All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC
@ 2021-11-02  1:26 ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ashutosh Dixit, Vinay Belgaumkar

Waitboost is a legacy feature implemented in the Host Turbo algorithm. This
patch set implements it for the SLPC path. A boost can happen when a request
is waiting for an unmet dependency. GT frequency gets temporarily bumped to
boost freq to allow the previous request to finish quickly. We achieve this
on SLPC by setting the min frequency, SLPC will set that as the requested
frequency.

The boost will occur through a worker thread that will be scheduled
when the required conditions are met.

Like before, boost frequency is configurable through sysfs, so we can
adjust it to any specific value as long as it is between [min, RP0].

v2: Add a worker thread to perform freq boost.
v3: Address comments (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

Vinay Belgaumkar (3):
  drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
  drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |  72 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h           |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 151 +++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |   3 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  13 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c             |  19 +--
 7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC
@ 2021-11-02  1:26 ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel

Waitboost is a legacy feature implemented in the Host Turbo algorithm. This
patch set implements it for the SLPC path. A boost can happen when a request
is waiting for an unmet dependency. GT frequency gets temporarily bumped to
boost freq to allow the previous request to finish quickly. We achieve this
on SLPC by setting the min frequency, SLPC will set that as the requested
frequency.

The boost will occur through a worker thread that will be scheduled
when the required conditions are met.

Like before, boost frequency is configurable through sysfs, so we can
adjust it to any specific value as long as it is between [min, RP0].

v2: Add a worker thread to perform freq boost.
v3: Address comments (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>

Vinay Belgaumkar (3):
  drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
  drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |  72 +++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h           |   3 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 151 +++++++++++++++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |   3 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  13 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c             |  19 +--
 7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-02  1:26   ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ashutosh Dixit, Vinay Belgaumkar

Define helpers and struct members required to record boost info.
Boost frequency is initialized to RP0 at SLPC init. Also define num_waiters
which can track the pending boost requests.

Boost will be done by scheduling a worker thread. This will avoid
the need to make H2G calls inside an interrupt context. Initialize the
worker function during SLPC init as well. Had to move intel_guc_slpc_init
a few lines below to accomodate this.

v2: Add a workqueue to handle waitboost
v3: Code review comments (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 102 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |   1 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  13 +++
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index 65a3e7fdb2b2..3a9750af0bdf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -79,29 +79,6 @@ static void slpc_mem_set_disabled(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
 	slpc_mem_set_param(data, enable_id, 0);
 }
 
-int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
-{
-	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
-	u32 size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
-	int err;
-
-	GEM_BUG_ON(slpc->vma);
-
-	err = intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(guc, size, &slpc->vma, (void **)&slpc->vaddr);
-	if (unlikely(err)) {
-		drm_err(&i915->drm,
-			"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
-			ERR_PTR(err));
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
-	slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static u32 slpc_get_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 {
 	struct slpc_shared_data *data;
@@ -203,6 +180,82 @@ static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
 	return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id);
 }
 
+static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
+	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&slpc->lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * This function is a little different as compared to
+	 * intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(). Softlimit will not be updated
+	 * here since this is used to temporarily change min freq,
+	 * for example, during a waitboost. Caller is responsible for
+	 * checking bounds.
+	 */
+
+	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
+		ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
+				     SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
+				     freq);
+		if (ret)
+			drm_err(&i915->drm, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d",
+				freq, ret);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void slpc_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = container_of(work, typeof(*slpc), boost_work);
+
+	/*
+	 * Raise min freq to boost. It's possible that
+	 * this is greater than current max. But it will
+	 * certainly be limited by RP0. An error setting
+	 * the min param is not fatal.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+	if (atomic_read(&slpc->num_waiters)) {
+		slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, slpc->boost_freq);
+		slpc->num_boosts++;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+}
+
+int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
+	u32 size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
+	int err;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(slpc->vma);
+
+	err = intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(guc, size, &slpc->vma, (void **)&slpc->vaddr);
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+		drm_err(&i915->drm,
+			"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
+			ERR_PTR(err));
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
+	slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
+
+	slpc->boost_freq = 0;
+	atomic_set(&slpc->num_waiters, 0);
+	slpc->num_boosts = 0;
+
+	mutex_init(&slpc->lock);
+	INIT_WORK(&slpc->boost_work, slpc_boost_work);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state)
 {
 	switch (state) {
@@ -522,6 +575,9 @@ static void slpc_get_rp_values(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 	slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
 					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+
+	if (!slpc->boost_freq)
+		slpc->boost_freq = slpc->rp0_freq;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index e45054d5b9b4..b62528647770 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -38,5 +38,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
 void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt);
+void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
index 41d13527666f..bf5b9a563c09 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
 #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_
 #define _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_
 
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
 #define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5
@@ -20,10 +23,20 @@ struct intel_guc_slpc {
 	u32 min_freq;
 	u32 rp0_freq;
 	u32 rp1_freq;
+	u32 boost_freq;
 
 	/* frequency softlimits */
 	u32 min_freq_softlimit;
 	u32 max_freq_softlimit;
+
+	/* Protects set/reset of boost freq
+	 * and value of num_waiters
+	 */
+	struct mutex lock;
+
+	struct work_struct boost_work;
+	atomic_t num_waiters;
+	u32 num_boosts;
 };
 
 #endif
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
@ 2021-11-02  1:26   ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel

Define helpers and struct members required to record boost info.
Boost frequency is initialized to RP0 at SLPC init. Also define num_waiters
which can track the pending boost requests.

Boost will be done by scheduling a worker thread. This will avoid
the need to make H2G calls inside an interrupt context. Initialize the
worker function during SLPC init as well. Had to move intel_guc_slpc_init
a few lines below to accomodate this.

v2: Add a workqueue to handle waitboost
v3: Code review comments (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 102 ++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |   1 +
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  13 +++
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index 65a3e7fdb2b2..3a9750af0bdf 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -79,29 +79,6 @@ static void slpc_mem_set_disabled(struct slpc_shared_data *data,
 	slpc_mem_set_param(data, enable_id, 0);
 }
 
-int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
-{
-	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
-	u32 size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
-	int err;
-
-	GEM_BUG_ON(slpc->vma);
-
-	err = intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(guc, size, &slpc->vma, (void **)&slpc->vaddr);
-	if (unlikely(err)) {
-		drm_err(&i915->drm,
-			"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
-			ERR_PTR(err));
-		return err;
-	}
-
-	slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
-	slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
-
-	return err;
-}
-
 static u32 slpc_get_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 {
 	struct slpc_shared_data *data;
@@ -203,6 +180,82 @@ static int slpc_unset_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc,
 	return guc_action_slpc_unset_param(guc, id);
 }
 
+static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
+	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&slpc->lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * This function is a little different as compared to
+	 * intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(). Softlimit will not be updated
+	 * here since this is used to temporarily change min freq,
+	 * for example, during a waitboost. Caller is responsible for
+	 * checking bounds.
+	 */
+
+	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
+		ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
+				     SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
+				     freq);
+		if (ret)
+			drm_err(&i915->drm, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d",
+				freq, ret);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void slpc_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = container_of(work, typeof(*slpc), boost_work);
+
+	/*
+	 * Raise min freq to boost. It's possible that
+	 * this is greater than current max. But it will
+	 * certainly be limited by RP0. An error setting
+	 * the min param is not fatal.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+	if (atomic_read(&slpc->num_waiters)) {
+		slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, slpc->boost_freq);
+		slpc->num_boosts++;
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+}
+
+int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	struct intel_guc *guc = slpc_to_guc(slpc);
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
+	u32 size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct slpc_shared_data));
+	int err;
+
+	GEM_BUG_ON(slpc->vma);
+
+	err = intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(guc, size, &slpc->vma, (void **)&slpc->vaddr);
+	if (unlikely(err)) {
+		drm_err(&i915->drm,
+			"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
+			ERR_PTR(err));
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	slpc->max_freq_softlimit = 0;
+	slpc->min_freq_softlimit = 0;
+
+	slpc->boost_freq = 0;
+	atomic_set(&slpc->num_waiters, 0);
+	slpc->num_boosts = 0;
+
+	mutex_init(&slpc->lock);
+	INIT_WORK(&slpc->boost_work, slpc_boost_work);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static const char *slpc_global_state_to_string(enum slpc_global_state state)
 {
 	switch (state) {
@@ -522,6 +575,9 @@ static void slpc_get_rp_values(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
 	slpc->min_freq = REG_FIELD_GET(RPN_CAP_MASK, rp_state_cap) *
 					GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
+
+	if (!slpc->boost_freq)
+		slpc->boost_freq = slpc->rp0_freq;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index e45054d5b9b4..b62528647770 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -38,5 +38,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
 void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt);
+void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
index 41d13527666f..bf5b9a563c09 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h
@@ -6,6 +6,9 @@
 #ifndef _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_
 #define _INTEL_GUC_SLPC_TYPES_H_
 
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
 #define SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS 5
@@ -20,10 +23,20 @@ struct intel_guc_slpc {
 	u32 min_freq;
 	u32 rp0_freq;
 	u32 rp1_freq;
+	u32 boost_freq;
 
 	/* frequency softlimits */
 	u32 min_freq_softlimit;
 	u32 max_freq_softlimit;
+
+	/* Protects set/reset of boost freq
+	 * and value of num_waiters
+	 */
+	struct mutex lock;
+
+	struct work_struct boost_work;
+	atomic_t num_waiters;
+	u32 num_boosts;
 };
 
 #endif
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-02  1:26   ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ashutosh Dixit, Vinay Belgaumkar

Add helper in RPS code for handling SLPC and non-SLPC paths.
When boost is requested in the SLPC path, we can ask GuC to ramp
up the frequency req by setting the minimum frequency to boost freq.
Reset freq back to the min softlimit when there are no more waiters.

v2: Schedule a worker thread which can boost freq from within
an interrupt context as well.

v3: No need to check against requested freq before scheduling boost
work (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c         |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 5e275f8dda8c..6f310c9d9765 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -936,8 +936,23 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
 }
 
+void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(slpc);
+	} else {
+		atomic_dec(&rps->num_waiters);
+	}
+}
+
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
 	if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || i915_request_has_waitboost(rq))
 		return;
 
@@ -945,6 +960,16 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
 		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
 
+		if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+			slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+			/* Return if old value is non zero */
+			if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
+				schedule_work(&slpc->boost_work);
+
+			return;
+		}
+
 		if (atomic_fetch_inc(&rps->num_waiters))
 			return;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 11960d64ca82..407e878d5006 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ void intel_rps_disable(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
+void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
 void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index 3a9750af0bdf..db418396a145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -446,7 +446,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
 	    val > slpc->max_freq_softlimit)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Need a lock now since waitboost can be modifying min as well */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+
 	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
+
 		ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
 				     SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
 				     val);
@@ -459,6 +463,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
 	if (!ret)
 		slpc->min_freq_softlimit = val;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -644,6 +650,20 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Return min back to the softlimit.
+	 * This is called during request retire,
+	 * so we don't need to fail that if the
+	 * set_param fails.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&slpc->num_waiters))
+		slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+}
+
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index b62528647770..d74d6d749bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -39,5 +39,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
 void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt);
 void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
+void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 2c3cd6e635b5..08f38e86231d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
 	}
 
 	if (test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags))
-		atomic_dec(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters);
+		intel_rps_dec_waiters(&rq->engine->gt->rps);
 
 	/*
 	 * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption,
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
@ 2021-11-02  1:26   ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel

Add helper in RPS code for handling SLPC and non-SLPC paths.
When boost is requested in the SLPC path, we can ask GuC to ramp
up the frequency req by setting the minimum frequency to boost freq.
Reset freq back to the min softlimit when there are no more waiters.

v2: Schedule a worker thread which can boost freq from within
an interrupt context as well.

v3: No need to check against requested freq before scheduling boost
work (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c         |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 5e275f8dda8c..6f310c9d9765 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -936,8 +936,23 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
 }
 
+void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(slpc);
+	} else {
+		atomic_dec(&rps->num_waiters);
+	}
+}
+
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
 	if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || i915_request_has_waitboost(rq))
 		return;
 
@@ -945,6 +960,16 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
 		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
 
+		if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+			slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+			/* Return if old value is non zero */
+			if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
+				schedule_work(&slpc->boost_work);
+
+			return;
+		}
+
 		if (atomic_fetch_inc(&rps->num_waiters))
 			return;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 11960d64ca82..407e878d5006 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ void intel_rps_disable(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
+void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
 void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index 3a9750af0bdf..db418396a145 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -446,7 +446,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
 	    val > slpc->max_freq_softlimit)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Need a lock now since waitboost can be modifying min as well */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+
 	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
+
 		ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
 				     SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
 				     val);
@@ -459,6 +463,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
 	if (!ret)
 		slpc->min_freq_softlimit = val;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -644,6 +650,20 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Return min back to the softlimit.
+	 * This is called during request retire,
+	 * so we don't need to fail that if the
+	 * set_param fails.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&slpc->num_waiters))
+		slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+}
+
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index b62528647770..d74d6d749bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -39,5 +39,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
 void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt);
 void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
+void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 2c3cd6e635b5..08f38e86231d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
 	}
 
 	if (test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags))
-		atomic_dec(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters);
+		intel_rps_dec_waiters(&rq->engine->gt->rps);
 
 	/*
 	 * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption,
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-02  1:26   ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Ashutosh Dixit, Vinay Belgaumkar

Add a helper to sort through the SLPC/RPS paths of get/set methods.
Boost frequency will be modified as long as it is within the constraints
of RP0 and if it is different from the existing one. We will set min
freq to boost only if there is at least one active waiter.

v2: Add num_boosts to guc_slpc_info and changes for worker function
v3: Review comments (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 29 +++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c           | 19 ++-------
 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 6f310c9d9765..07ff7ba7b2b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -936,6 +936,53 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
 }
 
+u32 intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		return slpc->boost_freq;
+	} else {
+		return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq);
+	}
+}
+
+static int rps_set_boost_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val)
+{
+	bool boost = false;
+
+	/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
+	val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
+	if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+	if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
+		rps->boost_freq = val;
+		boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
+	if (boost)
+		schedule_work(&rps->work);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 freq)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		return intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(slpc, freq);
+	} else {
+		return rps_set_boost_freq(rps, freq);
+	}
+}
+
 void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 407e878d5006..aee12f37d38a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
 void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
+u32 intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
+int intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 freq);
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
 void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index db418396a145..4e1d3cd29164 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -650,6 +650,33 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (val < slpc->min_freq || val > slpc->rp0_freq)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+
+	if (slpc->boost_freq != val) {
+		/* Apply only if there are active waiters */
+		if (atomic_read(&slpc->num_waiters)) {
+			ret = slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, val);
+			if (ret) {
+				ret = -EIO;
+				goto done;
+			}
+		}
+
+		slpc->boost_freq = val;
+	}
+
+done:
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 {
 	/*
@@ -687,6 +714,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p
 				   slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc));
 			drm_printf(p, "\tMin freq: %u MHz\n",
 				   slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc));
+			drm_printf(p, "\twaitboosts: %u\n",
+				   slpc->num_boosts);
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index d74d6d749bdc..0caa8fee3c04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 void intel_guc_slpc_fini(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
+int intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
index 1804f4142740..59d441cedc75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribu
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
 	struct intel_rps *rps = &i915->gt.rps;
 
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq));
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(rps));
 }
 
 static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
@@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
 	struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps;
-	bool boost = false;
 	ssize_t ret;
 	u32 val;
 
@@ -296,21 +295,9 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
-	val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
-	if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
-	if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
-		rps->boost_freq = val;
-		boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
-	if (boost)
-		schedule_work(&rps->work);
+	ret = intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(rps, val);
 
-	return count;
+	return ret ?: count;
 }
 
 static ssize_t vlv_rpe_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
@ 2021-11-02  1:26   ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-02  1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel

Add a helper to sort through the SLPC/RPS paths of get/set methods.
Boost frequency will be modified as long as it is within the constraints
of RP0 and if it is different from the existing one. We will set min
freq to boost only if there is at least one active waiter.

v2: Add num_boosts to guc_slpc_info and changes for worker function
v3: Review comments (Ashutosh)

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 29 +++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c           | 19 ++-------
 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 6f310c9d9765..07ff7ba7b2b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -936,6 +936,53 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
 }
 
+u32 intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		return slpc->boost_freq;
+	} else {
+		return intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq);
+	}
+}
+
+static int rps_set_boost_freq(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 val)
+{
+	bool boost = false;
+
+	/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
+	val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
+	if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+	if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
+		rps->boost_freq = val;
+		boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
+	if (boost)
+		schedule_work(&rps->work);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 freq)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		return intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(slpc, freq);
+	} else {
+		return rps_set_boost_freq(rps, freq);
+	}
+}
+
 void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
 {
 	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 407e878d5006..aee12f37d38a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
 void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
+u32 intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps);
+int intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 freq);
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
 void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index db418396a145..4e1d3cd29164 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -650,6 +650,33 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	if (val < slpc->min_freq || val > slpc->rp0_freq)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+
+	if (slpc->boost_freq != val) {
+		/* Apply only if there are active waiters */
+		if (atomic_read(&slpc->num_waiters)) {
+			ret = slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, val);
+			if (ret) {
+				ret = -EIO;
+				goto done;
+			}
+		}
+
+		slpc->boost_freq = val;
+	}
+
+done:
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 {
 	/*
@@ -687,6 +714,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p
 				   slpc_decode_max_freq(slpc));
 			drm_printf(p, "\tMin freq: %u MHz\n",
 				   slpc_decode_min_freq(slpc));
+			drm_printf(p, "\twaitboosts: %u\n",
+				   slpc->num_boosts);
 		}
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index d74d6d749bdc..0caa8fee3c04 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 void intel_guc_slpc_fini(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 int intel_guc_slpc_set_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
+int intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
index 1804f4142740..59d441cedc75 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev, struct device_attribu
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
 	struct intel_rps *rps = &i915->gt.rps;
 
-	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_gpu_freq(rps, rps->boost_freq));
+	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", intel_rps_get_boost_frequency(rps));
 }
 
 static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
@@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = kdev_minor_to_i915(kdev);
 	struct intel_rps *rps = &dev_priv->gt.rps;
-	bool boost = false;
 	ssize_t ret;
 	u32 val;
 
@@ -296,21 +295,9 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Validate against (static) hardware limits */
-	val = intel_freq_opcode(rps, val);
-	if (val < rps->min_freq || val > rps->max_freq)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
-	if (val != rps->boost_freq) {
-		rps->boost_freq = val;
-		boost = atomic_read(&rps->num_waiters);
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
-	if (boost)
-		schedule_work(&rps->work);
+	ret = intel_rps_set_boost_frequency(rps, val);
 
-	return count;
+	return ret ?: count;
 }
 
 static ssize_t vlv_rpe_freq_mhz_show(struct device *kdev,
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-02  1:35   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-02  1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:05 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Waitboost is a legacy feature implemented in the Host Turbo algorithm. This
> patch set implements it for the SLPC path. A boost can happen when a request
> is waiting for an unmet dependency. GT frequency gets temporarily bumped to
> boost freq to allow the previous request to finish quickly. We achieve this
> on SLPC by setting the min frequency, SLPC will set that as the requested
> frequency.
>
> The boost will occur through a worker thread that will be scheduled
> when the required conditions are met.
>
> Like before, boost frequency is configurable through sysfs, so we can
> adjust it to any specific value as long as it is between [min, RP0].
>
> v2: Add a worker thread to perform freq boost.
> v3: Address comments (Ashutosh)

For the series:

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>
> Vinay Belgaumkar (3):
>   drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
>   drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
>   drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |  72 +++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h           |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 151 +++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |   3 +
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  13 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c             |  19 +--
>  7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC
@ 2021-11-02  1:35   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-02  1:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:05 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Waitboost is a legacy feature implemented in the Host Turbo algorithm. This
> patch set implements it for the SLPC path. A boost can happen when a request
> is waiting for an unmet dependency. GT frequency gets temporarily bumped to
> boost freq to allow the previous request to finish quickly. We achieve this
> on SLPC by setting the min frequency, SLPC will set that as the requested
> frequency.
>
> The boost will occur through a worker thread that will be scheduled
> when the required conditions are met.
>
> Like before, boost frequency is configurable through sysfs, so we can
> adjust it to any specific value as long as it is between [min, RP0].
>
> v2: Add a worker thread to perform freq boost.
> v3: Address comments (Ashutosh)

For the series:

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
>
> Vinay Belgaumkar (3):
>   drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
>   drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
>   drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c           |  72 +++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h           |   3 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c   | 151 +++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h   |   3 +
>  .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc_types.h |  13 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c           |   2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c             |  19 +--
>  7 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.0
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3)
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2021-11-02  1:38 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-11-02  1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96082/
State : warning

== Summary ==

$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
3b5f16b5d3d0 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
-:13: WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'accomodate' may be misspelled - perhaps 'accommodate'?
#13: 
a few lines below to accomodate this.
                     ^^^^^^^^^^

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 155 lines checked
3bbcbcb0adb5 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
-:89: CHECK:BRACES: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open brace '{'
#89: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c:453:
 	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
+

total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 99 lines checked
7c77538083a4 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3)
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2021-11-02  2:10 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-11-02  2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6287 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96082/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10825 -> Patchwork_21499
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/index.html

Participating hosts (38 -> 34)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): fi-tgl-1115g4 
  Missing    (5): fi-kbl-soraka bat-dg1-6 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-cyan bat-adlp-4 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21499 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@query-info:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][1] ([fdo#109315])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@amdgpu/amd_basic@query-info.html

  * igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@nop-gfx0:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([fdo#109315] / [i915#2575]) +16 similar issues
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@amdgpu/amd_cs_nop@nop-gfx0.html

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([i915#2190])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1155])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#111827]) +8 similar issues
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@kms_chamelium@common-hpd-after-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#4103]) +1 similar issue
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109285])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b:
    - fi-cfl-8109u:       [PASS][8] -> [DMESG-WARN][9] ([i915#295]) +12 similar issues
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-b.html

  * igt@kms_psr@primary_mmap_gtt:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][10] ([i915#1072]) +3 similar issues
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@kms_psr@primary_mmap_gtt.html

  * igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr:
    - fi-tgl-1115g4:      NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([i915#3301])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-tgl-1115g4/igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - fi-bdw-5557u:       NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#1602] / [i915#2426] / [i915#4312])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat:
    - fi-skl-6700k2:      [DMESG-FAIL][13] ([i915#2291] / [i915#541]) -> [PASS][14]
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-skl-6700k2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_heartbeat.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic:
    - fi-cml-u2:          [DMESG-WARN][15] ([i915#4269]) -> [PASS][16]
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/fi-cml-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/fi-cml-u2/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@basic.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109285]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109285
  [fdo#109315]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109315
  [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#1155]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1155
  [i915#1602]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1602
  [i915#2190]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2190
  [i915#2291]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2291
  [i915#2426]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2426
  [i915#2575]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2575
  [i915#295]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/295
  [i915#3301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3301
  [i915#3303]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3303
  [i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
  [i915#4269]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4269
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#541]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/541


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_10825 -> Patchwork_21499

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_10825: 06a77fd52e7b991026f29867d6569ac640703311 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6265: 5004c6cf2ad4a72423b4cf0cd42686925bcb80fe @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_21499: 7c77538083a46ffbc2cfe8174fb21599282e872d @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


== Linux commits ==

7c77538083a4 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
3bbcbcb0adb5 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
3b5f16b5d3d0 drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7233 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3)
  2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2021-11-02  3:50 ` Patchwork
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-11-02  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30277 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3)
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/96082/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10825_full -> Patchwork_21499_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_21499_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_21499_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Participating hosts (10 -> 10)
------------------------------

  No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_21499_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@b-vga1:
    - shard-snb:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-snb7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@b-vga1.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-snb2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@b-vga1.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_21499_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@feature_discovery@display-3x:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([i915#1839])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@feature_discovery@display-3x.html

  * igt@gem_create@create-massive:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][4] ([i915#3002])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_create@create-massive.html

  * igt@gem_ctx_param@set-priority-not-supported:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109314])
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_param@set-priority-not-supported.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2842])
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@bcs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2842])
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@bcs0.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@bcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2842])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_params@secure-non-root:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#112283])
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_params@secure-non-root.html

  * igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][12] -> [DMESG-WARN][13] ([i915#118])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all.html
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all.html

  * igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][14] -> [SKIP][15] ([i915#2190])
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html

  * igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [WARN][16] ([i915#2658])
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl1/igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion.html

  * igt@gem_pxp@regular-baseline-src-copy-readible:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([i915#4270]) +1 similar issue
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_pxp@regular-baseline-src-copy-readible.html

  * igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][18] ([i915#3002])
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@input-checking.html

  * igt@gen7_exec_parse@cmd-crossing-page:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][19] ([fdo#109289]) +1 similar issue
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@gen7_exec_parse@cmd-crossing-page.html

  * igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][20] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716])
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl6/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html

  * igt@i915_module_load@reload:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][21] -> [DMESG-WARN][22] ([i915#1982])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl7/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl4/igt@i915_module_load@reload.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][23] ([i915#454])
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html

  * igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][24] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1937])
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl4/igt@i915_pm_lpsp@kms-lpsp@kms-lpsp-dp.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [WARN][25] ([i915#2681] / [i915#2684])
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-non-lpsp:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][26] ([fdo#111644] / [i915#1397] / [i915#2411])
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@dpms-mode-unset-non-lpsp.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][27] ([i915#2373])
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_lrc.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][28] ([i915#1759])
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-64bpp-rotate-270:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][29] ([fdo#111614]) +1 similar issue
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-64bpp-rotate-270.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0-async-flip:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][30] ([i915#3763]) +1 similar issue
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl9/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-0-async-flip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-hflip:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][31] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3777])
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_big_fb@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-hflip.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-8bpp-rotate-90:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][32] ([fdo#111615]) +3 similar issues
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-8bpp-rotate-90.html

  * igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-async-flip:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][33] ([i915#3743])
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl1/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-0-async-flip.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_ccs:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][34] ([i915#3689]) +7 similar issues
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][35] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +3 similar issues
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl3/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-random-ccs-data-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +1 similar issue
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-random-ccs-data-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-crc-primary-basic-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][37] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +4 similar issues
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-b-crc-primary-basic-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][38] ([i915#3689] / [i915#3886]) +3 similar issues
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-c-crc-sprite-planes-basic-y_tiled_gen12_mc_ccs.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +5 similar issues
   [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl3/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-hpd.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-0-5:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][40] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +9 similar issues
   [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-0-5.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-red-to-blue:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][41] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +9 similar issues
   [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-ctm-red-to-blue.html

  * igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-degamma:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +6 similar issues
   [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-b-degamma.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@mei_interface:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#111828])
   [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_content_protection@mei_interface.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-32x32-sliding:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][44] ([i915#3319]) +1 similar issue
   [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-32x32-sliding.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-sliding:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][45] ([fdo#109279] / [i915#3359]) +2 similar issues
   [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-512x512-sliding.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-max-size-rapid-movement:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][46] ([i915#3359]) +2 similar issues
   [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-max-size-rapid-movement.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109271]) +70 similar issues
   [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipb-atomic:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#111825]) +30 similar issues
   [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipb-atomic.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][49] ([i915#2346])
   [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][50] -> [FAIL][51] ([i915#2346] / [i915#533])
   [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl10/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html
   [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl1/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-toggle:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][52] -> [FAIL][53] ([i915#2346])
   [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-toggle.html
   [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@flip-vs-cursor-toggle.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@short-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([i915#4103])
   [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@short-busy-flip-before-cursor-atomic-transitions-varying-size.html

  * igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@psr-suspend:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][55] -> [INCOMPLETE][56] ([i915#2411] / [i915#456])
   [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@psr-suspend.html
   [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@psr-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@ab-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2:
    - shard-glk:          [PASS][57] -> [FAIL][58] ([i915#2122])
   [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-glk5/igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@ab-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2.html
   [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-glk7/igt@kms_flip@2x-plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@ab-hdmi-a1-hdmi-a2.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][59] -> [DMESG-WARN][60] ([i915#180]) +9 similar issues
   [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html
   [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][61] -> [DMESG-WARN][62] ([i915#180]) +2 similar issues
   [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-apl7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html
   [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-a-y-ccs-to-yf-ccs:
    - shard-skl:          [PASS][63] -> [DMESG-WARN][64] ([i915#4380])
   [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-a-y-ccs-to-yf-ccs.html
   [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl3/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-a-y-ccs-to-yf-ccs.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-shrfb-fliptrack-mmap-gtt:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][65] ([fdo#109271]) +119 similar issues
   [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl1/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-shrfb-fliptrack-mmap-gtt.html

  * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-wc:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][66] ([fdo#109271]) +69 similar issues
   [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@psr-2p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-mmap-wc.html

  * igt@kms_invalid_mode@clock-too-high:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][67] ([i915#4278])
   [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_invalid_mode@clock-too-high.html

  * igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-d:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][68] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +2 similar issues
   [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-d.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][69] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl6/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][70] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-coverage-7efc.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-max:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][71] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
   [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-constant-alpha-max.html

  * igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-d-tiling-none:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][72] ([i915#3536])
   [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_plane_lowres@pipe-d-tiling-none.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2:
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +2 similar issues
   [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][74] ([i915#2920]) +2 similar issues
   [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-1:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][75] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +4 similar issues
   [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl9/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-1.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-5:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][76] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658])
   [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-5.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [FAIL][77] ([i915#132] / [i915#3467])
   [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_mmap_gtt.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move:
    - shard-iclb:         [PASS][78] -> [SKIP][79] ([fdo#109441]) +2 similar issues
   [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html
   [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_move.html

  * igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][80] ([i915#180] / [i915#295])
   [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_vblank@pipe-a-ts-continuation-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][81] ([i915#2437])
   [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters.html
    - shard-apl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437])
   [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl6/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters.html

  * igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-b-ctx-flip-skip-current-frame:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][83] ([i915#2530]) +1 similar issue
   [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb8/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-b-ctx-flip-skip-current-frame.html

  * igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test1_macro:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][84] ([fdo#109291]) +1 similar issue
   [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb7/igt@prime_nv_pcopy@test1_macro.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1:
    - shard-tglb:         NOTRUN -> [SKIP][85] ([i915#2994])
   [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb8/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-1.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@sema-10:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][86] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +1 similar issue
   [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl3/igt@sysfs_clients@sema-10.html

  * igt@sysfs_clients@sema-25:
    - shard-skl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][87] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994])
   [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@sysfs_clients@sema-25.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
    - shard-apl:          [SKIP][88] ([fdo#109271]) -> [PASS][89]
   [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
   [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [FAIL][90] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][91] +1 similar issue
   [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html
   [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-solo@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@bcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         [FAIL][92] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][93] +3 similar issues
   [92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@bcs0.html
   [93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@bcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][94] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][95]
   [94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html
   [95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0:
    - shard-glk:          [FAIL][96] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][97] +1 similar issue
   [96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
   [97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html

  * igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][98] ([i915#454]) -> [PASS][99]
   [98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html
   [99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_dc@dc6-psr.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend:
    - shard-skl:          [INCOMPLETE][100] ([i915#151]) -> [PASS][101]
   [100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html
   [101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl9/igt@i915_pm_rpm@system-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend:
    - shard-tglb:         [INCOMPLETE][102] ([i915#4211]) -> [PASS][103]
   [102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html
   [103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-d-cursor-suspend.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-edp1:
    - shard-tglb:         [INCOMPLETE][104] ([i915#2411] / [i915#456]) -> [PASS][105]
   [104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-edp1.html
   [105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-edp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-dp1:
    - shard-apl:          [DMESG-WARN][106] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][107] +3 similar issues
   [106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-apl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-dp1.html
   [107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@c-dp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1:
    - shard-kbl:          [DMESG-WARN][108] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][109] +4 similar issues
   [108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html
   [109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html

  * igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-a-yf-ccs-to-y-ccs:
    - shard-skl:          [DMESG-WARN][110] ([i915#4380]) -> [PASS][111]
   [110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-a-yf-ccs-to-y-ccs.html
   [111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl3/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-a-yf-ccs-to-y-ccs.html

  * igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-b-yf-to-yf-ccs:
    - shard-skl:          [DMESG-WARN][112] -> [PASS][113] +1 similar issue
   [112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-b-yf-to-yf-ccs.html
   [113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl3/igt@kms_flip_tiling@flip-change-tiling@edp-1-pipe-b-yf-to-yf-ccs.html

  * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch:
    - shard-skl:          [FAIL][114] ([i915#1188]) -> [PASS][115]
   [114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-skl6/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch.html
   [115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-skl8/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch.html

  * igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][116] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][117] +3 similar issues
   [116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic.html
   [117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic.html

  * igt@kms_setmode@basic:
    - shard-apl:          [FAIL][118] ([i915#31]) -> [PASS][119]
   [118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-apl2/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
   [119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-apl7/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         [FAIL][120] ([i915#2842]) -> [SKIP][121] ([i915#2848])
   [120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0.html
   [121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0:
    - shard-iclb:         [FAIL][122] ([i915#2842]) -> [FAIL][123] ([i915#2849])
   [122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
   [123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle:
    - shard-iclb:         [WARN][124] ([i915#1804] / [i915#2684]) -> [WARN][125] ([i915#2684])
   [124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb6/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle.html
   [125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-idle.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@cursor-plane-update-sf:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][126] ([i915#658]) -> [SKIP][127] ([i915#2920])
   [126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr2_sf@cursor-plane-update-sf.html
   [127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@cursor-plane-update-sf.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-2:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][128] ([i915#2920]) -> [SKIP][129] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue
   [128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html
   [129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb1/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-primary-update-sf-dmg-area-2.html

  * igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip:
    - shard-iclb:         [SKIP][130] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068] / [i915#658]) -> [FAIL][131] ([i915#4148])
   [130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html
   [131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@page_flip.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - shard-kbl:          ([FAIL][132], [FAIL][133], [FAIL][134], [FAIL][135], [FAIL][136], [FAIL][137], [FAIL][138], [FAIL][139], [FAIL][140], [FAIL][141], [FAIL][142]) ([i915#1436] / [i915#180] / [i915#1814] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363] / [i915#4312] / [i915#602] / [i915#92]) -> ([FAIL][143], [FAIL][144], [FAIL][145], [FAIL][146], [FAIL][147], [FAIL][148], [FAIL][149], [FAIL][150], [FAIL][151], [FAIL][152], [FAIL][153], [FAIL][154], [FAIL][155], [FAIL][156]) ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1436] / [i915#180] / [i915#1814] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363] / [i915#4312] / [i915#602] / [i915#92])
   [132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10825/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_1

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_21499/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 33505 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
  2021-11-02  1:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-04  0:23     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-04  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:06 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Define helpers and struct members required to record boost info.
> Boost frequency is initialized to RP0 at SLPC init. Also define num_waiters
> which can track the pending boost requests.
>
> Boost will be done by scheduling a worker thread. This will avoid
> the need to make H2G calls inside an interrupt context. Initialize the
> worker function during SLPC init as well. Had to move intel_guc_slpc_init
> a few lines below to accomodate this.
>
> v2: Add a workqueue to handle waitboost
> v3: Code review comments (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency
@ 2021-11-04  0:23     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-04  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:06 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Define helpers and struct members required to record boost info.
> Boost frequency is initialized to RP0 at SLPC init. Also define num_waiters
> which can track the pending boost requests.
>
> Boost will be done by scheduling a worker thread. This will avoid
> the need to make H2G calls inside an interrupt context. Initialize the
> worker function during SLPC init as well. Had to move intel_guc_slpc_init
> a few lines below to accomodate this.
>
> v2: Add a workqueue to handle waitboost
> v3: Code review comments (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  2021-11-02  1:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-04  0:23     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-04  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:07 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Add helper in RPS code for handling SLPC and non-SLPC paths.
> When boost is requested in the SLPC path, we can ask GuC to ramp
> up the frequency req by setting the minimum frequency to boost freq.
> Reset freq back to the min softlimit when there are no more waiters.
>
> v2: Schedule a worker thread which can boost freq from within
> an interrupt context as well.
>
> v3: No need to check against requested freq before scheduling boost
> work (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
@ 2021-11-04  0:23     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-04  0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:07 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Add helper in RPS code for handling SLPC and non-SLPC paths.
> When boost is requested in the SLPC path, we can ask GuC to ramp
> up the frequency req by setting the minimum frequency to boost freq.
> Reset freq back to the min softlimit when there are no more waiters.
>
> v2: Schedule a worker thread which can boost freq from within
> an interrupt context as well.
>
> v3: No need to check against requested freq before scheduling boost
> work (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
  2021-11-02  1:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-04  0:41     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-04  0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:08 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Add a helper to sort through the SLPC/RPS paths of get/set methods.
> Boost frequency will be modified as long as it is within the constraints
> of RP0 and if it is different from the existing one. We will set min
> freq to boost only if there is at least one active waiter.
>
> v2: Add num_boosts to guc_slpc_info and changes for worker function
> v3: Review comments (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks for SLPC
@ 2021-11-04  0:41     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-04  0:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinay Belgaumkar; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Mon, 01 Nov 2021 18:26:08 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
>
> Add a helper to sort through the SLPC/RPS paths of get/set methods.
> Boost frequency will be modified as long as it is within the constraints
> of RP0 and if it is different from the existing one. We will set min
> freq to boost only if there is at least one active waiter.
>
> v2: Add num_boosts to guc_slpc_info and changes for worker function
> v3: Review comments (Ashutosh)

Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  2021-11-01 20:28   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
@ 2021-11-02  0:19     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Belgaumkar, Vinay @ 2021-11-02  0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dixit, Ashutosh; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel



On 11/1/2021 1:28 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 21:39:36 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>>
>> @@ -945,6 +960,17 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
>> 	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
>> 		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
>>
>> +		if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
>> +			slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
>> +
>> +			/* Return if old value is non zero */
>> +			if (atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
>> +				return;
>> +
>> +			if (intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps) < slpc->boost_freq)
> 
> I think this check is not needed because:
> 
> a. The waitboost code only changes min_freq. i915 code should not depend on
>     how GuC changes requested_freq in response to change in min_freq.
> 
> b. What is more worrisome is that when we "de-boost" we set min_freq to
>     min_freq_softlimit. If GuC e.g. has a delay in bringing requested_freq
>     down and intel_rps_boost() gets called meanwhile we will miss the one
>     opportunity we have to boost the freq (when num_waiters goes from 0 to
>     1. Asking GuC to boost when actual_freq is already boost_freq is
>     harmless in comparison). So to avoid this risk of missing the chance to
>     boost I think we should delete this check and replace the code above
>     with something like:
> 
>                  if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
>                          struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> 
>                          if (slpc->boost_freq <= slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
>                                  return;
> 
>                          if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
>                                  schedule_work(&slpc->boost_work);
> 
>                          return;
>                  }
> 
> Note that this check:
> 
>                  if (slpc->boost_freq <= slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
>                                  return;
> 
> (which is basically a degenerate case in which we don't have to do
> anything), can be probably be implemented when boost_freq is set in sysfs,
> or may already be encompassed in "val < slpc->min_freq" in
> intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq() in which case this check can also be
> skipped from this function.

We already have that check in set_boost_freq function. So, just adding 
the atomic_fetch_inc check.

> 
>> +void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
>> +{
>> +	/* Return min back to the softlimit.
>> +	 * This is called during request retire,
>> +	 * so we don't need to fail that if the
>> +	 * set_param fails.
>> +	 */
> 
> nit: maybe follow kernel multi-line comment format.
> 
Ok.

Thanks,
Vinay.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  2021-11-01  4:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-01 20:28   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  2021-11-02  0:19     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Dixit, Ashutosh @ 2021-11-01 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Belgaumkar, Vinay; +Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel

On Sun, 31 Oct 2021 21:39:36 -0700, Belgaumkar, Vinay wrote:
>
> @@ -945,6 +960,17 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
>	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
>		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
>
> +		if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
> +			slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
> +
> +			/* Return if old value is non zero */
> +			if (atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
> +				return;
> +
> +			if (intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps) < slpc->boost_freq)

I think this check is not needed because:

a. The waitboost code only changes min_freq. i915 code should not depend on
   how GuC changes requested_freq in response to change in min_freq.

b. What is more worrisome is that when we "de-boost" we set min_freq to
   min_freq_softlimit. If GuC e.g. has a delay in bringing requested_freq
   down and intel_rps_boost() gets called meanwhile we will miss the one
   opportunity we have to boost the freq (when num_waiters goes from 0 to
   1. Asking GuC to boost when actual_freq is already boost_freq is
   harmless in comparison). So to avoid this risk of missing the chance to
   boost I think we should delete this check and replace the code above
   with something like:

                if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
                        struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);

                        if (slpc->boost_freq <= slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
                                return;

                        if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
                                schedule_work(&slpc->boost_work);

                        return;
                }

Note that this check:

                if (slpc->boost_freq <= slpc->min_freq_softlimit)
                                return;

(which is basically a degenerate case in which we don't have to do
anything), can be probably be implemented when boost_freq is set in sysfs,
or may already be encompassed in "val < slpc->min_freq" in
intel_guc_slpc_set_boost_freq() in which case this check can also be
skipped from this function.

> +void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
> +{
> +	/* Return min back to the softlimit.
> +	 * This is called during request retire,
> +	 * so we don't need to fail that if the
> +	 * set_param fails.
> +	 */

nit: maybe follow kernel multi-line comment format.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  2021-11-01  4:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-11-01  4:39 ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  2021-11-01 20:28   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-11-01  4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar, Ashutosh Dixit

Add helper in RPS code for handling SLPC and non-SLPC paths.
When boost is requested in the SLPC path, we can ask GuC to ramp
up the frequency req by setting the minimum frequency to boost freq.
Reset freq back to the min softlimit when there are no more waiters.

v2: Schedule a worker thread which can boost freq from within
an interrupt context as well.

Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c         |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 5e275f8dda8c..b2d5b1747086 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -936,8 +936,23 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
 }
 
+void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+		slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+		intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(slpc);
+	} else {
+		atomic_dec(&rps->num_waiters);
+	}
+}
+
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc;
+
 	if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || i915_request_has_waitboost(rq))
 		return;
 
@@ -945,6 +960,17 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
 		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
 
+		if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
+			slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+			/* Return if old value is non zero */
+			if (atomic_fetch_inc(&slpc->num_waiters))
+				return;
+
+			if (intel_rps_get_requested_frequency(rps) < slpc->boost_freq)
+				schedule_work(&slpc->boost_work);
+		}
+
 		if (atomic_fetch_inc(&rps->num_waiters))
 			return;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 11960d64ca82..407e878d5006 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ void intel_rps_disable(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
+void intel_rps_dec_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
 void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index cc51987b2535..65da454b6693 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -445,7 +445,11 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
 	    val > slpc->max_freq_softlimit)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Need a lock now since waitboost can be modifying min as well */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+
 	with_intel_runtime_pm(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref) {
+
 		ret = slpc_set_param(slpc,
 				     SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
 				     val);
@@ -458,6 +462,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_set_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 val)
 	if (!ret)
 		slpc->min_freq_softlimit = val;
 
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -643,6 +649,19 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	/* Return min back to the softlimit.
+	 * This is called during request retire,
+	 * so we don't need to fail that if the
+	 * set_param fails.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&slpc->lock);
+	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&slpc->num_waiters))
+		slpc_force_min_freq(slpc, slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
+	mutex_unlock(&slpc->lock);
+}
+
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index b62528647770..d74d6d749bdc 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -39,5 +39,6 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
 void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt);
 void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
+void intel_guc_slpc_dec_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 2c3cd6e635b5..08f38e86231d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
 	}
 
 	if (test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags))
-		atomic_dec(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters);
+		intel_rps_dec_waiters(&rq->engine->gt->rps);
 
 	/*
 	 * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption,
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC
  2021-10-20 19:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost " Vinay Belgaumkar
@ 2021-10-20 19:52 ` Vinay Belgaumkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Vinay Belgaumkar @ 2021-10-20 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar

Add helpers in RPS code for handling SLPC and non-SLPC cases.
When a boost is requested in the SLPC case, we can ask GuC to ramp
up the frequency by setting the minimum frequency to RP0. Reset the
frequency back to the min softlimit when there are no more waiters.

Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c         | 13 ++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h         |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c         |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
index 172de6c9f949..023e9c0b9f4a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c
@@ -935,6 +935,16 @@ void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps)
 	GT_TRACE(rps_to_gt(rps), "park:%x\n", rps->cur_freq);
 }
 
+void intel_rps_update_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps)
+{
+	struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc = rps_to_slpc(rps);
+
+	if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+		intel_guc_slpc_update_waiters(slpc);
+	else
+		atomic_dec(&rps->num_waiters);
+}
+
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 {
 	if (i915_request_signaled(rq) || i915_request_has_waitboost(rq))
@@ -944,6 +954,9 @@ void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq)
 	if (!test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags)) {
 		struct intel_rps *rps = &READ_ONCE(rq->engine)->gt->rps;
 
+		if (rps_uses_slpc(rps))
+			return intel_guc_slpc_boost(rps_to_slpc(rps));
+
 		if (atomic_fetch_inc(&rps->num_waiters))
 			return;
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
index 11960d64ca82..4ca9924cb5ed 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ void intel_rps_disable(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_park(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_unpark(struct intel_rps *rps);
 void intel_rps_boost(struct i915_request *rq);
+void intel_rps_update_waiters(struct intel_rps *rps);
 
 int intel_rps_set(struct intel_rps *rps, u8 val);
 void intel_rps_mark_interactive(struct intel_rps *rps, bool interactive);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
index 4a2acb8f2cc7..a104371a8b79 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c
@@ -598,6 +598,34 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	/* Raise min freq to boost. It's possible that
+	 * this is greater than current max. But it will
+	 * certainly be limited by RP0. An error setting
+	 * the min param is not fatal.
+	 */
+	if (!slpc->num_waiters)
+		slpc_set_param(slpc,
+			       SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
+			       slpc->boost_freq);
+
+	slpc->num_waiters++;
+}
+
+void intel_guc_slpc_update_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
+{
+	/* Return min back to the softlimit.
+	 * This is called during request retire,
+	 * so we don't need to fail that if the
+	 * set_param fails.
+	 */
+	if (!(--slpc->num_waiters))
+		slpc_set_param(slpc,
+			       SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ,
+			       slpc->min_freq_softlimit);
+}
+
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = slpc_to_i915(slpc);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
index e45054d5b9b4..25093dfdea0b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.h
@@ -38,5 +38,7 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_get_max_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_get_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 *val);
 int intel_guc_slpc_print_info(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, struct drm_printer *p);
 void intel_guc_pm_intrmsk_enable(struct intel_gt *gt);
+void intel_guc_slpc_boost(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
+void intel_guc_slpc_update_waiters(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index 2c3cd6e635b5..ef056137dbe1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
 	}
 
 	if (test_and_set_bit(I915_FENCE_FLAG_BOOST, &rq->fence.flags))
-		atomic_dec(&rq->engine->gt->rps.num_waiters);
+		intel_rps_update_waiters(&rq->engine->gt->rps);
 
 	/*
 	 * We only loosely track inflight requests across preemption,
-- 
2.25.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-04  0:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-02  1:26 [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-02  1:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-02  1:26 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Define and initialize boost frequency Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-02  1:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-04  0:23   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-04  0:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02  1:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-02  1:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-04  0:23   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-04  0:23     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02  1:26 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Update boost sysfs hooks " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-02  1:26   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-04  0:41   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-04  0:41     ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02  1:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost " Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02  1:35   ` [Intel-gfx] " Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02  1:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC (rev3) Patchwork
2021-11-02  2:10 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-11-02  3:50 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-01  4:39 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost for SLPC Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-01  4:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-11-01 20:28   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2021-11-02  0:19     ` Belgaumkar, Vinay
2021-10-20 19:52 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Implement waitboost " Vinay Belgaumkar
2021-10-20 19:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Add waitboost functionality " Vinay Belgaumkar

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.