All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink
@ 2010-04-19 13:21 Vitaly Mayatskikh
  2010-04-20 12:56 ` Cong Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh @ 2010-04-19 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Amerigo Wang, Linus Torvalds, Neil Horman

Two "echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" OOPSes kernel. Also
content of this file is invalid after first shrink to zero: it shows 1
instead of 0.

This patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>

diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
index 87ebe8a..474a847 100644
--- a/kernel/kexec.c
+++ b/kernel/kexec.c
@@ -1134,11 +1134,9 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
 
 	free_reserved_phys_range(end, crashk_res.end);
 
-	if (start == end) {
-		crashk_res.end = end;
+	if (start == end)
 		release_resource(&crashk_res);
-	} else
-		crashk_res.end = end - 1;
+	crashk_res.end = end - 1;
 
 unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&kexec_mutex);

-- 
wbr, Vitaly

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink
  2010-04-19 13:21 Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink Vitaly Mayatskikh
@ 2010-04-20 12:56 ` Cong Wang
  2010-04-20 13:54   ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2010-04-20 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vitaly Mayatskikh; +Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Neil Horman

Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> Two "echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" OOPSes kernel. Also
> content of this file is invalid after first shrink to zero: it shows 1
> instead of 0.
> 
> This patch fixes it.

Hmmm, I certainly did tests for 'echo 0 > kexec_crash_size' when I
worked on this, but I didn't get any oops. Can you show me the full
oops?

But yes, the size calculation looks wrong.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mayatskikh <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec.c b/kernel/kexec.c
> index 87ebe8a..474a847 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec.c
> @@ -1134,11 +1134,9 @@ int crash_shrink_memory(unsigned long new_size)
>  
>  	free_reserved_phys_range(end, crashk_res.end);
>  
> -	if (start == end) {
> -		crashk_res.end = end;
> +	if (start == end)
>  		release_resource(&crashk_res);
> -	} else
> -		crashk_res.end = end - 1;
> +	crashk_res.end = end - 1;
>  

If we do this, crashk_res.end will be ahead of crashk.start.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink
  2010-04-20 12:56 ` Cong Wang
@ 2010-04-20 13:54   ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
  2010-04-22  8:30     ` Cong Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vitaly Mayatskikh @ 2010-04-20 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Cong Wang; +Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Neil Horman

At Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:56:14 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 
> Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> > Two "echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" OOPSes kernel. Also
> > content of this file is invalid after first shrink to zero: it shows 1
> > instead of 0.
> > 
> > This patch fixes it.
> 
> Hmmm, I certainly did tests for 'echo 0 > kexec_crash_size' when I
> worked on this, but I didn't get any oops. Can you show me the full
> oops?

Do it twice. start == end condition will work over and over, and
kernel will try to release_resource() again (and that's causes OOPS).

This scenario is unlikely to happen often (root privs, valid
crashkernel= in cmdline, dump-capture kernel not loaded), I hit it
only by chance.

-- 
wbr, Vitaly

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink
  2010-04-20 13:54   ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
@ 2010-04-22  8:30     ` Cong Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Cong Wang @ 2010-04-22  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vitaly Mayatskikh; +Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Neil Horman

Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> At Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:56:14 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
>> Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
>>> Two "echo 0 > /sys/kernel/kexec_crash_size" OOPSes kernel. Also
>>> content of this file is invalid after first shrink to zero: it shows 1
>>> instead of 0.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes it.
>> Hmmm, I certainly did tests for 'echo 0 > kexec_crash_size' when I
>> worked on this, but I didn't get any oops. Can you show me the full
>> oops?
> 
> Do it twice. start == end condition will work over and over, and
> kernel will try to release_resource() again (and that's causes OOPS).
> 

Hmm, I see. ACK to your patch.

Thanks much!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-22  8:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-19 13:21 Fix OOPS in crash_kernel_shrink Vitaly Mayatskikh
2010-04-20 12:56 ` Cong Wang
2010-04-20 13:54   ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2010-04-22  8:30     ` Cong Wang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.