux.git/tools/testing/selftests/x86/test_vsyscall_64
[WARN]  failed to find vDSO
        no vsyscall map in /proc/self/maps
[RUN]   test gettimeofday()
[RUN]   test time()
[RUN]   getcpu() on CPU 0
[RUN]   getcpu() on CPU 1
[RUN]   Checking read access to the vsyscall page
[OK]    We do not have read access: #PF(0x4)
[RUN]   Make sure that vsyscalls really page fault
**
ERROR:/home/alex/lsrc/qemu.git/linux-user/x86_64/../i386/cpu_loop.c:185:emulate_vsyscall: assertion failed: (ret != -TARGET_EFAULT)
qemu:handle_cpu_signal received signal outside vCPU context @ pc=0x7f6eed31b613

-- 
Alex Bennée


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 21:09 [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement x86_64 vsyscalls Richard Henderson
2020-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] target/i386: Renumber EXCP_SYSCALL Richard Henderson
2020-01-15  7:22   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-15  9:55   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] linux-user/i386: Split out gen_signal Richard Henderson
2020-01-15  7:22   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-15  9:58   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] linux-user/i386: Emulate x86_64 vsyscalls Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 10:51   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 16:26   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 18:19     ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 18:22       ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 20:15       ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-14 23:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement " Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-15  7:01 ` Laurent Desnogues
2020-01-15 10:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-01-15 17:28   ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 14:05 ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 19:37   ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 14:30 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2020-01-16 18:31   ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87imlblbi3.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.