All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, riku.voipio@iki.fi,
	laurent@vivier.eu, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] linux-user/i386: Emulate x86_64 vsyscalls
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 08:22:09 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a81dad4f-7968-a360-6a66-9559ef131dd8@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3733f2cd-9262-d7f9-ab9c-c8a3032732df@linaro.org>

On 1/16/20 8:19 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 1/16/20 6:26 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>> +    /*
>>> +     * Perform the syscall.  None of the vsyscalls should need restarting,
>>> +     * and all faults should have been caught above.
>>> +     */
>>> +    ret = do_syscall(env, syscall, env->regs[R_EDI], env->regs[R_ESI],
>>> +                     env->regs[R_EDX], env->regs[10], env->regs[8],
>>> +                     env->regs[9], 0, 0);
>>
>> How come the register ABI to the syscall is different to the others. I
>> can see why syscall doesn't come from EAX but the others are a different
>> set to normal syscalls which might be why:
> 
> Cut and paste error, I assume.

What register difference?


        case EXCP_SYSCALL:
            /* linux syscall from syscall instruction */
            ret = do_syscall(env,
                             env->regs[R_EAX],
                             env->regs[R_EDI],
                             env->regs[R_ESI],
                             env->regs[R_EDX],
                             env->regs[10],
                             env->regs[8],
                             env->regs[9],
                             0, 0);

Looks the same to me...


r~


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-16 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14 21:09 [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement x86_64 vsyscalls Richard Henderson
2020-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] target/i386: Renumber EXCP_SYSCALL Richard Henderson
2020-01-15  7:22   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-15  9:55   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] linux-user/i386: Split out gen_signal Richard Henderson
2020-01-15  7:22   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-15  9:58   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-14 21:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] linux-user/i386: Emulate x86_64 vsyscalls Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 10:51   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 16:26   ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 18:19     ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 18:22       ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2020-01-16 20:15       ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-14 23:35 ` [PATCH 0/3] linux-user: Implement " Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-15  7:01 ` Laurent Desnogues
2020-01-15 10:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2020-01-15 17:28   ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 14:05 ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 19:37   ` Richard Henderson
2020-01-16 14:30 ` Alex Bennée
2020-01-16 18:31   ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a81dad4f-7968-a360-6a66-9559ef131dd8@linaro.org \
    --to=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=laurent@vivier.eu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.